Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: NRG Oncology/GOG Study 279.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery. METHODS: Patients enrolled in a single-arm phase II study. Pretreatment inguinal-femoral nodal assessment was performed. Sixty-four Gy IMRT was prescribed to the vulva, with 50-64 Gy delivered to the groins/low pelvis. Radiation therapy (RT) plans were quality-reviewed pretreatment. C 40 mg/m2 and G 50 mg/m2 were administered once per week throughout IMRT. Complete pathologic response (CPR) was the primary end point. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients enrolled, of which 52 were evaluable. The median age was 58 years (range, 25-58), and 94% were White. Forty (77%) had stage II or III disease, and all had squamous histology. A median of six chemotherapy cycles (range, 1-8) were received. Eighty-five percent of RT plans were quality-reviewed with 100% compliance to protocol. Seven patients came off trial because of toxicity or patient withdrawal. Of 52 patients available for pathologic assessment, 38 (73% [90% CI, 61 to 83]) achieved CPR. No pelvic exenterations were performed. With a median follow-up of 51 months, the 12-month PFS was 74% (90% CI, 62.2 to 82.7) and the 24-month OS was 70% (90% CI, 57 to 79). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hematologic toxicity and radiation dermatitis. There was one grade 5 event unlikely related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Weekly C and G concurrent with IMRT sufficiently improved CPR in women with locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical resection.

Ovarian Cancer Risk-Reduction and Screening in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Objective: To determine the utilization of risk-reducing strategies and screening protocols for ovarian cancer in female BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods: This study was a sub-analysis of female participants from a larger multicenter, cross-sectional survey of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers unaffected by cancer. The questionnaire was administered electronically via email at four institutions located in the northeast United States. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Results: The survey was completed by 104 female BRCA mutation carriers. BRCA subtypes included 54.3% BRCA2, 41.0% BRCA1, and 2.9% both. The age at which patients underwent genetic testing varied 21.2% were 18-24 years, 25.0% were 25-34 years, 29.8% were 35-44 years, and 24.0% were 45 years or older. Nearly, all respondents (97.1%) reported that a provider had discussed risk-reducing surgeries. Of the 79 females who underwent genetic testing before 45 years of age, 53.2% reported that a health care provider recommended taking combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) to reduce their risk of ovarian cancer, and, of these women, 88.1% chose to use them. COCs were offered at higher rates among women who were younger at the age of genetic testing (18-24: 86%, 25-34: 62%, 35-44: 23%; p < 0.0001). Approximately half (55.8%) of the respondents reported having been offered increased screening for possible early detection of ovarian cancer, of which 81.0% chose to undergo screening. The majority utilized a combination of transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 measurements. There were no differences observed in screening utilization based on BRCA mutation type. Conclusion: In our cohort of female BRCA mutation carriers, risk-reducing surgery was offered to almost all women, whereas only half were offered risk-reducing medication and/or increased screening. Further investigation is needed to identify barriers to the utilization of risk-reducing strategies among this high-risk population.

Barriers to hormone therapy following prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify barriers to hormone therapy (HT) use among women with BRCA1/2 mutations after prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). METHODS: A cross-sectional, electronic survey was conducted of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers at Women and Infants Hospital, Yale Medical Center, Hartford Healthcare, and Maine Medical Center. This study was a subanalysis of a subset of female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who had undergone a prophylactic BSO. Data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test or t test. RESULTS: We performed a subanalysis of 60 BRCA mutation carriers who underwent a prophylactic BSO. Only 24 women (40%) reported ever using HT. HT use was higher in women who underwent their prophylactic BSO at age younger than 45 years (51% vs. 25%, P = 0.06). Among all women who had a prophylactic BSO, the majority (73%) reported that a provider talked to them about using HT. Two thirds reported having seen contradictory information in the media about long-term consequences of HT. Seventy percent listed their provider as the primary influence in their decision to start HT. The most common reasons for not starting HT included it not being recommended by their physician (46%) and that it was not necessary (37%). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA mutation carriers frequently undergo prophylactic BSO at young ages, and less than half report using HT. This study highlights barriers to HT use, such as patient fears and physician discouragement, and identifies potential areas to improve educational efforts.

Endometrial Cancer Surgery With or Without Concomitant Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life (QOL) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or early-stage endometrial cancer and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who chose to have concomitant surgery with cancer surgery alone. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted across eight U.S. sites. Potentially eligible patients were screened for SUI symptoms. Those who screened positive were offered referral to urogynecology and incontinence treatment, including concomitant surgery. Participants were categorized into two groups: 1) concomitant cancer and SUI surgery or 2) cancer surgery alone. The primary outcome was cancer-related QOL as measured by the FACT-En (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial) (range 0-100; higher score indicates better QOL). The FACT-En and questionnaires assessing urinary symptom-specific severity and effects were assessed before surgery and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Adjusted median regression accounting for clustering was used to examine the relationship between SUI treatment group and FACT-En scores. RESULTS: Of 1,322 (53.1%) patients, 702 screened positive for SUI with 532 analyzed; 110 (21%) chose concomitant cancer and SUI surgery, and 422 (79%) chose cancer surgery alone. FACT-En scores increased for both the concomitant SUI surgery and cancer surgery-only groups from the preoperative to the postoperative period. After adjustment for timepoint and preoperative covariates, the median change in FACT-En score (postoperative-preoperative) was 1.2 points higher (95% CI -1.3 to 3.6) for the concomitant SUI surgery group compared with the cancer surgery-only group across the postoperative period. Median time until surgery (22 days vs 16 days; P <.001), estimated blood loss (150 mL vs 72.5 mL; P <.001), and operative time (185.5 minutes vs 152 minutes; P <.001) were all greater for the concomitant cancer and SUI surgery group compared with the cancer-only group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concomitant surgery did not result in improved QOL compared with cancer surgery alone for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and patients with early-stage endometrial cancer with SUI. However, FACT-En scores were improved in both groups.

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of vagina: Report of a unique case with literature review.

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of vagina is extremely rare. The association between this tumor and high-risk HPV infection is unclear. To our knowledge, HPV status has been reported in only 3 previous cases of SCC of vagina. Herein, we present a unique case of vaginal small cell carcinoma with discordant HPV testing results between vaginal and cervical samples. We also review and discuss findings from previously reported cases of small cell carcinoma of vagina.

Molecular markers in uterine serous cancer: Correlation between endometrial biopsy and hysterectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the correlation of molecular biomarkers between biopsy and final pathology specimens in uterine serous cancer (USC) and to establish the overall prevalence of specific biomarkers among subjects with USC. METHODS: Twenty eight patients with a diagnosis of USC and sufficient biopsy and hysterectomy specimens were identified. IHC was used to measure the biomarker status of EGFR, phospho-AKT, ER, PR, Her2/neu, and PTEN in FFPE tissue. The presence or absence of individual biomarkers was then compared between a given subject's diagnostic biopsy specimen and final hysterectomy specimen. RESULTS: In the cohort identified, average age was 72 and average BMI was 29. 75% of patients had full lymphadenectomy performed. The average time from biopsy to surgery was 33 days (range 9-91 days). The distribution of disease was 61% stage I (n = 17), 14% stage II (n = 4), 22% stage III (n = 6) and 4% stage IV (n = 1). Biopsy and hysterectomy specimens agreed 67% of the time for phospho-AKT, 80% for ER, 73% for PR, 83% for EGFR, 100% for Her2/neu and 95% for PTEN loss. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of specific biomarkers correlated well between subjects' biopsy and hysterectomy specimens in women with USC as measured by a pathologist using routine clinical techniques. Preoperative diagnostic biopsy may be a useful tool for guiding neoadjuvant targeted therapy in USC.

Gynecologic Cancer Survivorship.

Survivorship care includes surveillance and prevention of cancer recurrence, addressing side effects of cancer and cancer treatment and coordination of follow-up care. This article reviews guidelines for surveillance of women with ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and vulvar cancer. It also reviews many of the long-term physical side effects of gynecologic cancer treatment including fatigue, neuropathy, lymphedema, cognitive dysfunction, sexual health concerns, menopausal symptoms, infertility, and economic stressors. Finally, survivorship care plans are reviewed as a tool for coordinating care for women with a history of gynecologic cancer.

While women await surgery for type I endometrial cancer, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate reduces tumor glandular cellularity.

BACKGROUND: Multiple population-level studies have demonstrated an adverse effect of long wait times to surgery on survival for women with endometrial cancer. Other retrospective and nonrandomized prospective studies have shown that preoperative administration of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate decreases tumor glandular cellularity, which may be a surrogate marker for clinically meaningful tumor response. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether preoperative injection with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate decreases tumor glandular cellularity when compared to placebo injection in women awaiting hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or type I endometrial cancer, and to determine whether depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection affects quality of life while waiting for surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 400-mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection or 0.9% saline injection at the preoperative visit. Patients with recent use of progesterone analogs were excluded. A sample size of 76 patients (38 per arm) was calculated to detect a 20% difference in decreased glandular cellularity between arms. Pathologic characteristics including the primary outcome, tumor glandular cellularity, from patients' diagnostic biopsies were reviewed by 2 dedicated gynecologic pathologists and compared to posttreatment hysterectomy specimens. On the night prior to surgery, patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial Survey (Version 4) to report quality of life while waiting for surgery. In comparing characteristics between the intervention and control groups, t tests were used for continuous variables, and χ2 or Fisher exact tests were used where appropriate for categorical data. RESULTS: From March 2015 through March 2016, 148 women were screened and 76 patients were enrolled. In all, 38 patients were randomized to and received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection and 38 were randomized to and received placebo injection. Demographics were similar between groups. Patients who received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection experienced a larger decrease in tumor glandular cellularity (mean change -64 [-31.8%] vs -14 [-5.5%] cells per quarter high-powered field in depot medroxyprogesterone acetate vs placebo groups, P = .002). This effect was most pronounced in women waiting ≥3 weeks for surgery. Several additional histologic and immunohistochemical markers of tumor differentiation and decreased cell proliferation were more pronounced in the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate group than in the placebo group. There were no significant differences in quality of life between groups on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial Survey. Only 5.3% of patients who were approached declined to participate due to concerns regarding an intramuscular injection. CONCLUSION: Administration of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate prior to surgery for type I endometrial cancers caused greater tumor effect than placebo injection. Injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was acceptable to and well tolerated by patients. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate may represent a meaningful bridge to surgery in women who can expect long wait times.

Tetrathiomolybdate mediates cisplatin-induced p38 signaling and EGFR degradation and enhances response to cisplatin therapy in gynecologic cancers.

Cisplatin and its analogs are among the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents against various types of cancer. It is known that cisplatin can activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which may provide a survival benefit in cancers. Tetrathiomolybdate (TM) is a potent anti-cancer and anti-angiogenic agent and has been investigated in a number of clinical trials for cancer. In this study, we explore the therapeutic potential of TM on cisplatin-mediated EGFR regulation. Our study shows that TM is not cytotoxic, but exerts an anti-proliferative effect in ECC-1 cells. However, TM treatment prior to cisplatin markedly improves cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. TM suppressed cisplatin-induced activation of EGFR while potentiating activation of p38; the activation of p38 signaling appeared to promote cisplatin-induced EGFR degradation. These results are in contrast to what we saw when cells were co-treated with cisplatin plus an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, where receptor activation was inhibited but receptor degradation was also blocked. Our current study is in agreement with previous findings that TM may have a therapeutic benefit by inhibiting EGFR activation. We furthermore provide evidence that TM may provide an additional benefit by potentiating p38 activation following cisplatin treatment, which may in turn promote receptor degradation by cisplatin.

Assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm for the conservative management of women with a pelvic mass.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of as an aid in the identification of women who can safely undergo conservative, non-surgical management. METHODS: All patients referred to the Program in Women's Oncology for surgery with a pelvic mass are evaluated at a prospective multidisciplinary tumor board (TB) where ROMA and imaging are used for management recommendations. This study evaluated women presented to TB with a pelvic mass between 2009 and 2013 who had either surgical or conservative management. RESULTS: Of the 498 patients assessed, 392 (79%) had benign disease, 22 (4%) had LMP tumors, 28 (6%) had stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), 36 (7%) had stage III-IV EOC and 20 (4%) had non-EOC. Using clinical assessment in conjunction with ROMA, the TB recommended observation in 188 (37.8%) women. All patients diagnosed with an invasive malignancy were recommended for surgery by the TB. In the 315 patients managed surgically, 212 were found to have benign disease and 84 women were diagnosed with an invasive malignancy. The sensitivity for the initial TB recommendations using ROMA in conjunction with clinical judgment for detecting malignancy was 100% with a specificity of 47.7% and a NPV of 100%. When including low malignant potential tumors the sensitivity was 99.1%. For stage I-IV EOC ROMA alone had a sensitivity of 95.3%. CONCLUSIONS: ROMA in conjunction with clinical assessment can safely identify women for conservative management.

HE4 expression is associated with hormonal elements and mediated by importin-dependent nuclear translocation.

Antiestrogens including tamoxifen and fulvestrant have been evaluated as chemotherapeutics for ovarian cancer, particularly in cases of platinum resistant disease. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is highly overexpressed in women with ovarian cancer and overexpression of HE4 has been found to correlate with platinum resistance. However, the role of HE4 in modulating responses to hormones and hormonal therapy has not been characterized in ovarian cancer. Here we demonstrate that 17ß-estradiol, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant induce nuclear and nucleolar translocation of HE4 and that HE4 overexpression induces resistance to antiestrogens. HE4 was found to interact with estrogen receptor-α (ER-α), and HE4 overexpression resulted in ER-α downregulation in vitro and in human ovarian cancers. We identified a novel role for importin-4 in governing the nuclear transport of HE4. Treatment with ivermectin, an importin inhibitor, blocked HE4/importin-4 nuclear accumulation and sensitized HE4-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells to fulvestrant and tamoxifen.

Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine if BRCA mutation status changes surgical decision making in women who undergo genetic testing after the diagnosis of breast cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of breast cancer patients who had BRCA mutation testing performed prior to surgery. We compared surgical choice and change in surgical choice in women who tested positive for a BRCA mutation with those who tested negative. Surgery was considered the most definitive surgery within a year of diagnosis. Other data collected included age, race, stage, histology, receptor status, adjuvant treatment, gravity, parity, and family history. Variables were compared by BRCA status using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred and two women were included. Thirty-two (10.6%) were identified as carrying a BRCA mutation. Most women had early stage disease (55.6% T1 lesions, 72.8% node negative); 55.6% had breast-conserving surgery, and the remaining had unilateral or bilateral mastectomy. BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to have both a personal history of breast cancer (RR 2.74, 95% CI=1.08-6.98) and hormone receptor-negative tumors (56.0% vs. 26.2%, p=0.002). BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to choose bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction (56.3% vs. 15.9%, p<0.0001); 71.9% of BRCA mutation carriers opted for a different surgery than what was initially planned by their surgeon as compared to 29% of mutation-negative patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA mutation testing strongly influences surgical decision making in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. For women who meet NCCN referral guidelines, genetic evaluation should be performed prior to surgical intervention.