A phase II open-label study of aprepitant as anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy.

Despite the widespread use of 5-HT3 antagonists as anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving induction chemotherapy, nausea and vomiting persist in many cases. We performed a Phase II single-arm study evaluating the use of aprepitant on days 1-5, in combination with a 5-HT antagonist on days 1-3, in AML patients undergoing induction chemotherapy with daunorubicin on days 1-3 plus cytarabine, given as a continuous infusion, on days 1-7. This was compared to a retrospective cohort of AML patients that received the same chemotherapy regimen with a 5-HT antagonist but without aprepitant. The cumulative incidence of vomiting/retching by the end of day 5 was significantly lower in the aprepitant vs. the control group (26.3 vs. 52.8%, p = 0.013). The cumulative incidence of nausea by the end of day 5 was 61% in the aprepitant group vs. 75% in the control group. The total use of supplemental anti-emetics on days 2-5 was also significantly lower in the aprepitant group (p = 0.01). In contrast, the cumulative incidence of vomiting/retching by the end of day 8, the incidence of vomiting/retching on days 6-8, and the use of anti-emetics on days 6-8, were not significantly different between the two groups. The results suggest that the use of aprepitant may be associated with a lower rate of emesis during aprepitant dosing days, but not afterward. However, this requires confirmation in a randomized trial.

AML refractory to primary induction with Ida-FLAG has a poor clinical outcome.

We evaluated outcomes of 100 patients with high risk AML treated with Ida-FLAG induction as first-line therapy. 72 achieved remission with one cycle; 19 did not. High risk cytogenetics and TP53 mutations were associated with failure to achieve remission. In those reaching remission, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation was associated with better relapse-free and overall survival. Those not achieving remission with induction therapy were extremely unlikely to reach remission with further therapy and had a dismal prognosis. Exploratory molecular analysis confirmed persistence of the dominant genetic mutations identified at diagnosis. Ex vivo chemosensitivity did not demonstrate significant differences between responders and non-responders. Thus, Ida-FLAG induction has a high chance of inducing remission in patients with high risk AML. Those achieving remission require allogeneic transplantation to achieve cure; those not achieving remission rarely respond to salvage chemotherapy and have a dismal outcome. Alternatives to conventional chemotherapy must be considered in this group.

Flow cytometric assessment of autologous gammadelta T cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: potential effector cells for immunotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Gammadelta T cells are a rare component of the circulating innate immune system capable of exerting anti-neoplastic activity. This population may be suitable for the adoptive immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Little is known however, about the frequency and function of circulating gammadelta T cells in AML. The aim of the study was to enumerate peripheral blood gammadelta T cells in patients with AML and explore the feasibility of their use clinically. METHODS: We compared the absolute circulating gammadelta T cell levels in 33 AML patients before and after treatment versus 20 healthy volunteers using flow cytometry. The function of gammadelta T cells was assessed by detection of intracelluar interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and cytotoxicity against leukemic blasts. RESULTS: AML patients with high blast counts prior to induction chemotherapy had marginally decreased gammadelta T cell levels compared with healthy controls: median 38/microL versus 83/microL; P = 0.051. Sequential gammadelta T cell enumeration after induction showed significantly decreased counts in patients with a persistently high blast burden compared to patients with reduced but detectable residual disease (molecular maker or borderline bone marrow infiltration): median 7/microL versus 105/microL; P = 0.008. Patients with residual disease had significantly higher gammadelta T cell counts compared to those retested after they had achieved complete remission (CR); P = 0.0025. In CR, gammadelta T cell counts remained lower than those of healthy individuals: median 33/microL versus 83/microL, P = 0.030. We detected a sharp increase (on average, four-fold higher than values in CR) of gammadelta T cells in patients in very early morphologic or molecular relapse. We also tested the functional properties of gammadelta T cells from patients with AML in CR. Flow cytometric assessment of IFN-gamma revealed similar numbers of gammadelta T cells expressing the T1 cytokine compared with healthy controls. We also showed that gammadelta T cells were able to kill leukemic target cells in vitro. CONCLUSION: Flow cytometric assessment of gammadelta T cells in patients with AML revealed quantitative shifts with respect to disease status. Our data suggest that gammadelta T cells warrant further investigation as potential therapeutic agents.

The pharmacokinetics of erythropoietin in the cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous administration of recombinant human erythropoietin.

OBJECTIVES: Erythropoietin (EPO) was originally described as a regulator of erythropoiesis. Recently, synthesis of EPO and expression of the EPO receptor (EPO-R) have been reported for the central nervous system (CNS). The potential use of EPO to prevent or reduce CNS injury and the paucity of information regarding its entry into the human CNS led us to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of recombinant human EPO (r-HuEPO) in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). METHODS: Four patients with Ommaya reservoirs were enrolled to facilitate serial CSF sampling. R-HuEPO was given intravenously (IV) in single doses of 40,000 IU or 1,500 IU/kg and in multiple doses of 40,000 IU daily for 3 days. RESULTS: The EPO concentrations in the CSF increased after a period of slow equilibration. Linear first-order distribution kinetics were observed for serum and CSF. The concentration of EPO in the CSF was proportional to the serum concentration of EPO and the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as determined by the albumin quotient (QA=[albumin] CSF/[albumin] serum). A rise in the CSF concentration was seen as early as 3 h after IV administration. Peak levels (C(max)) were reached between 9 h and 24 h. After a single dose of 1,500 IU/kg, the Cmax in the CSF ranged from 11 mIU/ml to 40 mIU/ml, and the ratios of CSF/serum Cmax ranged from 3.6x10-4 to 10.2x10-4. The terminal half-life (t1/2) values of EPO in serum and CSF were similar. The t(1/2) of r-HuEPO in the CSF ranged from 25.6 h to 35.5 h after a single dose of 1,500 IU/l. Using these parameters a PK model was generated that predicts the concentration-time profile of EPO in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: We report that r-HuEPO can cross the human BBB and describe for the first time the PK of EPO in the CSF after IV administration. Our data suggest that the concentration-time profile of EPO in the CSF can be predicted for individual patients if the serum concentration of EPO and the Q(A) are known. This information may be useful in the design of clinical trials to explore the potential therapeutic effects of EPO during CNS injury.