Trauma After Cochlear Implantation: The Accuracy of Micro-Computed Tomography and Cone-Beam Fusion Computed Tomography Compared With Histology in Human Temporal Bones.

HYPOTHESIS: Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), in conjunction with the image fusion technique, may provide similar results for trauma assessment after cochlear implantation, with respect to the trauma evaluation in preclinical cochlear implant (CI) studies, as the histology. BACKGROUND: Before clinical use, novel cochlear implant (CI) designs are tested in temporal bone (TB) studies for usability and risk evaluation. The criterion standard for evaluating intracochlear insertion trauma and electrode location has historically been with histological samples. Progress of modern imaging technology has created alternatives to classic histology. This study compares the micro-CT and CBCT fusion images between histological samples in a preclinical CI study. METHODS: Fourteen freshly frozen TBs were inserted with a lateral wall research CI electrode. All TBs were scanned with CBCT preoperatively and postoperatively. After insertion, the TBs were prepared for micro-CT and histology. Twelve TBs underwent first a micro-CT and then the histological process. The CBCTs were used for image fusion, and all three different methods were used for intracochlear trauma evaluation. The results were compared between methods. RESULTS: There were 4 of 14 translocations detected with the fusion image method and 3 of 12 with the micro-CT and histology. When compared, the trauma grades converged and were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The trauma grading based on micro-CT is comparable to the histology. The image fusion technique based on CBCT is less accurate because it relies on an empirical assumption of the basal membrane localization, but it is clinically applicable.

The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients.

Understanding speech is essential for adequate social interaction, and its functioning affects health, wellbeing, and quality of life (QoL). Untreated hearing loss (HL) is associated with reduced social activity, depression and cognitive decline. Severe and profound HL is routinely rehabilitated with cochlear implantation. The success of treatment is mostly assessed by performance-based outcome measures such as speech perception. The ultimate goal of cochlear implantation, however, is to improve the patient's QoL. Therefore, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) would be clinically valuable as they assess subjective benefits and overall effectiveness of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported benefits of unilateral cochlear implantation in an unselected Finnish patient cohort of patients with bilateral HL. The study design was a prospective evaluation of 118 patients. The patient cohort was longitudinally followed up with repeated within-subject measurements preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were one performance-based speech-in-noise (SiN) test (Finnish Matrix Sentence Test), and two PROMs [Finnish versions of the Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing questionnaire (SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ)]. The results showed significant average improvements in SiN scores, from +0.8 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) preoperatively to -3.7 and -3.8 dB SNR at 6 and12 month follow-up, respectively. Significant improvements were also found for SSQ and NCIQ scores in all subdomains from the preoperative state to 6 and 12 months after first fitting. No clinically significant improvements were observed in any of the outcome measures between 6 and 12 months. Preoperatively, poor SiN scores were associated with low scoring in several subdomains of the SSQ and NCIQ. Poor preoperative SiN scores and low PROMs scoring were significantly associated with larger postoperative improvements. No significant association was found between SiN scores and PROMs postoperatively. This study demonstrates significant benefits of cochlear implantation in the performance-based and patient-reported outcomes in an unselected patient sample. The lack of association between performance and PROMs scores postoperatively suggests that both capture unique aspects of benefit, highlighting the need to clinically implement PROMs in addition to performance-based measures for a more holistic assessment of treatment benefit.

Assessment of ejection fraction and heart perfusion using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in Finland and Estonia: a multicenter phantom study.

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial SPECT/CT imaging is frequently performed to assess myocardial perfusion and dynamic parameters of heart function, such as ejection fraction (EF). However, potential pitfalls exist in the imaging chain that can unfavorably affect diagnosis and treatment. We performed a national cardiac quality control study to investigate how much SPECT/CT protocols vary between different nuclear medicine units in Finland, and how this may affect the heart perfusion and EF values. METHODS: Altogether, 21 nuclear medicine units participated with 27 traditional SPECT/CT systems and two cardiac-centered IQ-SPECT systems. The reproducibility of EF and the uniformity of perfusion were studied using a commercial dynamic heart phantom. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed and processed at each participating unit using their own clinical protocol and with a standardized protocol. The effects of acquisition protocols and analysis routines on EF estimates and uniformity of perfusion were studied. RESULTS: Considerable variation in EF estimates and in the uniformity of perfusion were observed between the units. Uniformity of perfusion was improved in some units after applying the higher count-statistic standard acquisition protocol. EF estimates varied more due to differences in analysis routines than as a result of different acquisition protocols. The results obtained with the two IQ-SPECT systems differed substantially from the traditional multipurpose cameras. CONCLUSION: On average, the EF and heart perfusion were accurately estimated by SPECT/CT, but high errors could be produced if the acquisition and analysis routines were poorly optimized. Eight of the 21 participants altered their imaging protocol after this quality control tour.