Management of the colonic polyps referred for surgery: an opportunity for improvement.

PURPOSE: To examine local practice for non-malignant polyps and to calculate morbidity and mortality associated with bowel resection for this indication. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing our local gastrointestinal pathology database over a five-year period to identify colonic resections performed for benign polyps. Using search terms "polyp" and "adenoma," 272 cases were identified. Exclusion criteria included: cancer diagnosis, emergency surgeries, multiple resections, and subtotal colectomies for polyposis. 106 patients were included in the study. Primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included patient morbidity, characteristics of polyps requiring surgery, and the number of patients referred for a second endoscopic opinion prior to proceeding with surgery. RESULTS: 64 male and 42 female patients with a mean age of 65.3 years (± 8.6 years) underwent colon resection for benign polyps. The mean polyp size was 32.7 mm (± 19.5 mm). 30 patients (28.6%) had polyps equal to or less than 2 cm. Most of the polyps described were sessile (n = 55, 51.9%) and located in the right colon (n = 84, 79.3%). Endoscopic resection was attempted in 31 patients (29.2%), and five cases (4.7%) were referred for a second endoscopic opinion prior to proceeding with surgery. Endoscopists incorrectly felt that polyps were malignant in 62 cases (58.5%). Using Clavien-Dindo classification, most patients had no complications n = 36 (34.0%) or minor complications n = 41 (38.7%). Twelve patients (11.3%) had complications that required antibiotics, blood transfusions, or total parental nutrition. Nine patients (8.5%) required surgical or endoscopic management. Six patients (5.7%) required ICU admission. Mortality rate was 1.9% (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Surgery for benign colonic polyps is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These findings reveal a gap in endoscopic management of benign colonic polyps.

Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the annual case volume of general surgeons (greater or less than 200 colonoscopies) is associated with quality outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved all adults who underwent colonoscopy by a surgeon in the city of St. John's, NL, during the first 6 months of 2012. Subjects were identified through records from the health authority, and data were recorded on a standardized data sheet. Univariate analysis followed by stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether there was an association between quality outcomes (colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate) and predictors of these outcomes including annual colonoscopy volume, patient age, gender, indication for colonoscopy, and ASA score. A Chi-squared test was used to determine whether other outcomes were associated with annual colonoscopy volume. RESULTS: Data were collected on 1060 patients. Mean age was 59.5 (sd 12.2) years with 550 females. A total of 13 surgeons were studied, of which 7 performed less than 200 annual colonoscopies over the previous 2 years (low-volume group) and 6 performed more than 200 annual colonoscopies over the previous 2 years (high-volume group). While there was a significant difference in the colonoscopy completion rate favoring the high-volume group (82.2 vs. 91.1 %, p < 0.001), no difference was noted in the adenoma detection rate between groups (16.7 vs. 17.7 %, p = 0.762). The regression model revealed that colonoscopy completion was also associated with an indication of screening or surveillance and an ASA score of 1 or 2. The adenoma detection rate was associated with older age and male gender. There was no statistically significant association between annual colonoscopy volume and other safety outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Performing over 200 colonoscopies annually is associated with higher colonoscopy completion rates, but does not appear to be associated with other quality measures.

Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators.

Background. The purpose of this study is to determine if colonoscopy quality is associated with the annual case volume of endoscopists. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed on 3235 patients who underwent colonoscopy in the city of St. John's, NL, between January and June 2012. Data collected included completion of colonoscopy (CCR) and adenoma detection rates (ADR). Endoscopists were divided into quintiles based on annual case volume. To account for potential confounding variables, univariate analyses followed by multivariable logistic regression were used to identify variables independently associated with CCR and ADR. Results. A total of 13 surgeons and 8 gastroenterologists were studied. There was a significant difference in CCR (p < 0.001) and ADR (p < 0.001) based on annual volume. Following multivariable regression, predictors of successful colonoscopy completion included annual colonoscopy volume, lower age, male sex, an indication of screening or surveillance, and a low ASA score. Predictors of adenoma detection included older age, male sex, an indication of screening or surveillance, and gastroenterology specialty. Conclusion. Higher annual case volume is associated with better quality of colonoscopy in terms of completion. However, gastroenterology specialty appears to be a better predictor of ADR than annual case volume.

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice.

In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John's, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included. Adverse events are as follows. Medication-related includes use of reversal agents 0.1%, hypoxia 9.9%, hypotension 15.4%, and hypertension 0.9%. No patients required CPR or experienced allergic reactions or laryngospasm/bronchospasm. The indicator, "sedation dosages in patients older than 70," showed lower usage of fentanyl and midazolam in elderly patients. Procedure-related immediate includes perforation 0.2%, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding 0.3%, need for hospital admission or transfer to the emergency department 0.1%, and severe persistent abdominal pain proven not to be perforation 0.4%. Instrument impaction was not seen. Procedure-related delayed includes death within 14 days 0.1%, unplanned health care visit within 14 days of the colonoscopy 1.8%, unplanned hospitalization within 14 days of the colonoscopy 0.6%, bleeding within 14 days of colonoscopy 0.2%, infection 0.03%, and metabolic complication 0.03%. Conclusions. The most common adverse events were mild and sedation related. Rates of serious adverse events were in keeping with published reports.

Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: The training of residents in colonoscopy has become an important topic as more attention is being paid to quality outcomes. PURPOSE: To determine whether colonoscopy quality outcomes are adversely affected by allowing residents to perform colonoscopies under supervision. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed on all adults who underwent colonoscopy in the city of St. John's, NL, from January to June 2012 by an endoscopist who trains residents. Subjects were identified through records from the health authority. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record, including the endoscopy procedure report, the nursing record of the endoscopy, and the pathology report. Data were recorded on a standardized data sheet and entered into SPSS version 19.0 for analysis. A Chi-squared test was used for categorical data and a t test was used for continuous data. RESULTS: A total of 867 cases involving seven endoscopists and three trainees were studied. The colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist in 673 cases and performed by a trainee in 194 cases. Mean age [59.3 (SD 12.44) years] and gender (51.7% female) were similar between groups. There was no difference in cecal intubation rate (90.6 vs. 89.2%, p = 0.544) between endoscopists and trainees. There was a difference in polyp detection (23.3 vs. 33.5%, p = 0.004) and adenoma detection (12.8 vs. 22.7%, p = 0.034) favoring the trainees. There was no difference in the average dose of Fentanyl given (98.4 vs. 94.9 mg, p = 0.066), but there was less use of Versed favoring the trainee group (3.59 vs. 3.31 mg, p = 0.002). There was no difference in the endoscopy nurses' perception of patient discomfort between groups (28.7 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.632). CONCLUSION: The presence of a trainee does not appear to adversely affect quality outcomes in colonoscopy. When the polyp and adenoma detection rates of endoscopists are low, the addition of a trainee may improve these detection rates.