Comparison of novel 6.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheters versus 5 Fr guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention.

AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel sheathless (SH) 6.5 Fr (French) hydrophilic-coated guiding catheter (GC) compared to the standard 5 Fr GCs in transradial coronary interventions (TRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing TRI with 6.5 Fr SH or 5 Fr GCs were included. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were recorded. Primary endpoints were procedural success and presence of radial pulse at discharge. Secondary endpoints were successful GC support, in-hospital adverse events, access-site complications, procedural duration and contrast load. There were 269 patients with 146 procedures in each group. The SH GC group had more non-ST elevation MI, in-stent restenosis, high-risk and bifurcation lesions. Procedural success in both arms was 95.2%. One patient in each group (0.7%) experienced radial artery occlusion (RAO) after TRI, without clinical sequelae. One access-site haematoma and one minor stroke occurred in the 5 Fr group (none in the SH group, both p=ns). Mean procedure time (52±21 vs. 45±21 minutes, p=0.004) and contrast load (160±45 ml vs. 140±45 ml, p=0.003) were greater in the SH group. CONCLUSIONS: Both 6.5 Fr SH GCs and 5 Fr GCs achieved high procedural TRI success with low RAO rates. The SH GC eliminated the disadvantages of the 5 Fr GC whilst maintaining the advantage of low RAO rates, and may become the GC of choice in TRI.

Three-year experience of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery capability, despite receiving only a class IIb recommendation in the ACC/AHA practice guidelines, can be performed effectively and safely. We reviewed the fi rst 3 years of our experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single centre review of all patients receiving primary PCI for STEMI between 2003 and 2005. Demographic, procedural and outcome data were analysed. RESULTS: There were 259 patients who underwent primary PCI. The mean age was 55.3 +/- 12.3 years. Median door-to-balloon time was 97.5 minutes and 45.2% and 52.9% had anterior and inferior STEMI, respectively. The majority of patients presented with Killip class I (87.6%); however, 5.8% were in Killip class IV. Single vessel disease was found in 47.1%. Angiographic PCI success (defined as residual stenosis <50% with TIMI 3 fl ow) was achieved in 89.1%. Usage of stents, distal protection and aspiration devices were 97.2%, 27.8% and 34.1 %, respectively; 9.3% required intra-aortic balloon pump insertion. No patients required transfer for emergency coronary bypass surgery as a result of PCI complications. Post-PCI ST resolution >50% was achieved in 80.6%. The mean post-infarct left ventricular ejection fraction was 44.1%. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates were 2%, 2.8%, 4.0% and 4.8%, respectively. Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation rate was 2.8% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are comparable to those from on-site surgical centres. This supports the feasibility and safety of primary PCI in cardiac centres without on-site cardiac surgery.