Immune cell populations in the tumour environment following calcium electropora-tion for cutaneous metastasis: a histopathological study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calcium electroporation (CaEP) involves injecting calcium into tumour tissues and using electrical pulses to create membrane pores that induce cell death. This study assesses resultant immune responses and histopathological changes in patients with cutaneous metastases. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aimed cohort comprised 24 patients with metastases exceeding 5 mm. Tumours were treated once with CaEP (day 0) or twice (day 28). Biopsies were performed on days 0 and 2, with additional samples on days 7, 28, 30, 35, 60, and 90 if multiple tumours were treated. The primary endpoint was the change in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) two days post-treatment, with secondary endpoints evaluating local and systemic immune responses via histopathological analysis of immune markers, necrosis, and inflammation. RESULTS: Seventeen patients, with metastases primarily from breast cancer (14 patients), but also lung cancer (1), melanoma (1), and urothelial cancer (1), completed the study. Of the 49 lesions treated, no significant changes in TIL count or PD-L1 expression were observed. However, there was substantial necrosis and a decrease in FOXP3-expression (p = 0.0025) noted, with a slight increase in CD4+ cells but no changes in CD3, CD8, or CD20 expressions. Notably, four patients showed reduced tumour invasiveness, including one case of an abscopal response. INTERPRETATION: This exploratory study indicates that CaEP can be an effective anti-tumour therapy potentially enhancing immunity. Significant necrosis and decreased regulatory lymphocytes were observed, although TIL count remained unchanged. Several patients exhibited clinical signs of immune response following treatment.

Neo-train: study protocol and feasibility results for a two-arm randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of supervised exercise during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation with exercise interventions during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is effective in reducing physical and psychosocial chemotherapy-related adverse events in patients with cancer. In preclinical studies, data also support a growth inhibitory effect of aerobic exercise on the tumour microenvironment with possible improved chemotherapy delivery but evidence in human patients is limited. The aim of the study here described is to investigate if supervised exercise with high-intensity aerobic and resistance training during NACT can improve tumour reduction in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: This parallel two-armed randomized controlled trial is planned to include 120 women aged ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer starting standard NACT at a university hospital in Denmark (a total of 90 participants needed according to the power calculation and allowing 25% (n = 30) dropout). The participants will be randomized to usual care or supervised exercise consisting of high-intensity interval training on a stationary exercise bike and machine-based progressive resistance training offered three times a week for 24 weeks during NACT, and screening-based advice to seek counselling in case of moderate-severe psychological distress (Neo-Train program). The primary outcome is tumour size change (maximum diameter of the largest lesion in millimetre) measured by magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery. Secondary outcomes include clinical/pathological, physical and patient-reported measures such as relative dose intensity of NACT, hospital admissions, body composition, physical fitness, muscle strength, health-related quality of life, general anxiety, depression, and biological measures such as intratumoural vascularity, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating tumour DNA and blood chemistry. Outcomes will be measured at baseline (one week before to 1-2 weeks after starting NACT), during NACT (approximately week 7, 13 and 19), pre-surgery (approximately week 21-29), at surgery (approximately week 21-30) and 3 months post-surgery (approximately 33-42 weeks from baseline). DISCUSSION: This study will provide novel and important data on the potential benefits of supervised aerobic and resistance exercise concomitant to NACT on tumour response and the tumour microenvironment in patients with breast cancer, with potential importance for survival and risk of recurrence. If effective, our study may help increase focus of exercise as an active part of the neoadjuvant treatment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04623554) on November 10, 2020.

Patient-Related Characteristics Associated with Treatment Modifications and Suboptimal Relative Dose Intensity of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer-A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Reduced relative dose intensity (RDI) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with breast cancer may compromise treatment outcome and survival. We examined patient-related characteristics associated with treatment modifications and suboptimal RDI and tumour response in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: In this observational study, electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively for female patients with breast cancer scheduled for NACT at a university hospital in Denmark between 2017 and 2019. The RDI (ratio of delivered dose intensity in relation to standard dose intensity) was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined associations of sociodemographics, general health and clinical cancer characteristics with dose reductions, dose delays, discontinuation of NACT and suboptimal RDI < 85%. RESULTS: Among 122 included patients, 43%, 42% and 28% experienced dose reductions, dose delays ≥3 days and discontinuation, respectively. A total of 25% received an RDI < 85%. Comorbidity, taking long-term medications and being overweight were statistically significantly associated with treatment modifications, while age ≥ 65 years and comorbidity were associated with RDI < 85%. Around one third of all patients had radiologic (36%) or pathologic (35%) complete tumour response, with no statistically significant differences by RDI < or ≥85% irrespective of breast cancer subtype. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients had RDI ≥85%, still one out of four patients received an RDI < 85%. Further investigations of possible supportive care initiatives to improve patients' treatment tolerability are needed, particularly among subgroups of older age or with comorbidity.