CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) Strongly Enhances Plasma Apoa-I and Cholesterol Efflux Capacity in Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A PK/PD Substudy of the AEGIS-I Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is impaired following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CSL112 is an intravenous preparation of human plasma-derived apoA-I formulated with phosphatidylcholine (PC). CSL112 is intended to improve CEC and thereby prevent early recurrent cardiovascular events following AMI. AEGIS-I (ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b study, designed to evaluate the hepatic and renal safety of CSL112. Here, we report an analysis of a pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) substudy of AEGIS-I. METHODS: AMI patients were stratified by renal function and randomized 3:3:2 to 4, weekly, 2-hour infusions of low- and high-dose (2 g and 6 g) CSL112, or placebo. PK/PD assessments included plasma concentrations of apoA-I and PC, and measures of total and ABCA1-dependent CEC, as well as lipids/lipoproteins including high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), ApoB, and triglycerides. Inflammatory and cardio-metabolic biomarkers were also evaluated. RESULTS: The substudy included 63 subjects from AEGIS-I. CSL112 infusions resulted in rapid, dose-dependent increases in baseline corrected apoA-I and PC, which peaked at the end of the infusion (Tmax ≈ 2 hours). Similarly, there was a dose-dependent elevation in both total CEC and ABCA1-mediated CEC. Mild renal impairment did not affect the PK or PD of CSL112. CSL112 administration was also associated with an increase in plasma levels of HDL-C but not non-HDL-C, LDL-C, apoB, or triglycerides. No dose-effects on inflammatory or cardio-metabolic biomarkers were observed. CONCLUSION: Among patients with AMI, impaired CEC was rapidly elevated by CSL112 infusions in a dose-dependent fashion, along with an increase in apoA-I plasma concentrations. Findings from the current sub-study of the AEGIS-I support a potential atheroprotective benefit of CSL112 for AMI patients.

Results from a drug utilization study of extended release quetiapine fumarate prescribed by psychiatrists as treatment for major depressive disorder in selected countries in the European Union.

This multicenter, observational drug utilization (DU) study (NCT01594996) investigated the profile of patients and specialist providers who prescribed extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) for treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) across five European countries (Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain, and Sweden). A DU data abstraction form captured information on the characteristics of physicians, patients, and drugs utilized in the medical management of depressive episodes in MDD, where the therapeutic regimen included quetiapine XR. Data were reported descriptively. This analysis included 811 patients. Psychiatric histories indicated a burden of severe MDD in these patients. Patient demographics were similar across countries; however, those in Sweden had a younger mean age. Physicians' ratings of the therapeutic effect of prior treatment with antidepressants suggested the need for an add-on treatment for most patients. Overall, 15.7% of patients initiated quetiapine XR treatment as monotherapy. Presence of psychotic symptoms during depressive episodes predicted treatment with higher than recommended doses of quetiapine XR (odds ratio=3.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.0). This analysis demonstrated similarities in DU across the countries analyzed, largely in accordance with the recommended dose of quetiapine XR as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants in MDD (50-300 mg/day).

Effectiveness of a risk-minimization activity involving physician education on metabolic monitoring of patients receiving quetiapine: results from two postauthorization safety studies.

Following Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module XVI, two complementary studies were performed that included process and outcome measurements of the effectiveness of physician education on metabolic monitoring of patients receiving quetiapine. A multinational survey of 800 European Union physicians was utilized to assess the receipt of educational materials and also to assess the degree of monitoring as reported by physicians. Recall of receipt of educational materials ranged from 16.0 to 69.0% across the participating countries; however, physicians reported that 64.5% of patients were being monitored, with the majority reporting performance of three or more of four key metabolic-monitoring activities. Higher rates of monitoring were reported by those who reported receiving materials. Assessment of outcomes in a separate retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data showed lower levels of monitoring performed by specialist physicians. The monitoring activities observed were assessed as acceptable on the basis of the established performance of UK physicians, who are incentivized to deliver preventive screening.

Antibody persistence ten years after first and second doses of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, and immunogenicity and safety of second and third doses in older adults.

In a study of older adults, first and second doses of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PN23) induced IgG increases for all 8 vaccine serotypes tested. Participants (N=143, mean age 76 years) were re-enrolled to study antibody levels after ten years, and safety and immunogenicity of another PN23 dose. Ten years after first or second doses, mean IgG concentrations exceeded vaccine-naïve levels for 7 of 8 serotypes tested. Second and third doses administered at this time were generally well tolerated and were immunogenic, inducing similar postvaccination levels. Immunogenicity is preserved after multiple PN23 doses without evidence of a lower than expected immune response (i.e., without hyporesponsiveness).

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified process hepatitis B vaccine in healthy infants.

BACKGROUND: A modified process hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) uses higher phosphate content in the manufacturing process relative to the current product, Recombivax-HB. The higher phosphate is thought to improve antigen presentation, and thereby, increase antibody production. The mpHBV was previously shown to be well tolerated and immunogenic in adults. The current study tested a 2-, 4-, 6-month vaccination schedule and a higher dose formulation (10 µg mpHBV) in healthy infants. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, healthy infants (N = 1718), approximately 2 months of age, received a 0.5-mL intramuscular dose of 5-µg mpHBV, Recombivax-HB (5 µg), 10-µg mpHBV, or Engerix-B (10 µg) at day 1, month 2, and month 4 (2, 4, 6 months of age). Serum antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) was analyzed at month 7. The geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroprotection rate (SPR; % subjects with anti-HBs titer ≥ 10 mIU/mL) were determined 1 month after the third dose. RESULTS: Month 7 SPRs were 99.3% (402/405, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.3, 100) in the 5 µg mpHBV group, 100.0% (398/398, 95% CI: 99.9, 100) in the 10 µg mpHBV group, 98.5% (400/406, 95% CI: 97.2, 99.8) in the Recombivax-HB group, and 99.5% (398/400, 95% CI: 98.7, 100) in the Engerix-B group. Month 7 GMTs (mIU/mL) were 748.2 (95% CI: 672.0, 833.1) in the 5 µg mpHBV group, 981.5 (95% CI: 891.0, 1081.2) in the 10 µg mpHBV group, 376.8 (95% CI: 331.4, 428.5) in the Recombivax-HB group, and 556.6 (95% CI: 491.8, 629.9) in the Engerix-B group. The percentages of subjects reporting injection-site or systemic adverse events were similar across the vaccination groups. CONCLUSIONS: All 4 hepatitis B vaccines elicited high anti-HBs SPRs. After dose 3, anti-HBs GMT were highest in the 10 µg mpHBV group, but did not meet the predefined criteria for superiority. All vaccines were well tolerated.

Revaccination with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine induces elevated and persistent functional antibody responses in adults aged 65 > or = years.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at high risk of developing invasive pneumococcal disease, but the optimal timing and number of vaccine doses needed to prevent disease among this group are unknown. We compared revaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PN23) with primary vaccination for eliciting initial and persistent functional antibody responses. METHODS: Subjects aged > or = 65 years were enrolled. Functional (opsonic) and total immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody levels were measured following either PN23 primary vaccination (n = 60) or revaccination 3-5 years after receiving a first PN23 vaccination (n = 60). Antibody against vaccine serotypes 4, 14, and 23F was measured at prevaccination (day 0), 30 days after vaccination, and 5 years after vaccination. RESULTS: By day 30, both primary vaccination and revaccination induced significant increases in opsonic and IgG antibody levels. Day 30 levels following revaccination were slightly lower but not significantly different than those after primary vaccination. Year 5 levels were similar in both groups and remained significantly higher than prevaccination levels for primary vaccination subjects. There was good agreement between postvaccination opsonic and IgG antibody levels. CONCLUSIONS: Revaccination of older adults with PN23 was comparable to primary vaccination for inducing elevated and persistent functional and IgG antibody responses.

Effectiveness of a bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type B-hepatitis B vaccine in preventing hepatitis B virus infection among children born to hepatitis B e antigen-positive carrier mothers.

BACKGROUND: This observational study evaluated a modified immunoprophylactic regimen (hepatitis B immune globulin [HBIG]) and a dose of thimerosal-free monovalent hepatitis B (HB) vaccine shortly after birth followed by doses of thimerosal-free bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-HB vaccine at 2 and 4 months of age, and a booster at 12 months of age) in infants at high risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (mothers HBeAg+). METHODS: Children >or=6 months of age vaccinated in routine clinical practice were tested twice (>or=6 months apart) for HBV antigens surface antigen (HBsAg) and "e" antigen, and for antibody to HBsAg. Partial nucleotide sequence analysis was performed on HBV DNA isolated from infants identified with a breakthrough chronic HBV infection. A fully sequential statistical design was used to maximize patient safety and study efficiency. RESULTS: Four of 60 children developed chronic HBV infection despite vaccination, but at no point did the cumulative number of cases reach the boundary of statistical significance. Overall, the analysis adjusted for sequential testing yielded an estimated breakthrough rate of 6.7% (90% CI: 2.3%-14.6%). In a subset of uninfected children tested for antibody to HBsAg 1 to 4 months after the second dose of Hib-HB vaccine, 90% (9/10) had >or=10 milli-International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The third dose of Hib-HB vaccine induced a secondary increase in the level of antibody; 94.7% (18/19) of a second group developed >or=100 mIU/mL, with a geometric mean concentration of 771 mIU/mL (95% CI: 351.4-1692.1 mIU/mL). CONCLUSION: The tested regimen is comparably effective to historical experience with a standard one employing HBIG plus monovalent thimerosal-containing HB vaccine given at 0, 1, and 6 months of age.

Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine manufactured by a modified process in healthy young adults.

BACKGROUND: Merck has developed a manufacturing process modification for RECOMBIVAX HB. Three lots of modified process hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) were studied in a randomized, blinded trial to demonstrate similarity of the three lots of mpHBV and noninferiority to RECOMBIVAX HB (control vaccine) with regard to immunogenicity. RESULTS: Month 7 SPRs for the mpHBV groups ranged from 97.8 to 98.9% (98.2% for the mpHBV groups combined). The seroprotection rate (SPR) for the control group was 98.5%. The estimated geometric mean titer (GMT) was 1761 mIU/mL for the mpHBV groups combined and 1108 mIU/mL for the control group. The GMT ratio (mpHBV/control) was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2 to 2.1], indicating superiority of mpHBV compared with control. The percentages of subjects reporting any adverse experience (AE), injection-site AEs, or systemic AEs were similar across the four vaccination groups. There were no serious AEs. METHODS: Healthy 20-to 35-year-old subjects (N = 860) received a 1-mL intramuscular dose [10 mcg hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)] of mpHBV from 1 of 3 lots or control at Day 1, and Months 1 and 6. Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was assayed Predose 1 and 1 month Postdose 3 (Month 7) using a quantitative hepatitis B antibody assay (Ortho VITROS ECi assay). Anti-HBs GMTs and SPRs (% of subjects with an anti-HBs titer > or =10 mIU/mL) were compared at Month 7. After each dose, injection-site AEs and oral temperature were recorded for 5 days; systemic AEs were recorded for 15 days. CONCLUSIONS: The SPRs for the mpHBV groups and the control group were high; responses were consistent across the mpHBV groups. The mpHBV and control vaccines were generally well tolerated.

Precise answers to the wrong question: prospective clinical trials and the meta-analyses of pneumococcal vaccine in elderly and high-risk adults.

Ten prospective clinical trials conducted in elderly and high-risk adults have failed to show that pneumococcal vaccine prevents pneumococcal bacteraemia and all pneumonia. Several of these trials focused on unrepresentative populations and most had serious methodological problems. Few adequately considered sample size requirements in pre-trial planning. Retrospective sample size calculations based on the findings of the individual trials showed that none was large enough to rule out false negative results. Five published meta-analyses have attempted to determine the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine by pooling the results of the individual clinical trials. The resulting study populations often were not representative of the populations of elderly and high-risk adults for whom vaccination is recommended. The meta-analysts often omitted clinical trials that should have been evaluated, included other trials that should have been omitted and miscounted the numbers of subjects and outcome events in the individual trials. Retrospective sample size calculations showed that none of the meta-analyses included an adequate number of person years of observation to rule out false negative results. The prospective clinical trials and meta-analyses of pneumococcal vaccine in elderly and high-risk adults have been inconclusive, but they should not be regarded as negative studies. The clinical effectiveness of vaccination in preventing pneumococcal bacteraemia in elderly and high-risk adults has been demonstrated in observational studies, and vaccination is cost-effective. This evidence is sufficient to justify wider use of pneumococcal vaccine.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering ability of lovastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg/d with fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg/d.

BACKGROUND: The available statin drugs have similar pharmacodynamic properties but are not equal in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lovastatin and fluvastatin in lowering LDL-C. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of patients aged >20 years with primary hypercholesterolemia conducted at 44 clinical sites across the United States. After a 6-week National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I diet lead-in period in patients taking lipid-lowering drugs at screening, patients were randomized to receive lovastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/d or fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d (the doses available at the time the study was conducted) for 6 weeks. Patients not taking lipid-lowering drugs at screening and who had been following the Step I diet for at least 6 weeks proceeded to the treatment phase. All patients received instruction for a Step I diet, which they followed throughout the treatment phase. After the treatment period, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-C, and triglycerides were measured, and TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients (476 men, 362 women; mean [SD] age, 59 [12] years) were included in the study. Lovastatin 20 and 40 mg/d significantly reduced mean LDL-C compared with the same dosages of fluvastatin. TC and the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio decreased more with lovastatin than with fluvastatin at a given dose level. Approximately 50% of patients treated with lovastatin 20 and 40 mg/d compared with approximately 25% treated with fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg/d reached NCEP Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goals. CONCLUSION: In this small study population of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia taking lipid-lowering drugs, short-term (6-week) treatment with lovastatin was more efficacious than fluvastatin in lowering cholesterol levels and reaching LDL-C treatment goals.

Neurohormonal and clinical responses to high- versus low-dose enalapril therapy in chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the neurohormonal responses and clinical effects of long-term, high-dose versus low-dose enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Examination of neurohormonal and clinical responses in patients receiving different doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may provide insight into the potential for additional suppression with angiotensin II (AT-II) or aldosterone antagonists. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with CHF were randomized to receive either high-dose (40 mg/day, n = 37) or low-dose (5 mg/day, n = 38) enalapril over six months. The results from exercise testing, echocardiography, tissue-specific ACE activity and monthly pre- and post-enalapril neurohormonal levels were compared. RESULTS: Despite greater intra-group improvements in plasma renin activity and serum aldosterone levels in the high-dose group, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in all variables, except for serum ACE activity at the end of study. Elevated serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II levels were observed in 35% and 85% of patients, respectively, at 34 weeks, an inter-group difference that was not statistically significant. A trend toward higher levels of tissue-specific ACE activity in the high-dose group compared with the low-dose group at the end of study was observed (p = 0.054). A predefined composite end point of clinical events had a trend toward better improvement in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not demonstrate a difference between high- and low-dose enalapril in terms of serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II suppression, despite a dose-dependent reduction in serum ACE activity. Even at maximal doses of enalapril, elevated serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II levels were frequently observed.