Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 42(9): 1702-1708, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34266866

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and medulloblastomas have similar imaging and histologic features but distinctly different outcomes. We hypothesized that they could be distinguished by MR imaging-based radiomic phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assembled T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images of 48 posterior fossa atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and 96 match-paired medulloblastomas from 7 institutions. Using a holdout test set, we measured the performance of 6 candidate classifier models using 6 imaging features derived by sparse regression of 900 T2WI and 900 T1WI Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based radiomics features. RESULTS: From the originally extracted 1800 total Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based features, sparse regression consistently reduced the feature set to 1 from T1WI and 5 from T2WI. Among classifier models, logistic regression performed with the highest AUC of 0.86, with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 scores of 0.80, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. The top 3 important Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative features, by decreasing order of relative contribution, included voxel intensity at the 90th percentile, inverse difference moment normalized, and kurtosis-all from T2WI. CONCLUSIONS: Six quantitative signatures of image intensity, texture, and morphology distinguish atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors from medulloblastomas with high prediction performance across different machine learning strategies. Use of this technique for preoperative diagnosis of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors could significantly inform therapeutic strategies and patient care discussions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Cerebelares , Meduloblastoma , Tumor Rabdoide , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Meduloblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Fenótipo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tumor Rabdoide/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 40(10): 1649-1657, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fractional tumor burden better correlates with histologic tumor volume fraction in treated glioblastoma than other perfusion metrics such as relative CBV. We defined fractional tumor burden classes with low and high blood volume to distinguish tumor from treatment effect and to determine whether fractional tumor burden can inform treatment-related decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with high-grade gliomas (primarily glioblastoma) with recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions on DSC-MR imaging were retrospectively evaluated after surgical sampling. Histopathologic examination defined treatment effect versus tumor. Normalized relative CBV thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to define low, intermediate, and high fractional tumor burden classes in each histopathologically defined group. Performance was assessed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Consensus agreement among physician raters reporting hypothetic changes in treatment-related decisions based on fractional tumor burden was compared with actual real-time treatment decisions. RESULTS: Mean lower fractional tumor burden, high fractional tumor burden, and relative CBV of the contrast-enhancing volume were significantly different between treatment effect and tumor (P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001), with tumor having significantly higher fractional tumor burden and relative CBV and lower fractional tumor burden. No significance was found with intermediate fractional tumor burden. Performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was the following: high fractional tumor burden, 0.85; low fractional tumor burden, 0.7; and relative CBV, 0.81. In comparing treatment decisions, there were disagreements in 7% of tumor and 44% of treatment effect cases; in the latter, all disagreements were in cases with scattered atypical cells. CONCLUSIONS: High fractional tumor burden and low fractional tumor burden define fractions of the contrast-enhancing lesion volume with high and low blood volume, respectively, and can differentiate treatment effect from tumor in recurrent glioblastomas. Fractional tumor burden maps can also help to inform clinical decision-making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioblastoma/terapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA