Custeio Baseado em Atividade e Tempo (TDABC) do modelo CEDMAC de terapia assistida para dispensação de medicamentos imunobiológicos para doenças reumatológicas no SUS / Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) of the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy for dispensing immunobiological rheumatologic medications at SUS

Objetivos: Mensurar o custo dos procedimentos de infusão de imunobiológicos no modelo CEDMAC (Centro de Dispensação de Medicações de Alto Custo) e estimar o custo minimização integral gerada pela existência desse modelo. Métodos: A metodologia de Custeio Baseado em Atividade e Tempo (TDABC) foi usada para calcular os custos dos procedimentos. Tempos de atividades, capacidades máximas de atendimento e fluxos dos processos internos foram obtidos em entrevistas e validados por meio de acompanhamento de pacientes. Os procedimentos foram categorizados em três tipos: a) aplicação subcutânea, b) infusão endovenosa rápida e c) infusão endovenosa longa. O custo-minimização foi estimado a partir de análise de 2017 para pacientes com artrite reumatoide (AR). Resultados: Ao longo de 2019, foram realizados 12.074 atendimentos no CEDMAC. Desses atendimentos, 60% foram de aplicação subcutânea (custo de R$ 117,90), 30%, de infusão endovenosa rápida (custo de R$ 169,90) e 10%, de endovenosa longa (custo de R$ 217,50). Usando a análise realizada em 2017, foi possível calcular o custo-minimização integral do modelo (uma economia líquida estimada de R$ 1.258.024,26 ao ano) e também extrapolar esses valores para todo o SUS caso o modelo fosse difundido no país (uma economia líquida estimada de R$ 189.401.652,88). Conclusão: Utilizando o método de TDABC, foi possível realizar de maneira rápida e eficiente o custeio dos principais procedimentos realizados no modelo CEDMAC. Essa análise embasará a solicitação da incorporação desses procedimentos na tabela unificada do SUS. Caso os procedimentos sejam incorporados e o modelo CEDMAC, difundido pelo Brasil, estima-se que a economia gerada seja da ordem de 189 milhões de reais ao ano.

Objectives: To measure the costs of immunobiological infusion procedures in the CEDMAC model (Centro de Dispensação de Medicações de Alto Custo) and to estimate the full cost-minimization generated by the existence of this model. Methods: Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) methodology was used to calculate the procedures costs. Activity times, service capacities and internal flows were obtained from employee interviews and validated by follow-up with patients. Procedures were categorized into three types: a) subcutaneous, b) intravenous fast infusion, and c) intravenous slow infusion. The full cost-minimization was estimated based on a 2017 analysis of the cost-minimization for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Results: In 2019, 12,074 patients were attended at CEDMAC. Of these, 60% of infusions were subcutaneous (costing R$ 117.90 each), 30% were fast intravenous infusion (costing R$ 169.90), and 10% were slow intravenous infusion (costing R$ 217.50). Using a 2017 RA analysis, it was possible to calculate the full cost-minimization of the model, with an estimated net savings of R$ 1,258,024.26 per year. The estimated net savings if the model were disseminated throughout the country for the entire SUS would be R$ 189,401,652.88. Conclusion: Using the TDABC method it was possible to quickly and efficiently estimate the cost allocation of the main procedures performed in the CEDMAC model. This analysis will support the request for incorporating these procedures into SUS. If the procedures were incorporated, and the CEDMAC model was disseminated throughout Brazil, the savings generated by this initiative could be up to 189 million reais per year.

Increment of immunogenicity after third dose of a homologous inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the immunogenicity of the third dose of CoronaVac vaccine in a large population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) and the factors associated with impaired response. METHODS: Adult patients with ARD and age-balanced/sex-balanced controls (control group, CG) previously vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac received the third dose at D210 (6 months after the second dose). The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG and neutralising antibodies (NAb) was evaluated previously to vaccination (D210) and 30 days later (D240). Patients with controlled disease suspended mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for 7 days or methotrexate (MTX) for 2 weekly doses after vaccination. RESULTS: ARD (n=597) and CG (n=199) had comparable age (p=0.943). Anti-S1/S2 IgG seropositivity rates significantly increased from D210 (60%) to D240 (93%) (p<0.0001) in patients with ARD. NAb positivity also increased: 38% (D210) vs 81.4% (D240) (p<0.0001). The same pattern was observed for CG, with significantly higher frequencies for both parameters at D240 (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses in the ARD group revealed that older age (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.0, p=0.024), vasculitis diagnosis (OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.53, p<0.001), prednisone ≥5 mg/day (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77, p=0.003), MMF (OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.61, p<0.001) and biologics (OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.46, p<0.001) were associated with reduced anti-S1/S2 IgG positivity. Similar analyses demonstrated that prednisone ≥5 mg/day (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90, p=0.011), abatacept (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74, p=0.004), belimumab (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.67, p=0.004) and rituximab (OR=0.11, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.30, p<0.001) were negatively associated with NAb positivity. Further evaluation of COVID-19 seronegative ARD at D210 demonstrated prominent increases in positivity rates at D240 for anti-S1/S2 IgG (80.5%) and NAb (59.1%) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We provide novel data on a robust response to the third dose of CoronaVac in patients with ARD, even in those with prevaccination COVID-19 seronegative status. Drugs implicated in reducing immunogenicity after the regular two-dose regimen were associated with non-responsiveness after the third dose, except for MTX. Trial registration number NCT04754698.

Update on antiphospholipid antibody syndrome / Atualização da síndrome do anticorpo antifosfolípide

Summary Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) associated with thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Most APS events are directly related to thrombotic events, which may affect small, medium or large vessels. Other clinical features like thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cardiac valve disease, cognitive dysfunction and skin ulcers (called non-criteria manifestations) add significant morbidity to this syndrome and represent clinical situations that are challenging. APS was initially described in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but it can occur in patients without any other autoimmune disease. Despite the autoimmune nature of this syndrome, APS treatment is still based on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.

Resumo A síndrome antifosfolipídide (APS) é uma doença autoimune caracterizada por tromboses e morbidade gestacional associadas à positividade de antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). A maioria das manifestações da APS está diretamente relacionada aos eventos trombóticos, que podem afetar pequenos, médios ou grandes vasos. Outras manifestações como trombocitopenia, nefropatia, valvulopatia, disfunção cognitiva e úlceras cutâneas (chamadas de manifestações não critérios) agregam significativa morbidade e muitas vezes são refratárias ao tratamento convencional. Embora tenha sido inicialmente descrita em pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico (LES), a síndrome antifosfolípide também pode ocorrer em pacientes sem outras doenças autoimunes associadas. Apesar do caráter autoimune dessa síndrome, o tratamento da APS ainda é baseado na anticoagulação e na antiagregação plaquetária.

Update on antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) associated with thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Most APS events are directly related to thrombotic events, which may affect small, medium or large vessels. Other clinical features like thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cardiac valve disease, cognitive dysfunction and skin ulcers (called non-criteria manifestations) add significant morbidity to this syndrome and represent clinical situations that are challenging. APS was initially described in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but it can occur in patients without any other autoimmune disease. Despite the autoimmune nature of this syndrome, APS treatment is still based on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.

Clinical and laboratory features of overlap syndromes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, or rheumatoid arthritis.

Because overlap syndromes (OSs) are rarely described, we analyzed retrospectively their frequencies and correlations in Brazilian series of 31 patients with dermatomyositis (DM)/polymyositis (PM) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attended at a referral single center. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs: anti-Jo-1, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-EJ, anti-OJ, anti-SRP, anti-Mi-2) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs: anti-PM-Scl75, anti-PM-Scl100, anti-Ku) as well as specific autoantibodies related to SLE, SSc, and RA were investigated. The mean age of the OS patients (9 DM and 22 PM) was 44.6 ± 15.4 years, with a predominance of women (83.9 %) and white ethnicity (58.1 %). PM was the most frequent inflammatory myopathy, and the clinical presentation of DM/PM was significantly different among the OS groups. Overlap was found with SSc (48.4 %), SLE (29.0 %), and RA (22.6 %). The clinical manifestations of DM/PM were identified simultaneously with SSc and RA in the majority of cases, in contrast to identification in the SLE group (p < 0.05). All patients were positive for antinuclear antibodies, and the prevalence of MSA and MAA was 38.8 % in all OS groups, mutually exclusive, and more frequent in the SSc group. Comparing the clinical and laboratory features, there was a higher frequency of vascular (skin ulcers, Raynaud's phenomenon) and pulmonary (interstitial lung disease) involvement in the SSc group (p < 0.05). Moreover, there were no differences among the groups in relation to disease relapse and deaths. Concluding, this is the first study to show the different characteristics of a series of patients with connective tissue disease (CTD)-OS in the heterogeneous Brazilian population.