Chronic opioid analgesic usage post-kidney transplantation and clinical outcomes.

Chronic opioid usage (COU) is common among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) qualified for kidney transplantation and associated with inferior post-transplant outcomes. The magnitude of COU after kidney transplantation and its impact on transplant outcomes remain unknown. We performed a single-center retrospective study aimed to describe the prevalence of COU during the first year, to identify the predictors of COU and to determine the impact of COU on post-transplant outcomes including the rates of hospitalization and acute rejection during the first year, as well as long-term patient and graft survival. Among 1045 kidney transplant patients, 119 (11.4%) had required continued outpatient prescription of opioid analgesics during the first year after kidney transplantation, mostly for non-surgery-related pain (85%). A positive history of COU prior to transplantation was the strongest predictor of COU in the first year post-transplantation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.31, p < 0.001). Patients with COU had more often hospital admission during the first year (AOR 2.48, p = 0.001, for 1 or 2 admissions, and AOR 6.03, p < 0.001 for ≥3 admissions), but similar rate of acute rejection (19.3% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.31). During long-term follow-up, however, the patient and/or death-censored kidney survival was not different. COU early post-kidney transplantation, when clinically indicated and properly supervised, does not appear to affect the risk of death and death-censored graft failure.

Identification of a protein signature in renal allograft rejection.

PURPOSE: Serum creatinine functions as a poor surrogate marker of renal allograft dysfunction and long-term graft survival. By measuring multiple proteins simultaneously in the serum of transplant patients, we can identify unique protein signatures of graft dysfunction. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We utilized training and validation cohorts composed of healthy and volunteer subjects, stable renal transplant patients, and renal transplant patients experiencing acute allograft rejection. Utilizing our antibody microarray, we measured 108 proteins simultaneously in these groups. RESULTS: Using Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction, we identified ten serum proteins from 19 renal transplant patients with stable renal function, which are differentially expressed, compared to healthy control subjects. In addition, we identified 17 proteins that differentiate rejecting renal transplant recipients from stable renal transplant. Validation cohorts substantiated these findings. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our preliminary results support that a specific pattern of protein expression or "protein signature" may be able to differentiate between stable transplant patients from those with rejection. Future studies will focus on other etiologies of renal allograft dysfunction and the effect of treatment on protein expression and long-term outcome.

Metabolic syndrome, vitamin D deficiency and hypoadiponectinemia among nondiabetic patients early after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is common among kidney transplant patients. We studied the relationship between MetS, vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and hypoadiponectinemia early posttransplantation and their impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-four previously nondiabetic kidney transplant patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study between February and November 2008. Participants underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test and had their plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), adiponectin, insulin, intact parathyroid hormone and lipids measured at 11 weeks posttransplantation. Clinical events including cardiovascular events, new-onset diabetes after transplantation, acute rejection, graft loss and death were recorded during the follow-up to December 2012. RESULTS: Thirty-four study patients (45.9%) had MetS. Patients with MetS had lower plasma concentrations of 25[OH]D (20.5 ± 7.2 vs. 24.8 ± 11.1 ng/ml, p = 0.049) and adiponectin (8.2 ± 4.5 vs. 14.6 ± 8.0 µg/ml, p < 0.0001) early on, and higher composite clinical event rate (61.8 vs. 27.5%, p = 0.003) during the follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of MetS early after transplantation was independently associated with 25[OH]D deficiency/insufficiency (OR: 14.0, 95% CI: 1.8, 107.5; p = 0.011), depressed plasma adiponectin levels (ß -6.39, r(2) 0.195, p < 0.0001) and increased risk for clinical events (OR: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.9, 16.5; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant patients with MetS early after transplantation had lower levels of 25[OH]D and adiponectin, and unfavorable clinical outcomes.

A history of chronic opioid usage prior to kidney transplantation may be associated with increased mortality risk.

Chronic opioid usage (COU) for analgesia is common among patients with end-stage renal disease. In order to test whether a prior history of COU negatively affects post-kidney transplant outcomes, we retrospectively examined clinical outcomes in adult kidney transplant patients. Among 1064 adult kidney transplant patients, 452 (42.5%) reported the presence of various body pains and 108 (10.2%) reported a prior history of COU. While the overall death or kidney graft loss was not statistically different between patients with and without a history of COU, the cumulative mortality rate at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplantation, and during the entire study period, appeared significantly higher for patients with than without a history of COU (6.5, 18.5, and 20.4 vs. 3.2, 7.5, and 12.7%, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounding factors in entire cohorts and Cox regression analysis in 1:3 propensity-score matched cohorts suggest that a positive history of COU was significantly associated with nearly a 1.6- to 2-fold increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.60, and hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.08-3.42, respectively). Thus, a history of chronic opioid usage prior to transplantation appears to be associated with increased mortality risk. Additional studies are warranted to confirm the observed association and to understand the mechanisms.

Novel views on new-onset diabetes after transplantation: development, prevention and treatment.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is associated with increased risk of allograft failure, cardiovascular disease and mortality, and therefore, jeopardizes the success of renal transplantation. Increased awareness of NODAT and the prediabetic states (impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, IGT) has fostered previous and present recommendations, based on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Unfortunately, the idea that NODAT merely resembles T2DM is potentially misleading, because the opportunity to initiate adequate anti-hyperglycaemic treatment early after transplantation might be given away for 'tailored' immunosuppression in patients who have developed NODAT or carry personal risk factors. Risk factor-independent mechanisms, however, seem to render postoperative hyperglycaemia with subsequent development of overt or 'full-blown' NODAT, the unavoidable consequence of the transplant and immunosuppressive process itself, at least in many cases. A proof of the concept that timely preventive intervention with exogenous insulin against post-transplant hyperglycaemia may decrease NODAT was recently provided by a small clinical trial, which is awaiting confirmation from a multicentre study. However, because early insulin therapy aimed at beta-cell protection seems to contrast the currently recommended, stepwise approach of 'watchful waiting' prior to pancreatic decompensation, we here aim at reviewing recent concepts regarding the development, prevention and treatment of NODAT, some of which seem to challenge the traditional view on T2DM and NODAT. In summary, we suggest a novel, risk factor-independent management approach to NODAT, which includes glycaemic monitoring and anti-hyperglycaemic treatment in virtually everybody after transplantation. This approach has widespread implications for future research and is intended to tackle NODAT and also ultimately cardiovascular disease.

Comparison of the long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation: USA versus Spain.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation are suboptimal because many patients lose their allografts or experience premature death. Cross-country comparisons of long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation may provide insight into factors contributing to premature graft failure and death. We evaluated the rates of late graft failure and death among US and Spanish kidney recipients. METHODS: This is a cohort study of US (n = 9609) and Spanish (n = 3808) patients who received a deceased donor kidney transplant in 1990, 1994, 1998 or 2002 and had a functioning allograft 1 year after transplantation with follow-up through September 2006. Ten-year overall and death-censored graft survival and 10-year overall recipient survival and death with graft function (DWGF) were estimated with multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: Among recipients alive with graft function 1 year after transplant, the 10-year graft survival was 71.3% for Spanish and 53.4% for US recipients (P < 0.001). The 10-year, death-censored graft survival was 75.6 and 76.0% for Spanish and US recipients, respectively (P = 0.73). The 10-year recipient survival was 86.2% for Spanish and 67.4% for US recipients (P < 0.001). In recipients with diabetes as the cause of ESRD, the adjusted DWGF rates at 10 years were 23.9 and 53.8 per 1000 person-years for Spanish and US recipients, respectively (P < 0.001). Among recipients whose cause of ESRD was not diabetes mellitus, the adjusted 10-year DWGF rates were 11.0 and 25.4 per 1000 person-years for Spanish and US recipients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: US kidney transplant recipients had more than twice the long-term hazard of DWGF compared with Spanish kidney transplant recipients and similar levels of death-censored graft function. Pre-transplant medical care, comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, and their management in each country's health system are possible explanations for the differences between the two countries.

Delayed graft function requiring more than one-time dialysis treatment is associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation with negative impact on clinical outcomes. In a single-center retrospective analysis, we compared patient and kidney survival, early renal function, and the incidence of acute rejection during the first year among all adult deceased donor kidney transplant patients without DGF, with DGF requiring one-time and/or more than one-time dialysis treatment between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Of 831 adult kidney transplant patients, 74 (8.9%) required one-time and 134 (16.1%) more than one-time dialysis treatment post-transplantation, respectively. While DGF patients with one-time dialysis treatment had comparable clinical outcomes to that of patients without DGF, patients with DGF requiring more than one-time dialysis treatment had a 45% increased risk for death (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.05, p = 0.04) after adjustment for the differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Furthermore, DGF patients with more than one-time dialysis requirement displayed significantly lower renal function after recovery (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.21, 0.49, p < 0.001, for eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min) and higher incidence of acute rejection during the first year (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11, 2.49, p = 0.015). Additional studies of therapeutic approaches to manage patients with prolonged DGF are needed.

Incidences of preformed and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies and their clinicohistological correlates in the early course of kidney transplantation.

Our center started routine monitoring of preformed and de novo human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in September 2010 using single antigen beads on the Luminex platform. Recipients with preformed DSA or other high immunological risk factors had serial DSA monitoring at 3, 6, and 12-months posttransplant, and low-risk recipients were screened only at 12-months. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 3, 6, and 12-months post-transplant for all recipients. In addition, for-cause biopsies and DSA testing were performed when clinically indicated for allograft dysfunction. Among 150 adult kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant recipients included in the analysis, 14% had preformed DSA and 7.8% of recipients without preformed DSA developed de novo DSA by 12-months. De novo DSA developed in 25% of recipients on cyclosporine compared to 5% of those on tacrolimus (p = 0.02). The incidences of acute rejection were 34%, 48%, and 70% in recipients with no DSA, with preformed DSA, and with de novo DSA, respectively (p = 0.05). In all recipients with de novo DSA and rejection, the first rejection episode preceded or was concurrent with the emergence of de novo DSA. Despite the difference in rejection incidences, the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1-year was not significantly different between recipients with or without DSA.

The time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation and the clinical outcomes of pancreas after kidney transplantation.

Pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is one of the accepted pancreas transplant modalities. We studied the impact of time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation on the outcomes of PAK transplantation. Using OPTN/SRTR data, we included 1853 PAK transplants performed between 1996 and 2005 with follow-up until November 1, 2008. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using the time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation either as a categorical (less than one yr, between one and less than three yr, and greater than or equal to three yr) or as a continuous variable (months) to assess kidney graft and patient survival. Patients who received a pancreas transplant three yr or later after kidney transplantation had higher risk of death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32, p = 0.03). Each month beyond three yr between kidney and pancreas transplantation incurred 1% higher risk of subsequent death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001, 1.02, p = 0.03). In conclusion, time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation is an independent risk factor of kidney graft loss following pancreas transplantation. Shortening the time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation to less than three yr may reduce the risk of kidney graft loss in qualified PAK transplant candidates.

Early pancreas graft failure is associated with inferior late clinical outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Early pancreas graft failure after simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is common. We studied the impact of early pancreas graft failure on long-term kidney and patient survival. METHODS: We included all primary SPK transplants performed in the United States between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007, who had maintained kidney graft function at 90 days posttransplantation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate analyses were performed. The causes of death between the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS: A total of 6282 SPK recipients were included in the analyses. Of those, 470 had lost pancreas graft within the first 90 days largely related to pancreas graft thrombosis. Early pancreas graft failure was associated with lower subsequent kidney graft and patient survival (log-rank, P=0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated a 70% higher risk of kidney graft failure after 3 years (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69; 95% CI 1.08, 2.66; P=0.022) and more than doubled the risk for death (adjusted hazard ratio 2.18; 95% CI 1.67, 2.85; P<0.001) among SPK recipients with early pancreas graft failure. The causes of death were similar between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Early pancreas graft failure in SPK transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk for subsequent kidney failure and death. Optimization of therapeutic interventions after early pancreas graft failure is needed.

New-onset diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients discharged on steroid-free immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: New-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation. We studied the relationship between steroid-free maintenance regimens and NODAT in a national cohort of adult kidney transplant patients. METHODS: A total of 25,837 previously nondiabetic kidney transplant patients, engrafted between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2006, were included in the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the risk of developing NODAT within 3 years after transplant for patients discharged with and without steroid-containing maintenance immunosuppression regimens. The effect of transplant program-level practice regarding steroid-free regimens on the risk of NODAT was studied as well. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of NODAT within 3 years of transplant was 16.2% overall; 17.7% with maintenance steroids and 12.3% without (P<0.001). Patients discharged with steroids had 42% greater odds of developing NODAT compared with those without steroids (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.27-1.58, P<0.001). The maintenance regimen of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate sodium was associated with 25% greater odds of developing NODAT (AOR=1.25, 95% CI=1.08-1.45, P=0.003) than the regimen of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate sodium. Several induction therapies also were associated with lower odds of NODAT compared with no induction. Patients from programs that used steroid-free regimens for a majority of their patients had reduced odds of NODAT compared with patients from programs discharging almost all of their patients on steroid-containing regimens. CONCLUSION: The adoption of steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression at discharge from kidney transplantation in selected patients was associated with reduced odds of developing NODAT within 3 years.

Universal prophylaxis is cost effective in cytomegalovirus serology-positive kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The economic merit of universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy in the management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection for serology positive (R+) kidney transplant patients remains undefined. We performed cost effectiveness and cost utility modeling comparing these two approaches. METHODS: The incidence of CMV infection under universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy was determined among 653 R+ patients from our institution and 416 R+ patients from various clinic trials, respectively. Standardized decision tree analysis and Markov transitional models were used to calculate cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the prototypical clinical data and published literature. Incremental cost effectiveness and cost utility were calculated as dollars for one case of infection avoided and one QALY gained over 10 years, respectively. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incidence of CMV infection was 4.1% and 55.5% within the first year after transplant for universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy, respectively. Compared with preemptive therapy, universal prophylaxis incurred $1464 more in direct cost while saving $7309 in indirect cost, and resulted in a net gain of 0.209 in QALYs per patient over a 10-year period. Thus, universal prophylaxis dominates over preemptive therapy with a cost saving of $27,967 for 1 QALY gained. This cost saving was sensitive to the variation in the rate of CMV infection and disease with each approach. CONCLUSION: Universal prophylaxis in CMV R+ kidney transplant patients is clinically effective and cost saving. It should be considered as the preferred approach.

Transplantation in diabetic kidney failure patients: modalities, outcomes, and clinical management.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common and devastating disease, affecting up to 19.3 million Americans. It is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States. Diabetic patients with ESRD have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and death. For those kidney transplant patients with no history of DM prior to transplantation, the development of new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) also poses a serious threat to both graft and patient survival. Kidney transplantation is the best renal replacement option for diabetic ESRD and has the potential to halt the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Early referral for transplant evaluation is essential for pre-emptive or early kidney transplantation in this cohort of patients. In type 1 DM patients with ESRD, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) should be encouraged; and in patients facing prolonged waiting time for SPK transplantation but with an available living donor, living donor kidney transplantation followed by pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) is a suitable alternative. Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics is deemed experimental by Medicare, and easy access to this modality remains restricted to qualified patients enrolled in clinical trials or with private insurance. The optimal management of kidney transplant patients with pre-existent DM or NODAT involves a multi-pronged approach consisting of pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention to address all potential cardiovascular risk factors such as glycemic and lipid control, blood pressure control, weight loss, and smoking cessation. Finally, re-transplantation should be recommended in suitable kidney transplant patients when the kidney allograft demonstrates continuous and progressive decline in function.

Abnormal glucose metabolism and metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients early after transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal glucose metabolism (AGM) and metabolic syndrome (MS) are individually associated with a poor cardiovascular outcome in kidney transplant recipients. We prospectively studied the relationship between AGM and MS in non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients early after transplantation. METHODS: A total of 203 de novo kidney transplant recipients underwent standard 2-hr glucose tolerance test 10 weeks after transplantation. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. AGM was defined as impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and new onset diabetes after transplant according to the WHO criteria, and MS was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Expert Panel criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 97 patients (47.8%) met the diagnosis of AGM and 98 patients (48.3%) met the criteria of MS. AGM and MS are highly associated (chi, P<0.001). Fasting plasma glucose levels before the transplant are independent predictors common for AGM and MS. Age predicts AGM with and without MS, whereas body mass index before transplant predicts MS. Patients with impaired glucose tolerance and new-onset diabetes after transplant displayed significant worsening of their fasting plasma glucose levels during the 10-week observational period. MS and the components of MS, but not AGM, were associated with reduced transplant renal function (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: The early screening of AGM and MS should be emphasized, and the role of early therapeutic interventions aimed at both conditions explored. The long-term follow-up of these patients will yield more insight on the significance of such findings.

Metabolic syndrome and new onset diabetes after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) and new onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) are common in kidney transplant patients. We studied the relationship between the two conditions and their impact on metabolic and cardiovascular risk profiles. METHODS: All non-diabetic patients transplanted between 1999 and 2005 who were followed up to 2006 were included. MS and NODAT were determined. Kaplan-Meier survival and various regression analyses were performed to determine the clinical correlates for both conditions and their association with various cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Among 591 patients, 314 (53.1%) had MS and 90 (15.2%) developed NODAT. The two conditions were highly associated with each other as 84 patients with NODAT also had MS (14.2%). Elevated body mass index and fasting glucose levels at transplant were risk factors for both conditions, whereas weight gain after transplant was associated only with MS. African American, old age, and hypertension-related ESRD were risk factors for NODAT. Finally, the presence of MS was associated with reduced kidney function and elevated uric acid levels, whereas the presence of NODAT with elevated pulse pressure. CONCLUSIONS: MS and NODAT are highly prevalent and significantly associated with impaired metabolic and cardiovascular risk profiles. Early identification of such conditions may facilitate targeted therapeutic intervention.

Clinical and economic outcomes of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in adults who received kidney transplants from living unrelated donors and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and costs of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (TMG) induction in patients who received kidney transplants from living unrelated donors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Eighty-seven patients who received kidney transplants from living unrelated donors: 40 of the recipients underwent transplantation between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, and did not receive TMG induction (no induction group); 47 underwent transplantation between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2006, and received TMG induction (induction group). All patients received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Biopsy-proven acute rejection, posttransplantation complications, and inpatient hospital costs for the first 12 months after transplantation were compared between groups using standard univariate statistical analyses. Induction significantly decreased the occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection versus no induction (2% vs 48%, p<0.001). Fifty percent of rejection episodes in the no induction group required hospitalization, and 46% of rejection episodes required TMG treatment. Slightly elevated initial costs associated with TMG induction were offset by lower costs related to rejection treatment. Total inpatient costs for the 12 months after transplantation were comparable between the groups (no induction $66,038 vs induction $74,183, p>0.05). For the no induction versus induction groups, no significant differences in cytomegalovirus disease (5% vs 6%), malignancy (3% vs 2%), graft failures (5% vs 6%), mortality (5% vs 4%), and serum creatinine concentrations (mean +/- SD 1.4 +/- 0.3 vs 1.5 +/- 0.3 mg/dl) were observed at 12 months (p>0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Five-day TMG induction effectively reduced the 1-year acute rejection rate without significantly increasing total inpatient costs or posttransplantation complications among recipients of kidney transplants from living unrelated donors.

Six-month prophylaxis is cost effective in transplant patients at high risk for cytomegalovirus infection.

The risk of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a concern in seronegative kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients of seropositive organs despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis. The optimal duration of prophylaxis is unknown. We studied the cost effectiveness of 6- versus 3-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir. A total of 222 seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants received valganciclovir prophylaxis for either 3 or 6 mo during two consecutive time periods. We assessed the incidence of CMV infection and disease 12 mo after completion of prophylaxis and performed cost-effectiveness analyses. The overall incidence of CMV infection and disease was 26.7% and 24.4% in the 3-mo group and 20.9% and 12.1% in the 6-mo group, respectively. Six-month prophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk for CMV disease (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.72), but not infection (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.14). Cost-effectiveness analyses showed that 6-mo prophylaxis combined with a one-time viremia determination at the end of the prophylaxis period incurred an incremental cost of $34,362 and $16,215 per case of infection and disease avoided, respectively, and $8,304 per one quality adjusted life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses supported the cost effectiveness of 6-mo prophylaxis over a wide range of valganciclovir and hospital costs, as well as variation in the incidence of CMV disease. In summary, 6-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir combined with a one-time determination of viremia is cost effective in reducing CMV infection and disease in seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants.