Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic versus open hepatectomy in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic hepatectomy (RH) is currently widely accepted and it is associated with some benefits when compared to open hepatectomy (OH). However, whether such benefits can still be achieved for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing RH or OH. METHODS: Perioperative and survival data from patients with large HCC who underwent RH or OH between January 2010 and December 2020 were collected from eight centres. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimise potential biases. RESULTS: Using predefined inclusion criteria, 797 patients who underwent OH and 309 patients who underwent RH were enroled in this study. After PSM, 280 patients in the robotic group had shorter operative time (median 181 vs. 201 min, P <0.001), lower estimated blood loss (median 200 vs. 400 ml, P <0.001), and shorter postoperative length of stay (median 6 vs. 9 days, P <0.001) than 465 patients in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Cox analysis showed AFP greater than 400 ng/ml, tumour size greater than 10 cm, and microvascular invasion were independent risk factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. After PSM, subgroup analysis showed that patients with a huge HCC (diameter >10 cm) who underwent RH had significantly lower estimated blood loss (median 200.0 vs. 500.0 min, P <0.001), and shorter length of stay (median 7 vs. 10 days, P <0.001) than those who underwent OH. CONCLUSION: Safety and feasibility of RH and OH for patients with large HCC were comparable. RH resulted in similar long-term survival outcomes as OH.

Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open hepatectomy among overweight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has gradually been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open hepatectomy (OH). This study was to compare short-term outcomes in RH and OH for overweight (preoperative body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m²) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Perioperative and postoperative data from these patients who underwent RH or OH between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the impact of RH versus OH on the prognosis of overweight HCC patients. RESULTS: All 304 overweight HCC patients were included, 172 who were underwent RH, and 132 who were underwent OH. After the 1:1 PSM, there were 104 patients in both RH and OH groups. After PSM, the RH group of patients had a shorter operative time, less estimated blood loss (EBL), a longer total clamping time, a shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS), less chance of surgical site infection and less rates of blood transfusion (all P < 0.05) compared to the OH patients. The differences between operative time, EBL and LOS were more significant in obese patients. RH was found to be an independent protective factor of EBL ≥ 400ml relative to OH in overweight patients for the first time. CONCLUSIONS: RH was safe and feasible in overweight HCC patients. Compared with OH, RH has advantages in terms of operative time, EBL, postoperative LOS, and surgical site infection. Carefully selected overweight patients should be considered for RH.

Significance of anatomical resection and resection margin status in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma and microvascular invasion: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a risk factor for postoperative survival outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of anatomical resection (AR) versus nonanatomical resection (NAR) combined with resection margin (RM) (narrow RM <1 cm vs. wide RM ≥1 cm) on long-term prognosis in hepatitis B virus-related HCC patients with MVI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from multicenters on HCC patients with MVI who underwent hepatectomy was analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching analysis was performed in these patients. RESULTS: The 1965 enrolled patients were divided into four groups: AR with wide RM ( n =715), AR with narrow RM ( n =387), NAR with wide RM ( n =568), and NAR with narrow RM ( n =295). Narrow RM ( P <0.001) and NAR ( P <0.001) were independent risk factors for both overall survival and recurrence-free survival in these patients based on multivariate analyses. For patients in both the AR and NAR groups, wide RM resulted in significantly lower operative margin recurrence rates than those patients in the narrow RM groups after propensity score matching ( P =0.002 and 0.001). Patients in the AR with wide RM group had significantly the best median overall survival (78.9 vs. 51.5 vs. 48.0 vs. 36.7 months, P <0.001) and recurrence-free survival (23.6 vs. 14.8 vs. 17.8 vs. 9.0 months, P <0.001) than those in the AR with narrow RM, NAR with wide RM or with narrow RM groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: If technically feasible and safe, AR combined with wide RM should be the recommended therapeutic strategy for HCC patients who are estimated preoperatively with a high risk of MVI.

[Blood vessels and nerves surrounding the seminal vesicles: A clinical anatomic study].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the precise locations of the blood vessels and nerves surrounding the seminal vesicles (SV) in men and provide some anatomical evidence for SV-related minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: We observed the courses and distribution of the blood vessels and nerves surrounding SVs and obtained the data for positioning the SV neuroplexes in 20 male pelvises. RESULTS: One branch of the neuroplexes was distributed to the SVs bilaterally with the neurovascular bundles, (2.85 ± 0.18) cm from the median sulcus of the prostate (MSP), while another branch ran through the Denonvillier fascia behind the SV, (0.81 ± 0.06) cm from the MSP. The arterial SVs (ASV) originated from the inferior vesical artery and fell into 4 types, 55% going directly to the SVs as one branch, 15% running between the SV and the ampulla of the deferent duct as another branch, 25% downward as 2 branches to the SV and between the SV and the ampulla of the deferent duct respectively, and 5% as the other ASVs. The shortest distance from the ASV through the prostatic neuroplexus to the posterior SV was (1.08 ± 0.09) cm. CONCLUSION: In SV resection, neuroplexus injury can be reduced with a bilateral distance of < 2.85 cm and a posterior distance of < 0.81 cm from the MSP, and so can bleeding by vascular ligation between the SV and the ampulla of the deferent duct.