Similarity of insulin detemir pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles in healthy caucasian and Japanese american subjects.

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir in three ascending doses in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. This was an open-label, single-center, parallel-group design evaluating 30 subjects (15 Japanese and 15 Caucasians). Subjects received a total of three subcutaneous injections (one injection per visit) of insulin detemir (0.19, 0.38, 0.75 U/kg [1 U = 24 nmol]) in ascending order. Following drug administration, subjects received intravenous glucose in 0.5-mg/kg/min increments every 30 minutes, followed by a constant rate of 2.0 mg/kg/min for up to 12 hours. For pharmacokinetic evaluations, serial blood sampling was performed over a period of 30 hours after dosing. Of the subjects, 36 were enrolled, and 30 completed the study. There was a linear dose-response relationship between the three ascending insulin detemir doses and serum insulin detemir AUC values for both the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. The two dose-response regression lines had equivalent slopes but slightly different intercepts (although not statistically significant). This difference may be due to variation in AUC, body weight differences, or chance. Six subjects discontinued the study, 2 as a result of adverse events (blood draw-related ecchymosis and hypoglycemia). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were headache, dizziness, and reactions related to blood draws/infusion sites. All TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The results show that an increase in insulin detemir dose will result in a similar increase in insulin detemir concentration in the two ethnic groups. Therefore, therapeutic dosing of insulin detemir is expected to be similar in both ethnic groups, with no special dose adjustment or algorithm based on race. Insulin detemir at 0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 U/kg was generally well tolerated in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

Insulin 70/30 mix plus metformin versus triple oral therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes after failure of two oral drugs: efficacy, safety, and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Subjects (n = 188) with type 2 diabetes and inadequate response to two oral medications (A1C >8.0%) were randomly assigned to treatment with either a third oral medication or an insulin 70/30 mix b.i.d. plus metformin for a comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The protocol called for aggressive dose titration to achieve target values of fasting blood glucose (80-120 mg/dl), postprandial glucose (<160 mg/dl), and A1C (<7%). These efficacy parameters were evaluated at weeks 2, 6, 12, and 24 of therapy. If dose adjustments failed to achieve targeted glycemic control, subjects were switched to an alternate therapy. RESULTS: At the end of study (week 24 of therapy), A1C and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values showed comparable decreases in the two treatment groups. Only 31% (oral therapy) and 32% (insulin plus metformin) of subjects achieved target values of A1C (<7%). A total of 10 of the 98 subjects randomized to triple oral therapy (10.2%) who failed to improve sufficiently were switched to insulin therapy. An additional four subjects dropped out of the oral treatment group due to adverse events felt to be potentially drug related. Only two of the subjects randomized to insulin plus metformin had to be switched to basal-bolus regimens (regular insulin and NPH insulin). Cost analysis determined that insulin plus metformin (mean cost 3.20 dollars/day) provided efficacy equal to that of a triple oral drug regimen (10.40 dollars/day). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin 70/30 mix plus metformin was as effective as triple oral therapy in lowering A1C and FPG values. The triple oral regimen was not as cost effective, and a high percentage of subjects (total of 16.3%) did not complete this regimen due to lack of efficacy or side effects.