Comparison of three different minimally invasive intramedullary screw for proximal phalanx fractures. A biomechanical study. / Comparación de tres técnicas de tornillo endomedular mínimamente invasivo para fracturas de falange proximal. Estudio biomecánico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Phalangeal fractures are the most common hand fractures. In the last years, intramedullary compression screw (IMHCS) for instable transverse or short oblique proximal P1 fractures have been described. Although both anterograde (intraarticular or trans-articular) and retrograde IMHCS techniques have shown good results, no comparison between anterograde and retrograde screw in P1 fractures has been published. We sought to determine stability with retrograde IMHCS and anterograde IMHCS, both trans-articular and intra-articular technique, in a cadaveric transverse proximal P1 fracture model, at two different levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a biomechanical study in 30 fresh-frozen human cadaveric P1 fracture model. Fracture was performed at 9-mm from the metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joint in 15 specimens, whereas it was done at 15 mm in the other 15. In turn, in each group, five fractures were stabilized with an anterograde intra-articular IMHCS, five with anterograde trans-articular IMHCS and other five with retrograde IMHCS. RESULTS: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in 9-mm P1 fractures (both trans- and intra-articular technique, 62.74 N and 70.86 N, respectively) was found to be more stable than retrograde IMHCS one (32.72 N) (p = 0.022). Otherwise, retrograde IMHCS fixation was found to be more stable in more distal P1 fractures (90.52 N retrograde vs. 57.64 N trans-articular vs. 42.92 N intra-articular; p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in proximal transverse P1 bone cut in a cadaveric model provides more stability than retrograde IMHCS, while retrograde screw provides more stability when the bone cut is located more distal.

[Translated article] Comparison of three different minimally invasive intramedullary screw for proximal phalanx fractures. A biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Phalangeal fractures are the most common hand fractures. In the last years, intramedullary compression screw (IMHCS) for instable transverse or short oblique proximal P1 fractures have been described. Although both anterograde (intraarticular or trans-articular) and retrograde IMHCS techniques have shown good results, no comparison between anterograde and retrograde screw in P1 fractures has been published. We sought to determine stability with retrograde IMHCS and anterograde IMHCS, both trans-articular and intra-articular technique, in a cadaveric transverse proximal P1 fracture model, at two different levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a biomechanical study in 30 fresh-frozen human cadaveric P1 fracture model. Fracture was performed at 9-mm from the metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joint in 15 specimens, whereas it was done at 15mm in the other 15. In turn, in each group, five fractures were stabilised with an anterograde intra-articular IMHCS, five with anterograde trans-articular IMHCS and other five with retrograde IMHCS. RESULTS: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in 9-mm P1 fractures (both trans- and intra-articular technique, 62.74N and 70.86N, respectively) was found to be more stable than retrograde IMHCS one (32.72N) (p=0.022). Otherwise, retrograde IMHCS fixation was found to be more stable in more distal P1 fractures (90.52N retrograde vs. 57.64N trans-articular vs. 42.92N intra-articular; p=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in proximal transverse P1 bone cut in a cadaveric model provides more stability than retrograde IMHCS, while retrograde screw provides more stability when the bone cut is located more distal.

Wrist kinetics after scaphoidectomy.

BACKGROUND: The scaphoid cannot be excised without generating substantial carpal dysfunction. The extent and nature of such a destabilizing procedure, however, has never been properly studied in the laboratory. METHODS: We used a six-degrees-of-freedom motion tracking device to quantify the changes in carpal alignment produced by isometric simultaneous loading of five wrist motor tendons in 12 fresh normal cadaver arms, before and after excising the entire scaphoid. FINDINGS: In the intact wrist, tendon loading consistently extended and supinated the capitate while flexing the triquetrum. After scaphoidectomy, the opposite rotations were always found: the capitate collapsed into flexion and pronation, whereas the triquetrum migrated proximally, while extending and radial deviating. All these changes were statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: Unless it is supplemented by some sort of midcarpal stabilization, scaphoidectomy alone is much too aggressive as a procedure to be considered a treatment option for wrist osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Laboratory study. Not applicable.

[Muscular control of scapholunate instability. An experimental study]. / Control muscular de la inestabilidad escafolunar. Estudio experimental.

PURPOSE: As long as the neuromuscular stabilizers are intact, a lesion of the scapholunate ligament may or may not progress to a carpal instability. The mechanisms by which the muscles compensate this defect are not very well known. We designed an experimental study with the aim of clarifying these mechanisms. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Using 10 fresh wrists, with no pre-existing lesions, we studied the movements of the scaphoid, triquetrum and capitate produced by the isometrical loading of the muscles which move the wrist, each of them isolated or combined, before and after cutting off the scapholunate ligaments. To do this, we placed sensors in each of these bones and used the Fastrack system to record these movements. RESULTS: The simultaneous loading of the muscles of the wrist produce rotational movements in flexion and supination of the proximal carpal row. After cutting off the scapholunate ligaments, the scaphoid rotates in pronation and flexion, while the triquetrum rotates in pronation and extension. In this situation of a scapholunate lesion, the muscles that worsen the carpal dexasation are the extensor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi ulnaris. On the other hand, the isolated loading of the radial muscles reduce the scapholunate diastasis, thus improving the carpal alignment. CONCLUSION: In dynamic scapholunate instabilities, isometric contraction of the ulnar carpal muscles must be avoided, as it promotes the scapholunate diastasis. The rest of the muscles have the opposite effect, stabilizing the carpus when primary stabilizers have failed.

[Carpal dynamic stability mechanisms. Experimental study]. / Mecanismos de estabilización dinámica del carpo. Estudio experimental.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, experimentally in cadavers, the effect of the motor muscles in the wrist in the kinetic behaviour of the carpal, under axial load, and the wrist in a neutral position. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The changes in the spatial orientation of the carpal bones were recorded with a movement trajectory gauge that functions with electromagnetic fields. A total of 30 fresh cadaver wrists were used, in which the principal motor tendons were isolated and subjected to loads proportional to the area of the physiological section of each muscle. The experiment was performed under isometric load conditions of all the tendons, and separately from each tendon. RESULTS: The simultaneous load of all the tendons studied caused a three-dimensional change of the carpal bones. The flexor carpi radialis led to supination of the scaphoids and pronation of the pyramidal. Conversely, the isolated load of the flexor carpi ulnaris, abductor pollicis longus and the extensor carpi radialis longus, caused a supination movement of the 2 carpal rows. Only the extensor carpi ulnaris led to a marked pronation of the carpal. COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The forearm muscles, as well as the movements of the wrist, cause pronation/supination/supination, flexion/extension and radial/cubital inclination movements. It is proposed that the most important movements in the dynamic stabilisation of the carpal are the intercarpal pronation and supination movements provoked by these muscles. Depending on the carpal injury mechanism or instability, the stimulating of one muscle group or the other may be beneficial.