Does age, sex, or ACE genotype affect glucose and insulin responses to strength training?

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether age, sex, or angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype influences the effects of strength training (ST) on glucose homeostasis. Nineteen sedentary young (age = 20-30 yr) men (n = 10) and women (n = 9) were studied and compared with 21 sedentary older (age = 65-75 yr) men (n = 12) and women (n = 9) before and after a 6-mo total body ST program. Fasting insulin concentrations were reduced in young men and in older men with ST (P < 0.05 in both). In addition, total insulin area under the curve decreased by 21% in young men (P < 0.05), and there was a trend for a decrease (11%) in older men (P = 0.06). No improvements in insulin responses were observed in young or older women. The ACE deletion/deletion genotype group had the lowest fasting insulin and insulin areas under the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) curve before training (all P < 0.05), but those with at least one insertion allele had a trend for a greater reduction in total insulin area than deletion homozygotes (P = 0.07). These results indicate that ST has a more favorable effect on insulin response to an OGTT in men than in women and offer some support for the hypothesis that ACE genotype may influence insulin responses to ST.

Effects of dynamic exercise on mean blood velocity and muscle interstitial metabolite responses in humans.

We examined the effects of dynamic one-legged knee extension exercise on mean blood velocity (MBV) and muscle interstitial metabolite concentrations in healthy young subjects (n = 7). Femoral MBV (Doppler), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and muscle interstitial metabolite (adenosine, lactate, phosphate, K(+), pH, and H(+); by microdialysis) concentrations were measured during 5 min of exercise at 30 and 60% of maximal work capacity (W(max)). MAP increased (P < 0.05) to a similar extent during the two exercise bouts, whereas the increase in MBV was greater (P < 0.05) during exercise at 60% (77.00 +/- 6.77 cm/s) compared with 30% W(max) (43.71 +/- 3.71 cm/s). The increase in interstitial adenosine from rest to exercise was greater (P < 0.05) during the 60% (0.80 +/- 0.10 microM) compared with the 30% W(max) bout (0.57 +/- 0.10 microM). During exercise at 60% W(max), interstitial K(+) rose at a greater rate than during exercise at 30% W(max) (P < 0.05). However, pH increased (H(+) decreased) at similar rates for the two exercise intensities. During exercise, interstitial lactate and phosphate increased (P < 0.05) with no difference observed between the two intensities. After 5 min of recovery, MBV decreased to baseline levels after exercise at 30% W(max) (4.12 +/- 1.10 cm/s), whereas MBV remained above baseline levels after exercise at 60% W(max) (Delta19.46 +/- 2.61 cm/s; P < 0.05). MAP and interstitial adenosine, K(+), pH, and H(+) returned toward baseline levels. However, interstitial lactate and phosphate continued to increase during the recovery period. Thus an increase in exercise intensity resulted in concomitant changes in MBV and muscle interstitial adenosine and K(+), whereas similar changes were not observed for MAP or muscle interstitial pH, lactate, or phosphate. These data suggest that K(+) and/or adenosine may play an active role in the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise.

Contribution of perfusion pressure to vascular resistance response during head-up tilt.

We measured brachial and femoral artery flow velocity in eight subjects and peroneal and median muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in five subjects during tilt testing to 40 degrees. Tilt caused similar increases in MSNA in the peroneal and median nerves. Tilt caused a fall in femoral artery flow velocity, whereas no changes in flow velocity were seen in the brachial artery. Moreover, with tilt, the increase in the vascular resistance employed (blood pressure/flow velocity) was greater and more sustained in the leg than in the arm. The ratio of the percent increase in vascular resistance in leg to arm was 2.5:1. We suggest that the greater vascular resistance effects in the leg were due to an interaction between sympathetic nerve activity and the myogenic response.

Insulin action after resistive training in insulin resistant older men and women.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of resistive training (RT) on insulin action and assess the determinants of the changes in insulin action. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen older men and older postmenopausal women (65-74 years) with normal (6 men and 5 women) or impaired glucose tolerance (4 men and 3 women). INTERVENTION: Six months of progressive whole-body RT. MEASUREMENTS: Upper and lower body strength was assessed by the one repetition maximum test. Total body fat and fat-free mass (FFM) were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before and after 6 months of RT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from the relationship of glucose utilization (M) to the concentration of insulin (I) during the last 30 minutes of 3-hour hyperinsulinemic-euglycenic clamps (240 pmol x min(-2) x min(-1)) (M/I) before and after RT. RESULTS: RT significantly improved upper- and lower-body muscular strength (P < .005). FFM increased after RT in the entire group (P < .01) with no significant change in body fat. Although the change in M was larger in men (13%) than women (3%), the difference was not significant. The change in M was a function of initial M (r = -0.53, P < .05). There was a trend (0.060+/-0.006 vs 0.066+/-0.006 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)/pmol/l, n = 18) for M/I to increase after RT in the combined group of men and women (P = .06). There were no significant relationships between changes in M or M/I with changes in body composition or strength. CONCLUSION: A 6-month RT program tends to improve insulin action in insulin-resistant older adults. These results suggest that RT may be useful in ameliorating insulin resistance that often occurs with physical inactivity, obesity, and loss of muscular strength in older insulin resistant men and women.

Strength training normalizes resting blood pressure in 65- to 73-year-old men and women with high normal blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of heavy resistance strength training (ST) on resting blood pressure (BP) in older men and women. DESIGN: Prospective intervention study. SETTING: University of Maryland Exercise Science Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one sedentary, healthy older men (69 +/- 1 year, n = 11) and women (68 +/- 1 year, n = 10) served as subjects for the study. INTERVENTION: Six months of progressive whole body ST performed 3 days per week using Keiser K-300 air-powered resistance machines. MEASUREMENTS: One-repetition maximum (1 RM) strength was measured for seven different exercises before and after the ST program. Resting BP was measured on six separate occasions before and after ST for each subject. RESULTS: Substantial increases in 1 RM strength were observed for upper body (UB) and lower body (LB) muscle groups for men (UB: 215 vs 265 kg; LB: 694 vs 838 kg; P < .001) and women (UB: 128 vs 154 kg; LB: 441 vs 563 kg; P < .001). The ST program led to reductions in both systolic (131 +/- 2 vs 126 +/- 2 mm Hg, P < .010) and diastolic (79 +/- 2 vs 75 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < .010) BP. Systolic BP was reduced significantly in men (134 +/- 3 vs 127 +/- 2 mm Hg, P < .01) but not in women (128 +/- 3 vs 125 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .01), whereas diastolic BP was reduced following training in both men (81 +/- 3 vs 77 +/- 1, mm Hg, P = .054) and women (78 +/- 2 vs 74 +/- 2 mm Hg, P = .055). CONCLUSIONS: Six months of heavy resistance ST may reduce resting BP in older persons. According to the latest guidelines from the Joint National Committee for the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of Hypertension, the changes in resting BP noted in the present study represent a shift from the high normal to the normal category.