Suicide-preventive compulsory admission is not a proportionate measure - time for clinicians to recognise the associated risks.

Suicide is considered a global public health issue and compulsory admission is a commonly used measure to prevent suicide. However, the practice has been criticised since several studies indicate that the measure lacks empirical support and may even increase suicide risk. This paper investigates whether the practice has enough empirical support to be considered proportionate. To that end, arguments supporting compulsory admission as a suicide-preventive measure for most suicidal patients are scrutinized. The ethical point of departure is that the expected benefits of compulsory admission should outweigh the potential harms of the measure to be proportionate and defensible. It is concluded that, for most suicidal patients, suicide-preventive compulsory admission cannot be presumed to be a proportionate measure. To be so, the expected medical benefits of the measure should be greater than the potential increase in suicide risk and other harms that compulsory admission could entail. Instead of using compulsory admission as a suicide-preventive measure, extra safety measures may be needed during and after compulsory admission to prevent the risk of hospitalisation-induced suicide.

Patients with borderline personality disorder and the effects of compulsory admissions on self-harm behaviour: a questionnaire study.

BACKGROUND: Previous research on patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) has indicated negative effects, including increased suicidality, from long hospital admissions and paternalism. Still, long-term compulsory admissions have been reported to occur regularly. Less is known about how healthcare personnel perceives these admissions and to what extent they think the use of compulsory care can be diminished. This study addresses those questions to make care more beneficial. METHODS: A questionnaire study, the respondents being nurses and psychiatric aides employed at psychiatric hospital wards in Sweden. The questionnaire contained questions with fixed answers and room for comments. 422 questionnaires were distributed to 21 wards across Sweden, and the response rate was 66%. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive content analysis. RESULTS: Most respondents experienced that more than a week's compulsory admission either increased (68%) or had no effect (26%) on self-harm behaviour. A majority (69%) considered the compulsory admissions to be too long at their wards, with detrimental effects on the patients. They also recognized several reasons for compulsory admissions without medical indication, like doctors' fear of complaints and patients' lack of housing. Also, patients sometimes demand compulsory care. Respondents recommended goal-oriented care planning, around three-day-long voluntary admissions, and better outpatient care to reduce compulsory hospital admissions. DISCUSSION: These findings imply that many BPD patients are regularly forced to receive psychiatric care that inadvertently can make them self-harm more. The respondents' comments can be used as a source when formulating clinical guidelines.

Hospital staff at most psychiatric clinics in Stockholm experience that patients who self-harm have too long hospital stays, with ensuing detrimental effects.

BACKGROUND: Previous research on patients who self-harm has indicated potential negative effects from long hospital stays. Yet, such care has been reported to occur regularly. We conducted this questionnaire study to investigate how hospital staff, who treat self-harming patients, experience the relation between lengths of stay and self-harm behaviour, and the motives for non-beneficial hospital stays. METHODS: The respondents of the questionnaire were nurses and mental health workers employed at public inpatient wards in Stockholm, treating patients who self-harm. The questionnaire contained questions with fixed answers and room for comments. A total of 304 questionnaires were distributed to 13 wards at five clinics, and the response rate was 63%. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive content analysis. RESULTS: The results show that most staff experienced that more than a week's stay either increased (57%) or had no effect (33%) on self-harm behaviour. Most respondents at most clinics considered the stays to be too long at their wards, and that the stays could be reduced. The respondents recognized several reasons for non-beneficial hospital stays, like fear of suicidal behaviour and doctors' fear of complaints. Patients appearing as demanding or fragile were thought to be given more care than others. The respondents' comments confirmed the majority's experience of detrimental effects from longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of the health care staff experienced that patients who self-harm often receive too long hospital stays, with detrimental effects, and they had experienced several non-medical reasons for such care.

Against Ulysses contracts for patients with borderline personality disorder.

Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) sometimes request to be admitted to hospital under compulsory care, often under the argument that they cannot trust their suicidal impulses if treated voluntarily. Thus, compulsory care is practised as a form of Ulysses contract in such situations. In this normative study we scrutinize the arguments commonly used in favour of such Ulysses contracts: (1) the patient lacking free will, (2) Ulysses contracts as self-paternalism, (3) the patient lacking decision competence, (4) Ulysses contracts as a defence of the authentic self, and (5) Ulysses contracts as a practical solution in emergency situations. In our study, we have accepted consequentialist considerations as well as considerations of autonomy. We conclude that compulsory care is not justified when there is a significant uncertainty of beneficial effects or uncertainty regarding the patient's decision-making capacity. We have argued that such uncertainty is present regarding BPD patients. Hence, Ulysses contracts including compulsory care should not be used for this group of patients.

Physician estimated vs. self-reported subjective memory in depressed patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy.

Background: Subjective memory deficits are common in depression and during series of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). There is a need for feasible assessment of memory deficit. In the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT, patients' subjective memory function is rated by a clinician. Self-ratings would be easier to administer.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the consistency between self-reported and physician estimated subjective memory in depressed patients treated with ECT.Methods: Fifty-two inpatients treated with ECT for major- or bipolar depression were recruited and 41 of them completed the study protocol. Each patient rated their own subjective memory and had it rated in an interview by a physician both before/in the beginning of the ECT series and after the ECT series. The patients' memory was rated and self-rated with the memory item in the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). We then analyzed correlations, and differences in distributions, between self-reported assessment and physician estimates of patients' subjective memory.Results: The correlations between the self-reported and the physician estimated ratings of subjective memory were 0.699 (p < .01) in baseline ratings and 0.651 (p < .01) in post-treatment ratings. These correlations were relatively high compared to a previous study on self-reported vs. physician estimated CPRS ratings.Conclusions: Based on the results in this study, we propose that patients' self-ratings of subjective memory in association with ECT can be used instead of a physician's rating of patients' subjective memory.

Psychiatrists' motives for practising in-patient compulsory care of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD).

INTRODUCTION: Patients with BPD are often subjected to compulsory care. However, as compulsory care restricts liberty and may have negative effects, it is recommended that it be used sparingly. In this study, we investigate psychiatrists' motives for practising compulsory care of BPD patients. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with twelve Swedish psychiatrists from Stockholm County. These interviews were analysed according to descriptive qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The qualitative data from our study resulted in three themes: (1) BPD patients are perceived as difficult: interpersonally, in clinical and legal management, and due to suicide risk; (2) there are medical and non-medical motives for compulsory care of BPD patients, and its consequences can vary; and (3) BPD patients have decision competence and sometimes demand to be taken into compulsory care. CONCLUSION: The interviewed psychiatrists' own judgements and values, rather than clinical and legal directions, were decisive in their practice of compulsory care. For the BPD patients, this can result in vast differences in the mental healthcare offered, depending on which individual psychiatrist they encounter. Socio-political expectations and psychiatrists' personal views seem to lead to more compulsory care of BPD patients than is clinically recommended and legally sanctioned.