Patient's perception of hygiene in the dental practice after COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted various sectors, including healthcare. The dental profession has faced unprecedented challenges in providing care while minimizing the risk of transmission. The aim of the study is to assess how patient's perception of hygiene in the dental field has changed since COVID-19. In detail, it has been analyzed patient's attention to hygiene and how in his opinion the dental practice changed its procedures after COVID-19. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions was submitted to 509 subjects, patients of several dental practices. These were related to: 1) change in their perception of hygiene after COVID-19; 2) how the office they usually go to has changed and what hygiene standards it has adopted; 3) vaccination against COVID-19. Descriptive analyses of all variables in the questionnaire were performed, and statistical analyses between variables were carried out by Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: Most patients (75.8%) stated that they had changed their perception of hygiene after the onset of COVID-19. They reported that they had experienced changes in hygiene procedures at their usual dental practice (70.7%), including rinsing with chlorhexidine mouthwash, continuous air and water disinfection and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Vaccination of practitioners was considered to be important by 73.5% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study it was analyzed how emergence of the new Coronavirus has considerably changed the perception of patient hygiene within the dental practice. As a result of the awareness implemented to prevent virus transmission, patients are paying more attention to hygiene and preventive procedures to protect their health.

Correlation between consumption of sugared beverages and caries incidence in the pediatric patient.

BACKGROUND: Dental caries still represents a major public health problem, as it is the most widespread noncommunicable disease. The enamel of deciduous teeth is less resistant than permanent dentition and for this reason demineralization, and consequent caries formation, progresses more rapidly. The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between the incidence of caries and intake of sugary drinks in pediatric patients. METHODS: The study included 526 subjects (295 males, 231 females) between the ages of 2 and 15 years old. Several variables were examined, including: gender, age, separate values of the decay missing filled teeth (DMFT) epidemiological index (for both deciduous and permanent dentition), quantity and quality of sugary drinks taken daily, daily brushing frequency, parental nationality and socio-economic status. A multivariate analysis conducted (using a simple linear regression model) to verify the association between soft drink consumption and DMF, including a series of confounding variables (namely, sex, brushing frequency and parents' nationality). RESULTS: From the results of the statistical analysis of the variables examined, a correlation between the incidence of caries in children aged between 2 and 14 years and brushing frequency, consumption of sugary drinks and parents' nationality was found. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to raise awareness and properly inform patients and healthcare colleagues about the importance of oral health. Taking good care of our oral health represents part of implementation of the lifestyle and the quality of life of the future generations.

Soft drinks and dental erosion during pediatric age: a clinical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Dental erosion is an irreversible condition of loss of teeth hard tissues caused by intrinsic or extrinsic acids attack, without bacterial involvement. Common soft drinks have an acid pH and they release hydrogen ions and act as chelating agents, dissolving teeth mineral component. The aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between the consumption of soft drinks in children and the degree of dental erosion. METHODS: A questionnaire of 15 multiple choice questions was addressed to the parents of the 231 children needing different dental treatments. Responses were compared with the level of dental erosion of their child, that was clinically investigated using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) index. RESULTS: About 26.8% of subjects fall into a high-risk category of dental erosion while 24.2% in a low risk level. Socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits are able to affect the degree of dental erosion. Toothpastes containing fluoride have not proved effective in preventing this phenomenon and no significant correlations were found between the type of toothbrush used and its frequency of use. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to apply preventive measures such as information on the processes and causes of erosion, instruction about right home oral hygiene maneuvers and the possible use of specific products, to avoid the development of problems related to severe dental wear.

Impact of breastfeeding and bottle-feeding comparison on children between 2- and 6-year-old caries development.

BACKGROUND: Caries is a multifactorial degenerative disease, and it is the most common chronic disease during childhood. Few studies have assessed the effects of breastfeeding and bottle feeding on children's dental caries, also taking into account the duration of both options. We investigated whether the infant feeding duration and feeding methods (breast, bottle or both) are risk factors for dental caries in childhood. METHODS: Our study included 210 children from 2 to 6 years old and it was carried out in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Borgo Cavalli (Treviso, Italy). The average number of decayed, missing, and filled primary tooth surfaces (DMFT) were investigated by analyzing the medical histories. Data collection was conducted from September 2021 to July 2022. Data analysis was performed using the statistical program R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). First, an analysis was performed to verify the database using a graph. We used the negative Poisson and Binomial count model for the data. Next, the verification of which covariables were significant was performed, finally the conclusions were obtained. RESULTS: By dividing the population according to the type of feeding, we saw that most of the children participating in the study had between 3 and 7 cavities. By analyzing the length of feeding, we saw that the average duration was between 10 and 20 months. Due to the P values, we concluded that the total duration of feeding variable was not significant in explaining the event of interest and, therefore, only the variable type of feeding (artificial and natural) was significant because the P value was below the 5% significance level. Finally, we concluded that natural type breastfeeding increases the average amount of caries by 1.29 times, or 29% more than artificial feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bottle-feeding, breastfeeding increases the risk of caries at an early age; however, there is no correlation between duration and occurrence of caries. Meanwhile, considering health benefits, dental professionals should not discourage breastfeeding; as a matter of fact, promoting breastfeeding has many benefits for infants and mothers, provided that it is associated with proper oral hygiene.

Relationship between Breastfeeding Difficulties, Ankyloglossia, and Frenotomy: A Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Breastfeeding plays a key role in the development of the baby, in addition to the benefits to the mother and this dyad. Among the possible difficulties in this process, we have ankyloglossia. Some professionals opt for the frenotomy, although the literature is controversial. This paper aims to present how the literature provides subsidies for health professionals' decision and action in the intersection of the themes: breastfeeding, ankyloglossia, and frenotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research on the platforms SciELO and PubMed used the terms: "ankyloglossia," "frenotomy," and "lingual frenulum" and the same ones associated with "breastfeeding." A specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and validated by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to reduce any bias in the analysis. In the end, 16 papers were included and, by thematic equivalence, divided into two domains: association between lingual frenulum alteration and breastfeeding and between frenotomy and breastfeeding. RESULTS: The literature does not assure that the frenotomy is the "standard conduct" to be adopted in cases of difficulty in breastfeeding and ankyloglossia. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed on the different types of ankyloglossia and their direct influence on the sucking function and lactation difficulties.

Zirconia vs. stainless steel pediatric crowns: a literature review.

The aim of this review was to assess efficacy and acceptance of aesthetic zirconia crowns (ZCs) compared to the traditionally employed stainless steel crowns (SSCs) for primary teeth restoration. A comprehensive literature search was completed for the relevant keywords in Scopus and Medline databases. Resulting article abstracts and full texts were screened to determine final inclusion. Eighteen articles were included from the initial search. There is still little evidence to support the use of one type of crowns over another for primary teeth, in particularly for ZCs, lately introduced in pediatric restoration. The gold standard for restoring decayed primary teeth is still represented by SSCs, despite the growing importance of the aesthetic issue related to their use. Aesthetic ZCs resulted in having adequate properties to be employed for the treatment of decayed primary teeth, such as mechanical resistance, limited plaque adhesion, wear behavior and natural appearance. There is still a paucity of literature clinically evaluating the efficacy of ZCs for primary teeth restoration, but they can be considered a promising alternative to SSCs. This field of research has to be more deeply explored to improve dental care in children affected by early childhood caries.

Healing of human critical-size alveolar bone defects secondary to cyst enucleation: a randomized pilot study with 12 months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar bone cyst enucleation can give rise to critical-size defects whose healing may be incomplete due to the loss of periosteum or bone walls and there is a paucity of studies investigating the use of immediate bone grafts. The aim of this study was to compare spontaneous healing versus a deproteinized bovine bone graft. METHODS: In this prospective randomized clinical pilot study, twenty patients requiring the removal of a cyst ≥20 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to one of two groups: deproteinized bovine bone grafting (test) or spontaneous healing (control). Computed tomographies were obtained preoperatively and 12 months after surgery and the radiolucent volumes were compared. Residual radiological morphology and clinical outcomes at 7 days and 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery were also assessed. RESULTS: The median percentage reduction in the volume of the defect was 98% in the test group and 73% in the control group (P=0.001) with an evidence of soft tissue invagination in the latter. There were no differences in the clinical parameters between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this pilot study, the healing of critical-size alveolar bone defects is incomplete at 1 year observation and the use of deproteinized bovine bone graft did not influence the clinical outcomes.