Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 45(1): 57-64, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34823888

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the carbon footprint of cataract surgery in a French university hospital. SETTING: Operating room of Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France. DESIGN: Single-center component analysis. METHODS: One day of surgery was used as a reference. Greenhouse gases (GHG) related to patient and staff transportation were calculated based on the distance travelled and the means of transportation used. The annual consumption of energy (heating and electricity) of our building was converted in kg equivalent of carbon dioxide (CO2eq), and the principle of proportionality was used to calculate what was used for a single cataract procedure. GHG emissions related to the life cycle assessment (LCA) of the equipment used and the sterilization process were calculated. RESULTS: The LCA of disposable items accounted for 59.49kg (73.32%) of CO2eq for each procedure. A single procedure generated 2.83±0.10kg of waste. The average CO2eq produced by the transportation of the patients to and from our center, adjusted for one procedure, was 7.26±6.90kg (8.95%) of CO2eq. The CO2eq produced by the sterilization of the phacoemulsifier handpiece was 2.12kg (2.61%). The energy consumption of the building and staff transportation accounted for the remaining CO2eq emissions, 0.76kg (0.93%) and 0.08kg (0.10%) respectively. Altogether, the carbon footprint of one cataract procedure in our center was 81.13kg CO2eq - the equivalent of an average car driving 800km. CONCLUSION: Our data provide a basis to quantify cataract surgery as a source of GHG and suggests that reductions in emissions can be achieved.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Gases de Efeito Estufa , Pegada de Carbono , Gases de Efeito Estufa/análise , Hospitais , Humanos
2.
Br J Community Nurs ; 11(10): S16-9, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17175592

RESUMO

Necrotizing skin infections, although rare, have proven difficult to manage and treat in a wide range of patient groups. The risks of extensive tissue necrosis, systemic sepsis and potentially organ failure make this disease one which health-care professionals must be aware of. Treatment involves rapid debridement and intensive therapy including broad-spectrum antibiotics. Appropriate wound care is essential as is a great deal of psychological support for the patient and relatives. This article also highlights some of the risk factors which may pre-dispose a patient to infection.


Assuntos
Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Linfedema/terapia , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Infecção dos Ferimentos/terapia , Idoso , Bandagens , Causalidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Fasciite Necrosante , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Úlcera da Perna/etiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Enfermeiros Clínicos/organização & administração , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Enfermagem em Saúde Pública/organização & administração , Higiene da Pele/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização , Infecção dos Ferimentos/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA