Does selective digestive decontamination (SDD) increase antibiotic resistance? Long-term comparison of two intensive care units (with and without SDD) of the same tertiary hospital.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to to compare the antimicrobial resistance rate and its relationship with the antibiotic consumption in two separate Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of the same hospital, one with and other without selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in the two ICUs of the Araba University Hospital. Trauma and neurosurgical patients are admitted to the SDD-ICU, and general digestive surgery patients go to the no SDD-ICU. From 2014 to 2018 we analyzed the number of isolates, and the bacterial resistance trends of 47 antimicrobial-microorganism combinations. Additionally, antimicrobial consumption was estimated in both ICUs. Resistance rates were also compared with those reported in ENVIN-HELICS Spanish national registry. RESULTS: In the ICU with SDD protocol, there was a significant decrease in the resistance of E. coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and in the resistance of E. faecalis to high concentration of gentamycin and high concentration of streptomycin. A significant increase of resistance of Staphylococcus coagulasa negative (CoNS) to linezolid in the no SDD-ICU was also detected. Overall, the level of resistance in the SDD-ICU was lower or of the same order than in the ICU without SDD and that reported in the Spanish national registry. CONCLUSIONS: SDD had neither a clinically relevant impact on emergence and spread of resistance, nor in the overall systemic antimicrobial use. The patient type rather than the SDD protocol showed to condition the ecology and therefore, the resistance rate in the ICUs.

Antibiotic susceptibility trend before and after long-term use of selective digestive decontamination: a 16 year ecological study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare antimicrobial susceptibility rates in a Spanish ICU before and after the introduction of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and also to compare these with susceptibility data from other Spanish ICUs without SDD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in the ICU of the University Hospital of Alava, where SDD was implemented in 2002. The SDD protocol consisted of a 2% mixture of gentamicin, colistin and amphotericin B applied on the buccal mucosa and a suspension of the same drugs in the gastrointestinal tract; additionally, for the first 3 days, systemic ceftriaxone was administered. From 1998 to 2013 we analysed the susceptibility rates for 48 antimicrobial/organism combinations. Interrupted time series using a linear dynamic model with SDD as an intervention was used. Data from other ICUs were obtained from the ENVIN-HELICS national registry. RESULTS: Only amoxicillin/clavulanic acid against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, and a high concentration of gentamicin against Enterococcus faecalis, resulted in a significant decrease in the susceptibility rate after the implementation of SDD, with a drop of 20%, 27% and 32%, respectively. Compared with other Spanish ICUs without SDD, the susceptibility rate was higher in the ICU of our hospital in most cases. When it was lower, differences were <10%, except for a high concentration of streptomycin against Enterococcus faecium, for which the difference was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: No relevant changes in the overall susceptibility rate after the implementation of SDD were detected. Susceptibility rates were not lower than those in the Spanish ICUs without SDD.