RESUMO
Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer in the world, and lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer. Histologically, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most prevalent type of both skin and lung cancers. We report the case of a 38-year-old female with metastatic, poorly differentiated lung SCC detected on chest X-ray after she presented to the hospital with cough and dyspnea. She had had a 7.5 cm moderately differentiated well-circumscribed posterior scalp SCC completely excised eight years earlier. CT scan showed a large right lung mass, nodular filling defect in the left atrium (LA), and metastases to the adrenal glands and the first rib. Her pulmonary tumor extends to the LA via the right superior pulmonary vein, which is rarely reported in the literature. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the rib mass showed poorly differentiated SCC. The patient received urgent radiotherapy, given superior vena cava and mainstem bronchus compression. Head CT showed no brain metastasis. A biopsy of the left adrenal initially reported an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; however, a second pathologist reported it as a poorly differentiated carcinoma of lung origin. At least three pathologists verified the specimen, and it had a PD-L1 test with a 1-49% score. An initial echocardiogram confirmed the LA mass. The patient received a Paclitaxel-Carboplatin-Pembrolizumab regimen as the first-line treatment for metastatic SCC. A repeat echocardiogram after cycle 1 showed a decrease in the size of the tumor in the LA. Almost five months after her initial visit, this young woman's symptoms and performance status have improved post-palliative radiotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy. Follow-up CT showed smaller lung, nodal, adrenal, and costochondral masses, and evidence of necrosis. This case is clinically relevant because it represents a common problem presenting uncommonly. Moreover, it highlights that ultrasound-guided interventions and medical imaging are essential in directing metastatic cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, especially when pathology cannot confirm but only presume a specific diagnosis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the clinical impression of vulnerability and the Dutch Safety Management Program (VMS), a screening instrument on four geriatric domains (activities in daily living, falls, malnutrition, delirium) are useful predictors of 1-year mortality in older patients in the emergency department. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in the emergency department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients aged 65 years and older visiting the emergency department, and their attending physicians and nurses were included. Clinical impression of vulnerability appraised by physician and nurse and the VMS-screening were recorded. RESULTS: We included 196 patients of whom 64.8%, 61.7%, and 52.6% were considered vulnerable based on the clinical impression of vulnerability of physicians, nurses, and VMS-screening, respectively. Agreement between clinical impression of vulnerability of physicians and nurses, and VMS-screening were both fair (overall agreement 63.3% for both, and respectively kappa 0.32 and kappa 0.31). Clinical impression of vulnerability of physicians, nurses, and VMS-screening had a sensitivity of respectively 94%, 86%, and 73% for predicting 1-year mortality. A positive clinical impression of vulnerability was associated mostly with factors which can be observed directly during first patient contact after arrival to the emergency department, such as age, nutritional status, and functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The clinical impression of vulnerability is a simple dichotomous question which can be used as a first step in the identification of vulnerable older emergency department patients, whereas the more time-consuming VMS-screening is more specific for detection of vulnerability. The clinical impression of vulnerability is therefore useful in a busy emergency department environment where time and resources are limited.