RESUMO
This paper takes the government transition that took place between 2022 and 2023 in Brazil as a case study and aims to analyse how a cycle of radical right-wing populist government acted to dismantle Brazil's national health system foundations. It describes how governance was built based on political-clientelism and market-privatising interests and on the adoption of long-term fiscal austerity policies, whose results are public defunding and weakening and disorganisation of the country's national health system, with a significant worsening of health indicators and the capacity to respond to the population health needs. The lessons from recent experience in Brazil should serve as learning and a source of academic and political reflection, since there is an ongoing international movement and signs of rise of radical right-wing populist regimes in several countries, which endanger the Democratic Rule of Law, institutions, and social policies. It allows putting into perspective how political cycles of this nature can affect national universal health systems, including those that have experienced substantial progress towards universal access and universal health coverage. Keeping in mind the Brazilian experience, it was possible to observe the progressive structuring of a radical right-wing neo-populism and in the sanitarian.
Assuntos
Política Pública , Assistência de Saúde Universal , Humanos , Brasil , Pessoal de Saúde , Governo , Política de SaúdeAssuntos
COVID-19 , Epidemias , Humanos , História do Século XIX , Academias e Institutos , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , FrançaRESUMO
Approaching from the perspective of the history and social studies of science, the article analyses some aspects of the early history of Chagas disease, from its discovery through initial research. It is our goal to show that historians of science can explore this topic as a way not only of remembering and narrating past events but also of examining the processes through which science is produced. To this end, we present five basic precepts that have guided historical and sociological studies of "science in action": science as a collective endeavor, as a social activity, as a set of practices, as a process that involves controversies, and as a formative process. By examining the topic in the light of these five points, we demonstrate how the history of this successful research tradition can lead us to broader reflections about the complex dynamics interweaving science and society.
Assuntos
Doença de Chagas , História do Século XX , HumanosRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented. The pandemic not only induced a public health crisis, but has led to severe economic, social, and educational crises. Across economies and societies, the distributional consequences of the pandemic have been uneven. Among groups living in vulnerable conditions, the pandemic substantially magnified the inequality gaps, with possible negative implications for these individuals' long-term physical, socioeconomic, and mental wellbeing. This Viewpoint proposes priority, programmatic, and policy recommendations that governments, resource partners, and relevant stakeholders should consider in formulating medium-term to long-term strategies for preventing the spread of COVID-19, addressing the virus's impacts, and decreasing health inequalities. The world is at a never more crucial moment, requiring collaboration and cooperation from all sectors to mitigate the inequality gaps and improve people's health and wellbeing with universal health coverage and social protection, in addition to implementation of the health in all policies approach.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Desigualdades de Saúde , Política Pública , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Saúde PúblicaRESUMO
Approaching from the perspective of the history and social studies of science, the article analyses some aspects of the early history of Chagas disease, from its discovery through initial research. It is our goal to show that historians of science can explore this topic as a way not only of remembering and narrating past events but also of examining the processes through which science is produced. To this end, we present five basic precepts that have guided historical and sociological studies of "science in action": science as a collective endeavor, as a social activity, as a set of practices, as a process that involves controversies, and as a formative process. By examining the topic in the light of these five points, we demonstrate how the history of this successful research tradition can lead us to broader reflections about the complex dynamics interweaving science and society.
RESUMO
RESUMO Este artigo discute o papel da interdisciplinaridade na análise e no enfrentamento da crise sanitária e social global suscitada pela pandemia de Covid-19. Defende-se a necessidade de se repensarem as divisões entre mundo natural e sociedade, com destaque para a questão ambiental, e a nova conformação do campo da informação e comunicação e seus impactos na sociedade contemporânea. Entende-se a pandemia de Covid-19 como um fenômeno inteiramente novo que põe em evidência, por vezes em aceleração, uma série de tendências, mas que pode implicar inflexões e mudanças cujo rumo não está dado. Destaca-se a centralidade da área de saúde coletiva no esforço interdisciplinar para a definição de agendas científicas e, também, de propostas de políticas públicas. Conclui-se que o fortalecimento de pesquisas interdisciplinares especialmente atentas às interrelações de sistemas naturais e sociais são e serão essenciais para a superação da crise atual e das prováveis emergências sanitárias futuras.
ABSTRACT This article discusses the role of interdisciplinarity in analyzing and dealing with the global health and social crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It defends the need to rethink the divisions between the natural world and society, with emphasis on the environmental issue, and the new conformation of the field of information and communication and its impacts on contemporary society. The COVID 19 pandemic is understood as an entirely new phenomenon that highlights, sometimes accelerating, a series of trends, but which may imply inflections and changes whose direction is not given. The centrality of the field of collective health in the interdisciplinary effort to define scientific agendas and also public policy proposals is highlighted. It is concluded that the strengthening of interdisciplinary research, especially attentive to the interrelationships of natural and social systems, is and will be essential for overcoming the current crisis and probable future health emergencies.
RESUMO
An analysis is presented of actions taken by the Brazilian research institution Fiocruz for the communication and popularization of science, from two perspectives. The aim was to investigate how a system for the communication and popularization of science is organized at a large scientific institution and how it is articulated with the institutional discourse. A brief review is presented of how the topic has developed over the history of Fiocruz, followed by a discussion of the way it has been addressed in its official planning documents. The science communication/popularization actions undertaken in 2015 and 2016 were mapped out and classified according to how they interact with the public, giving a better understanding of this area.
Neste trabalho apresentamos uma análise das ações de divulgação e popularização da ciência na Fiocruz a partir de duas perspectivas. O estudo tem por objetivo investigar como se organiza um sistema de divulgação e popularização da ciência em uma instituição científica de grande porte e como esse sistema se articula com seu discurso institucional. Além de fazer uma breve revisão da evolução do tema na história da Fiocruz, realizamos um levantamento de como o mesmo tem sido tratado nos documentos oficiais de planejamento. Com o mapeamento das ações realizadas em 2015 e 2016, foi possível compreender melhor esse universo e classificá-lo de acordo com suas características junto ao público.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos/história , Ciência/história , Academias e Institutos/organização & administração , Brasil , Fundações/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Ciência/educaçãoRESUMO
Resumo Neste trabalho apresentamos uma análise das ações de divulgação e popularização da ciência na Fiocruz a partir de duas perspectivas. O estudo tem por objetivo investigar como se organiza um sistema de divulgação e popularização da ciência em uma instituição científica de grande porte e como esse sistema se articula com seu discurso institucional. Além de fazer uma breve revisão da evolução do tema na história da Fiocruz, realizamos um levantamento de como o mesmo tem sido tratado nos documentos oficiais de planejamento. Com o mapeamento das ações realizadas em 2015 e 2016, foi possível compreender melhor esse universo e classificá-lo de acordo com suas características junto ao público.
Abstract An analysis is presented of actions taken by the Brazilian research institution Fiocruz for the communication and popularization of science, from two perspectives. The aim was to investigate how a system for the communication and popularization of science is organized at a large scientific institution and how it is articulated with the institutional discourse. A brief review is presented of how the topic has developed over the history of Fiocruz, followed by a discussion of the way it has been addressed in its official planning documents. The science communication/popularization actions undertaken in 2015 and 2016 were mapped out and classified according to how they interact with the public, giving a better understanding of this area.