Lipid-binding antiphospholipid antibodies: significance for pathophysiology and diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of pathogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Since approximately 30 years ago, lipid-binding aPL, which do not require a protein cofactor, have been regarded as irrelevant for APS pathogenesis even though anticardiolipin are a diagnostic criterion of APS. In this review, we will summarize the available evidence from in vitro studies, animal models, and epidemiologic studies, which suggest that this concept is no longer tenable. Accordingly, we will only briefly touch on the role of other aPL in APS. This topic has been amply reviewed in detail elsewhere. We will discuss the consequences for laboratory diagnostics and future research required to resolve open questions related to the pathogenic role of different aPL specificities.

Targeting the tissue factor coagulation initiation complex prevents antiphospholipid antibody development.

ABSTRACT: Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are a major cause for acquired thrombophilia, but specific interventions preventing autoimmune aPL development are an unmet clinical need. Although autoimmune aPL cross react with various coagulation regulatory proteins, lipid-reactive aPL, including those derived from patients with COVID-19, recognize the endolysosomal phospholipid lysobisphosphatidic acid presented by the cell surface-expressed endothelial protein C receptor. This specific recognition leads to complement-mediated activation of tissue factor (TF)-dependent proinflammatory signaling and thrombosis. Here, we show that specific inhibition of the TF coagulation initiation complex with nematode anticoagulant protein c2 (NAPc2) prevents the prothrombotic effects of aPL derived from patients with COVID-19 in mice and the aPL-induced proinflammatory and prothrombotic activation of monocytes. The induction of experimental APS is dependent on the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex, and NAPc2 suppresses monocyte endosomal reactive oxygen species production requiring the TF cytoplasmic domain and interferon-α secretion from dendritic cells. Latent infection with murine cytomegalovirus causes TF cytoplasmic domain-dependent development of persistent aPL and circulating phospholipid-reactive B1 cells, which is prevented by short-term intervention with NAPc2 during acute viral infection. In addition, treatment of lupus prone MRL-lpr mice with NAPc2, but not with heparin, suppresses dendritic-cell activation in the spleen, aPL production and circulating phospholipid-reactive B1 cells, and attenuates lupus pathology. These data demonstrate a convergent TF-dependent mechanism of aPL development in latent viral infection and autoimmune disease and provide initial evidence that specific targeting of the TF initiation complex has therapeutic benefits beyond currently used clinical anticoagulant strategies.

A novel von Willebrand factor multimer ratio as marker of disease activity in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), an autoantibody-mediated severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, is caused by insufficient proteolytic processing of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers (MMs) and microvascular thrombi. Recurrence of acute iTTP is associated with persistence or reappearance of ADAMTS13 deficiency. Some patients remain in remission despite recurring or persisting severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. In a prospective 2-year observational study, we investigated VWF MM patterns and ADAMTS13 in patients with iTTP in remission and at acute episodes. Of the 83 patients with iTTP, 16 suffered 22 acute episodes whereas 67 remained in clinical remission during follow-up, including 13 with ADAMTS13 <10% and 54 with ADAMTS13 ≥10%. High -molecular weight to low-molecular weight VWF MM ratio based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose gel electrophoresis was compared with ADAMTS13 activity. VWF MM ratio was significantly higher in patients in remission with <10% compared with ≥10% ADAMTS13 activity. Fourteen samples obtained from 13 to 50 days (interquartile range; median, 39) before acute iTTP onset (ADAMTS13 <10% in 9 patients and 10%-26% in 5) showed VWF MM ratios significantly higher than those from 13 patients remaining in remission with ADAMTS13 <10%. At acute iTTP onset, VWF MM ratio decreased significantly and was low in all patients despite <10% ADAMTS13. The VWF MM ratio does not depend exclusively on ADAMTS13 activity. The disappearance of high molecular weight VWF MMs resulting in low VWF MM ratio at iTTP onset may be explained by consumption of larger VWF MMs in the microcirculation. The very high VWF MM ratio preceding acute iTTP recurrence suggests that VWF processing is hampered more than in patients remaining in remission.

Rapid translocation of intracellular toll-like receptors depends on endosomal NADPH oxidase.

Endosomal toll-like receptors (TLRs) must be translocated from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the endosome and proteolytically cleaved within the endosome before they can induce cellular signals. As ligands for these TLRs are also liberated from apoptotic or necrotic cells, this process is controlled by several mechanisms which shall ensure that there is no inadvertent activation. We have shown previously that antiphospholipid antibodies induce endosomal NADPH-oxidase (NOX) followed by the translocation of TLR7/8 to the endosome. We show now that endosomal NOX is required for the rapid translocation of TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9. Deficiency of gp91phox, the catalytic subunit of NOX2, or inhibition of endosomal NOX by the chloride channel blocker niflumic acid both prevent immediate (i.e., within 30 min) translocation of these TLRs as shown by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Under these conditions, the induction of mRNA synthesis for TNF-α and secretion of TNF-α is delayed by approx. 6-9 h. However, maximal expression of TNF-α mRNA or secretion of TNF-α is not significantly reduced. In conclusion, these data add NOX2 as another component involved in the orchestration of cellular responses to ligands of endosomal TLRs.

Pathogenic lipid-binding antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with severity of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-associated coagulopathy is a hallmark of disease severity and poor prognosis. The key manifestations of this prothrombotic syndrome-microvascular thrombosis, stroke, and venous and pulmonary clots-are also observed in severe and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are detectable in COVID-19 patients, but their association with the clinical course of COVID-19 remains unproven. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the presence and relevance of lipid-binding aPL in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Two cohorts of 53 and 121 patients from a single center hospitalized for PCR-proven severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 infection were analyzed for the presence of aPL and clinical severity of COVID-19. RESULTS: We here demonstrate that lipid-binding aPL are common in COVID-19. COVID-19 patients with lipid-binding aPL have higher median concentrations of C-reactive protein and D-dimer, and are more likely to have a critical clinical course and fatal outcome. Lipid-binding aPL isolated from COVID-19 patients target the recently described cell surface complex of lysobisphosphatidic acid (LBPA) with the protein C receptor (EPCR) to induce prothrombotic and inflammatory responses in monocytes and endothelial cells. We show that B1a cells producing lipid-reactive aPL of the IgG isotype circulate in the blood of COVID-19 patients. In vivo, COVID-19 aPL accelerate thrombus formation in an experimental mouse model dependent on the recently delineated signaling pathway involving EPCR-LBPA. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients rapidly expand B1a cells secreting pathogenic lipid-binding aPL with broad thrombotic and inflammatory effects. The association with markers of inflammation and coagulation, clinical severity, and mortality suggests a causal role of aPL in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.

Lipid presentation by the protein C receptor links coagulation with autoimmunity.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) cause severe autoimmune disease characterized by vascular pathologies and pregnancy complications. Here, we identify endosomal lysobisphosphatidic acid (LBPA) presented by the CD1d-like endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) as a pathogenic cell surface antigen recognized by aPLs for induction of thrombosis and endosomal inflammatory signaling. The engagement of aPLs with EPCR-LBPA expressed on innate immune cells sustains interferon- and toll-like receptor 7-dependent B1a cell expansion and autoantibody production. Specific pharmacological interruption of EPCR-LBPA signaling attenuates major aPL-elicited pathologies and the development of autoimmunity in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Thus, aPLs recognize a single cell surface lipid-protein receptor complex to perpetuate a self-amplifying autoimmune signaling loop dependent on the cooperation with the innate immune complement and coagulation pathways.

Induction of tissue factor expression by anti-ß2-glycoprotein I is mediated by tumor necrosis factor α.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are heterogeneous and there is evidence that binding specificity determines which cellular effects they can trigger. We have therefore hypothesised that the induction of tissue factor (TF) in monocytes and endothelial cells by aPL depends on their binding specificity. To further investigate this, we have analyzed the ability of three human monoclonal aPL with distinctly different binding specificities to induce transcription and cell surface expression of TF in monocytes and endothelial cells. Results with human monoclonal aPL were validated with IgG-fractions obtained from patients with APS. We confirmed previous results that a lipid reactive human monoclonal aPL rapidly induced TF transcription and cell surface expression in monocytes and endothelial cells. A monoclonal aPL reactive against ß2 glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) induced TF with a delayed time course. This was fully dependent on the induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) secretion as capture of TNFα by adalimumab prevented TF induction. This pattern was confirmed with patient IgG fractions. Both lipid reactive and anti-ß2GPI induced TF transcription. Unexpectedly, this activity of anti-ß2GPI was mediated fully by TNFα which was secreted in response to incubation with anti-ß2GPI. The role of TNFα in mediating TF induction by anti-ß2GPI may have wider implications for APS pathogenesis.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor primes monocytes for antiphospholipid antibody-induced thrombosis.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) with complex lipid and/or protein reactivities cause complement-dependent thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Although cross-reactivities with coagulation regulatory proteins contribute to the risk for developing thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, the majority of pathogenic aPLs retain reactivity with membrane lipid components and rapidly induce reactive oxygen species-dependent proinflammatory signaling and tissue factor (TF) procoagulant activation. Here, we show that lipid-reactive aPLs activate a common species-conserved TF signaling pathway. aPLs dissociate an inhibited TF coagulation initiation complex on the cell surface of monocytes, thereby liberating factor Xa for thrombin generation and protease activated receptor 1/2 heterodimer signaling. In addition to proteolytic signaling, aPLs promote complement- and protein disulfide isomerase-dependent TF-integrin ß1 trafficking that translocates aPLs and NADPH oxidase to the endosome. Cell surface TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI) synthesized by monocytes is required for TF inhibition, and disabling TFPI prevents aPL signaling, indicating a paradoxical prothrombotic role for TFPI. Myeloid cell-specific TFPI inactivation has no effect on models of arterial or venous thrombus development, but remarkably prevents experimental aPL-induced thrombosis in mice. Thus, the physiological control of TF primes monocytes for rapid aPL pathogenic signaling and thrombosis amplification in an unexpected crosstalk between complement activation and coagulation signaling.

Platelet Activation by Antiphospholipid Antibodies Depends on Epitope Specificity and is Prevented by mTOR Inhibitors.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been reported to activate platelets. This is considered to be one of the pathogenic properties of aPL. Even though aPL heterogeneity is quite well established, little is known, if the ability to activate platelets is common to all aPL or depends on antigen specificity. To further study this issue, we analyzed the ability of three human monoclonal aPL with distinctly different antigenic specificities to activate platelets in vitro. The results obtained with human monoclonal aPL were validated with immunoglobulin G (IgG) fractions obtained from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). A co-factor-independent human monoclonal anticardiolipin aPL had no discernible effect on human platelets. Two monoclonal aPL reactive against ß2 glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) induced platelet aggregation, integrin αIIbß3 activation and P-selectin surface expression. These data could be confirmed with patient IgG fractions which could only induce aggregation, if they had anti-ß2GPI activity. Anti-ß2GPI aPL-induced platelet activation depended on interaction of aPL with the low affinity Fcγ-receptor IIa on the platelet surface. It was completely abolished by pretreatment of platelet-rich plasma with the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors rapamycin or everolimus. This extends previous data showing that mTOR is involved in signaling of anti-ß2GPI in monocytes and endothelial cells. In conclusion, anti-ß2GPI aPL activate platelets while co-factor-independent anticardiolipin aPL have no effect. mTOR is involved in this signaling process which has implications beyond APS, because so far the role of mTOR signaling in platelets is incompletely explored and requires further study.

Cofactor-Independent Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has occupied haemostaseologists, rheumatologists and obstetricians since its initial description 35 years ago. Its name has been coined because of the antibodies against phospholipids which were the common property of affected patients. In particular, the pathogenesis of APS has been intensively studied after the early discovery that it was possible to induce the clinical manifestations in animals by transfer of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In recent years, it has become clear that aPL are not only structurally heterogeneous but also have different pathogenic properties. This review will focus on the relevance of antigenic specificity of aPL in terms of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and perhaps treatment of APS.

Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: recent insights and emerging concepts.

Introduction: Even though our understanding of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has improved tremendously over the last decades, we are still not in a position to replace symptomatic anticoagulation by pathogenesis based causal treatments. Areas covered: Recent years have provided further insights into pathogenetically relevant mechanisms. These include a differentiation of pathogenic subtypes of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), novel mechanisms modulating disease activity, for example, extracellular vesicles and microRNA, and novel players in pathogenesis, for example, neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Expert commentary: It is evident that aPL induce a proinflammatory and procoagulant state and recent data suggest that different aPL species activate different signaling pathways which sometimes converge into a common cellular response. This implies that presence of more than one aPL species may disproportionally increase the risk for the major manifestations of APS, that is, thrombosis and fetal loss. Further delineation of the pathogenic mechanisms will hopefully provide clues to causal rather than symptomatic treatments of APS.

Complement C5 but not C3 is expendable for tissue factor activation by cofactor-independent antiphospholipid antibodies.

The complement and coagulation cascades interact at multiple levels in thrombosis and inflammatory diseases. In venous thrombosis, complement factor 3 (C3) is crucial for platelet and tissue factor (TF) procoagulant activation dependent on protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). Furthermore, C5 selectively contributes to the exposure of leukocyte procoagulant phosphatidylserine (PS), which is a prerequisite for rapid activation of monocyte TF and fibrin formation in thrombosis. Here, we show that monoclonal cofactor-independent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) rapidly activate TF on myelomonocytic cells. TF activation is blocked by PDI inhibitor and an anti-TF antibody interfering with PDI binding to TF, and requires C3 but unexpectedly not C5. Other prothrombotic, complement-fixing antibodies, for example, antithymocyte globulin, typically induce TF activation dependent on C5b-7-mediated PS exposure on the outer membrane of monocytes. We show that aPLs directly induce procoagulant PS exposure independent of C5. Accordingly, mice deficient in C3, but not mice deficient in C5, are protected from in vivo thrombus formation induced by cofactor-independent aPLs. Only immunoglobulin G (IgG) fractions with cofactor-independent anticardiolipin reactivity from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) induce complement-independent monocyte PS exposure and PDI-dependent TF activation. Neither a human monoclonal aPL directed against ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) nor patient IgG with selective reactivity to ß2GPI rapidly activated monocyte TF. These results indicate that inhibitors of PDI and TF, but not necessarily clinically available drugs targeting C5, have therapeutic benefit in preventing thrombosis associated with APS caused by pathogenic aPLs primarily reactive with lipid, independent of ß2GPI.

Mechanisms of Cellular Activation in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

It is long known that antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) induce proinflammatory and procoagulant cellular responses. The underlying signal transduction has been a major focus of research and is the topic of this review. An amazingly heterogeneous panel of signaling pathways has been described and it turns out that at least some of this heterogeneity can be explained by effects of distinct aPL species. On the one hand, there are antibodies against ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) which appear to exert their cellular effects only as a complex of ß2GPI/anti-ß2GPI. Their major targets are low-density lipoprotein-receptor related protein 8 (LRP8), annexin A2 (ANXA2), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and possibly TLR2. The other relevant aPL species are antibodies against cardiolipin which are internalized into endosomes and induce cellular responses via activation of endosomal NADPH-oxidase. Their cell surface target is still unknown. Another important issue relates to the role of complement. It has been shown in vivo that certain pathogenic effects of aPL depend on complement activation, but the exact interplay with the signaling pathways described earlier needs to be elucidated. Thus, while there has been tremendous progress over the past decade, many open questions remain to be answered.

Endosomal Redox Signaling in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is well established that the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is caused by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). While several underlying mechanisms have been described in the past, many open questions remain. Here, we will review data on endosomal signaling and, in particular, redox signaling in APS. RECENT FINDINGS: Endosomal redox signaling has been implicated in several cellular processes including signaling of proinflammatory cytokines. We have shown that certain aPL can activate endosomal NADPH-oxidase (NOX) in several cell types followed by induction of proinflammatory and procoagulant cellular responses in vitro. Involvement of endosomes in aPL signaling has also been reported by others. In wild-type mice but not in NOX-deficient mice, aPL accelerate venous thrombus formation underscoring the relevance of endosomal NOX. Furthermore, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibits activation of endosomal NOX and prevents thrombus formation in aPL-treated mice. Endosomal redox signaling is an important novel mechanism involved in APS pathogenesis. This makes endosomes a potential target for future treatment approaches of APS.

Hydroxychloroquine inhibits proinflammatory signalling pathways by targeting endosomal NADPH oxidase.

OBJECTIVES: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used for decades to treat patients with rheumatic diseases, for example, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis or the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We hypothesise that HCQ might target endosomal NADPH oxidase (NOX), which is involved in the signal transduction of cytokines as well as antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). METHODS: For in vitro experiments, monocytic cells were stimulated with tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) or a human monoclonal aPL and the activity of NOX was determined by flow cytometry. The expression of genes known to be induced by these stimuli was quantified by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Live cell imaging was performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Finally, the effects of HCQ on NOX-induced signal transduction were analysed in an in vivo model of venous thrombosis. RESULTS: HCQ strongly reduces or completely prevents the induction of endosomal NOX by TNFα, IL-1ß and aPL in human monocytes and MonoMac1 cells. As a consequence, induction of downstream genes by these stimuli is reduced or abrogated. This effect of HCQ is not mediated by direct interference with the agonists but by inhibiting the translocation of the catalytic subunit of NOX2 (gp91phox) into the endosome. In vivo, HCQ protects mice from aPL-induced and NOX2-mediated thrombus formation. CONCLUSIONS: We describe here a novel mechanism of action of HCQ, that is, interference with the assembly of endosomal NOX2. Since endosomal NOX2 is involved in many inflammatory and prothrombotic signalling pathways, this activity of HCQ might explain many of its beneficial effects in rheumatic diseases including the APS.

Pathophysiological insights into the antiphospholipid syndrome.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by venous and/or arterial thrombosis and severe pregnancy morbidity in presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). While there is compelling evidence that aPL cause the clinical manifestations of APS, the underlying mechanisms are still a matter of scientific debate. This is mainly related to the broad heterogeneity of aPL. There are three major types of aPL: The first one binds to (anionic) phospholipids, e.g. cardiolipin, in absence of other factors (cofactor independent aPL). The second type binds to phospholipids only in presence of protein cofactors, e.g. ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) (cofactor dependent aPL). The third type binds to cofactor proteins directly without need for phospholipids. It is widely believed that cofactor independent aPL (type 1) are associated with infections and, more importantly, non-pathogenic, while pathogenic aPL belong to the second and in particular to the third type. This view, in particular with regard to type 1 aPL, has not been undisputed and novel research data have shown that it is in fact untenable. We summarize the available data on the pathogenetic role of aPL and the implications for diagnosis of APS and future research.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in a large population-based cohort: genome-wide associations and effects on monocyte gene expression.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterised by venous and/or arterial thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in women combined with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We aimed to identify genetic factors associated with the presence of aPL in a population based cohort. Furthermore, we wanted to clarify if the presence of aPL affects gene expression in circulating monocytes. Titres of IgG and IgM against cardiolipin, ß2glycoprotein 1 (anti-ß2GPI), and IgG against domain 1 of ß2GPI (anti-domain 1) were determined in approx. 5,000 individuals from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) a population based cohort of German descent. Genotyping was conducted on Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP 6.0 arrays. Monocyte gene expression was determined in a subgroup of 1,279 individuals by using the Illumina HT-12 v3 BeadChip. Gene expression data were confirmed in vitro and ex vivo by qRT-PCR. Genome wide analysis revealed significant associations of anti-ß2GPI IgG and APOH on chromosome 17, which had been previously identified by candidate gene approaches, and of anti-domain1 and MACROD2 on chromosome 20 which has been listed in a previous GWAS as a suggestive locus associated with the occurrence of anti-ß2GPI antibodies. Expression analysis confirmed increased expression of TNFα in monocytes and identified and confirmed neuron navigator 3 (NAV3) as a novel gene induced by aPL. In conclusion, MACROD2 represents a novel genetic locus associated with aPL. Furthermore, we show that aPL induce the expression of NAV3 in monocytes and endothelial cells. This will stimulate further research into the role of these genes in the APS.

Distribution of antiphospholipid antibodies in a large population-based German cohort.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired thrombophilia. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) above the 99th percentile of a reference group. Data on the distribution of aPL in the population are limited. The distribution of aPL including diagnostic cutoffs should be determined in a population-based cohort. METHODS: The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based cohort aged 35-74 years. We determined the presence of antibodies against cardiolipin (aCL, IgG, and IgM), ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI, IgG, and IgM), and domain 1 of ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-domain 1, IgG) in a sample of 4979 participants. RESULTS: aPL titers were similar in the whole sample and in an apparently healthy subgroup of 1049 individuals. There was a strong age-dependent increase of both aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgM, while aPL IgG titers were stable or tended to decrease with age. A relevant decrease was observed for aCL IgG in women and anti-domain 1 IgG in both sexes. There was no association of aPL titers with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that for IgM aPL, age-dependent reference ranges should be used. In fact, the controversy regarding the clinical utility of IgM aPL might be related to the use of inappropriate reference ranges among other causes. In our population, aPLs were not associated with a history of VTE.