Electro-fulguration for extensive inflammatory bladder lesions in post-menopausal women with antibiotic-recalcitrant recurrent urinary tract infections.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate how women with uncomplicated antibiotic-recalcitrant recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) and extensive inflammatory bladder lesions on office cystoscopy responded to electro-fulguration (EF) to eliminate these chronic bladder sites. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective study of non-neurogenic women with RUTIs, inflammatory lesions on cystoscopy, and who underwent EF was performed. Lesions were classified through a simplified staging system based on the extent of bladder wall involvement. Only those with extensive bladder wall involvement (stages 3 and 4) at the time of EF were analyzed in this report. Six months after EF, an office cystoscopy was performed, with endoscopic success defined as no lesions seen. The primary clinical outcome was number of symptomatic UTIs after EF, defined as cure (0/year), improvement (1-2/year), and failure (≥3/year). RESULTS: From 2007 to 2019, a total of 57 women met the study criteria, 30 stage 3 and 27 stage 4. Nineteen (63%) were endoscopically successful in stage 3 and 11 (41%) in stage 4. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (stage 3) and 3.1 years (stage 4). All had at least a 6-month UTI follow-up after the 6 months of office cystoscopy, with 15 patients cured, 37 improved, and 5 failed (all stage 4). CONCLUSIONS: Although EF only resulted in 63% complete endoscopic resolution, the majority experienced a decrease in the frequency of UTIs, suggesting that EF can be durably effective even in women with very extensive cystitis lesions.

Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Patients With Chest Wall Trauma on Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for severe rib fractures recommend neuraxial blockade in addition to multimodal pain therapies. While the guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention recommend chemoprophylaxis, these medications must be held for neuraxial blockade placement. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly described block for thoracic pain control. Advantages include its quick learning curve and potential for less bleeding complications. We describe the use of ESPB for rib fractures in patients on chemoprophylaxis. We hypothesize that ESPB can be performed in this patient population without holding chemoprophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of a level 1 trauma center from 9/2016 to 12/2018. All patients with trauma with rib fractures undergoing neuraxial blockade or ESPB were included. Demographics, chemoprophylaxis and anticoagulation regimens, outcomes, and complications were collected. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with rib fracture(s) were admitted. Of these, 73 had a pain management consult. Thirteen had epidural catheters and 25 had ESPBs placed. There was no difference in demographics, injury patterns, bleeding complications, or venous thromboembolism rates among the groups. Patients with ESPB were less likely to have a dose of chemoprophylaxis held because of placement of a catheter (25% versus 100%, P < 0.00001). Three patients with ESPB were on oral anticoagulation on admission, and two were able to continue their regimen during placement. CONCLUSIONS: ESPB can be safely placed in patients on chemoprophylaxis. It should be considered over traditional blocks in patients with blunt chest wall trauma because of its technical ease and ability to be performed with chemoprophylaxis.