[Castleman's disease in the rheumatological practice]. / Morbus Castleman in der rheumatologischen Praxis.

The term Castleman's disease encompasses a group of rare lymphoproliferative diseases that show histopathological similarities in lymph node biopsy. Diagnostic criteria and a specific ICD-10 code have been available for a few years. Case studies listed at the beginning illustrate that close cooperation between clinicians and pathologists is required to enable a reliable diagnosis. For an optimal histopathological assessment, the pathologist is also dependent on the removal of a complete lymph node. Before distinguishing a potentially fatal multicentric idiopathic Castleman's disease from the resectable unicentric form, which is important in terms of prognosis and treatment, early diagnosis presupposes that Castleman's disease is considered in the differential diagnosis. Various immune phenomena and overlaps with autoimmune diseases can increase the probability of misdiagnosis or undetected cases in the clinical routine of rheumatologists. The intention of the present overview is therefore to point out the similarities with autoimmune diseases that are relevant for differential diagnoses and to point out situations that justify a review of the previous diagnosis.

The influence of the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on their adherence to immunomodulatory medication: a cross sectional study over 3 months in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the adherence of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) to their immunomodulatory medication during the three-month lockdown in Germany. METHODS: From 16th March until 15th June 2020, IRD patients from private practices and rheumatology departments were asked to answer a questionnaire addressing their behaviour with respect to their immunomodulating therapy. Eight private practices and nine rheumatology departments that included rheumatology primary care centres and university hospitals participated. A total of 4252 questionnaires were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (54%) were diagnosed with RA, followed by psoriatic arthritis (14%), ankylosing spondylitis (10%), connective tissue diseases (12%) and vasculitides (6%). Most of the patients (84%) reported to continue their immunomodulatory therapy. Termination of therapy was reported by only 3% of the patients. The results were independent from the type of IRD, the respective immunomodulatory therapy and by whom the patients were treated (private practices vs rheumatology departments). Younger patients (<60 years) reported just as often as older patients to discontinue their therapy. CONCLUSION: The data show that most of the patients continued their therapy in spite of the pandemic. A significant change in behaviour with regard to their immunomodulatory therapy was not observed during the three months of observation. The results support the idea that the immediate release of recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology were well received, supporting the well-established physician-patient relationship in times of a crisis.

[Most important vaccinations in patients with rheumatological diseases and why]. / Wichtigste Impfungen bei Patienten mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen und warum.

For a long time, most of the infectious diseases seemed to have become under control. In particular, vaccinations have contributed to this development. In recent years newly occurring bacterial infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens and viral infections, such as the chikungunya virus, influenza epidemics and currently the COVID-19 pandemic, are endangering the world population. This specifically affects patients with rheumatological diseases, who often require immunosuppressive therapy and are thus at risk for infections. Vaccinations can protect those affected, both individually and by generating herd immunity, and are thus an important instrument to reduce morbidity and mortality from infections. Knowledge of the indications and application of the individual vaccinations is particularly important for consistent implementation of the current recommendations.

[Is complete immunity against measles a realistic target for patients with rheumatic diseases and how can it possibly be achieved?] / Ist komplette Immunität gegen Masern bei Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen ein realistisches Ziel, und wie ist es möglicherweise zu erreichen?

Measles outbreaks occur rather frequently in Germany. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases are often treated with immunosuppressants. A recent study showed that about 7% of such patients are not protected against measles according to the lack of documentation in the vaccination card or the absence of protective antibodies. The Standing Committee on Immunization (STIKO) recommends a first vaccination against measles as a measles-mumps-rubella combined vaccination (MMR) in children aged 11-14 months and a second vaccination at 14-23 months. For adults born after 1970, vaccination against measles is recommended if they have not yet been vaccinated against measles or have only been vaccinated once against measles or if their vaccination status is unclear. In April 2019, STIKO published instructions for vaccinations recommended for immunodeficiency. Since March 1, 2020, measles vaccination have been compulsory in Germany.

[Biological therapy after COVID-19 infection : No reactivation of a COVID-19 infection with positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody status under biological therapy]. / Biologikatherapie nach COVID-19-Infektion : Keine Reaktivierung einer COVID-19-Infektion bei positivem Antikörperstatus SARS-CoV-2 unter Biologikatherapie.

A case with rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient compensation under disease-modifying combined long-term therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide is reported. After recovery from a COVID-19 infection, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy was initiated. Until now no reactivation of the COVID-19 infection with positive SARS-CoV­2 antibody status has occurred.

[A cross sectional study on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in terms of their compliance to their immunsuppressive medication during COVID-19 pandemic]. / Einstellung von Patienten mit entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen zur immunsuppressiven Therapie im Rahmen der COVID-19 Pandemie ­ eine Situationsanalyse.

The current COVID-19 pandemic inherits an unprecedented challenge for the treating rheumatologists. On the one hand, antirheumatic drugs can increase the risk of infection and potentially deteriorate the course of an infection. On the other hand, an active inflammatory rheumatic disease can also increase the risk for an infection. In the recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology (www.dgrh.de), it is recommended that our patients continue the antirheumatic therapy to maintain remission or low state of activity despite the pandemic. In this study, patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease were asked in the first weeks of the pandemic on their opinion of their immunomodulating therapy. The result shows that over 90% of the patients followed the recommendation of the rheumatologist to continue the antirheumatic therapy, and only a small percentage of the patients terminated the therapy on their own. This result was independent of the individual anti-rheumatic therapy. Taken together, the results of this study illustrate not only the trustful patient-physician partnership in a threatening situation but also the high impact of state-of-the art recommendations by the respective scientific society.

[Model project on interdisciplinary university teaching-medical and psychology students learn together for the first time]. / Modellprojekt zur interdisziplinären universitären Lehre ­ Studierende der Medizin und der Psychologie lernen erstmals gemeinsam.

An interdisciplinary collaboration is required in the medical care of chronically ill patients with complex illnesses. Especially in the field of internistic rheumatology, interdisciplinary work is essential to consider the complex somatic and psychosocial aspects of a chronic illness. Nevertheless, the aspects of interprofessional work in the study of medicine and psychology are insufficiently addressed. For this reason, a model project for interdisciplinary university teaching was conceived, which combines both subjects. The course was held for the first time in semester 2019/2020 and was rated excellent by the participants. The main goal of the course is the implementation of interprofessional work in the training of medical personnel. In addition, the discipline of internistic rheumatology could be brought closer to the students.

[Hand ischemia and increased CRP level in a 75-year-old female patient]. / Handischämie und erhöhter CRP-Wert einer 75-jährigen Patientin.

The complexity of the diagnosis and therapy as well as the deficits in care are presented on the basis of the casuistry of a 75-year-old female patient with giant cell arteritis and a complicative course.

Large Variability of Frequency and Type of Physical Therapy in Patients in the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and frequency of physical therapy (PT) prescribed by physicians for patients in the registry of the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis. METHODS: The data for 4,252 patients were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Overall, 37.4% of patients (1,590 of 4,252) received PT at the end of a yearly follow-up. The most frequently used type of PT was lymphatic drainage (n = 1,061, 36.8%), followed by exercise therapy (n = 1,047, 36.3%) and heat therapy (n = 689, 23.9%). More than three-fourths of treated patients (82%) received 1 or 2 different forms of PT simultaneously. The prescription of PT was associated with the extent of skin fibrosis as measured by the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (<10 [41.8% of patients], 11-20 [55.8% of patients], and >21 [63.9% of patients]; P < 0.001). Patients with musculoskeletal involvement (e.g., arthritis, muscle weakness, joint contractures, tendon friction rubs) had a higher chance of receiving PT than patients without these symptoms, with corresponding ORs ranging from 1.96 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.69-2.28) for joint contractures to 3.83 (95% CI 2.89-5.08) for arthritis. When comparing the type of PT prescription across the initial and all follow-up visits from 2003 to 2017, significant alterations with a decreasing frequency of patients receiving PT could be observed (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the use of PT in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in a large cohort. Although SSc is characterized by considerable disability and restriction of motion, <40% of patients received PT.

Use of vasoactive/vasodilating drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related digital ulcers (DUs) in expert tertiary centres: results from the analysis of the observational real-life DeSScipher study.

INTRODUCTION: DeSScipher is the first European multicentre study on management of systemic sclerosis (SSc), and its observational trial 1 (OT1) evaluated the efficacy of different drugs for digital ulcer (DU) prevention and healing. The aim of this study was to assess current use of vasoactive/vasodilating agents for SSc-related DU in the expert centres by analysing the baseline data of the DeSScipher OT1. METHOD: Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the OT1 and data regarding DU were analysed. RESULTS: The most commonly used drugs, in both patients with and without DU, were calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (71.6%), followed by intravenous iloprost (20.8%), endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) (20.4%) and phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors (16.5%). Of patients, 32.6% with DU and 12.8% without DU received two drugs (p < 0.001), while 11.5% with DU and 1.9% without DU were treated with a combination of three or more agents (p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of the patients with recurrent DU were treated with bosentan and/or sildenafil. However, 64 out of 277 patients with current DU (23.1%) and 101 (23.6%) patients with recurrent DU were on CCBs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that CCBs are still the most commonly used agents for DU management in SSc. The proportion of patients on combination therapy was low, even in patients with recurrent DU: almost one out of four patients with current and recurrent DU was on CCBs alone. Prospective analysis is planned to investigate the efficacy of different drugs/drug combinations on DU healing and prevention. Key Points • The analysis of DeSScipher, the first European multicentre study on management of SSc, has shown that the most commonly used vasoactive/vasodilating drugs for DU were CCBs, followed by intravenous Iloprost, ERAs and PDE-5 inhibitors. • More than half of the patients with recurrent DU received bosentan and/or sildenafil. • However, the proportion of patients on combination therapy of more than one vasoactive/vasodilating drug was low and almost one out of four patients with current and recurrent DU was on CCBs alone.

[Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease]. / Therapie der systemischen Sklerose-assoziierten interstitiellen Lungenerkrankung.

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a fibrosing autoimmune disease of the connective tissue. In addition to skin fibrosis, pulmonary involvement and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in particular are the most common and severe manifestations of SSc. The disease is associated with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in progressive ILD. In the last 5 years new treatment concepts for SSc-ILD have been investigated in numerous clinical studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review is based on a literature search in PubMed, focusing on the most relevant papers published up to the end of 2018 with the keywords "SSc" and "treatment". RESULTS: The treatment of SSc-ILD has changed over the last few years due to the results of many clinical studies. The updated guidelines of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommend the use of cyclophosphamide or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Data for a positive influence on SSc-ILD are also available for mycophenolate, tocilizumab and anabasum. Because of the pathophysiological similarities to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the use of the antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone is currently being investigated in randomized, multicenter clinical trials and could be a novel and promising therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSION: Current drug studies may provide innovative therapeutic perspectives for SSc-ILD and could significantly improve the prognosis of affected patients in the future.

[Multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-a monocentric retrospective analysis]. / Multimodale rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung bei rheumatoider Arthritis ­ eine monozentrische Retrospektivanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment (MRCT, operation and procedures classification system, OPS code 8­983) is a specific concept of acute inpatient care (DRG I97Z) for treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases, degenerative diseases and/or chronic pain syndromes suffering from exacerbated pain and functional impairment. OBJECTIVE: A monocentric retrospective analysis of the effects of MRCT on pain and functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was conducted. METHODS: A total of 103 treatment episodes in 75 patients with proven RA who received MRCT between 2014 and 2017 were included in the analysis. The changes in pain intensity were evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), the functional limitations as assessed by the Hanover function questionnaire (FFbH) and the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and the disease activity (disease activity score of 28 joints, DAS28) before and after MRCT episodes. In addition, the patient characteristics and the course of the disease were documented and a univariate analysis of the influence of these factors on the parameters activity and function was performed. RESULTS: In patients with RA, the MRCT resulted in a significant amelioration of pain (p < 0.0001), a significant improvement of functional capacity (FFbH p = 0.0013, HAQ p = 0.1396) and a significant reduction of disease activity (DAS28 p < 0.0001). Different aspects of the disease and its previous course (e. g. disease duration, type and number of previous anti-rheumatic drugs, current medication) did not have a significant effect on the response. CONCLUSION: This retrospective monocentric analysis proved the efficacy of MRCT with respect to the inpatient treatment period in a large cohort of RA patients. This treatment concept not only improved pain and function (FFbH) but also significantly reduced the disease activity.

Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey.

BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a set of essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation, to assess if the existing DU classification was useful and feasible in clinical practice and to investigate if the new categorisation was preferred to the simple distinction of DU in recurrent and not recurrent, in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: DeSScipher is the largest European multicentre study on SSc. It consists of five observational trials (OTs), and one of them, OT1, is focused on DU management. The DeSScipher OT1 items on DU that reached ≥ 60% of completion rate were administered to EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research group) centres via online survey. Questions about feasibility and usefulness of the existing DU classification (DU due to digital pitting scars, to loss of tissue, derived from calcinosis and gangrene) and newly proposed categorisation (episodic, recurrent and chronic) were also asked. RESULTS: A total of 84/148 (56.8%) EUSTAR centres completed the questionnaire. DeSScipher items scored by ≥ 70% of the participants as essential and feasible for DU evaluation were the number of DU defined as a loss of tissue (level of agreement 92%), recurrent DU (84%) and number of new DU (74%). For 65% of the centres, the proposed classification of DU was considered useful and feasible in clinical practice. Moreover, 80% of the centres preferred the categorisation of DU in episodic, recurrent and chronic to simple distinction in recurrent/not recurrent DU. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice, EUSTAR centres identified only three essential items for DU evaluation and considered the proposed classification and categorisation as useful and feasible. The set of items needs to be validated while further implementation of DU classification and categorisation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational trial on DU (OT1) is one of the five trials of the DeSScipher project (ClinicalTrials.gov; OT1 Identifier: NCT01836263 , posted on April 19, 2013).

[Effects of serial mud baths on inflammatory rheumatic and degenerative diseases]. / Wirkeffekte serieller Heiltorfbäder bei entzündlich-rheumatischen und degenerativen Erkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: Mud baths have been used for a long time for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. In addition to a reduction of pain and improved function, serially applied mud baths lead to a reduction in the inflammatory processes, which often underlie degenerative and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of serial mud baths on parameters of functional health, on pain perception and at the molecular level in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and degenerative alterations, e.g. gonarthritis and/or coxarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients with inflammatory rheumatic (33 RA and 8 AS) and 40 patients with degenerative diseases were subdived into 2 groups by computer-assisted randomization. In each group a subgroup received 9 serial mud baths within 21 days in addition to a multimodal physical rehabilitative complex treatment (intervention groups). In the other subgroups only the physical rehabilitative treatment was carried out and no mud baths were administered (control group). The outcome parameters were assessment of the functional capacity and pain perception (HAQ, FFbH, VAS and WOMAC), diesease activity (DAS28 and BASDAI) as well as laboratory markers of inflammatory activity (CRP, BSG, IL-1 beta and IL-10) and the patient assessment. RESULTS: In the intervention groups after serial mud baths there was a significant improvement in the functional parameters (HAQ and FFbH, both p < 0.01) and a significant reduction in pain strength (VAS, p < 0.01) persisting for 3 months after the end of treatment. A significant reduction in disease activity (RA in DAS28 and AS in BASDAI) could be shown for the intervention groups as well as the control groups, whereby the effect strength was more pronounced in the intervention groups. In patients with gonarthritis and/or coxarthritis a significant improvement in functional limitations (WOMAC, p < 0.01) was only found in the intervention groups. A significant improvement in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 beta (p < 0.01) was only found in the intervention groups with a simultaneous increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (p < 0.01). The CRP and BSG remained within the normal range and showed no significant changes even after serial mud baths. CONCLUSION: Mud baths applied within the framework of a physical rehabilitative complex treatment brought about an improvement of parameters of functional health for both inflammatory rheumatic and degenerative diseases. Effects at the molecular level were induced, which are possibly accompanied by osteoprotective and chondroprotective effects.

Rituximab in routine care of severe active rheumatoid arthritis : A prospective, non-interventional study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, effectiveness and onset of effect of rituximab (RTX) in routine clinical treatment of severe, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study in rheumatological outpatient clinics or private practices in Germany. RTX-naïve adult patients were to receive RTX according to marketing authorisation and at their physician's discretion. Also according to their physician's discretion, patients could receive a second cycle of RTX (re-treatment = treatment continuation). Major outcome was the change in Disease Activity Score based on 28-joints count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) over 24 weeks and during 6 months of re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 1653 patients received at least one cycle RTX; 99.2% of these had received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) pre-treatment and 75.5% anti-tumor necrosis factor(TNF)­α pre-treatment. After a mean interval of 8.0 months, 820 patients received RTX re-treatment. Mean DAS28-ESR decreased from 5.3 at baseline to 3.8 after 24 weeks (-1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI: -1.6; -1.4]), and from 4.1 at start of cycle 2 to 3.5 at study end (change from baseline: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.0; -1.7]). Improvements in DAS28-ESR and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score occurred mainly during the first 12 weeks of RTX treatment, with further DAS28-ESR improvement until week 24 or month 6 of re-treatment. Improvements in DAS28-ESR and EULAR responses were more pronounced in seropositive patients. RF was a predictor of DAS28-ESR change to study end. Safety analysis showed the established profile of RTX. CONCLUSION: RTX was safe and effective in a real-life setting with rapid and sustained improvement in RA signs and symptoms.

[Rheumatoid arthritis]. / Rheumatoide Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and progressive systemic disease of the connective tissue, which is particularly manifested with destructive alterations to the joints. Inflammatory reactions in the synovium lead to the influx of peripheral inflammatory cells as well as the activation of local cells. Released growth factors, chemokines and especially cytokines play a key role in chronic inflammatory responses. In addition to the central lymphocytes, the T and B cells and their subpopulations, locally resident cells, such as neutrophils, macrophages and fibroblasts as well as cells of bone metabolism are activated by the inflammatory milieu and contribute to and drive inflammation and tissue damage. The destruction of cartilage and bone substance by local tissue cells, synovial fibroblasts and osteoclasts is characteristic for this disease. Untreated, the local inflammatory and destructive processes as well as systemic inflammatory factors lead to progressive and irreversible joint destruction. Cellular and immunological processes in RA are closely interwoven; therefore, besides the general inhibition of immunological processes, specific inhibition of central key molecules can reduce or completely stop the inflammatory destructive processes; however, a high heterogeneity can be observed among RA patients and disease progression. Therefore, an expansion of the therapeutic options is desirable as not all patients are able to equally benefit from the therapeutic treatment. It is important to characterize new molecular mechanisms, which could lead to the development of new therapeutic options. Some of the more recent insights are summarized in this overview.

[S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs]. / S2e-Leitlinie: Therapie der rheumatoiden Arthritis mit krankheitsmodifizierenden Medikamenten.

BACKGROUND: Medication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVE: Achieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany. METHODS: Following a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.

Visfatin alters the cytokine and matrix-degrading enzyme profile during osteogenic and adipogenic MSC differentiation.

OBJECTIVES: Age-related bone loss is associated with bone marrow adiposity. Adipokines (e.g., visfatin, resistin, leptin) are adipocyte-derived factors with immunomodulatory properties and might influence differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). Thus, the presence of adipokines and MMPs in bone marrow and their effects on MSC differentiation were analyzed. METHODS: MSC and ribonucleic acid (RNA) were isolated from femoral heads after hip replacement surgery of OA or osteoporotic femoral neck fracture (FF) patients. Bone structural parameters were evaluated by microcomputed tomography (µCT). MSC were differentiated towards adipocytes or osteoblasts with/without adipokines. Gene expression (adipokines, bone marker genes, MMPs, TIMPs) and cytokine production was evaluated by realtime-polymerase chain reaction (realtime-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Matrix mineralization was quantified using Alizarin red S staining. RESULTS: µCT showed an osteoporotic phenotype of FF compared to OA bone (reduced trabecular thickness and increased ratio of bone surface vs volume of solid bone). Visfatin and leptin were increased in FF vs OA. Visfatin induced the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. In contrast to resistin and leptin, visfatin increased MMP2 and MMP13 during adipogenesis. In osteogenically differentiated cells, MMPs and TIMPs were reduced by visfatin. Visfatin significantly increased matrix mineralization during osteogenesis, whereas collagen type I expression was reduced. CONCLUSION: Visfatin-mediated increase of matrix mineralization and reduced collagen type I expression could contribute to bone fragility. Visfatin is involved in impaired bone remodeling at the adipose tissue/bone interface through induction of proinflammatory factors and dysregulated MMP/TIMP balance during MSC differentiation.