Severity of initial stent angulation predicts reintervention after successful palliative enteral stenting for malignant luminal obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recurrent stent obstruction necessitating reintervention is problematic and incompletely understood. The aim of the present study was to identify factor(s) predisposing to reintervention. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients (n = 117) referred to a single major endoscopic referral centre for palliative enteral stenting from 1999 to 2006. Twelve were excluded due to inadequate follow-up data (n = 7) or initial radiographic documentation (n = 5). A total of 105 patients (gastroduodenal n = 57, colonic n = 48) were therefore analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was recurrent obstruction necessitating reintervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis of potential factors predisposing to reintervention, including stent angulation (mild [<15°], moderate [15°-90°], severe [>90°]) was completed for 98 patients (technically successful enteral stenting). RESULTS: Technical and clinical success were achieved in 98 of 105 (93.3%) and 92 of 98 (93.9%) cases, respectively. Post-stenting median survival was 97.5 days (range 3-1054). Eighteen patients (18.4%) required reintervention for stent obstruction at a median time to reintervention of 85 days (range 7-481). Increased stent angulation (severe vs mild hazard ratio 6.73 (95% confidence interval 1.59-27.59), P = 0.009) was the only statistically significant factor in multivariate analysis predicting reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitation as a retrospective review, this study found that reintervention for stent obstruction is necessary in almost one in five cases, and increasing severity of stent angulation is the most important risk factor.

Minor papilla sphincterotomy for pancreatitis due to pancreas divisum.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas divisum (PD) is the commonest congenital pancreatic abnormality and is implicated as a cause of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP). We report our experience in minor papilla sphincterotomy (MPS) for this condition. Studies published at present have not examined MPS as the primary treatment method in a homogenous (i.e. only those with ARP) patient group. METHODS: Patients with PD and ARP were identified from an endoscopic database. Treatment protocol consisted of minor papilla guidewire cannulation and sphincterotomy with either sphincterotome over the wire or needle knife over pancreatic stent. A 5-Fr stent was placed for 1 week. Adjunctive therapy was carried out as required. Follow-up data was collected by interview with the patient and referring doctors and review of the medical record. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent MPS for PD and ARP (median age = 33 years, range 9-77 years, men = 14). Median number of procedures to achieve cannulation and MPS was 1 (range 1-3). Complications encountered were pancreatitis (n = 2) and pain (n = 3). MPS restenosis occurred in 2. Adjuvant therapy was required in 14: stricture dilatation (n = 9), stone extraction (n = 7) and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (n = 6). Complete stone clearance was achieved in 7/7. Median follow up was 38 months (range 4-67 months). Median total number of pancreatitis episodes and hospitalizations pre-MPS were 4 and 2, respectively (range 1-20 and 0-5, respectively). Post-MPS these were reduced to 0 and 0, respectively (range 0-8 and 0-4; P = 0.0007 and P = 0.0003), with complete abolition of episodes in 13 patients. CONCLUSION: MPS in association with other endoscopic therapies imparts a significant clinical benefit to patients with ARP and PD. Complete clinical resolution occurs in the majority. Treatment is safe, and the response is durable.