Comparative study on two kidney graft rinsing and preservation solutions in terms of the post-transplantation risk of delayed graft function and cost.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Belzer solution (Viaspan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Brussels, Belgium), which is more expensive than Eurocollins solution, was better at preventing delayed graft function (DGF) and whether it was cost-effective as it could potentially reduce post-transplantation complications. METHOD: The risk of occurrence of complications associated with the use of these two rinsing and preserving solutions was estimated from a survey of 106 patients undergoing renal transplantation between 1 January 1993 and 31 March 1998. Both efficacy and adverse outcomes were recorded along with the costs directly associated with the transplantation procedure in the hospital setting: hospitalization, rinsing and preserving solutions, medical and technical interventions and diagnostic tests. RESULTS: For the 45 kidney grafts rinsed and preserved with Eurocollins (strategy S1: n1 = 45) the cost/graft was estimated at 40 euros. With Viaspan (strategy S2: n2 = 61) the corresponding cost/graft was 424 euros. Logistic regression analysis showed that Viaspan was better than Eurocollins solution (ebeta = 0.437; P = 0.05) in preventing DGF. Overall, S2 was less expensive than S1, from the hospital's perspective. The mean difference per patient was 278 euros, which amounts to a saving of 2% of the total cost per renal transplantation. For rinsing and preserving kidney grafts Belzer solution is therefore preferable to Eurocollins solution.

Posttransplantation acute tubular necrosis: risk factors and implications for graft survival.

Previous studies aimed at identifying the causes, risk factors, and outcome of kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function (DGF) have yielded controversial results. We retrospectively analyzed the causes and risk factors for DGF in 263 cadaveric kidney transplantations from November 1988 to March 1997 in one center. Causes of DGF were assessed by postoperative graft evolution and graft biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to investigate the risk factors for DGF induced by acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Seventy-six patients (29%) had DGF, which was caused by ATN in 70 patients (92.1%) and acute rejection (AR) in 6 patients (7.9%). Therefore, we focused on risk factors and consequences for ATN-induced DGF. In monofactorial analysis, ATN was significantly associated with greater weight and presence of an atheromatous disease in both donor and recipient. Other risk factors for ATN were older age of donor, recipient American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status category IV, cold ischemia time (CIT), and transplantation using the right kidney. The multivariate analysis showed that donor and recipient weight, donor age, transplantation using the right kidney, preservation in Eurocollins solution, ASA score, and CIT were associated with ATN. The incidence of rejection and renal function were not different at 3 months or 1 and 5 years. ATN is the main cause of DGF in kidney transplant recipients. ATN is caused by donor and recipient vascular background, grafting the right kidney, and CIT. ATN does not appear to have an adverse effect on long-term kidney function.