RESUMO
We investigated whether characterisation of full-length (f-)GADA responses could identify early insulin requirement in adult-onset diabetes. In 179 f-GADA positive participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, we assessed associations of truncated (t-)GADA positivity, f-GADA IgG subclasses, and f-GADA affinity with early insulin requirement (<5 years), type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1D GRS), and C-peptide. t-GADA positivity was lower in f-GADA positive without early insulin in comparison to f-GADA positive type 2 diabetes requiring insulin within 5 years, and type 1 diabetes (75% vs. 91% and 95% respectively, p<0.0001). t-GADA positivity (in those f-GADA positive) identified a group with a higher type 1 diabetes genetic susceptibility (mean T1D GRS 0.248 vs. 0.225, p=0.003), lower C-peptide (1156 pmol/L vs. 4289 pmol/L, p=1x10-7), and increased IA-2A positivity (23% vs. 6%, p=0.03). In survival analysis, t-GADA positivity was associated with early insulin requirement compared with those only positive for f-GADA, independently from age of diagnosis, f-GADA titre and duration of diabetes [adjusted HR 5.7 (95% CI 1.4, 23.5), p=0.017]. The testing of t-GADA in f-GADA positive individuals with type 2 diabetes identifies those who have genetic and clinical characteristics comparable to type 1 diabetes and stratifies those at higher risk of early insulin requirement.
RESUMO
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate characteristics of autoimmunity in individuals who have a type 2 diagnosis and are relatives of children with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Pre-diagnosis samples (median 17 months before onset) from relatives who were later diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were measured for autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase 65 (GADA), islet antigen-2 (IA-2A), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) and insulin (IAA) as well as the type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (GRS2). Associations between islet autoantibodies, insulin treatment and GRS2 were analysed using Fisher's exact and t-tests. RESULTS: Among 226 relatives (64% men; mean age at sampling 41 years; mean age 54 years at diagnosis), 32 (14%) were islet autoantibody-positive for at least one autoantibody more than a decade before diagnosis. Approximately half of these (n = 15) were treated with insulin. GADA-positivity was higher in insulin-treated relatives than in non-insulin-treated relatives (12/18 [67%] vs. 6/18 [33%], p < 0.001). IAA-positivity was observed in 13/32 (41%) of relatives with autoantibodies. GRS2 scores were increased in autoantibody-positive relatives (p = 0.032), but there was no clear evidence for a difference according to treatment (p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of measuring islet autoantibodies, including IAA, in relatives of people with type 1 diabetes to avoid misdiagnosis.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Ilhotas Pancreáticas , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Masculino , Feminino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/imunologia , Glutamato Descarboxilase/imunologia , Transportador 8 de Zinco/imunologia , Insulina/imunologia , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Família , Pré-Escolar , Predisposição Genética para DoençaRESUMO
Autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) are widely used in the prediction and classification of type 1 diabetes. GADA radiobinding assays (RBAs) using N-terminally truncated antigens offer improved specificity, but radioisotopes limit the high-throughput potential for population screening. Luciferase-based immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays are sensitive and specific alternatives to RBAs with the potential to improve risk stratification. The performance of assays using the Nanoluc luciferase (Nluc)-conjugated GAD65 constructs, Nluc-GAD65(96-585) and full length Nluc-GAD65(1-585), were evaluated in 434 well-characterized serum samples from patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes and first-degree relatives. Nonradioactive, high-throughput LIPS assays are quicker and require less serum than RBAs. Of 171 relatives previously tested single autoantibody positive for autoantibodies to full-length GAD65 by RBA but had not progressed to diabetes, fewer retested positive by LIPS using either truncated (n = 72) or full-length (n = 111) antigen. The Nluc-GAD65(96-585) truncation demonstrated the highest specificity in LIPS assays overall, but in contrast to RBA, N-terminus truncations did not result in a significant increase in disease-specificity compared with the full-length antigen. This suggests that binding of nonspecific antibodies is affected by the conformational changes resulting from addition of the Nluc antigen. Nluc-GAD65(96-585) LIPS assays offer low-blood-volume, high-specificity GADA tests for screening and diagnostics.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Glutamato Descarboxilase , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Autoanticorpos , Luciferases/genética , ImunoprecipitaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: C-peptide and islet autoantibodies are key type 1 diabetes biomarkers, typically requiring venous sampling, which limits their utility. We assessed transdermal capillary blood (TCB) collection as a practical alternative. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-one individuals (71 with type 1 diabetes, 20 control; individuals with type 1 diabetes: aged median 14.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 9.1-17.1], diabetes duration 4.0 years [1.5-7.7]; control individuals: 42.2 years [38.0-52.1]) underwent contemporaneous venous and TCB sampling for measurement of plasma C-peptide. Participants with type 1 diabetes also provided venous serum and plasma, and TCB plasma for measurement of autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase, islet antigen-2, and zinc transporter 8. The ability of TCB plasma to detect significant endogenous insulin secretion (venous C-peptide ≥200 pmol/L) was compared along with agreement in levels, using Bland-Altman. Venous serum was compared with venous and TCB plasma for detection of autoantibodies, using established thresholds. Acceptability was assessed by age-appropriate questionnaire. RESULTS: Transdermal sampling took a mean of 2.35 min (SD 1.49). Median sample volume was 50 µL (IQR 40-50) with 3 of 91 (3.3%) failures, and 13 of 88 (14.7%) <35 µL. TCB C-peptide showed good agreement with venous plasma (mean venous ln[C-peptide] - TCB ln[C-peptide] = 0.008, 95% CI [-0.23, 0.29], with 100% [36 of 36] sensitivity/100% [50 of 50] specificity to detect venous C-peptide ≥200 pmol/L). Where venous serum in multiple autoantibody positive TCB plasma agreed in 22 of 32 (sensitivity 69%), comparative specificity was 35 of 36 (97%). TCB was preferred to venous sampling (type 1 diabetes: 63% vs. 7%; 30% undecided). CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal capillary testing for C-peptide is a sensitive, specific, and acceptable alternative to venous sampling; TCB sampling for islet autoantibodies needs further assessment.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Idoso , Peptídeo C , Autoanticorpos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas , Biomarcadores , Glutamato DescarboxilaseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A) are thought to appear close to type 1 diabetes (T1D) onset and can identify high-risk multiple (≥2) autoantibody positive individuals. Radiobinding assays (RBA) are widely used for ZnT8A measurement but have limited sustainability. We sought to develop a novel, high-performance, non-radioactive luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay to replace RBA. METHODS: A custom dual C-terminal ZnT8 (aa268-369; R325/W325) heterodimeric antigen, tagged with a NanoluciferaseTM (Nluc-ZnT8) reporter, and LIPS assay was developed. Assay performance was evaluated by testing sera from new onset T1D (nâ =â 573), healthy schoolchildren (nâ =â 521), and selected first-degree relatives (FDRs) from the Bart's Oxford family study (nâ =â 617; 164 progressed to diabetes). RESULTS: In new-onset T1D, ZnT8A levels by LIPS strongly correlated with RBA (Spearman's râ =â 0.89; Pâ <â 0.0001), and positivity was highly concordant (94.3%). At a high specificity (95%), LIPS and RBA had comparable assay performance [LIPS pROC-AUC(95) 0.032 (95% CI: 0.029-0.036); RBA pROC-AUC(95) 0.031 (95% CI: 0.028-0.034); Pâ =â 0.376]. Overall, FDRs found positive by LIPS or RBA had a comparable 20-year diabetes risk (52.6% and 59.7%, respectively), but LIPS positivity further stratified T1D risk in FDRs positive for at least one other islet autoantibody detected by RBA (Pâ =â 0.0346). CONCLUSION: This novel, high-performance, cheaper, quicker, higher throughput, low blood volume Nluc-ZnT8 LIPS assay is a safe, non-radioactive alternative to RBA with enhanced sensitivity and ability to discriminate T1D progressors. This method offers an advanced approach to current strategies to screen the general population for T1D risk for immunotherapy trials and to reduce rates of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Transporte de Cátions , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Criança , Autoanticorpos , Transportador 8 de Zinco , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Lábio , Luciferases/metabolismo , ImunoprecipitaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Saliva is easily obtainable non-invasively and potentially suitable for detecting both current and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, but there is limited evidence on the utility of salivary antibody testing for community surveillance. METHODS: We established 6 ELISAs detecting IgA and IgG antibodies to whole SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, to its receptor binding domain region and to nucleocapsid protein in saliva. We evaluated diagnostic performance, and using paired saliva and serum samples, correlated mucosal and systemic antibody responses. The best-performing assays were field-tested in 20 household outbreaks. RESULTS: We demonstrate in test accuracy (N = 320), spike IgG (ROC AUC: 95.0%, 92.8-97.3%) and spike IgA (ROC AUC: 89.9%, 86.5-93.2%) assays to discriminate best between pre-pandemic and post COVID-19 saliva samples. Specificity was 100% in younger age groups (0-19 years) for spike IgA and IgG. However, sensitivity was low for the best-performing assay (spike IgG: 50.6%, 39.8-61.4%). Using machine learning, diagnostic performance was improved when a combination of tests was used. As expected, salivary IgA was poorly correlated with serum, indicating an oral mucosal response whereas salivary IgG responses were predictive of those in serum. When deployed to household outbreaks, antibody responses were heterogeneous but remained a reliable indicator of recent infection. Intriguingly, unvaccinated children without confirmed infection showed evidence of exposure almost exclusively through specific IgA responses. CONCLUSIONS: Through robust standardisation, evaluation and field-testing, this work provides a platform for further studies investigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission and mucosal immunity with the potential for expanding salivo-surveillance to other respiratory infections in hard-to-reach settings.
If a person has been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 they will produce specific proteins, called antibodies. These are present in the saliva and blood. Saliva is easier to obtain than blood, so we developed and evaluated six tests that detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in saliva in children and adults. Some tests detected antibodies to a particular protein made by SARS-CoV-2 called the spike protein, and these tests worked best. The most accurate results were obtained by using a combination of tests. Similar tests could also be developed to detect other respiratory infections which will enable easier identification of infected individuals.
RESUMO
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program (IASP) aims to improve the performance of immunoassays measuring autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes and the concordance of results across laboratories. IASP organises international workshops distributing anonymised serum samples to participating laboratories and centralises the collection and analysis of results. In this report, we describe the results of assays measuring IAA submitted to the IASP 2018 and 2020 workshops. METHODS: The IASP distributed uniquely coded sera from individuals with new-onset type 1 diabetes, multiple islet autoantibody-positive individuals, and diabetes-free blood donors in both 2018 and 2020. Serial dilutions of the anti-insulin mouse monoclonal antibody HUI-018 were also included. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), partial ROC-AUC at 95% specificity (pAUC95) and concordance of qualitative/quantitative results were compared across assays. RESULTS: Results from 45 IAA assays of seven different formats and from 37 IAA assays of six different formats were submitted to the IASP in 2018 and 2020, respectively. The median ROC-AUC was 0.736 (IQR 0.617-0.803) and 0.790 (IQR 0.730-0.836), while the median pAUC95 was 0.016 (IQR 0.004-0.021) and 0.023 (IQR 0.014-0.026) in the 2018 and 2020 workshops, respectively. Assays largely differed in AUC (IASP 2018 range 0.232-0.874; IASP 2020 range 0.379-0.924) and pAUC95 (IASP 2018 and IASP 2020 range 0-0.032). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Assay formats submitted to this study showed heterogeneous performance. Despite the high variability across laboratories, the in-house radiobinding assay (RBA) remains the gold standard for IAA measurement. However, novel non-radioactive IAA immunoassays showed a good performance and, if further improved, might be considered valid alternatives to RBAs.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Animais , Camundongos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Curva ROC , Anticorpos Anti-Insulina , Padrões de Referência , Glutamato DescarboxilaseRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Proteomic profiling can identify useful biomarkers. Monozygotic (MZ) twins discordant for a condition represent an ideal test population. We aimed to investigate and validate proteomic profiling in twins with type 1 diabetes and in other well-characterized cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A broad, multiplex analysis of 4,068 proteins in serum samples from MZ twins concordant (n = 43) and discordant (n = 27) for type 1 diabetes identified major differences that were subsequently validated by a trypsin(ogen) assay in MZ pairs concordant (n = 39) and discordant (n = 42) for type 1 diabetes, individuals at risk for (n = 195) and with (n = 990) type 1 diabetes, as well as individuals with non-insulin-requiring adult-onset diabetes diagnosed as either autoimmune (n = 96) or type 2 (n = 291). RESULTS: Proteomic analysis identified major differences between exocrine enzyme levels in discordant MZ twin pairs despite a strong correlation between twins, whether concordant or discordant for type 1 diabetes (P < 0.01 for both). In validation experiments, trypsin(ogen) levels were lower in twins with diabetes than in the co-twin without diabetes (P < 0.0001) and healthy control participants (P < 0.0001). In recently diagnosed participants, trypsin(ogen) levels were lower than in control participants across a broad age range. In at-risk relatives, levels <15 ng/mL were associated with an increased risk of progression (uncorrected P = 0.009). Multiple linear regression in recently diagnosed participants showed that trypsin(ogen) levels were associated with insulin dose and diabetic ketoacidosis, while age and BMI were confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 diabetes is associated with altered exocrine function, even before onset. Twin data suggest roles for genetic and nongenetically determined factors. Exocrine/endocrine interactions are important underinvestigated factors in type 1 diabetes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Tripsina , Proteômica , BiomarcadoresRESUMO
Low-volume antibody assays can be used to track SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in settings where active testing for virus is limited and remote sampling is optimal. We developed 12 ELISAs detecting total or antibody isotypes to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, spike protein or its receptor binding domain (RBD), 3 anti-RBD isotype specific luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays and a novel Spike-RBD bridging LIPS total-antibody assay. We utilized pre-pandemic (n=984) and confirmed/suspected recent COVID-19 sera taken pre-vaccination rollout in 2020 (n=269). Assays measuring total antibody discriminated best between pre-pandemic and COVID-19 sera and were selected for diagnostic evaluation. In the blind evaluation, two of these assays (Spike Pan ELISA and Spike-RBD Bridging LIPS assay) demonstrated >97% specificity and >92% sensitivity for samples from COVID-19 patients taken >21 days post symptom onset or PCR test. These assays offered better sensitivity for the detection of COVID-19 cases than a commercial assay which requires 100-fold larger serum volumes. This study demonstrates that low-volume in-house antibody assays can provide good diagnostic performance, and highlights the importance of using well-characterized samples and controls for all stages of assay development and evaluation. These cost-effective assays may be particularly useful for seroprevalence studies in low and middle-income countries.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Anticorpos Antivirais , Proteínas do Envelope Viral , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Glicoproteínas de MembranaRESUMO
AIMS: Some childhood type 1 diabetes cases are islet autoantibody negative at diagnosis. Potential explanations include misdiagnosis of genetic forms of diabetes or insufficient islet autoantibody testing. Many NHS laboratories offer combinations of three autoantibody markers. We sought to determine the benefit of testing for additional islet autoantibodies, including insulin (IAA) and tetraspanin 7 (TSPAN7A). METHODS: Radiobinding assays (RBAs) were used to test for four islet autoantibodies in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (n = 486; 54.1% male; median age 10.4 years [range 0.7-18.0]; median duration 1 day [range -183 to 14]). Islet autoantibody negative children were tested for TSPAN7A using a luminescence-based test. Where available, islet cell antibody (ICA) and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) data were considered. RESULTS: Using three autoantibody markers, 21/486 (4.3%) children were autoantibody negative. Testing for IAA classified a further 9/21 (42.9%) children as autoantibody positive. Of the remaining 12 (2.5%) autoantibody negative children, all were TPAN7A negative, seven were ICA negative and one was positive for the protective variant DQB1*0602. One was subsequently diagnosed with Maturity Onset of Diabetes in the Young, but follow-up was not available in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Using highly sensitive assays, testing for three autoantibodies fails to detect islet autoimmunity in approximately 1/20 children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Testing for IAA in children <5 years and GADA in those >10 years was the most effective strategy for detecting islet autoimmunity. The ability to test for all islet autoantibodies should inform clinical decisions and make screening for monogenic diabetes more cost-effective.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Ilhotas Pancreáticas , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Feminino , Insulina/metabolismo , Autoanticorpos , Glutamato Descarboxilase , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/metabolismo , BiomarcadoresRESUMO
Most screening programs to identify individuals at risk for type 1 diabetes have targeted relatives of people living with the disease to improve yield and feasibility. However, â¼90% of those who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a family history. Recent successes in disease-modifying therapies to impact the course of early-stage disease have ignited the consideration of the need for and feasibility of population screening to identify those at increased risk. Existing population screening programs rely on genetic or autoantibody screening, and these have yielded significant information about disease progression and approaches for timing for screening in clinical practice. At the March 2021 Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Steering Committee meeting, a session was held in which ongoing efforts for screening in the general population were discussed. This report reviews the background of these efforts and the details of those programs. Additionally, we present hurdles that need to be addressed for successful implementation of population screening and provide initial recommendations for individuals with positive screens so that standardized guidelines for monitoring and follow-up can be established.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Autoanticorpos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de RastreamentoRESUMO
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Slow progressors to type 1 diabetes are individuals positive for multiple pancreatic islet autoantibodies who have remained diabetes-free for at least 10 years; regulation of the autoimmune response is understudied in this group. Here, we profile CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in a small but well-characterised cohort of extreme slow progressors with a median age 43 (range 31-72 years), followed up for 18-32 years. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from slow progressors (n = 8), age- and sex-matched to healthy donors. One participant in this study was identified with a raised HbA1c at the time of assessment and subsequently diagnosed with diabetes; this donor was individually evaluated in the analysis of the data. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated, and to assess frequency, phenotype and function of Tregs in donors, multi-parameter flow cytometry and T cell suppression assays were performed. Unsupervised clustering analysis, using FlowSOM and CITRUS (cluster identification, characterization, and regression), was used to evaluate Treg phenotypes. RESULTS: Unsupervised clustering on memory CD4+ T cells from slow progressors showed an increased frequency of activated memory CD4+ Tregs, associated with increased expression of glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR), compared with matched healthy donors. One participant with a raised HbA1c at the time of assessment had a different Treg profile compared with both slow progressors and matched controls. Functional assays demonstrated that Treg-mediated suppression of CD4+ effector T cells from slow progressors was significantly impaired, compared with healthy donors. However, effector CD4+ T cells from slow progressors were more responsive to Treg suppression compared with healthy donors, demonstrated by increased suppression of CD25 and CD134 expression on effector CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: We conclude that activated memory CD4+ Tregs from slow progressors are expanded and enriched for GITR expression, highlighting the need for further study of Treg heterogeneity in individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes.
Assuntos
Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Células T de Memória/imunologia , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Seguimentos , Proteína Relacionada a TNFR Induzida por Glucocorticoide/metabolismo , Humanos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The presence of islet autoantibodies remains a reliable biomarker to identify individuals at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes. As such, these autoantibodies play a pivotal role in understanding the prodrome of diabetes and selecting individuals for both prevention and intervention clinical trials. Over the last few decades, studies have sought to investigate autoantibody prevalence after diabetes onset to better understand ongoing islet autoimmunity; however, many findings are contradictory, and little is known about factors that may influence autoantibody persistence. Generally, glutamate decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADAs) are the most prevalent autoantibodies after diagnosis, particularly in adults, whilst zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A) prevalence declines more rapidly. However, when studies with islet autoantibody data at diagnosis are considered, it becomes clear that overall islet antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A) tend to persist for longer than GADA or ZnT8A. In this review, we assess the major studies that have contributed to our understanding of autoantibody persistence after diabetes onset and what factors affect this. Islet autoantibodies may provide biomarkers for long-term ß-cell function and insights into how to prevent ongoing islet autoimmunity but larger studies collecting samples at and decades after diabetes onset are required to leverage the information they could provide.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Autoimunidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/imunologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/metabolismoRESUMO
Severe COVID-19 appears rare in children. This is unexpected, especially in young infants, who are vulnerable to severe disease caused by other respiratory viruses. We evaluate convalescent immune responses in 4 infants under 3 months old with confirmed COVID-19 who presented with mild febrile illness, alongside their parents, and adult controls recovered from confirmed COVID-19. Although not statistically significant, compared to seropositive adults, infants have high serum levels of IgG and IgA to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, with a corresponding functional ability to block SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry. Infants also exhibit robust saliva anti-spike IgG and IgA responses. Spike-specific IFN-γ production by infant peripheral blood mononuclear cells appears restrained, but the frequency of spike-specific IFN-γ- and/or TNF-α-producing T cells is comparable between infants and adults. On principal-component analysis, infant immune responses appear distinct from their parents. Robust functional antibody responses alongside restrained IFN-γ production may help protect infants from severe COVID-19.
Assuntos
Formação de Anticorpos , COVID-19/imunologia , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A , Imunoglobulina G , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Interferon gama/imunologia , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to characterise islet autoantibody profiles and immune cell phenotypes in slow progressors to type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Immunological variables were compared across peripheral blood samples obtained from slow progressors to type 1 diabetes, individuals with newly diagnosed or long-standing type 1 diabetes, and healthy individuals. Polychromatic flow cytometry was used to characterise the phenotypic attributes of B and T cells. Islet autoantigen-specific B cells were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay and islet autoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells were quantified using peptide-HLA class I tetramers. Radioimmunoassays were used to detect islet autoantibodies. Sera were assayed for various chemokines, cytokines and soluble receptors via ELISAs. RESULTS: Islet autoantibodies were lost over time in slow progressors. Various B cell subsets expressed higher levels of CD95 in slow progressors, especially after polyclonal stimulation, compared with the corresponding B cell subsets in healthy donors (p < 0.05). The phenotypic characteristics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were similar in slow progressors and healthy donors. Lower frequencies of CD4+ T cells with a central memory phenotype (CD27int, CD127+, CD95int) were observed in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (mean percentage of total CD4+ T cells was 3.00% in slow progressors vs 4.67% in healthy donors, p < 0.05). Autoreactive B cell responses to proinsulin were detected at higher frequencies in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (median no. of spots was 0 in healthy donors vs 24.34 in slow progressors, p < 0.05) in an ELISpot assay. Islet autoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses were largely absent in slow progressors and healthy donors. Serum levels of DcR3, the decoy receptor for CD95L, were elevated in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (median was 1087 pg/ml in slow progressors vs 651 pg/ml in healthy donors, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In this study, we found that slow progression to type 1 diabetes was associated with a loss of islet autoantibodies and a distinct B cell phenotype, consistent with enhanced apoptotic regulation of peripheral autoreactivity via CD95. These phenotypic changes warrant further studies in larger cohorts to determine their functional implications.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Receptor fas/imunologia , Autoanticorpos/metabolismo , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Proinsulina/imunologia , Proinsulina/metabolismo , Receptor fas/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Progression rate from islet autoimmunity to clinical diabetes is unpredictable. In this review, we focus on an intriguing group of slow progressors who have high-risk islet autoantibody profiles but some remain diabetes free for decades. RECENT FINDINGS: Birth cohort studies show that islet autoimmunity presents early in life and approximately 70% of individuals with multiple islet autoantibodies develop clinical symptoms of diabetes within 10 years. Some "at risk" individuals however progress very slowly. Recent genetic studies confirm that approximately half of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is diagnosed in adulthood. This creates a conundrum; slow progressors cannot account for the number of cases diagnosed in the adult population. There is a large "gap" in our understanding of the pathogenesis of adult onset T1D and a need for longitudinal studies to determine whether there are "at risk" adults in the general population; some of whom are rapid and some slow adult progressors.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Autoimunidade/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/imunologia , Progressão da Doença , HumanosRESUMO
Zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8), a protein highly specific to pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells, is vital for the biosynthesis and secretion of insulin. ZnT8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A) are among the most recently discovered and least-characterised islet autoantibodies. In combination with autoantibodies to several other islet antigens, including insulin, ZnT8A help predict risk of future type 1 diabetes. Often, ZnT8A appear later in the pathogenic process leading to type 1 diabetes, suggesting that the antigen is recognised as part of the spreading, rather than the initial, autoimmune response. The development of autoantibodies to different forms of ZnT8 depends on the genotype of an individual for a polymorphic ZnT8 residue. This genetic variant is associated with susceptibility to type 2 but not type 1 diabetes. Levels of ZnT8A often fall rapidly after diagnosis while other islet autoantibodies can persist for many years. In this review, we consider the contribution made by ZnT8 to our understanding of type 1 diabetes over the past decade and what remains to be investigated in future research.
Assuntos
Autoimunidade/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Transportador 8 de Zinco/genética , Animais , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Biomarcadores , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Progressão da Doença , Epitopos/imunologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/imunologia , Camundongos , RiscoRESUMO
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Multiple islet autoimmunity increases risk of diabetes, but not all individuals positive for two or more islet autoantibodies progress to disease within a decade. Major islet autoantibodies recognise insulin (IAA), GAD (GADA), islet antigen-2 (IA-2A) and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A). Here we describe the baseline characteristics of a unique cohort of 'slow progressors' (n = 132) who were positive for multiple islet autoantibodies (IAA, GADA, IA-2A or ZnT8A) but did not progress to diabetes within 10 years. METHODS: Individuals were identified from five studies (BABYDIAB, Germany; Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young [DAISY], USA; All Babies in Southeast Sweden [ABIS], Sweden; Bart's Oxford Family Study [BOX], UK and the Pittsburgh Family Study, USA). Multiple islet autoantibody characteristics were determined using harmonised assays where possible. HLA class II risk was compared between slow progressors and rapid progressors (n = 348 diagnosed <5 years old from BOX) using the χ2 test. RESULTS: In the first available samples with detectable multiple antibodies, the most frequent autoantibodies were GADA (92%), followed by ZnT8A (62%), IAA (59%) and IA-2A (41%). High risk HLA class II genotypes were less frequent in slow (28%) than rapid progressors (42%, p = 0.011), but only two slow progressors carried the protective HLA DQ6 allele. CONCLUSION: No distinguishing characteristics of slow progressors at first detection of multiple antibodies have yet been identified. Continued investigation of these individuals may provide insights into slow progression that will inform future efforts to slow or prevent progression to clinical diabetes.
Assuntos
Autoanticorpos/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Transportador 8 de Zinco/imunologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Glutamato Descarboxilase/imunologia , Humanos , Insulina/química , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pennsylvania , Suécia , Reino Unido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Measuring regulatory T cell suppression provides important insight into T cell dysfunction in autoimmune disease. However, to date, suppression assays are limited by the requirement for freshly isolated cells, and significant cell numbers. Here, we present a novel and rapid in vitro assay using effector T cell surface expression of both CD25 and CD134 as a surrogate marker of regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. This surface marker-based suppression assay works for frozen samples and for samples with limited cell numbers. It is also shorter taking two days to complete compared to the four days required for proliferation-based assays. Furthermore, this assay works with both in vitro expanded and natural Tregs, as well as anti-CD3/anti-CD28 bead-based and APC stimulation conditions. In conclusion, we have developed and validated a new suppression assay for cryopreserved samples with limited cell numbers that may be helpful to investigate T cell regulation in the context of infection or autoimmune diseases.