Diphyodont tooth replacement of Brasilodon-A Late Triassic eucynodont that challenges the time of origin of mammals.

Two sets of teeth (diphyodonty) characterise extant mammals but not reptiles, as they generate many replacement sets (polyphyodonty). The transition in long-extinct species from many sets to only two has to date only been reported in Jurassic eucynodonts. Specimens of the Late Triassic brasilodontid eucynodont Brasilodon have provided anatomical and histological data from three lower jaws of different growth stages. These reveal ordered and timed replacement of deciduous by adult teeth. Therefore, this diphyodont dentition, as contemporary of the oldest known dinosaurs, shows that Brasilodon falls within a range of wide variations of typically mammalian, diphyodont dental patterns. Importantly, these three lower jaws represent distinct ontogenetic stages that reveal classic features for timed control of replacement, by the generation of only one replacement set of teeth. This data shows that the primary premolars reveal a temporal replacement pattern, importantly from directly below each tooth, by controlled regulation of tooth resorption and regeneration. The complexity of the adult prismatic enamel structure with a conspicuous intra-structural Schmelzmuster array suggests that, as in the case of extant mammals, this extinct species would have probably sustained higher metabolic rates than reptiles. Furthermore, in modern mammals, diphyodonty and prismatic enamel are inextricably linked, anatomically and physiologically, to a set of other traits including placentation, endothermy, fur, lactation and even parental care. Our analysis of the osteodental anatomy of Brasilodon pushes back the origin of diphyodonty and consequently, its related biological traits to the Norian (225.42 ± 0.37 myr), and around 25 myr after the End-Permian mass extinction event.

Avaliação da deformação do preparo de superfície de implantes dentários submetidos a diferentes intensidades de torque / Deformation analysis of the surface preparation in dental implants submitted to different torque intensities

Introdução: o aprimoramento do processo de osseointegração faz com que os investimentos em pesquisa e o desenvolvimento de novos materiais e tratamentos de superfície sejam despendidos para promover a relação entre osso e implante. Uma das condições para o sucesso é a ausência de micromovimentos ou estabilidade primária da peça implantada, fato esse que leva alguns cirurgiões a aplicar torques excessivos sobre o implante, podendo resultar em danos ao tratamento aplicado à superfície externa do mesmo. Objetivo: o presente trabalho investigou possíveis níveis de deformação do preparo de superfície conforme diferentes valores de torque foram aplicados à dois sistemas de implantes para avaliar os possíveis danos causados. Metodologia: foram instalados 5 implantes do sistema Dérig e 5 implantes do sistema Straumann em um bloco de poliuretano, para posterior remoção com contra-torque e avaliação da superfície sob o Microscópio Eletrônico de Varredura (MEV). Resultados: nos resultados obtidos, no grupo de implantes Dérig não foi possível constatar evidências que comprovem que a elevação dos valores de torque aplicados aos implantes até 95 Ncm danifiquem ou alterem a estrutura do preparo de superfície externa dos implantes, contudo, no grupo Straumann, verificamos danos e alterações no preparo de superfície com torque progressivo a partir de 50 Ncm. Conclusão: possíveis alterações e danos ao preparo de superfície de implantes que apresentem rugosidade de superfície aumentada por jateamento podem ocorrer em torques acima de 50 Ncm empregados com o objetivo de aumentar sua estabilidade primária.

Introduction: improving the osseointegration process means that investments in research and development of new materials and surface treatments are expended to promote the relationship between bone and implant. One of the conditions for success is the absence of micromovements or primary stability of the implanted part. This fact causes some surgeons to apply excessive torque to the implant, which may result in damage to the treatment applied to the external surface of the implant. Objective: The present work investigated possible surface preparation deformation levels as different torque values were applied to two implant systems to evaluate the possible damage caused. Methodology: ive Dérig system implants and five Straumann system implants were installed in a polyurethane block for subsequent counter-torque removal and surface evaluation under the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Results: Iin the obtained results, in the Dérig implant group it was not possible to verify evidences that the increase of the torque values applied to the implants up to 95 Ncm could damage or alter the structure of the external surface preparation of the implants, however, in the Straumann group we verified damage and changes in surface preparation with progressive torque from 50 Ncm. Conclusion: possible alterations and damages to the surface preparation of implants that present increased surface roughness by blasting can occur in torques above 50 Ncm employed in order to increase their primary stability.