Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Results of a single-center analysis.

We retrospectively studied 89 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) over a period of 10 years to (1) identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS); (2) to assess and compare the Bournemouth-, Spanish-, Düsseldorf-, Lille-, and the International prognostic scoring systems (IPSS); and to (3) compare the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 26-85). Karyotype analyses were done in 85 patients (96%). Median OS was 3 years; 67 patients (75%) have died, and 28 (31%) had progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Major independent prognostic variables for both OS and LFS (multivariate analysis) were percentage of bone marrow (BM) blasts (P < 0.0001), and in patients with cytogenetic data available, cytogenetic risk groups by Lille-score (OS, P = 0.031/LFS, P = 0.002) and IPSS (OS, P = 0.024). All five prognostic scoring systems successfully discriminated risk groups as regards OS and LFS, but in patients with cytogenetic data available, the major independent prognostic score for OS (P < 0.0001) and LFS (P = 0.006) was the IPSS. The FAB and WHO classifications also successfully discriminated between risk groups. The new WHO subgroups [refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), with (RCMD-RS) or without ringed sideroblasts] showed a significantly (P = 0.0454) different prognosis for OS, but not for LFS (P = 0.0839), in comparison to the subgroups having erythroid dysplasia only (RA/RARS). Risk stratification into refractory anemia with excess blast-I (RAEB-I) and RAEB-II tended to yield different prognoses for OS and LFS. The 5q-minus syndrome strongly predicted for a good prognosis. In patients treated with the demethylating agent decitabine (n = 24), IPSS "poor risk" cytogenetics were unable to predict for the expected worse prognosis when compared to "intermediate-risk" cytogenetics. In conclusion, we confirm in a single-center patient cohort that the use of the WHO classification improves the predictive value of the FAB classification and that, in patients with cytogenetic data available, the IPSS can be used for clinical decision-making.

Trisomy 19 as the sole chromosomal abnormality in proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Distinct morphologic and clinical features associated with specific chromosomal abnormalities have been described in subgroups of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), which often are losses or gains and only rarely translocations. Among 103 consecutive MDS patients diagnosed and karyotyped at the Albert-Ludwigs University of Freiburg (ALU) between 1993 and 1999, two chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMMoL) displayed trisomy 19 (+19) as the sole chromosomal abnormality. Three further CMMoL cases with +19 as the single abnormality, two of which previously reported, were collected from other centers. Four of the five patients presented with leukocytosis and splenomegaly, and an increased number of ringed sideroblasts was observed in two cases. Treatment was low-dose Decitabine (cases 1 and 2), oral steroids (case 3), hydroxyurea (case 4), and daunorubicin/Ara-C (case 5). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemias (AML) occurred in three/five patients (cases 1, 2, and 4) 26, 12, and 22 months after diagnosis of CMMoL, respectively. We conclude that +19 as the sole anomaly is a rare but recurrent change in CMMoL, in particular of the proliferative type. It is at present unclear which gene(s) located on chromosome 19 might have a functional role for the development of this phenotype.

Quantification of outpatient management and hospitalization of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated with low-dose decitabine.

Intravenous low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) yields an approximately 50% overall response rate, including 20-25% complete remission. Decitabine-treated MDS patients can be managed as outpatients after completion of a 3-day infusion schedule. In-hospital nights (IHNs), overall survival (OS), and remaining life spent in hospital were evaluated and compared to a matched control group receiving different standard treatments. Between July 1992 and September 2001, 99 high-risk MDS patients, median age 70 years (range 49-86), were treated with low-dose decitabine. Durations of all hospitalizations were recorded. For matched-pair analysis, 44 decitabine-treated patients were matched to 44 MDS patients according to International Prognostic Scoring System classification, period of diagnosis, age, French-American-British classification, and gender. Median number of IHN across all patients was 56 and survival was 481 days, resulting in 84% of remaining life spent at home. In the matched-pair analysis, the median number of IHN was 57 in the decitabine group vs. 50 in the control group. Median survival was 400 vs. 371 days for the decitabine and control groups, respectively. Median number of remaining life spent at home was identical (83% for both groups). Matched patients who received only best supportive care (n=12) had a shorter median survival than the decitabine patients (234 vs. 400 days), and the proportion of remaining life spent at home was slightly greater (82 vs. 77%). Interestingly, matched patients with induction therapy showed comparable IHN, OS, and remaining life spent at home. In conclusion, high-risk MDS patients treated with low-dose decitabine have better survival, and spend comparable time in hospital than patients treated with supportive treatment.