Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(9): e2334936, 2023 09 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738050

RESUMO

Importance: During COVID-19, Singapore simultaneously experienced a dengue outbreak, and acute hospitals were under pressure to lower bed occupancy rates. This led to new models of care to treat patients with acute, low-severity medical conditions either at home, in a hospital-at-home (HaH) model, or in a clinic-style setting sited at the emergency department in an ambulatory care team (ACT) model, but a reliable cost analysis for these models is lacking. Objective: To compare personnel costs of HaH and ACT with inpatient care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation study, time-driven activity-based costing was used to compare the personnel cost of inpatient care with treating dengue via HaH and treating chest pain via ACT. Participants were patients with nonsevere dengue and chest pain unrelated to a coronary event admitted via the emergency department to the internal medicine service of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Exposures: HaH for dengue and ACT for chest pain. Main Outcomes and Measures: A process map was created for the patient journey for a typical patient with each condition. The amount of time personnel spent on delivering care was estimated and the cost per minute determined based on their wages in 2022. The total cost of care was calculated by multiplying the time spent by the per-minute cost of the personnel resource and summing all costs. Results: Compared with inpatient care, HaH used 50% less nursing time (418 minutes, 95% uncertainty interval [UI], 370 to 465 minutes) but 80% more medical time (303 minutes, 95% UI, 270 to 338 minutes) per case of dengue. If implemented nationally, HaH would save an estimated 56 828 SGD per year (95% UI, -169 497 to 281 412 SGD [US $41 856; 95% UI, -$124 839 to $207 268]). The probability that HaH is cost saving was 69.2%. Compared with inpatient care, ACT used 15% less nursing time (296 minutes, 95% UI, 257 to 335 minutes) and 50% less medical time (57 minutes, 95% UI, 46 to 69 minutes) per case of chest pain. If implemented nationally, ACT would save an estimated 1 561 185 SGD per year (95% UI, 1 040 666 to 2 086 518 SGD [US $1 149 862; 95% UI, $766 483 to $1 536 786]). The probability that ACT is cost saving was 100%. Conclusions and Relevance: This economic evaluation found that the HaH and ACT models decreased the overall personnel cost of care. Reorganizing hospital resources may help hospitals reap the benefits of reduced hospital-acquired infections, improved patient recovery, and reduced hospital bed occupancy rates.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Dengue , Humanos , Análise Custo-Benefício , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Dor no Peito , Dengue/epidemiologia , Dengue/terapia
2.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 20(1): 111, 2020 06 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early warning scores (EWS) have been developed as clinical prognostication tools to identify acutely deteriorating patients. In the past few years, there has been a proliferation of studies that describe the development and validation of novel machine learning-based EWS. Systematic reviews of published studies which focus on evaluating performance of both well-established and novel EWS have shown conflicting conclusions. A possible reason is the heterogeneity in validation methods applied. In this review, we aim to examine the methodologies and metrics used in studies which perform EWS validation. METHODS: A systematic review of all eligible studies from the MEDLINE database and other sources, was performed. Studies were eligible if they performed validation on at least one EWS and reported associations between EWS scores and inpatient mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, or cardiac arrest (CA) of adults. Two reviewers independently did a full-text review and performed data abstraction by using standardized data-worksheet based on the TRIPOD (Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) checklist. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: The key differences in validation methodologies identified were (1) validation dataset used, (2) outcomes of interest, (3) case definition, time of EWS use and aggregation methods, and (4) handling of missing values. In terms of case definition, among the 48 eligible studies, 34 used the patient episode case definition while 12 used the observation set case definition, and 2 did the validation using both case definitions. Of those that used the patient episode case definition, 18 studies validated the EWS at a single point of time, mostly using the first recorded observation. The review also found more than 10 different performance metrics reported among the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Methodologies and performance metrics used in studies performing validation on EWS were heterogeneous hence making it difficult to interpret and compare EWS performance. Standardizing EWS validation methodology and reporting can potentially address this issue.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Escore de Alerta Precoce , Parada Cardíaca , Adulto , Parada Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 48(5): 145-149, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31210251

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is well established in acute medical units to identify acutely deteriorating patients and is shown to have good prognostic value. NEWS, however, has only been used in the Emergency Department as a triage tool. We aimed to evaluate the validity of NEWS in Acute Medical Ward (AMW) that treats predominantly acute infection-related conditions to the Internal Medicine service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study and analysed NEWS records of all patients admitted to AMW at Singapore General Hospital between 1 August 2015 and 30 July 2017. The outcome was defined as deterioration that required transfer to Intermediate Care Area (ICA), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death within 24 hours of a vital signs observation set. RESULTS: A total of 298,743 vital signs observation sets were obtained from 11,300 patients. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for any of the 3 outcomes (transfer to ICA, ICU or death) over a 24-hour period was 0.896 (95% confidence interval, 0.890-0.901). Event rate was noted to be high above 0.250 when the score was >9. In the medium-risk group (score of 5 or 6), event rate was <0.125. CONCLUSION: NEWS accurately triages patients according to the likelihood of adverse outcomes in infection-related acute medical settings.


Assuntos
Escore de Alerta Precoce , Unidades Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções , Medição de Risco/métodos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Triagem , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Infecções/complicações , Infecções/epidemiologia , Infecções/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Singapura/epidemiologia , Triagem/métodos , Triagem/normas
4.
Acute Med ; 16(4): 170-176, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29300795

RESUMO

Coordination and consolidation of care provided in acute care hospitals need reconfiguration and reorganization to meet the demand of large number of acute admissions. We report on the effectiveness of an Acute Medical Ward AMW (AMW) receiving cases that were suspected to have infection related diagnosis on admission by Emergency Department (ED), addressing this in a large tertiary hospital in South East Asia. Mean Length of Stay (LOS) was compared using Gamma Generalized Linear Models with Log-link while odds of readmissions and mortality were compared using logistic regression models. The LOS (mean: 5.8 days, SD: 9.1 days) of all patients admitted to AMW was similar to discharge diagnosis-matched general ward (GW) patients admitted before AMW implementation, readmission rates were lower (15-day: 5.3%, 30-day: 8.1%). Bivariate and multivariate models revealed that mean LOS after AMW implementation was not significantly different from before AMW implementation (Ratio: 0.99, p=0.473). Our AMW had reduced readmission rates for patients with infection but has not made an overall impact on the LOS and readmission rates for the department as a whole.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA