Bacteremia in Patients with Solid Organ Cancer: Insights into Epidemiology and Antibiotic Consumption.

Epidemiology and risk factors associated to bacterial resistance in solid organ cancer (SOC) patients has been barely described. This retrospective monocentric study analyzed clinical variables in SOC patients who developed bacteremia between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022. We described rates of bacterial resistance in Gram negative bacteria (80.6%): E. coli-ESBL, K. pneumoniae-ESBL, Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae and Meropenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, as well as antibiotic consumption, and compared these rates between the medical and oncology wards. In total, we included 314 bacteremias from 253 patients. SOC patients are frequently prescribed antibiotics (40.8%), mainly fluoroquinolones. Nosocomial bacteremia accounted for 18.2% of the cases and only 14.3% of patients were neutropenic. Hepatobiliary tract was the most frequent tumor (31.5%) and source of bacteremia (38.5%). Resistant bacteria showed a decreased rate of resistance during the years studied in the oncology ward. Both K-ESBL and K-CBP resistance rates decreased (from 45.8% to 20.0%, and from 29.2% to 20.0%, respectively), as well as MRPA, which varied from a resistance rate of 28% to 16.7%. The presence of a urinary catheter (p < 0.001) and previous antibiotic prescription (p = 0.002) were risk factors for bacterial resistance. Identifying either of these risk factors could help in guiding antibiotic prescription for SOC patients.

Production of OXA-48 carbapenemase acts as an independent risk factor for poor outcome in Klebsiella pneumoniae infection.

PURPOSE: To know whether the production of OXA-48 carbapenemase exerts an independent impact on the outcome of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection, once adjusted by clinical syndrome and baseline risk factors. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study including 117 infectious episodes due to OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae (OXA-48-Kp) and 117 episodes due to non-OXA-48-producing strains (non-OXA-48-Kp). Both groups were matched (1:1 ratio) by clinical syndrome (source of infection, preceding invasive procedures and indwelling devices, and associated bacteremia) and hospitalization ward at infection onset. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the association between OXA-48-Kp infection and clinical cure by day 14 (primary outcome) and 30-day all-cause mortality (secondary outcome). RESULTS: Both study groups were well balanced regarding underlying conditions and comorbidity burden. Sepsis or septic shock were more frequent in OXA-48-Kp cases than non-OXA-48-Kp controls (41 [35.0%] vs. 17 [14.5%]; P-value < 0.0001). Clinical cure by day 14 was less commonly achieved in OXA-48-Kp cases (49 [41.9%] vs. 95 [81.2%]; P-value < 0.001), whereas 30-day all-cause mortality was higher (33 [28.2%] vs. 18 [15.4%]; P-value = 0.018). Multivariate analysis confirmed that OXA-48-Kp infection was independently associated with the lack of 14-day clinical cure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45; 95% confidential interval [95%CI]: 0.29-0.70; P-value < 0.0001). A non-significant association was observed for 30-day all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.65; 95%CI: 0.92-2.94; P-value = 0.093). CONCLUSION: Our matched analysis suggests that the production of OXA-48 carbapenemase acts as an independent risk factor for poor outcome in K. pneumoniae infection as compared to episodes due to non-carbapenemase-producing strains.

Prevalence of Chagas disease in Latin American pregnant women in Madrid, Spain: A multicentre cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2016.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess Trypanosoma cruzi infection prevalence among pregnant migrants living in Madrid according to the country of origin and to assess screening coverage in this at-risk population. METHODS: Retrospective multicentre cross-sectional study conducted from January 2011 to December 2016 in eight Madrid hospitals. Each hospital reviewed their microbiology data records to assess the screening coverage and serological diagnosis in all pregnant women coming from endemic areas. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, 149,470 deliveries were attended at the eight hospitals, and 11,048 pregnant women were screened for Chagas disease. Most cases (93.5%) were in women from Bolivia, who also showed the highest prevalence (12.4%, 95% confidence interval: 9.9-15.0). Pooled prevalence amongst the screened women was 2.9% (95% CI: 1.8-4.1). Chagas disease screening coverage varied greatly between centres, with a pooled mean coverage of 47% (95% CI: 37%-57%; 73% [95% CI: 63%-82%] for those centres with universal screening vs. 10% [95% CI: 6%-15%] for those with a selective screening approach; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study provides useful data for policy makers and epidemiologists in a non-endemic area without congenital Chagas screening programmes.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of immunocompromised adult patients with early-stage symptomatic COVID-19: A real-life experience.

Regardless of vaccination status, progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a relevant cause of morbidity among immunocompromised patients. Despite the proven efficacy of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r), concerns remain regarding the potential for drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) and the safety in this at-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with NMV/r, as well as the occurrence of DDIs and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). This retrospective observational study included all the patients with some form of immunosuppression and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 that received NMV/r at our center from April to August 2022. The main outcome was worsening of the clinical status (increase of ≥1 point from baseline in a validated clinical progression scale) by Days +7 and +28 after the initiation of therapy. Safety outcomes included the rates of any TEAE and potentially severe DDIs. We included 110 patients. Main causes of immunosuppression were hematological malignancy (58.2%) (mainly multiple myeloma [22.7%] and non-Hodgkin lymphoma [13.6%]), active chemotherapy (30.0%) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (14.5%). Clinical worsening by Days +7 and +28 was observed in four (3.6%) and five patients (4.5%), respectively. Only one patient had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test at Day +28. At least one potentially severe DDI was observed in 56.4% of the patients. The rate of attributable TEAEs was 10.9%, although only two patients (1.8%) required premature discontinuation of NMV/r. Early initiation of NMV/r therapy should be considered in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19, with particular attention to interacting medications.

Enhancing screening adherence for strongyloides infection in latinx inpatients with COVID-19: a local protocol implementation study.

Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome has been observed in immunosuppressed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Detecting and treating asymptomatic Strongyloides infection in individuals from endemic areas can effectively prevent hyperinfection. Unfortunately, many clinicians are unaware of this neglected infection. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether including Strongyloides screening in COVID-19 management protocols would encourage this practice. To accomplish this, we conducted a retrospective single-center study at 'Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre' in Madrid, Spain, comparing two consecutive cohorts. The first cohort comprised all Latinx patients over 18 years old who were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. The second cohort consisted of Latinx patients admitted between July 1st and December 31st, 2020, following an amendment to the COVID-19 management protocol that recommended screening for strongyloidiasis in at-risk patients. We identified 559 and 795 patients in the first and second periods, respectively. The percentage of individuals screened increased significantly from 8.8% to 51.6% after the screening recommendation was included in the protocol (odds ratio [OR] 11.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.01-15.33). In both periods, the screening rate was significantly higher among those receiving immunosuppression than those who did not receive steroids and/or tocilizumab. No other factors influenced the screening rate. In conclusion, including strongyloidiasis screening recommendations in COVID-19 management protocols led to its increased implementation. However, the overall screening rate remained low, emphasizing the need for further efforts to enhance screening practices.

Disparities between Latinx migrants and Spanish natives in COVID-19 outcome in Madrid.

Previous studies have suggested an increased susceptibility of COVID-19 among certain populations. We analyzed whether COVID-19 presentation and mortality differ between Latinx migrants and Spanish natives. METHODS AND MATERIALS: COVID-19 patients between 35-64 years old admitted between January 26th-May-5th 2020 were reviewed. Demographics, major comorbidities, symptoms, signs and analytical parameters on admission were recorded. Respiratory failure was defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation requirement at any time during hospitalization. A propensity score (PS) adjustment was created between Latinx and Spanish. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted by the PS was performed to evaluate the effects of different variables on mortality. RESULTS: 894 patients: 425 (47.5%) Latinx and 469 (52.5%) Spanish natives were included. Latinx were younger (50 vs 55 years p < 0.001) and had less comorbidities (29.4% vs 55.0% p < 0.001) than Spanish natives. More often they exhibited fever (22.1% vs 9.8% p = 0.018) and had higher inflammatory markers (PCR) (11.3 mg/dl vs 7.7 mg/dl p < 0.001). Mortality seemed lower among Latinx (4.7% vs 8.7%, p = 0.017). No association was found between ethnicity and mortality. Respiratory failure [OR = 23.978 (CI 95% 9.4-60.1) p < 0.001], LDH [OR (per unitary increment) = 1.002; CI95% (1.000-1.004;p = 0.036] and PCR [OR (per unitary increment) = 1.044 (CI95% 1.06-1.08); p = 0.02] were independently associated to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to identify significant ethnic disparities between Latinx and Spanish natives in terms of COVID-19 mortality. Universal access to the health care system in Spain may have contributed to a better outcome of Latinx patients. Differences previously described might be a consequence of socioeconomic disparities.

[Cytomegalovirus reactivation in patients with immune-mediated gastritis]. / Reactivación de citomegalovirus en pacientes con gastritis inmunomediada.

INTRODUCTION: Reactivation of cytomegalovirus can complicate the evolution of patients with gastritis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: The experience in our center is described and a review of the literature is performed. RESULTS: A case of severe gastritis induced by treatment with a programmed cell death receptor-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitor, associated with reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is described. In the systematic review, we identified 5 cases of immune-related gastritis associated with CMV reactivation. Ganciclovir treatment contributed to clinical improvement in most patients. CONCLUSION: The early identification of a CMV infection in patients with severe or refractory immune-related gastritis will allow the initiation of targeted treatment, and may avoid increasing immunosuppressive therapy.

Risk Factors and Outcomes for Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Immunocompromised Patients.

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) infection often occurs in immunocompromised patients, which also face an increased risk of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. A deeper knowledge of the risk factors for MDR-PSA infection in this patient population may help to choose appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy. Methods: a single-center case-control (1:2) retrospective study that included 48 patients with underlying immunosuppression developing MDR-PSA infection (cases) and 96 patients also immunocompromised that were infected with non-MDR-PSA (controls) was conducted. Both groups were matched by site of infection, clinical features and type of immunosuppression. Risk factors for MDR-PSA were assessed by logistic regression. Clinical outcomes were also compared between both groups. Results: immunosuppression was due to solid cancer in 63 (43.8%) patients, solid organ transplantation in 39 (27.1%), hematological disease in 35 (24.3%) and other causes in 7 (4.9%). Independent risk factors for MDR-PSA infection were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR]: 4.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63−13.79; p = 0.004), antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months (OR: 5.32; 95% CI: 1.93−14.73; p = 0.001), previous MDR-PSA colonization (OR: 42.1; 95% CI: 4.49−394.8; p = 0.001) and septic shock (OR: 3.73; 95% CI: 1.36−10.21; p = 0.010). MDR-PSA cases were less likely to receive adequate empirical therapy (14 [29.2%] vs. 69 [71.9%]; p < 0.001). 30-day clinical improvement was less common in MDR-PSA cases (25 [52.1%] vs. 76 [79.2%]; p = 0.001). Conclusions: diabetes mellitus, previous MDR-PSA colonization, prior receipt of antibiotics and septic shock acted as risk factors for developing MDR-PSA infections in immunocompromised patients, who have a poorer outcome than those infected with non-MDR-PSA strains.

Derivation of a score to predict infection due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a tool for guiding empirical antibiotic treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PSA) constitutes an emerging health problem. A predictive score of MDR-PSA infection would allow an early adaptation of empirical antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We performed a single-centre case-control (1:2) retrospective study including 100 patients with MDR-PSA and 200 with a non-MDR-PSA infection. Cases and controls were matched by site of infection, clinical characteristics and immunosuppression. A point risk score for prediction of MDR-PSA infection was derived from a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes (clinical improvement, complications and discharge) were also compared. RESULTS: Cases with MDR-PSA infection were younger than controls (67.5 vs. 73.0 y; P = 0.031) and have more frequent cirrhosis (9% vs. 2%; P = 0.005). Independent risk factors for MDR-PSA infection were prior antibiotic treatment (80% vs. 50.5%; P < 0.001), prior colonisation with MDR bacteria (41% vs. 13.5%; P < 0.001), hospital-acquired infection (63% vs. 47%; P = 0.009) and septic shock at diagnosis (33% vs. 14%; P < 0.001). Adequate therapy was less frequent in MDR-PSA infections (31% vs. 66.5% for empirical therapy; P < 0.001). The risk score included: previous MDR-PSA isolation (11 points), prior antibiotic use (3 points), hospital-acquired infection (2 points) and septic shock at diagnosis (2 points). It showed an area under the curve of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.70-0.81) and allowed to classify individual risk into various categories: 0-2 points (<20%), 3-5 points (25%-45%), 7-11 points (55%-60%), 13-16 points (75%-87%) and a maximum of 18 points (93%). CONCLUSION: Infections due to MDR-PSA have a poorer prognosis than those produced by non-MDR-PSA. Our score could guide empirical therapy for MDR-PSA when P. aeruginosa is isolated.

Prognostic factors of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a tertiary-care Spanish hospital: A retrospective single-center cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the determinants of outcome of infections due to oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48) carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (OXA-48-Kp). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 117 episodes of OXA-48-Kp infection were conducted. Multivariate Cox models identified factors predicting 14-day clinical response and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 77 (65.8%) isolates were susceptible to imipenem/meropenem. The 14-day clinical response and 30-day mortality rates were 41.9% and 28.2%. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 8.33; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.19-21.72; P-value <0.001), urinary tract infection (aHR: 3.04; 95%CI: 1.39-6.66; P-value = 0.006) and early appropriate treatment (aHR: 1.77; 95%CI: 0.97-3.22; P-value = 0.064) predicted clinical response, whereas severe sepsis had a deleterious impact (aHR: 0.22; 95%CI: 0.10-0.50; P-value <0.001). Lower respiratory tract infection (aHR: 6.58; 95%CI: 2.83-15.29; P-value <0.001) and bloodstream infection (aHR: 2.33; 95%CI: 1.05-5.15; P-value = 0.037) were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas definitive therapy including ≥1 active agent (aHR: 0.26; 95%CI: 0.11-0.63; P-value = 0.003) and source control (aHR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.14-0.91; P-value = 0.030) were protective. Combination therapy did not seem to be associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate antimicrobial treatment was protective for 30-day mortality in OXA-48-Kp infections. Carbapenems are usually active, whereas combination therapy appeared not to confer additional benefit.

Higher mortality of hospitalized haematologic patients with COVID-19 compared to non-haematologic is driven by thrombotic complications and development of ARDS: An age-matched cohorts study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The characteristics of COVID-19 in haematologic patients compared to non-haematologic patients have seldom been analyzed. Our aim was to analyze whether there are differences in clinical characteristics and outcome of haematologic patients with COVID-19 as compared to non-haematologic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in 2 University hospitals of patients admitted with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 included in the SEMICOVID19 database. The cohort with underlying haematologic disease was compared to a cohort of age and date-of-COVID-19-matched controls without haematologic disease (1:2). RESULTS: 71 cases and 142 controls were included from March-May 2020.Twenty (28.1%) had received recent chemotherapy. Twelve (16.9%) were stem cell transplant recipients (SCT). Eleven (15.5%) were neutropenic concurrently with COVID-19 diagnosis.Haematologic patients presented ARDS (58.5 vs 20.7%, p = 0.0001), thrombotic complications (15.7 vs 2.1%, p = 0.002), DIC (5.7 vs 0.0%, p = 0.011), heart failure (14.3 vs 4.9%, p = 0.029) and required ICU admission (15.5 vs 2.8%, p = 0.001), MV (14.1% vs 2.1%, p 0.001), steroid (64.8 vs 33.1%, p = 0.0001), tocilizumab (33.8 vs 8.5%, p = 0.0001) or anakinra treatment (9.9% vs 0%, p = 0.0001) more often. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher (38.0% vs 18.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest COVID-19 has worse outcomes in haematologic patients than in non-haematologic, independently of age, and that the development of ARDS and thrombotic complications drive the higher in-hospital mortality.

Analysis of the factors predicting clinical response to tocilizumab therapy in patients with severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains about the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of severe COVID-19. We aimed to analyze the profile of TCZ-respondent patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 who received off-label TCZ after recommendation by a local committee and were admitted to the University Hospital "12 de Octubre" until May 2020. The primary end point was a significant clinical improvement (SCI) on day 14 after administration of TCZ. Factors independently related to SCI were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 428 (63.3%) patients treated with TCZ, 271 (63.3%) experienced SCI. After adjustment for factors related to unfavorable outcomes, TCZ administration within the first 48 hours from admission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.98, 95% confidence Interval [95% CI]: 1.1-3.55; P = 0.02) and ALT levels >100 UI/L at day 0 (OR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.3-8.1; P = 0.01) were independently related to SCI. The rate of SCI significantly decreased according to the time of TCZ administration: 70.2% in the first 48 hours from admission, 58.5% on days 3-7, and 45.1% after day 7 (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: TCZ improves the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 the most if treatment starts within the first 48 hours after admission.

Effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Clinical experience with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) for treatment of infections due to multidrug or extremely resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is limited. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections treated with CAZ-AVI. The primary outcome was clinical cure by day 14, evaluated by logistic regression adjusted for the propensity score to receive CAZ-AVI as combination therapy. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, 90-day recurrence, emerging CAZ-AVI resistance, and safety of therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-one first episodes of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infection were included. The most common source was lower respiratory tract infection (34.4%), 14.8% episodes developed bloodstream infection and 50.8% had sepsis at presentation. Ceftazidime-avibactam therapy was initiated at a median of 7.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.5-12.0) days from symptom onset; it was used as combined therapy in 29 (47.5%) episodes. Clinical cure rate by day 14 was 54.1% and predictors of response were days to source control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.98; P = 0.024), days until the initiation of CAZ-AVI therapy (aOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.86; P = 0.003), age (aOR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.99-1.15; P = 0.066) and CAZ-AVI combination therapy (aOR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; P = 0.009). Rates of 30-day all-cause mortality and 90-day recurrence were 13.1% and 12.5%, respectively. Emergence of drug resistance to CAZ-AVI was not detected. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in three episodes (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI constitutes a valid alternative for the treatment of infections due to MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa.

Time of incubation of agar-plate culture for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection.

PURPOSE: Agar-plate culture (APC) remains the most sensitive parasitological technique for S. stercoralis diagnosis. Although it was first described three decades ago, the time of incubation of the plates is neither a commonly described feature nor usually standardized. The aim of the study was to analyze the required time to detect S. stercoralis larvae in APC. METHODS: A prospective laboratory-based study including all patients with at least one positive APC was performed. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 7 days. Clinical, analytical and parasitological features including results of the direct visualization of the stool (DV) after formalin-ether concentration and time-to-detection (TTD) of the larvae in APC were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 141 samples from 75 patients had a positive APC. In 49 of them (65.3%) three or more stool samples were processed for direct visualization (DV) and APC. Of these 49 patients, 8 (16.3%) were also diagnosed with DV and 41 (83.7%) were diagnosed only with APC. In 38 samples from 23 (30.7%) patients, the TTD was below 2 days, while in 27 samples from 13 (17.3%) patients, the larvae were detected on the 6th and 7th day. CONCLUSION: Direct visualization failed to detect S. stercoralis in most of the patients that were diagnosed with APC. Incubation periods below 2 and 5 days would miss an important percentage of infections. At least 7 days of incubation of the APC are required to detect presumably low-burden chronic infections in non-endemic countries.

Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus Post-Sternotomy Mediastinitis Following the Implementation of Universal Preoperative Nasal Decontamination With Mupirocin: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although presurgical nasal decontamination with mupirocin (NDM) has been advocated as a measure for preventing postsurgical mediastinitis (PSM) due to Staphylococcus aureus, this strategy is not universally recommended due to lack of robust supporting evidence. We aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative NDM in the annual incidence of S. aureus PSM at our institution. METHODS: An interrupted time-series analysis, with an autoregressive error model, was applied to our single-center cohort by comparing preintervention (1990-2003) and postintervention (2005-2018) periods. Logistic regression was performed to analyze risk factors for S. aureus PSM. RESULTS: 12 236 sternotomy procedures were analyzed (6370 [52.1%] and 5866 [47.9%] in the pre- and postintervention periods, respectively). The mean annual percentage adherence to NDM estimated over the postintervention period was 90.2%. Only 4 of 127 total cases of S. aureus PSM occurred during the 14-year postintervention period (0.68/1000 sternotomies vs 19.31/1000 in the preintervention period; P < .0001). Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated a statistically significant annual reduction in S. aureus PSM of -9.85 cases per 1000 sternotomies (-13.17 to -6.5; P < .0001) in 2005, with a decreasing trend maintained over the following 5 years and an estimated relative reduction of 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.25-74.09%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the single independent risk factor for S. aureus PSM (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.72-7.93) and was equally distributed in patients undergoing sternotomy during pre- or postintervention periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests the implementation of preoperative NDM significantly reduces the incidence of S. aureus PSM.

Tocilizumab for the treatment of adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: A single-center cohort study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to a massive cytokine release. The use of the anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) has been proposed in this hyperinflammatory phase, although supporting evidence is limited. We retrospectively analyzed 88 consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia that received at least one dose of intravenous TCZ in our institution between 16 and 27 March 2020. Clinical status from day 0 (first TCZ dose) through day 14 was assessed by a 6-point ordinal scale. The primary outcome was clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on the 6-point scale) by day 7. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement by day 14 and dynamics of vital signs and laboratory values. Rates of clinical improvement by days 7 and 14 were 44.3% (39/88) and 73.9% (65/88). Previous or concomitant receipt of subcutaneous interferon-ß (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.94; P = .041) and serum lactate dehydrogenase more than 450 U/L at day 0 (aOR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-0.99; P = .048) were negatively associated with clinical improvement by day 7. All-cause mortality was 6.8% (6/88). Body temperature and respiratory and cardiac rates significantly decreased by day 1 compared to day 0. Lymphocyte count and pulse oximetry oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio increased by days 3 and 5, whereas C-reactive protein levels dropped by day 2. There were no TCZ-attributable adverse events. In this observational single-center study, TCZ appeared to be useful and safe as immunomodulatory therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Incidence and clinical profiles of COVID-19 pneumonia in pregnant women: A single-centre cohort study from Spain.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the incidence and characteristics of COVID-19 pneumonia amongst pregnant women is scarce. METHODS: Single-centre experience with 32 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 5 to April 5, 2020 at Madrid, Spain. FINDINGS: COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed in 61·5% (32/52) women. Only 18·7% (6/32) had some underlying condition (mostly asthma). Supplemental oxygen therapy was required in 18 patients (56·3%), with high-flow requirements in six (18·7%). Eight patients (25·0%) fulfilled the criteria for acute distress respiratory syndrome. Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in two patients (6·2%). Tocilizumab was administered in five patients (15·6%). Delivery was precipitated due to COVID-19 in three women (9·4%). All the newborns had a favourable outcome, with no cases of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Severe cases of pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen were more likely to exhibit bilateral alveolar or interstitial infiltrates on chest X-ray (55·6% vs. 0·0%; P-value = 0·003) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels >10 mg/dL (33·0% vs. 0·0%; P-value = 0·05) at admission than those with no oxygen requirements. INTERPRETATION: Pregnant women with COVID-19 have a high risk of developing pneumonia, with a severe course in more than half of cases. The presence of bilateral kung infiltrates and elevated serum CRP at admission may identify women at-risk of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (COV20/00,181), Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality from COVID-19 in patients with haematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in haematological patients (HP) has not been comprehensively reported. METHODS: We analysed 39 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and haematological malignancies. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared to a matched control group of 53 non-cancer patients with COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess the risk factors associated with poor outcome. RESULTS: The most frequent haematological diseases were lymphoma (30%) and multiple myeloma (30%). Eighty-seven % HP developed moderate or severe disease. Patients with haematological malignancies had a significantly higher mortality rate compared to non-cancer patients (35.9% vs 13.2%; P = .003 (odds ratio 6.652). The worst outcome was observed in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. Only age >70 years and C reactive protein >10 mg/dl at admission were associated with higher risk of death (odds ratio 34.86, P = .003 and 13.56,P = .03). Persistent viral sheddind was detected in 5 HP. Active chemotherapy, viral load at diagnosis and COVID-19 therapy were not predictors of outcome. CONCLUSION: Mortality of COVID-19 is significantly higher in patients with haematological malignancies compared to non-cancer patients. The impact of persistent viral shedding must be considered in order to re-start therapies and maintain infectious control measures.

Executive summary of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) and the Spanish Society of Haematology and Haemotherapy (SEHH) on the management of febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies.

Febrile neutropenia is a very common complication in patients with hematological malignancies receiving chemotherapy, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria have become a therapeutic challenge in this high-risk patient population, since inadequate initial empirical treatment can seriously compromise prognosis. However, reducing antimicrobial exposure is one of the most significant cornerstones in the fight against resistance. The objective of these new guidelines is to update recommendations for the initial management of hematological patients who develop febrile neutropenia in this scenario of multidrug resistance. The two participating Societies (the Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica [Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology] and the Sociedad Española de Hematología y Hemoterapia [Spanish Society of Haematology and Haemotherapy]), designated a panel of experts in the field to provide evidence-based recommendations in response to common clinical questions. This document is primarily focused on bacterial infections. Other aspects related to opportunistic infections, such as those caused by fungi or other microorganisms, especially in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, are also touched upon.

Prevalence of submicroscopic malaria infection in immigrants living in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The importance of submicroscopic malaria infections in high-transmission areas could contribute to maintain the parasite cycle. Regarding non-endemic areas, its importance remains barely understood because parasitaemia in these afebrile patients is usually below the detection limits for microscopy, hence molecular techniques are often needed for its diagnosis. In addition to this, the lack of standardized protocols for the screening of submicroscopic malaria in immigrants from endemic areas may underestimate the infection with Plasmodium spp. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of submicroscopic malaria in afebrile immigrants living in a non-endemic area. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentre study was conducted. Afebrile immigrants were included, microscopic observation of Giemsa-stained thin and thick blood smears, and two different molecular techniques detecting Plasmodium spp. were performed. Patients with submicroscopic malaria were defined as patients with negative blood smears and detection of DNA of Plasmodium spp. with one or both molecular techniques. Demographic, clinical, analytical and microbiological features were recorded and univariate analysis by subgroups was carried out with STATA v15. RESULTS: A total of 244 afebrile immigrants were included in the study. Of them, 14 had a submicroscopic malaria infection, yielding a prevalence of 5.7% (95% confidence interval 3.45-9.40). In 71.4% of the positive PCR/negative microscopy cases, Plasmodium falciparum alone was the main detected species (10 out of the 14 patients) and in 4 cases (28.6%) Plasmodium vivax or Plasmodium ovale were detected. One patient had a mixed infection including three different species. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of submicroscopic malaria in afebrile immigrants was similar to that previously described in Spain. Plasmodium vivax and P. ovale were detected in almost a third of the submicroscopic infections. Screening protocols for afebrile immigrants with molecular techniques could be useful for a proper management of these patients.