[Advances in study of surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty].

Objective: To review the research on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty (THA), to clarify the possible muscle damage caused by different approaches, and to help clinicians avoid intraoperative muscle damage and identify the causes of certain muscle-related complications after operation. Methods: The research literature on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of THA at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to summarize the MRI performance of the posterior approach, modified direct lateral approach, direct anterior approach, and minimally invasive anterolateral approach (also called Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen approach). Results: The traditional posterior approach mainly damages the short external rotator muscle group and increases the incidence of postoperative dislocation; the piriformis-keeping posterior approach significantly improves the quality of the pyriformis tendon in the postoperative period, but it may lead to damage to the intrapelvic portion of the piriformis muscle. The modified direct lateral approach mainly damages the gluteus medius muscle, which increases the risk of postoperative claudication. The direct anterior approach mainly damages the vastus tensoris muscle and may result in damage to the short external rotator muscle group and the muscles around the incision. The minimally invasive anterolateral approach primarily damages the superior gluteal nerve, which subsequently leads to denervation of the broad fascial tensor fasciae latae, and this approach may also result in injury to the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles. The muscle damage status significantly affects prognosis, and the minimally invasive approach is more suitable for elderly patients. Conclusion: MRI can clarify the different types of muscle damage caused by different surgical approaches. Minimally invasive approaches can reduce muscle damage and improve postoperative function compared with traditional approaches, and can benefit elderly patients more, but due to the small field, forcing to expand the surgical field will lead to unintended muscle damage and reduce postoperative function.

[Influencing factors on effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty].

Objective: To summarize the influencing factors on the effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), so as to provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods: The related research literature of RTSA at home and abroad was extensively consulted, and the factors that may affect the effectiveness were summarized from the aspects of surgical technique, muscle condition, general condition of patients, psychological expectation, and lifestyle. Results: For surgical techniques, different surgical approaches have their own advantages. The glenoid notch, poor bone ingrowth, increased bone resorption, and infection would lead to the loosening of glenoid prosthesis. In addition, the neck shaft angle and inclination angle of humeral prosthesis affect the occurrence of glenoid notch and the range of motion of joint internal/external rotation after operation, respectively. For muscle condition, the quality of teres minor and deltoid muscle has an important influence on joint stability after operation. Moderate increase of deltoid muscle tension can improve joint mobility after operation, and suture repair of subscapular tendon during operation can relieve joint pain and improve function, range of motion, and strength. For the general condition of patients, gender, age, and body mass index are all related to postoperative joint function and complications, and different occupations and postoperative exercise levels affect the recovery. The patients with severe degenerative diseases, poor preoperative function, and long disease duration have lower expectations and higher satisfaction with the effectiveness, and bad lifestyle has a negative impact on the effectiveness. Conclusion: The effectiveness of RTSA is related to surgical technique, muscle condition, general condition of patients, psychological expectation, and lifestyle. In order to avoid the loosening of glenoid prosthesis, the operator should choose humeral prosthesis with small neck shaft angle and large glenoid ball and put them down and inclined inferiorly during operation, and choose appropriate approach to eliminate space with drainage to reduce the risk of infection. After operation, patients should avoid activities that generate high anterior and posterior shear forces. In addition, the humeral prosthesis with a inclination angle of 10°-20° can achieve the best balance between the range of internal rotation and external rotation after operation. Proper deltoid tension can maintain joint stability and good range of motion. Suture of subscapular tendon is recommended.