RESUMO
Research has found that service members (SMs) with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and co-occurring bodily injuries endorse lower chronic postconcussive symptom severity than SMs with mTBI and no bodily injuries. Investigations were conducted with primarily post-9/11 war-era SMs with blast injuries. The current study explores these findings in a cohort of more heterogeneous and recently evaluated military SM. Possible reasons suggested for the earlier findings include SMs with bodily injuries report fewer postconcussive symptoms due to (1) focusing attention on extra-cranial injuries and associated pain; (2) receiving more interpersonal and medical support, lowering distress; (3) using analgesics such as morphine or opioids; or (4) experiencing delayed postconcussive symptoms. The current investigation evaluates each of these hypothesized reasons for the earlier findings and the generalizability of the findings to a more recent sample. Data were extracted from 165 SMs in a TBI repository at a U.S. military medical center. All participants reported a history of an mTBI, confirmed by a clinical interview to meet Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense criteria. Other bodily injuries received at the time of the mTBI were documented with the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Multiple regression models evaluated the ability of the four hypothesized mechanisms to predict postconcussive symptom severity, measured by the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. SMs with bodily injuries (n = 48) reported nonsignificantly lower postconcussive symptoms than SMs with no bodily injuries (n = 117). The level of subjective pain was a determinant of postconcussive symptom severity among SMs with a history of mTBI, with or without associated bodily injuries. Social support was a weaker negative predictor of postconcussive symptoms among SMs with no associated bodily injuries.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Persistent symptoms post-mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) includes autonomic dysregulation (AD). The composite autonomic symptoms score, (COMPASS-31), was developed to quantify AD symptom severity in the last year, which limits clinical utility. The primary aim was to determine validity of a modified-COMPASS-31 measuring symptoms in the last month compared to the original, secondarily to compare both original and modified versions to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), and tertiarily to detect change post-treatment of the modified-COMPASS-31 compared to NSI and headache intensity (HI). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three military personnel with persistent headache post-mTBI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total and domain scores for COMPASS-31 (original vs. modified) NSI and HI at baseline. Change in modified-COMPASS-31. NSI, and HI. RESULTS: Baseline COMPASS-31 versions were comparable and highly correlated (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), they were moderately correlated at best to the NSI (r < 0.6), which may suggest differences in measurement metrics. The mean change in modified-COMPASS-31 scores (15.4/100, effect size 0.8) was mild to moderately correlated to the change in HI (r = 0.39) score, but not to NSI (r = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The modified-COMPASS-31 appears to be valid, can measure change of AD symptom severity, and is recommended as an outcome measure.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Militares , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Adulto , Feminino , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Testes NeuropsicológicosRESUMO
COVID-19 exposed and exacerbated health disparities, and a core challenge has been how to adapt pandemic response and public health in light of these disproportionate health burdens. Responding to this challenge, the County of Santa Clara Public Health Department designed a model of "high-touch" contact tracing that integrated social services with disease investigation, providing continued support and resource linkage for clients from structurally vulnerable communities. We report results from a cluster randomized trial of 5,430 cases from February to May 2021 to assess the ability of high-touch contact tracing to aid with isolation and quarantine. Using individual-level data on resource referral and uptake outcomes, we find that the intervention, randomized assignment to the high-touch program, increased the referral rate to social services by 8.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.8%-15.9%) and the uptake rate by 4.9% (-0.2%-10.0%), with the most pronounced increases in referrals and uptake of food assistance. These findings demonstrate that social services can be effectively combined with contact tracing to better promote health equity, demonstrating a novel path for the future of public health.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Busca de Comunicante/métodos , Tato , Promoção da Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Serviço SocialRESUMO
The present study evaluated whether Grooved Pegboard (GPB), when used as a performance validity test (PVT), can incrementally predict psychiatric symptom report elevations beyond memory-apparent PVTs. Participants (N = 111) were military personnel and were predominantly White (84%), male (76%), with a mean age of 43 (SD = 12) and having on average 16 years of education (SD = 2). Individuals with disorders potentially compromising motor dexterity were excluded. Participants were administered GPB, three memory-apparent PVTs (Medical Symptom Validity Test, Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test, Reliable Digit Span), and a symptom validity test (Personality Assessment Inventory Negative Impression Management [NIM]). Results from the three memory-apparent PVTs were entered into a model for predicting NIM, where failure of two or more PVTs was categorized as evidence of non-credible responding. Hierarchical regression revealed that non-dominant hand GPB T-score incrementally predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (F(2,108) = 16.30, p < .001; R2 change = .05, ß = -0.24, p < .01). In a second hierarchical regression, GPB performance was dichotomized into pass or fail, using T-score cutoffs (≤29 for either hand, ≤31 for both). Non-dominant hand GPB again predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (F(2,108) = 18.75, p <.001; R2 change = .08, ß = -0.28, p < .001). Results indicated that noncredible/failing GPB performance adds incremental value over memory-apparent PVTs in predicting psychiatric symptom report.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine correspondence between the statistically derived 8-point reliable change index for the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) against clinically significant item-level change in symptom severity from intake to discharge for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). SETTING: Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service at Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas. PATIENTS: In total, 655 active-duty service members with a diagnosis of mTBI who received treatment and completed self-report measures between 2007 and 2020. DESIGN: Observational retrospective analysis of outpatient clinical outcomes data. MAIN MEASURES: NSI total score change was used to divide patients into responder and nonresponders based on whether they met an 8-point decrease between intake and discharge. In addition, patients who had at least one NSI item that changed from a rating of 3 (severe) or 4 (very severe) at intake to a rating of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at discharge were coded as an individual with significant item-level change. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of the sample had significant item-level change and were classified as responders according to the reliable change method. Eight percent of the sample had significant item-level change but did not meet the 8-point reliable change threshold. Fifteen percent of the sample did not experience significant item-level change but were classified as responders according to reliable change. Thirty-one percent did not meet either method's criterion for change. Classification agreement between the reliable change and item-level change methods was 76%, which was statistically significant ( = 181.32, P < .001). CONCLUSION: There is good correspondence between reliable change and item-level change on the NSI in this population. Reliable change is easily calculated and thus much more accessible than the item-level change method. There may be some situations where calculating item-level change may be helpful.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas , Militares , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Humanos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine and categorize symptoms occurring within 60 s of vertebrobasilar-insufficiency (VBI) testing (left- and right-neck rotation) in individuals with persistent post-traumatic headache. BACKGROUND: As part of routine clinical cervical screening in our patients, we found extended VBI testing often triggered additional symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to document the prevalence and precise symptoms occurring during each movement direction of this test and determine any demographic or baseline signs or symptoms associated with a positive test. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review on military personnel receiving treatment for persistent post-traumatic headache was performed. Participants were grouped according to presence of non-headache related symptoms triggered during the tests. Frequency, onset, and symptom characteristics reported were categorized as potentially vascular and/or possible autonomic or cranial nerve in nature. RESULTS: At least one symptom was reported by 81.3% of 123 patients. Of these, 54% reported symptoms in one and 46% in both directions of rotation, yielding 146 abnormal tests. Most reported symptoms were tear disruption (41%), altered ocular-motor-control (25%), and blepharospasm (16%). Enlisted individuals and those with altered baseline facial sensation were more likely to have a positive test. CONCLUSIONS: The majority reported symptoms not typical of VBI within 60 seconds of sustained neck rotation. Further study is needed to better understand the mechanisms and clinical relevance.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar , Feminino , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/complicações , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rotação , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Cefaleia , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare sub-occipital muscle pressure sub pain thresholds (PPTs) in individuals with persistent-post-traumatic-headache (PPTH) in relation to the presence or not of cranial nerve and/or autonomic symptoms reported during sustained neck rotation (SNR). BACKGROUND: Previously 81% of military service members with PPTH demonstrated symptoms with SNR up to 60 seconds. Of these, 54% reported symptoms in one (Uni-Symp) and 46% in both directions of rotation (Bi-Symp). Sub-occipital PPTs, in relation to SNR direction, were of interest. METHODS: Retrospective review of records of 77 individuals, with PPTH with both SNR and PPTs. Average suboccipital and scalene PPTs were compared between Asymptomatic (n = 13), upon SNR testing, or Symptomatic (Uni-Symp, n = 32, Bi-Symp, n = 32), groups. RESULTS: The Bi-Symp group had significantly reduced sub-occipital PPTs relative to the Asymptomatic group on both sides [p < 0.009] with no side-to-side differences in either group. The Uni-Symp group had significantly lower sub-occipital PPTs on the symptomatic SNR test direction compared to the asymptomatic side [t(31) = 3.37, p = 0.002]. There were no differences within or between groups in the scalene PPTs(p's > 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: An upper cervical mechanical trigger of symptoms during SNR tests in some individuals with PPTH is possible. The direction of symptomatic SNR tests may indicate direction of guarded hypermobile dysfunction and direct treatment.
Assuntos
Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional , Humanos , Limiar da Dor/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Rotação , Cefaleia , Músculos , MialgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many service members (SMs) have been diagnosed with traumatic brain injury. Currently, military treatment facilities do not have access to established normative tables which can assist clinicians in gauging and comparing patient-reported symptoms. The aim of this study is to provide average scores for both the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) for active duty SMs based upon varying demographic groups. METHODS: Average scores were calculated for both the NSI and PCL-5 surveys from SMs who attended a military outpatient traumatic brain injury clinic. For this analysis, only the initial surveys for each SM were considered. The identifying demographics included age group, gender, grade, and race. RESULTS: Four normative tables were created to show the average scores of both the NSI and PCL-5 surveys grouped by demographics. The tables are grouped by Age Group/Gender/Race and Grade/Gender/Race. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and healthcare administrators can use the scores reported in this study to determine where SM NSI or PCL-5 scores fall within the average for their demographic group.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Militares , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Humanos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Instituições de Assistência AmbulatorialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize treatment responders and nonresponders as measured by the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) in order to understand whether certain traits in our patient population would characterize favorable response. SETTING: Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service at Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas. PATIENTS: In total, 655 active duty military patients with a diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who received treatment between 2007 and 2020 and completed self-report measures as part of routine care. DESIGN: Observational retrospective analysis of outpatient clinical outcomes data. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the NSI, divided into the responder and nonresponder groups. Responders were defined by reliable change in NSI total score (decrease of ≥8 points from intake to discharge). FINDINGS: Responders ( n = 395) reported a higher level of symptom burden at intake on the NSI. Women responded proportionally more (70%) than men (58%). After treatment, responders reported improvements on all measures evaluated while nonresponders reported no change or slightly worse symptoms. Logistic regression analysis showed that posttraumatic stress symptoms at intake decreased odds of favorable treatment response while satisfaction with social relationships increased odds of favorable treatment response. CONCLUSION: The results from this process improvement project suggested that posttraumatic symptoms warrant programmatic attention in TBI clinics while social relationships may be a protective factor that can be capitalized to enhance troop readiness. Systematic examination of these characteristics should be conducted on a larger population within the military health system.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Militares , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlations between the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and other questionnaires commonly administered within military traumatic brain injury clinics. SETTING: Military outpatient traumatic brain injury clinics. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 15,428 active duty service members who completed 24,162 NSI questionnaires between March 2009 and May 2020. DESIGN: Observational retrospective analysis of questionnaires collected as part of standard clinical care. MAIN MEASURES: NSI, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 and Military Version, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Abbreviated Version. Only questionnaires completed on the same date as the NSI were examined. RESULTS: The total NSI score was moderately to strongly correlated with all questionnaires except for the AUDIT. The strongest correlation was between the NSI Affective Score and the PHQ9 (r = 0.86). The NSI Vestibular Score was moderately correlated with the ABC (r = -0.55) and strongly correlated with the DHI (r = 0.77). At the item level, the HIT-6 showed strong correlation with NSI headache (r = 0.80), the ISI was strongly correlated with NSI difficulty sleeping (r = 0.63), and the ESS was moderately correlated with NSI fatigue (r = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Clinicians and healthcare administrators can use the correlations reported in this study to determine if questionnaires add incremental value for their clinic as well as to make more informed decisions regarding which questionnaires to administer.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Using embedded performance validity (PVT) comparisons, Erdodi et al. suggested that Grooved Pegboard (GPB) T-score cutoffs for either hand (≤ 29) or both hands (≤ 31) could be used as additional embedded PVTs. The current study evaluated the relationship between these proposed cutoff scores and established PVTs (Medical Symptom Validity Test [MSVT]; Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test [NV-MSVT], and Reliable Digit Span [RDS]). METHOD: Participants (N = 178) were predominately Caucasian (84%) males (79%) with a mean age and education of 41 (SD = 11.7) and 15.8 years (SD = 2.3), respectively. Participants were stratified as "passing" or "failing" the GPBviaErdodi's proposed criteria. "Failures" on the MSVT, NV-MSVT, and RDS were based on conventional recommendations. RESULTS: Moderate correlations between GPB classification and a condition of interest (COI; i.e. at least two failures on reference PVTs) were observed for dominant (χ2 (1, n = 178) = 34.72, Ï = .44, p < .001), non-dominant (χ2 (1, n = 178) = 16.46, Ï = .30, p = .001), and both hand conditions (χ2 (1, n = 178) = 32.48, Ï = .43, p < .001). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power were generally higher than Erdodi et al.'s initial findings. CONCLUSION: These findingsprovide supportfor the clinical utility of the GPB as an additional embedded PVT. More specifically, dominant and both hand cutoffs were found to be more robust measures ofnon-genuine performance in those without motor deficits. While promising, sensitivity continues to be low; therefore, it is ill-advised to use the GPB as a sole measure of -performance validity.
Assuntos
Simulação de Doença , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Simulação de Doença/diagnósticoRESUMO
Contact tracing is a pillar of COVID-19 response, but language access and equity have posed major obstacles. COVID-19 has disproportionately affected minority communities with many non-English-speaking members. Language discordance can increase processing times and hamper the trust building necessary for effective contact tracing. We demonstrate how matching predicted patient language with contact tracer language can enhance contact tracing. First, we show how to use machine learning to combine information from sparse laboratory reports with richer census data to predict the language of an incoming case. Second, we embed this method in the highly demanding environment of actual contact tracing with high volumes of cases in Santa Clara County, CA. Third, we evaluate this language-matching intervention in a randomized controlled trial. We show that this low-touch intervention results in 1) significant time savings, shortening the time from opening of cases to completion of the initial interview by nearly 14 h and increasing same-day completion by 12%, and 2) improved engagement, reducing the refusal to interview by 4%. These findings have important implications for reducing social disparities in COVID-19; improving equity in healthcare access; and, more broadly, leveling language differences in public services.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Busca de Comunicante/métodos , Idioma , SARS-CoV-2 , Algoritmos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Barreiras de Comunicação , Busca de Comunicante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , ConfiançaRESUMO
Our study aimed to understand the impact of cocaine dependence on high-risk decision-making abilities in individuals with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and individuals with cocaine dependence. We recruited 99 participants (27 HIV/Cocaine, 20 HIV Only, 26 Cocaine Only, and 26 Healthy Controls). The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) was applied to assess decision-making abilities. Independent and interactive effects of HIV status and cocaine dependence were examined using 2 × 2 factorial ANCOVA with premorbid IQ (WRAT-4: WR) as the covariate. We found cocaine dependence had a significant adverse effect on overall IGT performance (p = 0.015). We also found individuals who were HIV-positive tended to have less total money at the end of the game than individuals who were HIV-negative (p = 0.032), suggesting individuals living with HIV had less focus on long-term gains and more focus on short-term gains. Our findings highlight the significant impact of cocaine dependence on decision-making abilities and the difficulty individuals with HIV have in adequately weighing the cost and benefits of their decisions and making appropriate changes for the future.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/psicologia , Cocaína/efeitos adversos , Tomada de Decisões , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Adulto , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/virologia , Feminino , Jogos Experimentais , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/fisiopatologia , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Carga ViralRESUMO
Importance: Overcoming social barriers to COVID-19 testing is an important issue, especially given the demographic disparities in case incidence rates and testing. Delivering culturally appropriate testing resources using data-driven approaches in partnership with community-based health workers is promising, but little data are available on the design and effect of such interventions. Objectives: To assess and evaluate a door-to-door COVID-19 testing initiative that allocates visits by community health workers by selecting households in areas with a high number of index cases, by using uncertainty sampling for areas where the positivity rate may be highest, and by relying on local knowledge of the health workers. Design Setting and Participants: This cohort study was performed from December 18, 2020, to February 18, 2021. Community health workers visited households in neighborhoods in East San Jose, California, based on index cases or uncertainty sampling while retaining discretion to use local knowledge to administer tests. The health workers, also known as promotores de salud (hereinafter referred to as promotores) spent a mean of 4 days a week conducting door-to-door COVID-19 testing during the 2-month study period. All residents of East San Jose were eligible for COVID-19 testing. The promotores were selected from the META cooperative (Mujeres Empresarias Tomando Acción [Entrepreneurial Women Taking Action]). Interventions: The promotores observed self-collection of anterior nasal swab samples for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: A determination of whether door-to-door COVID-19 testing was associated with an increase in the overall number of tests conducted, the demographic distribution of the door-to-door tests vs local testing sites, and the difference in positivity rates among the 3 door-to-door allocation strategies. Results: A total of 785 residents underwent door-to-door testing, and 756 were included in the analysis. Among the 756 individuals undergoing testing (61.1% female; 28.2% aged 45-64 years), door-to-door COVID-19 testing reached different populations than standard public health surveillance, with 87.6% (95% CI, 85.0%-89.8%) being Latinx individuals. The closest available testing site only reached 49.0% (95% CI, 48.3%-49.8%) Latinx individuals. Uncertainty sampling provided the most effective allocation, with a 10.8% (95% CI, 6.8%-16.0%) positivity rate, followed by 6.4% (95% CI, 4.1%-9.4%) for local knowledge, and 2.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-6.6%) for index area selection. The intervention was also associated with increased overall testing capacity by 60% to 90%, depending on the testing protocol. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 785 participants, uncertainty sampling, which has not been used conventionally in public health, showed promising results for allocating testing resources. Community-based door-to-door interventions and leveraging of community knowledge were associated with reduced demographic disparities in testing.
Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Headaches are the most common complaint after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a significant cause of morbidity and disability among military personnel. Currently, there are a several measures which can assess headache disability, but there is a significant burden to assess each individual symptom given this heterogeneous polymorbid population. The objective of this proposed study was to validate the single headache item from the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) compared to the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants included consecutive treatment-seeking outpatients at the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service at the Brooke Army Medical Center from August 2007 to January 2010 who were administered a battery of assessment measures at initial intake, as part of usual care. Archival record review was conducted using procedures approved by the local Institutional Review Board. Inclusionary criteria included completion of both the HIT-6 and NSI. Participants with a cut-off score of >22 on the NSI Validity-10 were excluded in a post hoc analysis to validate findings among those who passed validity screen. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation between the single-item NSI headache measure and the HIT-6 revealed at least 64% shared variance in this military sample (r = 0.8, p < 0.001), indication a high association between the two measures. CONCLUSION: The NSI single-item headache measure adequately captured headache severity in this military cohort. Use of the single-item NSI headache measure may minimize survey burden on participants whose primary complaint is not headaches, or who present with multiple symptoms. Future studies are needed to validate the single-item headache measure in other samples.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas , Cefaleia , Militares , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-TraumáticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience sleep problems, which are also common symptoms of stress-related and mood disorders. OBJECTIVE: To determine if sleep problems contributed unique variance to post-concussive symptoms above and beyond symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder/major depressive disorder (PTSD/MDD) after mild TBI. METHODS: 313 active duty service members with a history of mild TBI completed sleep, PTSD, and mood symptom questionnaires, which were used to determine contributions to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. RESULTS: 59% of the variance in post-concussive symptoms were due to PTSD symptom severity while depressive symptoms and sleep problems contributed an additional 1% each. This pattern differed between those with and without clinical diagnosis of PTSD/MDD. For those with PTSD/MDD, PTSD and depression symptoms but not sleep contributed to post-concussive symptoms. For those without PTSD/MDD, PTSD symptoms and sleep contributed specifically to somatosensory post-concussive symptoms. Daytime dysfunction and sleep disturbances were associated with post-concussive symptoms after PTSD and depression symptoms were controlled. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD symptom severity explained the most variance for post-concussive symptoms among service members with a history of mild TBI, while depression symptoms, daytime dysfunction, and sleep disturbances independently contributed small amounts of variance.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Militares/psicologia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/psicologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Sono/fisiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are identified as signature injuries of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Statistics have confirmed a high incidence of PTSD among military personnel with mild TBI (mTBI) who served in these conflicts. Although receiving less attention, individuals with a history of mTBI are also at increased risk for depressive disorders. This study examines the incidence and correlates of depression in service members with a history of mTBI received an average of 4-1/2 years prior to evaluation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 184 service members with a history of mTBI extracted from a data repository maintained at a military medical center. RESULTS: One-third of the sample (34.2%) was clinically diagnosed with a depressive disorder in the month preceding evaluation. Of those with depression, 81% (51 of 63) were also diagnosed with PTSD. Proportionately more women than men had depression. Depression was more common among those who were undergoing a Military Evaluation Board and those who served in more than three combat deployments. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm chronically elevated the rates of depressive disorders and PTSD comorbidity among service members with a history of mTBI. Depression screening and treatment within the Military Health System should remain a priority for service members reporting a remote history of mTBI. Individuals with chronic PTSD, women, service members undergoing MEB and those who served in greater than three combat deployments are at particular risk.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Depressão/etiologia , Militares/psicologia , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare symptom reporting patterns of service members with a history of concussion based on work status: full duty, limited duty, or in the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)/disability process. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 181 service members with a history of concussion (MEB n = 56; limited duty n = 62; full duty n = 63). Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) Validity-10 cutoff (>22) and Mild Brain Injury Atypical Symptoms Scale (mBIAS) cutoffs (≥10 and ≥8) were used to evaluate potential over-reporting of symptoms. RESULTS: The MEB group displayed significantly higher NSI scores and significantly higher proportion scored above the mBIAS ≥10 cutoff (MEB = 15%; limited duty = 3%; full duty = 5%). Validity-10 cutoff did not distinguish between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MEB but not limited duty status was associated with increased risk of over-reporting symptoms in service members with a history of concussion. Results support the use of screening measures for over-reporting in the MEB/disability samples.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Militares , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The objective of this study was to assess the associations between resilience, adversity, post-concussion symptoms, and post-traumatic stress symptom reporting after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We hypothesized that resilience would be associated with less symptom reporting, and adversity would be associated with greater symptom reporting. This was a cross-sectional study of retrospective data collected for an ongoing TBI repository. United States military service members who screened positive for mTBI during a primary care visit completed the Trauma History Screen (THS), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). Data collected from February 2015 to August 2016 were used for the present study. Only participants with complete data for the above measures were included, yielding a sample size of 165 participants. Adversity (THS) and resilience (CD-RISC) scores were each correlated significantly with post-concussion (NSI) and traumatic stress (PCL-C) total and subscale scores in the hypothesized direction. Interactions between adversity and resilience were absent for all measures except the NSI sensory subscale. Four traumatic event types were significantly associated positively with most NSI and PCL-C total and subscale scores, but the age at which traumatic events were first experienced showed few and mixed significant associations. In conclusion, resilience and adversity were significantly associated with symptom endorsement after mTBI. Screening for cumulative adversity may identify individuals at greater risk of developing persistent post-concussion symptoms and/or PTSD, and interventions that increase resilience may reduce symptom severity.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Militares/psicologia , Resiliência Psicológica , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/psicologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Globally pharmacists are becoming increasingly involved in veterinary medicine; however, little is known about the level of interest for pharmacists playing a larger role in animal treatment in New Zealand. A key stakeholder in any progression of pharmacists becoming more involved in the practice of veterinary pharmacy is the veterinary profession. The aim of this study was to investigate views of veterinarians and veterinary students on the role of pharmacists supporting veterinarians with advice on animal medicines. Open interviews were conducted with veterinarians in Dunedin, New Zealand. Veterinary students at Massey University completed an online survey. Most veterinarians do not have regular communication with pharmacists regarding animal care, but believe it may be beneficial. In order to support veterinarians, pharmacists would need further education in veterinary medicine. Veterinary students believe there is opportunity for collaboration between professions provided that pharmacists have a better working knowledge of animal treatment. Most of the veterinary students surveyed perceive a gap in their knowledge concerning animal medicines, specifically pharmacology and compounding. While there is support for pharmacists contributing to veterinary medicine, particularly in the area of pharmaceutics, this is currently limited in New Zealand due to a lack of specialized education opportunities.