Global burden of skin and subcutaneous diseases and its association with socioeconomic status in children and adolescents: an analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2019.

Skin and subcutaneous diseases are one of the most common problems affecting the health of children and adolescents. The purpose of this study was to investigate the burden of skin and subcutaneous diseases among children and adolescents and its association with socioeconomic status. Data was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The number of cases, incidence rate, number of deaths, and death rate in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019 were extracted and stratified by age, sex, and socioeconomic status. In 2019, the global incidence and death rates of skin and subcutaneous diseases in children and adolescents were 57966.98 (95% Uncertainty Interval [UI] 53776.15 to 62521.24) per 100,000 and 0.21 (95% UI 0.13 to 0.26) per 100,000, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, the global incidence rate increased by 5.80% (95% UI 4.82-6.72%) and the death rate decreased by 43.68% (95% UI 23.04-65.27%). The incidence and death rates were negatively correlated with socioeconomic status. Incidence rates were not different between females and males, but death rates were higher among females than males. The highest incidence and death rates were found in the 1-4-year age group and < 1-year age group, respectively. The global burden of skin and subcutaneous diseases in children and adolescents was characterized by regional imbalances. The global burden of skin and subcutaneous diseases in children and adolescents from poorer regions requires more attention. This study provides strong evidence for global policymaking for childhood and adolescent diseases.

Effects of intensive, targeted education by pharmacists on anticoagulant patients with atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from China.

AIMS: Many people diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) may lack awareness of AF and anticoagulants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of intensive, targeted education by pharmacists on anticoagulant patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-six AF patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care or pharmacist education. Follow-up is scheduled after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pharmacists provided intensive education on knowledge deficits revealed by the Jessa Atrial Fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ) during each visit. Patients also completed two questionnaires to assess their medication adherence and satisfaction. Clinical outcomes were recorded during follow-up. 361 patients completed follow-up. Baseline scores on the JAKQ were similar in the education group (median: 31.3%) and the standard care group (median: 31.3%) (p = 0.911). Over time, the knowledge score of the education group increased significantly (1 month: 68.8%, 3 months: 81.3%; P <0.001), while there was no significant improvement in the standard care group (1 month: 37.5%, 3 months: 37.5%; P = 0.314). Adherence scores improved significantly over time in the education group (P < 0.001) but not in the standard care group (P =0.101). Compared with standard care, pharmacist education was associated with a significantly lower risk of bleeding (P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Given the knowledge deficiency of AF patients in China, standardized patient education should be a part of their daily care. Pharmacist-led education intervention can significantly improve the disease-related knowledge, medication adherence, and drug treatment satisfaction of AF patients while significantly reducing the risk of bleeding.

A new model (Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB) for predicting the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarin patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing warfarin-related major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and to develop a score that would provide a reference for assessing the risk of major GIB associated with warfarin treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data from warfarin-treated patients. Scores were analyzed using logistic regression. The area under the subject working characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the scoring performance. RESULTS: A total of 1591 patients who met the requirements for warfarin use were included in this study, and 46 developed major GIB. After univariate analysis as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis, nine factors were found to be associated with increased risk of major GIB, namely age ≥ 65 years, history of peptic ulcer, history of major bleeding, abnormal liver function, abnormal renal function, cancer, anemia, labile international normalized ratio, and combination of antiplatelet agents/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score was constructed using these nine factors. The AUC and Bootstrap method-corrected AUC of the Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score were 0.916 (95% CI: 0.862-0.970, P < 0.001) and 0.919 (95% CI: 0.860-0.967, P < 0.001), respectively, which were higher than those of the HAS-BLED score (AUC = 0.868, 95% CI: 0.812-0.924, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on nine risk factors, the Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score was constructed to predict the risk of warfarin-related major GIB. The newly developed Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score has a better predictive value than the HAS-BLED score and may be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of major GIB in patients on warfarin.

Global burden of cardiovascular disease attributable to metabolic risk factors, 1990-2019: an analysis of observational data from a 2019 Global Burden of Disease study.

OBJECTIVES: An up-to-date, detailed global analysis of the current status of the metabolic-attributed cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden has not been reported. Therefore, we investigated the global burden of metabolic-attributed CVD and its association with socioeconomic development status over the past 30 years. METHODS: Data on the burden of metabolic-attributed CVD were taken from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Metabolic risk factors of CVD included high fasting plasma glucose, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high systolic blood pressure (SBP), high body mass index (BMI) and kidney dysfunction. Numbers and age-standardised rates (ASR) of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and deaths were extracted and stratified by sex, age, Socio-demographic Index (SDI) level, country and region. RESULTS: The ASR of metabolic-attributed CVD DALYs and deaths decreased by 28.0% (95% UI 23.8% to 32.5%) and 30.4% (95% UI 26.6% to 34.5%), respectively, from 1990 to 2019. The highest burden of metabolic-attributed total CVD and intracerebral haemorrhage was mainly in low SDI locations, while the highest burden of ischaemic heart disease and IS was mainly in high SDI locations. The burden of DALYs and deaths in CVD was higher in men than women. In addition, the number and ASR of DALYs and deaths were highest in those over 80 years old. CONCLUSION: Metabolic-attributed CVD threatens public health, especially in low-SDI locations and among the elderly. Low SDI location should strengthen the control of metabolic factors such as high SBP, high BMI, and high LDL-c and increase the knowledge of metabolic risk factors for CVD. Countries and regions should enhance screening and prevention of metabolic risk factors of CVD in the elderly. Policy-makers should use 2019 GBD data to guide cost-effective interventions and resource allocation.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Combined With Hypertension: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Whether there are differences in direct oral anticoagulants efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with hypertension is unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the differences in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with AF combined with hypertension. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on data from 15 centers in China and included 2086 patients with AF. We divided the patients into dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups according to their direct oral anticoagulants. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the groups. Due to our limited sample size, the number of cases of some clinical events with low incidence was small. During a mean follow-up period of 10 months, a total of 268 (12.9%) bleeding events occurred, including 27 (1.3%) major bleeding events and 241 (11.6%) minor bleeding events, and 45 (2.2%) thromboembolic events. In patients with AF combined with hypertension, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher major bleeding incidence than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR], 2.89 [95% confidence interval [CI, 1.22-6.87]; P = .012). In contrast, the risk of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was similar for rivaroxaban (OR, 0.55 [95%CI, 0.29-1.01]; P = .069) and dabigatran (OR, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.63-1.08]; P = .150). Based on the results of this study, in patients with AF and hypertension treated with direct oral anticoagulants, the incidence of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was not statistically different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding.

Risk factors for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage has a high mortality rate, and many factors can cause intracranial hemorrhage. Until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been updated. AIM: We conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage. METHOD: The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316160). All English studies that met the inclusion criteria published before January 2022 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality and evidence of the included studies. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage were used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. RESULTS: Of 6083 citations, we included 105 studies in our analysis. For intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with age, National Institutes of Health stroke scale, leukoaraiosis, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, total cholesterol, proteinuria, fibrinogen levels, creatinine, homocysteine, early infarct signs, antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy; In addition, we found low-certainty evidence that there may be little to no association between risk of intracranial hemorrhage and weight, sex, platelet count, uric acid, albumin and white matter hyperintensity. Leukoaraiosis, cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol, white blood cell count, proteinuria, fibrinogen levels, creatinine, homocysteine and early CT hypodensities are not included in most intracranial hemorrhage risk assessment models. CONCLUSION: This study informs risk prediction for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage, it also informs guidelines for intracranial hemorrhage prevention and future research.

New score for predicting major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation using direct oral anticoagulants.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to identify factors associated with major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and to construct and externally validate a predictive model that would provide a validated tool for clinical assessment of major bleeding. METHODS: In the development cohort, prediction model was built by logistic regression, the area under the curve (AUC), and Nomogram. External validation, analytical identification and calibration of the model using AUC, calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: The development cohort consisted of 4209 patients from 7 centers and the external validation cohort consisted of 1800 patients from 12 centers. Multifactorial analysis showed that age > 65 years, history of bleeding, anemia, vascular disease, antiplatelet therapy/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rivaroxaban were independent risk factors for major bleeding, and gastrointestinal protective agents was a protective factor. The Alfalfa-MB model was constructed using these seven factors (AUC = 0.807), and in the external validation cohort, the model showed good discriminatory power (AUC = 0.743) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test P value of 0.205). The predictive power of the six bleeding scores was ORBIT (AUC = 0.706), HAS-BLED (AUC = 0.648), ATRIA (AUC = 0.645), HEMORR2 HAGES (AUC = 0.632), ABC (AUC = 0.619) and Shireman (AUC = 0.599) in descending order. CONCLUSION: Based on 7 factors, we derived and externally validated a predictive model for major bleeding with DOACs in patients with AF (Alfalfa-MB). The model has good predictive value and may be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of major bleeding in patients with DOACs.

Risk Factors for Anticoagulant-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage has a high mortality rate, and many factors can cause intracranial hemorrhage. Until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been published. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage. The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316750). All English studies that met the inclusion criteria published before January 2022 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality and evidence of the included studies. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage were used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 7322 citations, we included 20 studies in our analysis. For intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with race, Glasgow Coma Scale, stroke, leukoaraiosis, cerebrovascular disease, tumor, atrial fibrillation, previous bleeding, international normalized ratio, serum albumin, prothrombin time, diastolic blood pressure, and anticoagulant. Low-certainty evidence may be associated with age, cerebral microbleeds, smoking, alcohol intake, platelet count, and antiplatelet drug. In addition, we found very low-certainty evidence that there may be little to no association between the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and hypertension and creatinine clearance. Leukoaraiosis, cerebral microbleeds, cerebrovascular disease, and international normalized ratio are not included in most risk assessment models. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs risk prediction for anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage and informs guidelines for intracranial hemorrhage prevention and future research.

Severe Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting severe bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 87,616 patients were enrolled. The bleeding safety of DOACs for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA,80.2), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,68.3), apixaban (SUCRA,48.5), dabigatran (SUCRA,40.0), VKAs (SUCRA,12.9); major bleeding: dabigatran (SUCRA,74.0), apixaban (SUCRA,71.5), edoxaban (SUCRA,66.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,22.7), VKAs (SUCRA,15.4); gastrointestinal bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA,55.9), VKAs (SUCRA,53.7), edoxaban (SUCRA,50.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,50.4), dabigatran (SUCRA,39.5); intracranial hemorrhage: dabigatran (SUCRA,84.6), edoxaban (SUCRA,74.1), apixaban (SUCRA,65.8), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,24.4), VKAs (SUCRA,1.1). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF, the most safe DOAC is edoxaban in terms of fatal bleeding; dabigatran in terms of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage and apixaban in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, given the nature of indirect comparisons, more high-quality evidence from head-to-head comparisons is still needed to confirm them.

Off-label dose direct oral anticoagulants and clinical outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: A new evidence of Asian dose.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the label compliance of DOACs in the Chinese AF population and explore the relationship between inappropriate DOACs dosage and clinical results. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted in 14 centers in China. According to the China Food and Drug Administration(CFDA) label and the recommendations of international guidelines, we divided patients into on-label dosage and off-label dosage. We then compared the clinical results after propensity score matching. We collect demographic information through the hospital information system and obtain clinical events through follow-up of patients or their families. Clinical results include major, minor, total bleeding, thrombosis, and all-cause death. 4191 patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) were included, and approximately 55.6% and 1.7% of AF patients received off-label underdose and off-label overdose of DOACs, respectively. Compared with the on-label dose, DOACs with off-label underdose were associated with a significantly reduced risk of major bleeding (P = 0.004, OR = 0.23,95% CI: 0.08-0.69) and all-cause death (P<0.001, OR = 0.49,95% CI: 0.33-0.73). However, there was no significant difference in thrombotic events (P = 0.865 OR = 1.06,95% CI: 0.54-2.07) and minor bleeding (P = 0.465, OR = 1.10,95% CI: 0.85-1.43) risk. CONCLUSIONS: About 57.3% of Asian AF patients received an off-label dose of DOACs in daily practice. Off-label underdose DOACs were associated with significantly lower risks of major bleeding, all-cause death, and similar risks of minor bleeding, thrombotic events compared with on-label dose DOACs. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal dose of DOACs in Asian patients with AF at high bleeding risk.

A new model to predict the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran and rivaroxaban).

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and develop a risk score that would provide an effective tool for the clinical assessment of GIB. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of patients treated with DOACs. The score was developed through logistic regression. The performance of score was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: The 11 903 patients had a mean age of 65.1 years. In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years, alcohol use, history of peptic ulcer, history of major bleeding, abnormal liver function or renal function, cancer, platelet count <100 × 109 /L, anaemia, and concurrent antiplatelet agent or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment were independent risk factors for GIB, and concurrent treatment with gastrointestinal protective agents were a protective factor. The Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score was constructed using these 12 factors. The AUC of the Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81), which was higher than that of the HAS-BLED score (0.69; 95% CI 0.65-0.72) and the New score (0.65; 95% CI 0.61-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Based on 12 factors, we developed a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score. The newly developed Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score has better predictive value than the HAS-BLED score and the New score, and might be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of GIB in patients using DOACs.

Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8). CONCLUSIONS: For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Risk of nonmajor bleeding upon use of direct oral anticoagulants for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism: A network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with bleeding. Patients often stop taking DOACs due to nonmajor bleeding, which may lead to venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. We aimed to determine the risk of nonmajor bleeding using different DOACs to prevent and treat VTE. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until January 6, 2021. The incidence of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and minor bleeding was investigated. In frequentist-based network meta-analysis, we analyzed the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). RESULTS: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving 64,493 patients) were included. For preventing VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban, LMWH, dabigatran, and edoxaban. For treating VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was also lowest for apixaban, followed by that for edoxaban, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban and VKAs. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether it was used for preventing or treating VTE, apixaban had the lowest risk of nonmajor bleeding. This suggests that apixaban may have a lower risk of nonmajor bleeding than other anticoagulants and may help provide some clinical reference for choosing a more appropriate drug for the patient.

Risk factors for antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage has a high mortality rate, and many factors can cause antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage. Until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been published. AIM: We conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors of antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage. METHOD: The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022311647). All studies written in English that met the inclusion criteria published before January 2022 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality and evidence of the included studies. Risk factors for antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage were used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 2844 citations, we included 6 studies in our analysis. For intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with race, low BMI, GCS, severe bleeding, headache or vomiting, cerebrovascular disease, lacunar small vessel disease, cardiovascular disease, blood sugar, blood pressure, CT-defined white matter hypodensity, antihypertensive drugs, and antiplatelet therapy. In addition, we found low-certainty evidence that there may be little to no association between risk of intracranial hemorrhage and age, sex, and dual antithrombotic treatment or anticoagulant. CT-defined white matter hypodensity is not included in most intracranial hemorrhage risk assessment models. CONCLUSION: This study summarizes risk factors for antiplatelet drug-associated intracranial hemorrhage, which is significant in preventing intracranial hemorrhage.

Changes in the Gut Microbiota May Affect the Clinical Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulants.

The mechanism underlying large individual differences in the response to oral anticoagulants has not been fully clarified, and the influence of the intestinal microbiome on exogenous drug metabolism has gradually become an area of increased research interest. However, there has been no research into the influence of the gut microbiota on the pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Therefore, our study is the first to investigate the effect of the intestinal flora on oral anticoagulant metabolism and the associated mechanism. Antibiotics affected the diversity and abundance of the intestinal flora. Compared with the control group, the bioavailability of warfarin and rivaroxaban were significantly increased in the amoxicillin-treated group, whereas the bioavailability of dabigatran increased and subsequently decreased. Compared with the control group, the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and nuclear receptor, PXR, were altered in the amoxicillin -treated groups. This trend was consistent with the pharmacokinetic results. Changes in the intestinal flora can affect the expression of liver drug enzymes and P-gp, as well as affect the transport and metabolism of oral anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin, dabigatracin, and rivaroxaban), leading to differences in the efficacy of oral anticoagulants. This study revealed a novel mechanism for influencing individual differences in the treatment efficacy of oral anticoagulants.

Global burden of rheumatic heart disease and its association with socioeconomic development status, 1990-2019.

AIMS: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains an important health issue, yet global attention to RHD is diminishing. This study aimed to investigate the global burden of RHD and its relationship with socioeconomic development status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 database. Incidence, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and mortality numbers and rates for RHD were extracted and stratified by sex, level of socio-demographic index (SDI), country, and territory. In addition, the burden of RHD was compared across age groups. From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence and prevalence rates of RHD increased by 14.4% (11.2-17.0%) and 13.8% (11.0-16.0%), respectively. Incidence and prevalence rates showed an increasing trend in low SDI and low-middle SDI locations, while high-middle SDI and high SDI locations showed a decreasing trend. The age-standardized DALYs and mortality rates of RHD decreased by 53.1% (46.4-60.0) and 56.9% (49.8-64.7%), and this downward trend was more prominent in high-middle SDI and middle SDI locations. In addition, the age of incidence and prevalence rates were concentrated between 5-24 years and 15-49 years, predominantly in poor regions, and RHD appeared to be more common in women than in men. CONCLUSION: The burden of RHD is negatively correlated with socioeconomic development status. In particular, the burden of RHD among children, adolescents, and women of childbearing age in poorer regions requires more attention. Policymakers should use the 2019 GBD data to guide cost-effective interventions and resource allocation for RHD.

Effects and Mechanism of Action of Panax notoginseng Saponins on the Pharmacokinetics of Warfarin.

BACKGROUD: The interactions between Chinese herbs and drugs pose a great challenge to the combined clinical application of Chinese herbs and drugs. Chinese medicinal products contain complex pharmacologically active components that may influence the in vivo processes of drugs in a variety of ways. In China, drugs based on Panax ginseng total saponins (PNS) are often combined with warfarin for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin and its mechanism. METHOD: Blood was collected for the determination of the prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) from rats treated with warfarin alone or with warfarin + PNS. The plasma concentration of warfarin was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Western blot was used to detect the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. RESULTS: When warfarin and PNS were co-administered, the PT and INR increased compared to when warfarin was given alone. 72 hours after administration, compared to the warfarin alone group, the warfarin + low-dose PNS, warfarin + medium-dose PNS, and warfarin + high-dose PNS groups showed 110%, 122%, and 126% increases in PT, respectively (all P < 0.05), as well as 111%, 124%, and 128% increases in INR (all P < 0.05). Compared with the warfarin alone group, the clearance rate (CL/F) of warfarin in the warfarin + low-dose PNS, warfarin + medium-dose PNS, and warfarin + high-dose PNS groups was 10% (P > 0.05), 23% (P < 0.05), and 33% (P < 0.05) lower, respectively, while the systemic exposure (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC0-t) increased by 106% (P > 0.05), 119% (P < 0.05), and 134% (P < 0.05), respectively, and the blood concentration of warfarin incresed by 112%, 113%, and 114%, respectively (all P > 0.05). After combined treatment of HepG2 cells with warfarin + PNS, CYP1A2 expression was upregulated (P < 0.05) and CYP3A4 was downregulated (P < 0.05) but there was no effect on CYP2C9. In animal experiments, PNS had different effect on the expression of CYP1A2 in different doses. While a low dose of PNS resulted in downregulated CYP1A2 expression (P < 0.05), a medium dose resulted in upregulation (P < 0.05), and CYP1A2 expression was not significantly affected by a high dose of PNS (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, PNS at all doses downregulated the expression of CYP3A4 (P < 0.05) but had no effect on the expression of CYP2C9 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PNS can increase the blood concentration of warfarin, as well as the exposure time, and it can enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin by inhibiting the expression of the liver enzyme CYP3A4.

Editor's Choice - Severe Bleeding Risks of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the severe bleeding safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 6 January 2021. The incidence of severe bleeding (major, gastrointestinal [GI], intracranial, and fatal) was investigated. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, interventions that were not compared directly could be compared indirectly by the 95% confidence interval (CI), making the search results more intuitive. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated. RESULTS: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials (76 641 patients) were included. For the treatment of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% CI 1.07 - 4.12) and edoxaban (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36 - 5.15). The safety of the drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 98.0), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 69.6), dabigatran (SUCRA 50.7), edoxaban (SUCRA 26.5), and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; SUCRA 5.1); GI bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 80.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 66.8), edoxaban (SUCRA 62.3), VKAs (SUCRA 34.4), and dabigatran (SUCRA 5.8); intracranial bleeding: rivaroxaban (SUCRA 74.4), edoxaban (SUCRA 70.4), dabigatran (SUCRA 58.2), apixaban (SUCRA 44.4), and VKAs (SUCRA 5.6); fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA 82.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 59.2), dabigatran (SUCRA 48.6), apixaban (SUCRA 43.0), and VKAs (SUCRA 16.3). For the prevention of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than rivaroxaban (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.02 - 4.52). Among the four types of bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk among DOACs (major bleeding: SUCRA 81.6; GI bleeding: SUCRA 75.4; intracranial bleeding: SUCRA 64.1; fatal bleeding: SUCRA 73.6). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of VTE, in terms of major bleeding and GI bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of intracranial bleeding, rivaroxaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of fatal bleeding, edoxaban had the lowest bleeding risk. For the prevention of VTE, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk.