Long-Term Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Prostate Cancer Screening.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. The updated PSA testing 2018 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend shared decision-making for men ages 55 to 69. In 2010, the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage to childless adults earning < 138% of the federal poverty level. Thereafter, individual states have chosen to adopt or defer Medicaid expansion at different times. This allows for the opportunity to study the effects of expansion on a population that did not previously qualify for Medicaid. We examine the long-term association of Medicaid expansion on prostate cancer screening. METHODS: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were extracted for childless men earning less than 138% of the federal poverty level in states with different Medicaid expansion statuses from 2012 to 2020. States were classified into 4 expansion categories: very early expansion states, early expansion states, late expansion states, and nonexpansion states. Prevalence of PSA screening was determined for each category of expansion. Difference-in-difference analyses were used to understand variations in very early expansion states, early expansion states, and late expansion states trends with reference to nonexpansion states. RESULTS: PSA screening prevalence decreased in very early expansion states (27.76% vs 18.50%), early expansion states (33.79% vs 18.09%), late expansion states (36.08% vs 19.14%), and nonexpansion states (38.82% vs 24.40%) from 2012 to 2020. However, the difference-in-difference analyses did not show statistically significant results among any of the years and expansion category groups in our study period. CONCLUSIONS: PSA screening prevalence decreased in all states, regardless of expansion category. No long-term effect of Medicaid expansion on PSA screening prevalence was observed among states with different expansion statuses.

eConsult Provides a Novel Opportunity to Evaluate Hematuria Referrals for Medicaid Patients in the "Real-World" Community.

INTRODUCTION: We utilized an eConsult program to assess the appropriateness and completeness of hematuria evaluation among one of the largest Medicaid networks in California, the Inland Empire Health Plan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all hematuria consults from May 2018 to August 2020. Patient demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record and dialogues between primary care provider and specialist including laboratory results and imaging. We calculated the proportions of imaging types and the outcome of the eConsults among patients. χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 hematuria eConsults were submitted. Primary care provider evaluation for risk factors rates were low: 37% gross hematuria, 29% voiding symptoms/dysuria, 49% other urothelial risk factors or benign etiology, and 63% smoking. Only 50% of all referrals were deemed appropriate based on a history of gross hematuria or ≥3 red blood cells/high-power field on urinalysis without evidence of infection or contamination. Thirty-one percent of patients received a renal ultrasound, 2.8% received CT urography, 5.7% received other cross-sectional imaging, and 64% received no imaging. By the conclusion of the eConsult only 54% of patients were referred for a face-to-face visit. CONCLUSIONS: The use of eConsults allows for urological access in the safety-net population and presents a means to assess the urological needs in the community. Our findings suggest eConsults represent an opportunity to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with hematuria among safety-net patients who are otherwise less likely to receive a proper evaluation.

Online Engagement with Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Are Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies Outpacing the Gold Standard?

Background: Patients suffering from progressive symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increasingly turn to the internet for information on invasive and minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST). This study aimed to identify online articles accessed by patients seeking guidance on said options and to evaluate the quality and readability of their content. Methods: Social media analytics tool Buzzumo was used to identify the most shared articles on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Pinterest related to BPH surgical treatments from 2016 to 2021. The content quality was graded using the DISCERN tool; a questionnaire that assesses the quality of written information on treatment choices for a health problem. An online Automatic Readability Checker was used to evaluate the readability of the written transcripts. Google Trends data were used to evaluate search term popularity for BPH procedures from 2016 to 2021. Google Trends data and DISCERN ratings were analyzed with ANOVA and paired t-test, respectively. Results: Thirty-nine percent of identified articles were rated as low quality, 39% as moderate quality, and 22% as high quality using the DISCERN tool, with no significant difference among reviewer ratings (p = 0.0561). The median reading level of all articles was 12th grade. Google Trends data illustrated a rising popularity of MIST such as Rezum and urethral lift (Urolift), exceeding interest in more invasive procedures such as Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and laser surgery. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remained popular with no significant difference between MIST and TURP on Google Trends (p = 3.46). Conclusions: The most accessed articles on BPH treatments have important shortcomings, including risks of treatment and other available options for treatment. Article transcripts exceed the reading level of the average adult patient. TURP has remained a popular procedure online, but there is a notable rising interest in MIST, especially Urolift.