The abnormal signaling of the B cell receptor and co-receptors of lupus B cells.

It is easily understood that studying the physiology and pathophysiology of the BCRtriggered cascade is of importance, particularly in such diseases as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that are considered by many as a "B cell disease". Even though B cells are not considered as the only players in lupus pathogenesis, and other immune and non-immune cells are certainly involved, it is the success of recent B cell-targeting treatment strategies that ascribe a critical role to the lupus B cell.

Omicron variant dominance and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are key determinants for a milder course of COVID-19 in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether the introduction of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the dominance of the omicron variant had a significant impact on the outcome of COVID-19 in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SAIRDs). METHODS: Using data entered to the Greek Rheumatology Society COVID-19 registry, we investigated the incidence of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19, during the successive periods of the pandemic according to the prevalent strain (wild-type, Alpha, Delta, Omicron) in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Variables independently associated with hospitalization and death were explored using multivariate regression analyses, while Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict survival data. RESULTS: From August 2020 until June 30, 2022, 456 cases (70.2% females) of COVID-19 with a mean age (± SD) of 51.4 ± 14.0 years were reported. In unvaccinated patients, the proportions of hospitalization and death were 24.5% and 4%, compared to 12.5% and 0.8% in the vaccinated group (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of hospitalization for the wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods were 24.7%, 31.3%, 25.9%, and 8.1% respectively (p < 0.0001), while the case fatality rates were 2.7%, 4%, 7%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.001). Using multivariable regression analysis, factors independently associated with hospitalization were infection by a non-Omicron variant, being non-vaccinated, exposure to rituximab, older age, and respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Independent predictors for death were contracting COVID-19 during the Alpha or Delta period, pulmonary disease, and older age, while being vaccinated was protective. CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year analysis, the rates of hospitalization and death among patients with SAIRDs have declined significantly. Vaccination and the dominance of the Omicron variant appear to be the major determinants for this shift. Key points • During the late phase of the pandemic, the proportion of severe COVID-19 cases, defined as requiring hospitalization or resulting in death, in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases has declined. • Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the dominance of the Omicron strain are the key factors that have independently contributed to this shift.

Apremilast for biologic-naïve, peripheral psoriatic arthritis, including patients with early disease: results from the APROACH observational prospective study.

To evaluate the effect of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast in biologic-naïve patients with early peripheral PsA in terms of disease activity, clinical manifestations, patient-perceived outcomes, as well as apremilast's safety profile in routine care settings of Greece. Non-interventional, multicenter, 52-week prospective cohort study, enrolling biologic-naïve patients with early active peripheral PsA who started apremilast after intolerance or inadequate response (within the first 12 months of treatment) to an initial conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD treatment. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data.In total, 167 consecutive patients (mean age: 52.5 years; median PsA duration: 0.9 years) were analyzed. At baseline, the median (interquartile range) clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) score was 22.0 (16.0-29.0), with 86.8% of patients having at least moderate (29.3% high) disease activity; 87.4% had skin psoriasis, 37.7% nail psoriasis, 30.7% enthesitis, and 12.4% dactylitis. At 16, 24, and 52 weeks, 28.7, 42.5, and 48.5% of patients, achieved ≥ 50% improvement in their baseline cDAPSA score, respectively. At week 52, 55.6, 50, and 26.8% of evaluable patients achieved complete resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis and nail psoriasis, respectively. Improvements were also observed in patient's health state assessed by the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire, and health-related quality of life. The 52-week drug survival rate was 75%, while 13.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction.Biologic-naïve patients with early PsA, treated with apremilast experienced significant improvements in disease activity, extra-articular manifestations and patient-centered outcomes, accompanied by a favorable tolerability profile.

Treating Autoimmune-Related Interstitial Lung Disease With B Cell Depletion.

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases may affect vital organs with lung involvement being severe and difficult to treat manifestation. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) commonly affects the lung in the form of interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILD may be also seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory myositis (IM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), and the ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 B lymphocyte depleting mAb, often administered in the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Although RTX is an off-label treatment for CTD-ILD, there are numerous reports providing data that is effective in improving both pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and chest computed tomography findings consistent with ILD. There are retrospective uncontrolled studies that assess RTX as a treatment of ILD in autoimmune diseases. These studies, apart from one, do not include patients with AAV-ILD. In SSc-ILD, in particular, there are both controlled and uncontrolled studies displaying encouraging results following B cell depletion. In addition, a number of retrospective uncontrolled studies and fewer prospective studies evaluate RTX in connective tissue diseases CTD-ILD. Although RTX is an approved treatment for AAV there are scarce only data focusing on patients with AAV-ILD specifically. The results of a handful of studies comparing treatment of CTD-ILD with RTX to treatment with other agents are in favor of RTX. Results from large, still ongoing controlled trials are awaited to ascertain RTX effects in ILD encountered in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We review herein the results of the different RTX trials in patients with autoimmune disease-associated with ILD. Despite the heterogeneity of these studies, RTX may be considered an alternative and safe but still off-label treatment for patients with refractory CTD-ILD.

The Role of B Cells in Scleroderma Lung Disease Pathogenesis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, autoimmune, multisystem disease characterized by tissue fibrosis that, apart from the skin, may affect the lungs among other organs. B cells have been found in tissue lymphocytic infiltrates; in the lungs are encountered in lymphoid aggregates. The abnormal and hyperreactive B cell in SSc may initiate and perpetuate the fibrotic process via incompletely understood mechanisms. Studies in animal models of SSc have demonstrated that B cell dysregulation is an early event in disease pathogenesis. Functional disturbances of BCR signaling such as decreased inhibitory CD22 signal transduction or augmented CD19-mediated signaling result in prolonged B cell activation. Antagonism of BAFF, a cytokine known for his central role in B cell survival and maturation, not only suppresses the production of fibrogenic cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-10, but also amplifies antifibrogenic cytokine secretion such as IFN-γ and it finally contributes to skin fibrosis attenuation. B cells subsets in SSc patients display several abnormalities. Naïve B cells are increased, in contrast to switched memory B cells that are not only decreased but also activated. Disturbances in the expression of molecules that are involved in B cell tuning have also been described. Interestingly, a distinct B cell population characterized by anergy and exhaustion has been found to be increased in patients with SSc-ILD. Another B cell subset, the CD30+GM-Beff, is capable to differentiate monocytes to dendritic cells and is increased in SSc patients with ILD. Of note, patients with SSc-ILD exhibit increased expression of the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIB on naïve and double negative B cells aiming perhaps to counterbalance the abnormal B cell activation. Studies of B cell targeted treatments have demonstrated promising clinical efficacy. Therefore, B cell eliminating therapies could be integrated into the therapeutic armamentarium of patients suffering from SSc-ILD aiming to at least stabilize the fibrotic lung process.

B Cell Depletion Treatment in Resistant Systemic Sclerosis Interstitial Lung Disease.

Systemic sclerosis is a systemic, autoimmune disease that in many patients affects not only the skin, but also internal organs, mainly the lung. It is clear that internal organ (ie, lung) involvement determines the prognosis. Therefore, there is an unmet need to introduce novel and more effective treatments capable of halting disease progression and hence improve prognosis. Experimental data over the past decade has accumulated pointing to the B cell as a player in disease pathogenesis. Consequently, a number of controlled and uncontrolled studies have investigated the results of B cell depletion treatment in patients with SSc. The results are preliminary still encouraging for skin as well as for pulmonary involvement. In this review we will analyse and discuss such trials that have currently added B cell depletion as an alternative and promising treatment for resistant interstitial lung disease in scleroderma.

Man-in-a-barrel syndrome: a rare presentation of giant cell arteritis.

We present herein the case of a patient with brachial plexopathy, the first manifestation of giant cell arteritis (GCA). A 71-year-old woman presented with a subacute-onset weakness of her upper extremities; the patient had an initially good clinical response to steroid treatment. However, a few weeks after steroid discontinuation, she manifested fever and fatigue and increased serum markers consistent with a systemic inflammatory response. A PET-CT scan revealed an increased uptake in the subclavian arteries and a temporal biopsy was typical for GCA. Oral administration of high dosage steroids improved the patient's clinical symptoms and normalised her inflammatory serum markers.

Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Τo report outcomes of breakthrough COVID-19 in comparison with COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs). METHODS: Patients with SRD with COVID-19 (vaccinated and unvaccinated) were included by their rheumatologists in a registry operated by the Greek Rheumatology Society in a voluntarily basis. Type, date and doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were recorded, and demographics, type of SRD, concurrent treatment, comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation, need for oxygen supplementation and death) were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. RESULTS: Between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2021, 195 patients with SRD with COVID-19 were included; 147 unvaccinated and 48 vaccinated with at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfizer n=38 or AstraZeneca n=10). Among vaccinated patients, 29 developed breakthrough COVID-19 >14 days after the second vaccine dose (fully vaccinated), while 19 between the first and <14 days after the second vaccine dose (partially vaccinated). Despite no differences in demographics, SRD type, treatment or comorbidities between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients, hospitalisation and mortality rates were higher in unvaccinated (29.3% and 4.1%, respectively) compared with partially vaccinated (21% and 0%) or fully vaccinated (10.3% and 0%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinated patients with SRD with breakthrough COVID-19 have better outcomes compared with unvaccinated counterparts with similar disease/treatment characteristics.

B cell depletion treatment decreases Th17 cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate for any possible effects of treatment with rituximab (RTX) on the peripheral Th17 and Treg subpopulations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 16 patients with RA initiating RTX treatment, 11 patients with RA initiating abatacept treatment, 11 patients with RA treated with other medications, 8 patients with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases initiating RTX, and 14 healthy volunteers. Th17 cells (CD4+IL23R+IL17A+) and Treg cells (CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+) were evaluated flow-cytometrically. RESULTS: Th17 cells from patients treated with RTX decreased significantly at weeks 8 and 16 (mean ± SEΜ: 3.01% ± 0.54℅ CD4+ cells at week 0 vs. 1.53% ± 0.24℅ at week 8 vs 1.10% ± 0.20℅ at week 16, p = 0.0004). Reductions of Th17 cells were evident in clinical responders (DAS28 score ≤ 3.2), ACPA (+) and RF (-) patients; circulating Tregs remained stable. Th17 and Tregs were not affected by ABA treatment or by changes in disease activity. Tregs, but not Th17 cells, decreased following treatment with RTX in patients with other autoimmune diseases (0.75% ± 0.16% at week 0 vs. 0.43% ± 0.16% at week 8, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: RTX-induced B cell depletion results in a significant reduction of circulating Th17 cell percentages, whereas it has no effect on Tregs of patients with RA. This reduction of Th17 cells was evident particularly in responders to RTX treatment, ACPA+ and RF (-) patients with RA.

A prospective multicenter study assessing humoral immunogenicity and safety of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Greek patients with systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity.

What's New in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune multisystem disease with a variable presentation and manifestations ranging from mild to severe or even life-threatening. There is an ongoing and unmet need for novel, disease-specific, effective and safe treatment modalities. The aim of this review is to summarize data on SLE treatment that have emerged over the last 3 years. We will put emphasis on studies evaluating potential treatments on severe lupus manifestations such as lupus nephritis. Despite the existence of several therapeutic agents in SLE, the disease keeps causing significant morbidity. It is encouraging that a variety of therapeutic options are currently under investigation, although there are occasional trial failures.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Scleroderma-Like Syndrome: A Report of a Pembrolizumab-Induced "Eosinophilic Fasciitis-Like" Case and a Review of the Literature.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a promising new therapeutic strategy in oncology that aims to eliminate cancer cells by enhancing patients' immune response against tumor antigens. Despite their beneficial effects, immune checkpoint inhibitors are also responsible for a plethora of autoimmune manifestations, known as immune-related adverse events. We present a case of eosinophilic fasciitis-like disorder in an 81-year-old patient treated with the programmed death cell protein 1 inhibitor pembrolizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. The patient developed characteristic indurated skin lesions in his limbs after 1½ years of treatment with pembrolizumab and a typical "groove sign." Raynaud's syndrome was absent. A full-thickness biopsy confirmed the clinical diagnosis of an "EF-like" condition. Neither peripheral eosinophilia nor eosinophilic infiltrates in the skin biopsy were found. His symptoms improved after a 2.5-month CPI discontinuation and treatment with 16 mg of methylprednisolone slowly tapered to a dose of 4 mg. Eosinophilic fasciitis is a rare immune-related adverse event of CPI treatment; our literature search identified only 12 cases that fulfill the criteria of EF in patients receiving CPIs.

An MRI study of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal manifestations myofasciitis is the prominent imaging finding.

OBJECTIVE: To assess: (i) the prevalence, and clinical and imaging characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs) in a prospective manner and (ii) whether serum levels of cytokines associated with the Th1/Th2/Th17 response are differentially expressed in patients with and without musculoskeletal Ir-AEs. METHODS: All patients treated with ICI who developed musculoskeletal manifestations were referred to the Rheumatology Department, and an MRI of the involved area(s) was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 130 patients were treated with ICIs. Of these, 10 (7.7%) developed ICI-induced Ir-AEs. The median time from ICI treatment since development of symptoms was 2.5 months. Three different patterns of musculoskeletal manifestations were found: (i) prominent joint involvement (n = 3); (ii) prominent 'periarticular' involvement (n = 4). These patients had diffuse swelling of the hands, feet or knees. MRI depicted mild synovitis with more prominent myositis and/or fasciitis in the surrounding tissues in all cases; (iii) myofasciitis (n = 3). Clinically, these patients presented with pain in the knee(s)/thigh(s), whereas MRI depicted myofasciitis of the surrounding muscles. Patients with musculoskeletal ir-AEs had significantly higher oncologic response rates compared with patients not exhibiting musculoskeletal ir-AEs (50% vs 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.0016). Cytokine levels associated with a Th1/Th2/Th17 response were similar between patients with and without musculoskeletal ir-AEs. Overall, symptoms were mild/moderate and responded well to treatment, with no need for ICI discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, ICI-induced musculoskeletal manifestations developed in 7.7% of patients. Imaging evidence of myofasciitis was found in most patients, indicating that the muscle/fascia is more frequently involved than the synovium.

Treatment modalities and drug survival in a systemic sclerosis real-life patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: European data indicate that systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related death rates are increasing, thus raising concerns about SSc's optimal management. Herein, we describe current treatment modalities and drug survival in a real-life SSc cohort. METHODS: Details on immunosuppressive/antiproliferative (methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, rituximab, tocilizumab) and vasoactive agent [(endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), sildenafil, iloprost, and calcium channel blockers (CCB)] administration during the disease course (11.8 ± 8.4 years, mean + SD) of 497 consecutive patients examined between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively recorded. Drug survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Methotrexate was the most frequently administered immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agent (53% of patients), followed by cyclophosphamide (26%), mycophenolate (12%), and azathioprine (11%). Regarding vasoactive agents, CCB had been ever administered in 68%, ERAs in 38%, iloprost in 7%, and sildenafil in 7% of patients; 23% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis had never received immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agents, 33% of those with digital ulcers had never received ERAs, iloprost, or sildenafil, whereas 19% of all patients had never received either immunosuppressive/antiproliferative or other than CCB vasoactive agents. Survival rates of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate differed significantly, being 84/75%, 59/43%, and 74/63% at 12/24 months, respectively, with inefficacy being the most frequent discontinuation cause. Conversely, CCB, ERAs, and sildenafil had high and comparable retention rates of 97/91%, 88/86%, and 80/80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Existing therapeutic limitations indicate that more evidence-based treatment is warranted for successful management of SSc. Vasculopathy seems to be managed more rigorously, but the low retention rates of immunosuppressive/antiproliferative drugs suggest that effective and targeted disease-modifying agents are warranted.

An ischemic stroke as the presenting manifestation of rapidly progressive primary angiitis of central nervous system in a 17-year-old boy.

BACKGROUND: Childhood primary angiitis of the central nervous system (cPACNS) is an increasingly recognized inflammatory brain disease in children. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 17-year-old boy with recurrent ischemic events over a short time period. Diagnosis of angiography positive cPACNS was made based on neuroimaging findings while secondary causes or mimics of CNS vasculitis were meticulously excluded. The patient exhibited rapid deterioration of his condition with poor initial response to immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of cPACNS remains a challenge because of rarity of disease, unexplained etiopathogenesis, protean clinical presentation, as well as lack of specific laboratory and neuroimaging markers.

Autoimmune Biomarkers, Antibodies, and Immunologic Evaluation of the Patient with Fibrotic Lung Disease.

This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on experimental and clinical biomarkers of autoimmunity and aims to highlight important aspects of the immunologic evaluation of a patient with fibrotic lung disease.

B cell depletion treatment decreases CD4+IL4+ and CD4+CD40L+ T cells in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Recent data suggests that rituximab may favorably affect skin fibrosis and lung function in patients with systemic sclerosis. Based on experimental data suggesting a key role of B and T cells in scleroderma we aimed to explore the effect(s) of rituximab treatment on T cell subpopulations. Fifteen patients with scleroderma who received rituximab treatment and six who received standard treatment alone were recruited. Peripheral CD4+IL4+, CD4+INFγ+, CD4+IL17+ and CD4+CD40L+ T cells were assessed using flow cytometry. Using ELISA, serum levels of IL4 were assessed. Skin CD4+IL4+ T cells were assessed with confocal microscopy from skin biopsies. Following rituximab treatment skin CD4+IL4+ T cells obviously decreased as seen with confocal microscopy. Moreover, peripheral CD4+IL4+ T cells decreased significantly compared to those from patients who received standard treatment alone: median (IQR): 14.9 (22.63-12.88) vs 7.87 (12.81-4.9)%, p = 0.005 and 9.43 (19.53-7.50)% vs 14.86 (21.96-6.75)%, p = NS at baseline and 6 months later respectively, whereas there was no difference in serum IL4 levels. Peripheral CD4+CD40L+ T cells also decreased significantly following rituximab treatment compared to those from patients who received standard treatment alone: median (IQR): 17.78 (25.64-14.44)% vs 8.15 (22.85-3.08)%, p = 0.04 and 22.13 (58.77-8.20)% vs 72.11 (73.05-20.45)%, p = NS at baseline and 6 months later respectively. Furthermore, peripheral CD4+INFγ+ and CD4+IL17+ T cells revealed no differences following rituximab treatment. Our study demonstrates a link between rituximab treatment and CD4+IL4+ T cell decrease both in the skin and peripheral blood of patients with SSc.