Hyperglycemia in nondiabetic adult trauma patients is associated with worse outcomes than diabetic patients: An analysis of 95,764 patients.

BACKGROUND: The adverse impact of acute hyperglycemia is well documented but its specific effects on nondiabetic trauma patients are unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differential impact of hyperglycemia on outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic trauma inpatients. METHODS: Adults admitted 2018 to 2019 to 46 Level I/II trauma centers with two or more blood glucose tests were analyzed. Diabetes status was determined from International Classification of Diseases-10th Rev.-Clinical Modification, trauma registry, and/or hemoglobin A1c greater than 6.5. Patients with and without one or more hyperglycemic result >180 mg/dL were compared. Logistic regression examined the effects of hyperglycemia and diabetes on outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, and body mass index. RESULTS: There were 95,764 patients: 54% male; mean age, 61 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 10; diabetic, 21%. Patients with hyperglycemia had higher mortality and worse outcomes compared with those without hyperglycemia. Nondiabetic hyperglycemic patients had the highest odds of mortality (diabetic: adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.5; nondiabetics: adjusted odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.8-8.4). Hyperglycemic nondiabetics experienced worse outcomes on every measure when compared with nonhyperglycemic nondiabetics, with higher rates of sepsis (1.1 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), more SSIs (1.0 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), longer mean hospital length of stay (11.4 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), longer mean intensive care unit length of stay (8.5 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001), higher rates of intensive care unit use (68.6% vs. 35.1), and more ventilator use (42.4% vs. 7.3%). CONCLUSION: Hyperglycemia is associated with increased odds of mortality in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Hyperglycemia during hospitalization in nondiabetics was associated with the worst outcomes and represents a potential opportunity for intervention in this high-risk group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management; Level III.

Curative resection of a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the setting of von Willebrand's disease.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the alimentary tract and usually presents with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The diagnosis of GIST is typically made with upper endoscopy after excluding other causes of bleeding. The surgical management of GIST can be challenging depending upon the location of the tumor. We present a unique case of duodenal GIST in the setting von Willebrand's disease diagnosed after emergent laparotomy for massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Key strategies in curing our patient were treating the underlying bleeding disorder, collaborating with radiology and gastroenterology teams, and early exploratory laparotomy for refractory hemorrhage. This case demonstrates the challenges of diagnosing and managing GIST in patients with underlying coagulopathies.

Failure of 3 different methods and biopsy sites to diagnose a patient with invasive colorectal cancer: A case report.

RATIONALE: Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, and the majority arise from neoplastic adenomatous polyps. Bladder involvement in colorectal cancer is uncommon and found in approximately 3% of the cases, most commonly in sigmoid and rectal tumors and the diagnosis is classically based on biopsies of affected tissues. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 68-year-old male with no significant past medical history underwent diagnostic colonoscopy for abdominal distension and constipation with positive fecal occult blood test ordered by the primary care physician. DIAGNOSIS: Colonoscopy showed a sigmoid mass with biopsy finding of tubulovillous adenoma. Laparoscopy was performed for sigmoid colonic resection, but as the mass was large, a diverting loop colostomy and multiple biopsies were performed revealing tubulovillous adenoma again. Postoperative workup revealed right hydronephrosis, and cystoscopy was performed confirming bladder wall invasion with biopsies showing benign bladder wall tissue with no evidence of dysplasia or malignancy. Furthermore, computed tomography (CT)-guided core-needle biopsies of the colonic mass were performed but revealed adenomatous colonic mucosa without evidence of carcinoma. INTERVENTION: Definitive surgical en bloc excision of the tumor and anterior bladder wall was performed with urology team until grossly free margins were attained. Final pathology revealed well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from a preexisting tubulovillous adenoma with direct invasion of the bladder wall. OUTCOMES: The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged 2 weeks postoperatively with planned adjuvant chemotherapy. LESSONS: This case represents a classical presentation of invasive colorectal cancer. Perioperative workup, however, was confounded by failure of open, cystoscopic, and CT-guided biopsies to establish a tissue diagnosis for directed therapy. Upon literature review, evidence exists to support our approach to this unique dilemma.