A pilot study of chlorambucil in pre-treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients bearing germline BRCA or other DNA damage repair system variants.

BACKGORUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a malignancy with a grim prognosis and scarce personalized treatment options. Pathogenic variants of DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are emerging as molecular targets, as they confer a higher sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. This study aimed at assessing the activity of chlorambucil as salvage therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients bearing a germline pathogenetic variant or variant of uncertain significance on a DDR-related gene. METHODS: Platinum-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients harbouring a germline variant on a DDR gene received chlorambucil at a daily oral dose of 6 mg/m2 for 42 every 56 days for the first cycle and for 14 every 28 days for the following cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS-6). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondarily described. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled between December 2020 and September 2022. PFS-6 was 5%, median PFS and OS were 1.6 months and 3.0 months, respectively. Grade-3 adverse events were observed in 25% of patients, while no Grade-4 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Single agent chlorambucil did not show sufficient signal of activity to warrant its further investigation in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients bearing a DDR-related germline alteration.

Assessment of the Addition of Oxaliplatin to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis.

PURPOSE: The adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer (CC) is chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX). FP regimen plus OX (FPOX) may benefit in high-risk stage II CC. We performed a pooled analysis of pivotal MOSAIC and C-07 studies evaluating FPOX for the treatment of high-risk stage II CC according to prognostic factors, number of high-risk factors, and current clinicopathologic risk classification on the basis of T stage, tumor perforation, and number of lymph nodes examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand five hundred and ninety-five patients with stage II CC receiving FP or FPOX were pooled. The overall survival (OS) benefit of OX was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study. Three thousand and fifty-nine patients with stage III CC were used only for interaction tests between the allocated chemotherapy and stage. RESULTS: In the pooled analysis of stage II patients, independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were sex, age, perforation/obstruction, and tumor sidedness. There was a significant interaction in OS between stage and allocated chemotherapy with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 for stage II (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P = .813) and 0.82 for stage III (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92; P = .001; Pint = .073). There was no benefit from the addition of OX to FP for any of the prognostic factors. The number of high-risk factors tested was not predictive of OX benefit. According to the currently agreed clinicopathologic risk classification, no OS benefit of OX was observed, as HR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .349). CONCLUSION: No OS benefit of adjuvant OX was found in high-risk stage II CC, regardless of the definition used to characterize tumors as having a high risk for recurrence. Hence, our analysis suggests that OX should not be the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CC, even in high-risk patients.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC02): primary results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown encouraging activity in patients with treatment-refractory HER2-positive, RAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Dose optimisation and further antitumour assessments in patients with RAS mutations and those with previous anti-HER2 therapy are warranted. We aimed to evaluate two doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg) to establish the recommended dose in patients with pretreated HER2-positive, RAS wild-type or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: DESTINY-CRC02 was a multicentre, randomised, two-stage, two-arm, phase 2 study done in 53 research hospitals and medical centres in Australia, Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older or 20 years and older (depending on region) with pretreated pathologically documented, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic HER2-positive, and RAS wild-type or mutant colorectal cancer. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and have received previous chemotherapy, and anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, or anti-PD-L1 therapy, if clinically indicated. In stage 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a secure interactive response technology system, to receive 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan administered intravenously every 21 days. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, HER2 status, and RAS status. In stage 2, patients were assigned into the 5·4 mg/kg treatment group only. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review, assessed in all patients for whom treatment was assigned (full analysis set). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04744831, and is ongoing (not recruiting). FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2021, and March 29, 2022, 135 patients were centrally screened, 122 of whom were enrolled. In stage 1, 40 patients each were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg. In stage 2, an additional 42 patients were enrolled in the 5·4 mg/kg group. 64 (52%) participants were male and 58 (48%) were female. The median duration of follow-up was 8·9 months (IQR 6·7-10·5) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 10·3 months (5·9-12·7) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 37·8% (31/82 [95% CI 27·3-49·2]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 27·5% (11/40 [14·6-43·9]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. 34 (41%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 19 (49%) of 39 in the 6·4 mg/kg group had grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (13 [16%] of 83 patients), anaemia (six [7%]), nausea (six [7%]), and white blood cell count decreased (five [6%]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group; and were neutrophil count decreased (10 [26%] of 39 patients), anaemia (eight [21%]), platelet count decreased (four [10%]), and white blood cell count decreased (four [10%]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in 11 (13%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and six (15%) of 39 patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group; the most common in the 5·4 mg/kg group was nausea (three [4%] patients) and the most common in the 6·4 mg/kg group were fatigue (two [5%] patients), neutropenia (two [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [5%]). A drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event related to death occurred in one (1%) patient in the 5·4 mg/kg group (due to hepatic failure). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis events were observed in seven (8%) patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group (all grade 1 or 2) and in five (13%) patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group (four grade 1 or 2; one grade 5). INTERPRETATION: The promising antitumour activity and favourable safety profile support trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg as the optimal single-agent dose for patients with pretreated HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with RAS mutations, previous anti-HER2 therapy, or both. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

BRAF + EGFR +/- MEK inhibitors after immune checkpoint inhibitors in BRAF V600E mutated and deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the guideline endorsed first choice for patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) mCRC, however a significant proportion experience primary or secondary resistance. BRAF V600E mutated (BRAFm) and dMMR/MSI-H mCRC can be treated with BRAF + EGFR inhibitors but specific data on the efficacy after progression to ICIs are missing. METHODS: We collected consecutive patients with BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated from 2017 to 2024 with a combination of BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi, after disease progression on ICIs. A control cohort of BRAFm pMMR/MSS mCRC patients treated with encorafenib+cetuximab+/-binimetinib from 2nd line was used. RESULTS: dMMR/MSI-H (n = 50) BRAFm mCRC patients were more often > 70-year-old, with right-sided primary tumors, without liver but more lymphnode metastases than pMMR/MSS (n = 170). They were treated more frequently beyond 2nd line and 45 % were primary progressors to ICIs. Lower ORR (18 % versus 32 %, p = 0.09) and DCR (60 % versus 73 %, p = 0.11) was seen without reaching significance in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to pMMR/MSS patients. After a median follow-up of 14.04 months, no differences in PFS (median 5.13 versus 4.50 months, HR 0.83, 95 %CI: 0.57-1.20, p = 0.31) and OS (median 10.75 versus 9.11 months, HR 0.89, 95 %CI: 0.59-1.32, p = 0.55) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients benefit from BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi after progression under ICIs. Despite lower ORR and DCR, the outcome is not different from that observed in pMMR/MSS BRAFm CRC and is in line with the results of the BEACON registration trial.

Impact of metformin, statin, aspirin and insulin on the prognosis of uHCC patients receiving first line Lenvatinib or Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab.

Recently, in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting, the use of metformin has been associated to a trend toward worse response rate, overall survival and progression free survival in patients who received immunotherapy. The study population included individuals from both Eastern and Western regions with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC and receiving first line treatment with Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Lenvatinib. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional. For the analysis, patients were stratified based on their use of concomitant medication or not. At the time of database lock, 319 deaths were observed: 209 in the Lenvatinib cohort, 110 in the Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab cohort. In the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab arm, 50 (16.5%) patients were on chronic metformin use. At the univariate analysis for OS, patients who used metformin showed significantly shorter OS compared to patients who did not use metformin (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter OS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.1). At the univariate analysis for PFS, patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.0147). No differences were reported in terms of ORR and DCR between patients in metformin group and those in no-metformin group. In the Lenvatinib cohort, 65 (15%) patients were recorded to chronically use metformin. No statistically significant differences in terms of both OS and PFS were found between patients in metformin group and patients in no-metformin group. This analysis unveils a negative prognostic role associated with metformin use specifically within the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab group.

Suboptimal outcomes of sorafenib as a second-line treatment after atezolizumab-bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) for hepatocellular carcinoma will eventually experience disease progression. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are undergoing to identify second-line treatments. Where RCTs are unavailable or patients are non-eligible, sorafenib is often prescribed based on approval and reimbursement policies. However, evidence supporting this approach is minimal. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients who permanently discontinued AB. METHODS: The ARTE database prospectively collects patients treated with AB in a real-life setting. We analysed the outcome of patients who received sorafenib as second-line treatment. RESULTS: Amongst 213 patients, 130 (61.0 %) permanently discontinued AB. Of them, 54 received second- line treatments, and sorafenib was prescribed in 40 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 10.0 %. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 3.3 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7-3.9) and 6.9 months (95 % CI 2.7-11.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients progressing under AB, the efficacy of sorafenib on different outcomes is limited.

Predicting Benefit From FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patient outcomes may differ from randomized trial averages. We aimed to predict benefit from FOLFOXIRI versus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI), both plus bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: A Cox model with prespecified clinical, molecular, and laboratory variables was developed in 639 patients from the TRIBE2 trial for predicting 2-year mortality. Data from the CHARTA (n = 232), TRIBE1 (n = 504), and CAIRO5 (liver-only mCRC, n = 287) trials were used for external validation and heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) analysis. This involves categorizing patients into risk groups and assessing treatment effects across these groups. Performance was assessed by the C-index and calibration plots. The C-for-benefit was calculated to assess evidence for HTE. The c-for-benefit is specifically designed for HTE analysis. Like the commonly known c-statistic, it summarizes the discrimination of a model. Values over 0.5 indicate evidence for HTE. RESULTS: In TRIBE2, the overoptimism-corrected C-index was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.69). At external validation, the C-index was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.75), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.72), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.66), in CHARTA, TRIBE1, and CAIRO5, respectively. Calibration plots indicated slight underestimation of mortality. The c-for-benefit indicated evidence for HTE in CHARTA (0.56, 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.65), but not in TRIBE1 (0.49, 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.55) and CAIRO5 (0.40, 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.48). CONCLUSION: Although 2-year mortality could be reasonably estimated, the HTE analysis showed that clinically available variables did not reliably identify which patients with mCRC benefit from FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, both plus bevacizumab, across the three studies.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Upfront Esophagectomy Compared to Surgery after Neoadjuvant Treatments.

Background/Objectives: Despite the increased incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) in elderly people, there are no clear guidelines for its treatment in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients ≥ 75 years with resectable EC, receiving either upfront esophagectomy or neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: We retrospectively identified 127 patients with resectable EC ≥ 75 years who underwent esophagectomy between January 2000 and December 2022 at our Clinic in the University Hospital of Padova. The included patients were stratified into two groups: patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy (SURG group) and patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT group). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in OS (p = 0.7708), DFS (p = 0.7827) and cancer-related survival (p = 0.0827) between the SURG and the NAT group, except for the OS of EAC with stage III-IV, where the NAT group experienced a significant benefit in OS (p = 0.0263). When comparing the two groups, patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment experienced a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications (p = 0.0266). At univariate analysis, neoadjuvant therapy was the only variable strongly associated with postoperative morbidity (p = 0.026). Conclusions: Considering the unique characteristics of elderly patients, the choice of a multimodal approach should be tailored to each case in a multidisciplinary setting and balanced with a potential higher risk of postoperative complications, as well as potential toxicity related to chemoradiation and reduced life expectancy.

Upfront Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab With or Without Atezolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated and Overall Survival Results of the ATEZOTRIBE Study.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report 4-year results of the phase II randomized AtezoTRIBE study. Eligible patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received first-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/bevacizumab (control group, n = 73) or FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (experimental group, n = 145). We present overall survival (OS) and updated outcomes according to tumor immune-related biomarkers, both in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and the cohort of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. Median follow-up was 45.2 months (IQR, 42.6-49.2). In the ITT population, median OS was 33.0 and 27.2 months for experimental and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [80% CI, 0.61 to 0.98]; P = .084). An interaction effect between Immunoscore Immune-Checkpoint (IC) and treatment arm was observed (Pint, .089), with higher benefit from atezolizumab in the Immunoscore IC-high group. In the pMMR cohort (N = 202), median OS was 30.8 and 29.2 months for experimental and control groups, respectively (HR, 0.80 [80% CI, 0.63 to 1.02]; P = .117). Interactions between treatment group and tumor mutational burden (TMB) and Immunoscore IC were reported (Pint, .043 and .092, respectively), with patients bearing TMB-high and Immunoscore IC-high tumors deriving higher benefit from the addition of atezolizumab. First-line FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab plus atezolizumab improves OS in patients with mCRC. In the pMMR group, patients with Immunoscore IC-high and/or TMB-high tumors are identified as a subgroup of interest to further develop this treatment.

Prognostic analysis and outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as second or later-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) first-line therapy often consists of polychemotherapy regimens, but choosing a second-line therapy after disease progression, especially following first-line FOLFIRINOX, remains a clinical challenge. This study presents results from a large, multicenter, retrospective analysis of Italian patients with metastatic PC (mPC) treated with Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (AG) as second or later line of treatment. Main objective of the study is to identify prognostic factors that could inform treatment decisions. METHODS: The study included 160 mPC patients treated with AG in 17 Italian institutions. AG was administered according to labelling dose, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Variations in schedules, dose modifications, supportive measures, and response evaluation were determined by individual clinicians' practice. RESULTS: AG was well-tolerated and exhibited promising clinical activity. The overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 22.5% and 45.6%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 and 6.8 months, respectively. Among the patients who received AG as a second-line therapy (n = 111, 66.9%), median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Notably, in the 76 patients (68%) receiving AG after first-line FOLFIRINOX, an ORR of 19.7% and a DCR of 46.0% were observed, resulting in a median PFS of 3.5 and median OS of 5.7 months. The study identified specific clinical or laboratory parameters (LDH, NLR, fasting serum glucose, liver metastases, ECOG PS, and first-line PFS) as independent prognostic factors at multivariate level. These factors were used to create a prognostic nomogram that divided patients into three risk classes, helping to predict second-line OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest real-world population of mPC patients treated with AG as a second or later line of therapy. It supports the feasibility of this regimen following first-line FOLFIRINOX, particularly in patients with specific clinical and laboratory characteristics who derived prolonged benefit from first-line therapy.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. CONCLUSION: In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

The Prognostic Nutritional Index in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal cancers receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) status is the strongest predictive factor for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC). Primary resistance to ICIs is a relevant issue, but prognostic and predictive factors are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multinational, retrospective cohort of patients with MSI-H/dMMR mGC treated with ICIs without chemotherapy we collected baseline laboratory values to establish the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We evaluated the association between baseline PNI with the activity and efficacy of ICIs. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 31.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year PFS rate were not reached and 73.6 % in the PNI-high subgroup versus 6.3 months and 38.3 % in the PNI-low one (HR 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.61, p < .001). Median overall survival (OS) and 2-year OS rate were not reached and 81.9 % in the PNI-high subgroup versus 24.4 months and 50.5 % in the PNI-low one (HR 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.56, p < .001). In multivariable models, high PNI was associated with longer PFS and OS (HR 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.61, p <0.001 and 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.91, p = .031). CONCLUSIONS: High PNI is associated with longer PFS and OS, in patients with MSI-H mGC receiving ICIs. Patients with low baseline PNI may benefit from intensive therapeutic approaches.

Standardizing data collection in adjuvant colon cancer trials: A consensus project from the IDEA and ACCENT international consortia and national experts.

BACKGROUND: Despite contributions provided by the recent clinical trials, several issues and challenges still remain unsolved in adjuvant colon cancer (CC). Hence, further studies should be planned to better refine risk assessment as well as to establish the optimal treatment strategy in the adjuvant setting. However, it is necessary to request adequate, contemporary and relevant variables and report them homogeneously in order to bring maximal information when analyzing their prognostic value. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The project was devised to gain a consensus from experts engaged in the planning, accrual and analyses of stage II and III CC clinical trials, to identify mandatory and recommended baseline variables in order to i) harmonize future data collection worldwide in clinical trials dedicated to adjuvant treatment of CC; ii) propose guidance for Case Report Forms to be used for clinical trials in this setting. A total of 72 questions related to variables that should be reported and how to report them in adjuvant clinical trials were approved and then voted to reach a final consensus from panelists. RESULTS: Data items on patient-related factors, histopathological features, molecular profile, circulating biomarkers and blood analyses were analyzed and discussed by the whole expert panel. For each item, we report data supporting the acquired consensus and the relevant issues that were discussed. Nineteen items were deemed to be mandatory for resected stage III patients and 24 for resected stage II disease. In addition, 9 and 4 items were judged as recommended for stage III and II, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our opinion, these 28 variables should be used and uniformly reported in more comprehensive CRFs as research groups design future clinical trials in the field of adjuvant colon cancer.

Nivolumab plus relatlimab in patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II CheckMate 142 study.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, including nivolumab, have demonstrated long-term survival benefit in previously treated patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PD-1 and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) are distinct immune checkpoints that are often co-expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and contribute to tumor-mediated T-cell dysfunction. Relatlimab is a LAG-3 inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in combination with nivolumab in patients with melanoma. Here, we present the results from patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC treated with nivolumab plus relatlimab in the CheckMate 142 study. METHODS: In this open-label, phase II study, previously treated patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC received nivolumab 240 mg plus relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 50 previously treated patients received nivolumab plus relatlimab. With median follow-up of 47.4 (range 43.9-49.2) months, investigator-assessed ORR was 50% (95% CI 36% to 65%) and disease control rate was 70% (95% CI 55% to 82%). The median time to response per investigator was 2.8 (range 1.3-33.1) months, and median duration of response was 42.7 (range 2.8-47.0+) months. The median progression-free survival per investigator was 27.5 (95% CI 5.3 to 43.7) months with a progression-free survival rate at 3 years of 38%, and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 17.2 months to not estimable), with a 56% overall survival rate at 3 years. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (24%), asthenia (16%), and hypothyroidism (12%). Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 14% of patients, and TRAEs of any grade leading to discontinuation were observed in 8% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus relatlimab provided durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated in previously treated patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02060188.

Spotlight on New Hallmarks of Drug-Resistance towards Personalized Care for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest gynecological malignancy worldwide. Despite the latest advances, a major clinical issue in EOC is the disappointing prognosis related to chemoresistance in almost one-third of cases. Drug resistance relies on heterogeneous cancer stem cells (CSCs), endowed with tumor-initiating potential, leading to relapse. No biomarkers of chemoresistance have been validated yet. Recently, major signaling pathways, micro ribonucleic acids (miRNAs), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been advocated as putative biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for drug resistance. However, further investigation is mandatory before their routine implementation. In accordance with the increasing rate of therapeutic efforts in EOC, the need for biomarker-driven personalized therapies is growing. This review aims to discuss the emerging hallmarks of drug resistance with an in-depth insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms lacking so far. Finally, a glimpse of novel therapeutic avenues and future challenges will be provided.

International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape : Bertinoro Workshop, November 2022.

BACKGROUND: Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible. METHODS: A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement. RESULTS: The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a "dynamic" disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.

Gastric Carcinoma in Autoimmune Gastritis: A Histopathologic and Molecular Study.

Patients with autoimmune gastritis (AIG) have a 13-fold risk of developing type-1 neuroendocrine tumors, whereas the risk for gastric adenocarcinoma is still uncertain. Here we describe the clinicopathologic and molecular features of a series of gastric carcinomas (GC) arising in the context of AIG. A total of 26 AIG-associated GC specimens were collected from 4 Italian Institutions. Immunohistochemistry for MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CDX2, HER2, PD-L1, CLDN18, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and p53 and EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization were performed. Histologic and immunohistochemical features were jointly reviewed by 5 expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Next-generation sequencing analysis (TrueSight Oncology 500, Illumina) of 523 cancer-related genes was performed on 19 cases. Most tumors were diagnosed as pT1 (52%) and they were located in the corpus/fundus (58%) and associated with operative link for gastritis assessment stage II gastritis (80.8%), absence of parietal cells, complete intestinal metaplasia, and enterochromaffin-like-cell micronodular hyperplasia. Only 4 (15.4%) GCs were diagnosed during follow-up for AIG. The following histotypes were identified: 20 (77%) adenocarcinomas; 3 (11%) mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and 2 (8%) high-grade solid adenocarcinomas with focal neuroendocrine component, 1 (4%) adenocarcinoma with an amphicrine component. Overall, 7 cases (27%) showed MMR deficiency, 3 (12%) were positive (score 3+) for HER2, 6 (23%) were CLDN18 positive, and 11 (42%) had PD-L1 combined positive score ≥ 10. EBER was negative in all cases. Molecular analysis revealed 5/19 (26%) microsatellite instability (MSI) cases and 7 (37%) tumor mutational burden (TMB) high. The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (8/19, 42%), RNF43 (7/19, 37%), ERBB2 (7/19, 37% [2 amplified and 5 mutated cases]), ARID1A (6/19, 32%), and PIK3CA (4/19, 21%). In summary, AIG-associated GCs are often diagnosed at low stage in patients with longstanding misrecognized severe AIG; they often display a neuroendocrine component or differentiation, have relatively higher rates of MMR deficiency, and TMB high.