Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation.

BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. METHODS: After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. RESULTS: The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength.

Effects of Collagen Crosslink Augmentation on Mechanism of Compressive Load Sharing in Intervertebral Discs.

Exogenous crosslinking has been shown to have potential for treating disc degeneration and back pain due to its ability to increase the strength and toughness of the annulus fibrosus, increase intervertebral joint stability, decrease intradiscal pressure, and increase fluid flow through the disc. Some results imply that crosslink augmentation may also lead to changes in the compressive load sharing properties of the disc. The objective of the present study was to evaluate directional stress distribution changes of the disc following genipin crosslinking treatment. Bovine lumbar motion segments were randomly divided into control and crosslinked groups. Annular strains were determined from simultaneous deformation measurements at various time points during compressive creep testing. Four stress components of the annulus were then calculated according to the previously measured modulus data. Immediately after the application of a 750-N compressive load, mean axial and radial compressive stresses in the crosslinked group were twofold higher than control means. Conversely, mean lamellae-aligned and circumferential tensile stresses of the crosslinked discs were 8- and threefold lower, respectively, compared to control means. After 1-h creep loading, the two compressive mean stresses in both the control and genipin-crosslinked specimens increased approximately threefold from their initial 750-N-loaded values. The two tensile mean stresses in the crosslinked group remained lower than the respective levels of the control means after creep loading. A greater proportion of annular compressive load support under compressive creep loading, with a commensurate decrease in both tensile stresses and strains, was seen in the discs following exogenous crosslink augmentation.

Exogenous Crosslinking Restores Intradiscal Pressure of Injured Porcine Intervertebral Discs: An In Vivo Examination Using Quantitative Discomanometry.

STUDY DESIGN: In vivo examination of intradiscal pressure by quantitative discomanometry (QD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an injectable, exogenous crosslinking could acutely restore intradiscal pressure of stab-injured discs in vivo by short-term treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc biomechanical performance depends on its integrity associated with the intradiscal pressure and mechanical properties. Genipin crosslink augmentation has demonstrated the in vitro biomechanical capability to improve intervertebral joint stability and increase mechanical properties of the annulus fibrosus. METHODS: 4 lumbar discs on each of 8 swine were randomly assigned to 4 groups: intact, injured, untreated, and crosslinked. A 16G needle was stabbed into the annulus fibrosus to create the disc injury model. An injection of 0.33% genipin solution was delivered into the annulus to treat the injury. QD technique was performed to examine the intradiscal pressure for the intact and injured discs at the time of surgery, while untreated and crosslinked discs were measured 1-week postsurgery. 4 QD parameters were analyzed and compared across the 4 groups: leakage pressure and volume, and saturation pressure and volume. RESULTS: The leakage and saturation pressures of the injured group were significantly lower than those of the intact group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.01, respectively). The leakage and saturation pressures of untreated discs were statistically equivalent to the injured levels, but with a 2-times higher saturation volume. Relative to the untreated group, the leakage pressure and saturation pressure of genipin-crosslinked discs had a 617% (P = 0.008) and a 473% increase (P = 0.007), respectively. CONCLUSION: A large disc injury produced by annular puncture immediately lowered intradiscal pressure when left untreated. Genipin crosslinking can restore intradiscal pressure acutely in vivo without any obvious morbidity associated with the injection.