Smaller nadroparin dose reductions required for patients with renal impairment: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines advise 50 % and 25 % dose reduction of the therapeutic nadroparin dose (86 IU/kg) in patients with eGFR 15-29 and 30-60 ml/min respectively. For monitoring, peak anti-Xa levels are suggested. Data lack whether this results in therapeutic anti-Xa levels or in anti-Xa levels that are comparable to those of patients without renal impairment. AIMS: To determine dose ranges in patients with renal impairment that result in therapeutic anti-Xa levels and to determine the percentage of the 86 IU/kg dose that results in anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients without renal impairment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in five hospitals. Patients ≥18 years of age, with an eGFR ≥ 15 ml/min were included. The first correctly sampled peak (i.e. 3-5 h after ≥ third administration, regardless of dose per patient) was included. Simulated prediction models were developed using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: 770 patients were included. eGFR and hospital affected the association between dose and anti-Xa level. The doses for peak anti-Xa levels of 0.75 IU/ml differed substantially between hospitals and ranged from 55 to 91, 65-359 and 68-168 IU/kg in eGFR 15-29, 30-60 and > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. In eGFR 15-29 and 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2, doses of 75 % and 91 % of 86 IU/kg respectively, were needed for anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients with eGFR > 60 ml/min. CONCLUSION: We advise against anti-Xa based dose-adjustments as long as anti-Xa assays between laboratories are not harmonized and an anti-Xa target range is not validated. A better approach might be to target levels similar to eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, which are achieved by smaller dose reductions.

Inpatients Self-Administration of Medication: Stakeholders' views and prerequisites.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify stakeholders' views on inpatient Self-Administration of Medication and corresponding prerequisites for successful implementation. BACKGROUND: Self-Administration of Medication allows capable patients to manage their medication regimen throughout hospitalisation. It is assumed to facilitate continuity of care, increase medication safety and patient empowerment. To enable sustainable implementation stakeholders should support it. Knowledge about stakeholders' views regarding Self-Administration of Medication is currently lacking. DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted among stakeholders using semi-structured interviews. METHODS: Using purposive and snowball sampling fourteen representatives from Dutch healthcare associations, organisations and authorities were interviewed between April and July 2019. These stakeholders were asked to reflected on Self-Administration of Medication and its implementation. Data were examined using inductive thematic content analysis and reported following the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: Most stakeholders were positive towards Self-Administration of Medication and foresaw benefits in terms of the following: improvements to patient-centred care, contributions to sustainable use of healthcare assets and the need and opportunity for change. Critical concerns included reflecting potential risks for patient safety, concerns about implementation feasibility and questions regarding implementation necessity. Stakeholders highlighted prerequisites pertaining to the implementation process in which the following two themes emerged: (1) initiate a supported change and (2) perform research for best practices and identification of benefits. Other prerequisites concerned distinct levels within healthcare including individual patients (i.e. adequate communication), hospital organisation (i.e. to establish a workflow to secure medication safety) and healthcare system (i.e. to facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration in healthcare). CONCLUSION: Stakeholders were predominantly positive about Self-Administration of Medication. For successful and sustainable implementation of Self-Administration of Medication, prerequisites identified in this study should be met. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provided knowledge about stakeholders' views which could foster implementation and evaluation of Self-Administration of Medication, which may, in turn, promote effective deployment and patient empowerment.

Patients Managing Their Medical Data in Personal Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Personal electronic health records (PEHRs) allow patients to view, generate, and manage their personal and medical data that are relevant across illness episodes, such as their medications, allergies, immunizations, and their medical, social, and family health history. Thus, patients can actively participate in the management of their health care by ensuring that their health care providers have an updated and accurate overview of the patients' medical records. However, the uptake of PEHRs remains low, especially in terms of patients entering and managing their personal and medical data in their PEHR. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators that patients face when deciding to review, enter, update, or modify their personal and medical data in their PEHR. This review also explores the extent to which patient-generated and -managed data affect the quality and safety of care, patient engagement, patient satisfaction, and patients' health and health care services. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar web-based databases, as well as reference lists of all primary and review articles using a predefined search query. RESULTS: Of the 182 eligible papers, 37 (20%) provided sufficient information about patients' data management activities. The results showed that patients tend to use their PEHRs passively rather than actively. Patients refrain from generating and managing their medical data in a PEHR, especially when these data are complex and sensitive. The reasons for patients' passive data management behavior were related to their concerns about the validity, applicability, and confidentiality of patient-generated data. Our synthesis also showed that patient-generated and -managed health data ensures that the medical record is complete and up to date and is positively associated with patient engagement and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest recommendations for implementing design features within the PEHR and the construal of a dedicated policy to inform both clinical staff and patients about the added value of patient-generated data. Moreover, clinicians should be involved as important ambassadors in informing, reminding, and encouraging patients to manage the data in their PEHR.

The Effect of Self-Administration of Medication During Hospitalization on Patient's Self-Efficacy and Medication Adherence After Discharge.

Purpose: The effect of self-administration of medication (SAM), in which capable hospitalized patients administer medication themselves on medication self-efficacy is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SAM on medication self-efficacy, adherence and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods: A prospective pre-post intervention study on the orthopedic ward of the Sint Maartenskliniek (Nijmegen) was conducted from January 2020 to July 2021. All adults admitted to this ward were eligible for participation. The primary outcome was the level of medication self-efficacy measured by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) one week after discharge. Secondary outcomes were SEAMS-score three months after hospitalization, medication adherence measured by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) one week and three months after hospitalization and patient satisfaction expressed on a five-point Likert scale in patients who experienced SAM. The differences in median SEAMS-scores and non-adherence pre- versus post-implementation of SAM were statistically analyzed. Patients' agreement regarding satisfaction with SAM was calculated as proportion per Likert scale answer. Results: Of the 197 patients participating in the study, 96 were included pre- and 101 post-implementation of SAM. Median SEAMS-scores one week after discharge were 35 [IQR 31-38] and 34 [IQR 30-36] pre- and post-intervention respectively (p = 0.08). There was no difference in the proportion of non-adherent patients at one week and three months after discharge pre- and post-intervention, 52.4%, 53.2%, 57.9% and 64.4% respectively. Of the patients that experienced SAM 32% agreed and 49% strongly agreed that they would like to self-manage medication again during a future hospitalization. Conclusion: In this orthopedic population with high medication self-efficacy scores at discharge, SAM did not affect patients' medication self-efficacy nor medication adherence after hospitalization. Most patients preferred SAM. Additional studies should focus on the effect of SAM in other patient populations.

Patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Inpatient Self-administration of Medication (SAM) increases patient involvement in medication management and may increase medication safety. Its implementation is impeded. Successful and sustainable implementation of SAM strongly depends on patients' willingness to participate. This study aimed to identify and quantify patients' views on SAM, related (dis)advantages and prerequisites, patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, and their preferences in medication management during hospitalisation. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were performed to identify patients' views on SAM. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic-content analysis. These outcomes were used to construct a questionnaire about patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, their preferences for inpatient medication management and level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and prerequisites of SAM. Data were descriptively analysed. Results: Nineteen hospitalised patients [mean (standard deviation; SD) age 61.0 (13.4) years old; 52.6% male] were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, but some doubted the necessity to change standard care. Also, patients expressed concerns about medication safety. Prerequisites for SAM implementation were identified. These covered four main themes: information provision, accessible and safe storage, assurance of safety, and clear responsibilities. A total of 234 patients [mean (SD), age 65.3 (13.5) years; 54.7% male] participated in the questionnaire. Although 50.0% of the patients were willing to self-administer medication, patients were ambivalent as only 36.5% preferred SAM over nurse-led administration. Conclusion: The majority of patients were positive about SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over standard care. This ambivalent attitude may be overcome when the stated prerequisites are met and patients experience SAM in clinical practice. Based on patients' views, it can be concluded that implementation of SAM seems possible. Plain Language Summary: Research to identify patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation Background: Patient involvement is desired by patients. Nevertheless, currently healthcare providers take over patient's medication management when hospitalised. Capable patients administering their own medication during hospitalisation, known as 'Self-administration of Medication' (SAM) is one possible way to increase patient involvement in hospital care and to improve medication safety. Understanding patients' views on SAM, before its actual practice, could help to successfully implement it. In this research, we aimed to identify and measurepatients' views on SAM,(dis)advantages of and requirements for SAM stated by patients,patients' willingness to self-administrate medication,patients' preferences in medication management during hospitalisation.Methods: Our study consisted of two parts and was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. First, patients were interviewed to identify patients'views on SAM,requirements for SAM.Second, the outcomes of these interviews were used to construct a questionnaire aiming to identify patient'swillingness to self-administrate,preferences for self- or nurse-led medication administration,level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and requirements.Results: Nineteen hospitalised patients were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, some doubted the necessity to change nurse-led medication administration. Patients mentioned many advantages of SAM, such as increased patient empowerment and contribution to sustainability. Some patients had concerns about medication safety, for example, risking omissions or double administrations.In total, 234 patients completed the questionnaire. Half (50%) of the patients were willing to self-administer medication. However, only 37% of patients preferred SAM over nurse-led medication administration which indicates that the majority of patients were hesitant to actually self-administer medication. The most important requirements for SAM by patients were, 'I want to be informed before my hospitalisation that I have to bring my own medication' (80% agreed) and 'Healthcare professionals must assess per patient whether the patient is able to manage and use his or her own medication' (74% agreed).Conclusion: Most patients mentioned many advantages and had positive views on SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over nurse-led medication administration. This reservation may be overcome when the stated requirements are met and patients experience SAM when admitted to hospital.

Optimising the Nadroparin Dose for Thromboprophylaxis During Hemodialysis by Developing a Population Pharmacodynamic Model Using Anti-Xa Levels.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal nadroparin dose in patients undergoing hemodialysis is difficult to determine in clinical practice. Anti-Xa levels ≥ 0.4 IU/mL and < 2.0 IU/mL are suggested to prevent thrombus formation within the extracorporeal circuit whilst minimizing bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the variability in the association between dose and anti-Xa levels, identify patient and dialysis characteristics that explained this variability, and optimize nadroparin dosing based on the identified characteristics. METHODS: Anti-Xa samples were collected in patients who received intravenous nadroparin as thromboprophylaxis during routine dialysis sessions. A population pharmacodynamic model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. The percentage of patients ≥ 0.4 IU/mL (efficacy) and < 2.0 IU/mL (safety) was simulated for different doses, patient and dialysis characteristics. RESULTS: Patients (n = 137) were predominantly receiving standard hemodialysis (84.7% vs. hemodiafiltration 15.3%) and had a mean bodyweight of 76.3 kg (± 16.9). Lean body mass (LBM), mode of dialysis, and dialyzer partially explained between-subject variability in anti-Xa levels. Patients on hemodiafiltration and those receiving hemodialysis with a high LBM (≥ 80 kg) had a low probability (< 29%) of anti-Xa levels ≥ 0.4 IU/mL during the entire dialysis session. All patients, except hemodialysis patients with a low LBM (< 50 kg), had a high probability (> 70%) of peak anti-Xa levels < 2.0 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Mainly patients receiving hemodiafiltration and those receiving hemodialysis with a high LBM can benefit from a higher nadroparin dose than currently used in clinical practice, while having anti-Xa levels < 2.0 IU/mL.

Prolonged oxycodone use and potential risk factors in postoperative patients: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged exposure to opioids has a negative influence on the physical and mental health of a person. Currently, little is known about the risk of prolonging opioids after first postoperative use. AIM: A study was conducted to define the proportion of postoperative patients that use oxycodone longer than prescribed to determine risk factors of prolonged use. METHOD: This retrospective single-center nested case-control study was performed in the Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital. The study population consisted of postoperative adult patients who received an oxycodone prescription at discharge between April 2018 and June 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least one refill of oxycodone during a follow-up period of 30 days. The secondary outcome was the association of potential risk factors with oxycodone refills. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between the variables and outcome. RESULTS: 1203 patients were included of which 280 (23.3%) received one or more refill. Age (adjusted odds ratio 1.01 [95% confidence interval 1.00-1.02]), length of stay (1.10 [1.06-1.14], a Numeric Rating Scale pain score of four or higher (1.52 [1.14-2.01]), use of the continuous release form only (2.15 [1.60-2.89]) and admission to various hospital departments were associated with a refill of oxycodone . CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients with a refill of oxycodone is 23.3%. This could result in chronic oxycodone use and potential misuse. Patients with the determined risk factors may be a suitable population for future interventions to minimize prolonged use.

The effect of Patient's Own Medication use on patient's self-reported medication knowledge during hospitalisation: a pre-post intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Improving patient's medication knowledge and consequently medication use is essential for optimal treatment outcomes. As patient knowledge about medication is currently suboptimal, interventions to optimise medication knowledge are necessary. Implementation of Patient's Own Medication (POM) in which patients bring their outpatient medication to the hospital, and nurses administer these during admission, may increase medication knowledge. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of POM use on self-reported medication knowledge of hospitalised patients compared to standard care. Patient's sense of medication safety, attitude to the provision of information, and to inpatient medication use were studied in both standard care and during POM use too. METHOD: In this nationwide intervention study perceived medication knowledge was assessed with a questionnaire pre and post implementing POM use. The questionnaire assessed perceived medication knowledge at admission and discharge, medication safety during hospitalisation, the provision of information during hospitalisation and at discharge, and inpatient medication use during hospitalisation. Patients' answers were categorised into positive and negative/neutral. The proportion of patients with adequate medication knowledge, in the standard care and POM use group at hospital admission and discharge, were calculated and compared with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among the 731 patients (393 received standard care and 338 POM) who completed the questionnaire (80.2%), POM use seemed to be positively associated with self-reported knowledge on how to use medication at discharge (adjusted OR: 3.22 [95% CI 2.01-5.16]). However, for the other two knowledge related statements POM use was not associated. Medication knowledge at admission was the most important variable associated with perceived medication knowledge at discharge. The majority perceived POM use to be safer (52.9% of standard care patients versus 74.0% POM users; P <  0.01), POM users knew better which medicines they still used during hospitalisation (85.8% versus 92.3% resp.; P = 0.01), and most patients preferred POM use regardless of having experienced it (68.2% versus 82.2% resp.; P <  0.01). CONCLUSION: POM use positively affects patient's medication knowledge about how to use medication and patients' perception of medication safety. With POM use more patients have a positive attitude towards the provision of information. The majority of patients prefer POM use. In conclusion, POM use seems a valuable intervention and requires further investigation.

A multifaceted clinical decision support intervention to improve adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines.

Background Venous thromboembolism is a potentially fatal complication of hospitalisation, affecting approximately 3% of non-surgical patients. Administration of low molecular weight heparins to the appropriate patients adequately decreases venous thromboembolism incidence, but guideline adherence is notoriously low. Objective To determine the effect of a multifaceted intervention on thromboprophylaxis guideline adherence. The secondary objective was to study the effect on guideline adherence specifically in patients with a high venous thromboembolism risk. As an exploratory objective, we determined how many venous thromboembolisms may be prevented. Setting A Dutch general teaching hospital. Method A prospective study with a pre- and post-intervention measurement was conducted. A multifaceted intervention, consisting of Clinical Decision Support software, a mobile phone application, monitoring of duplicate anticoagulants and training, was implemented. Guideline adherence was assessed by calculating the Padua prediction and Improve bleeding score for each patient. The number of preventable venous thromboembolisms was calculated using the incidences of venous thromboembolism in patients with and without adequate thromboprophylaxis and extrapolated to the annual number of admitted patients. Main outcome measure Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in pre- and post-intervention measurements. Results 170 patients were included: 85 in both control and intervention group. The intervention significantly increased guideline adherence from 49.4 to 82.4% (OR 4.78; 95%CI 2.37-9.63). Guideline adherence in the patient group with a high venous thromboembolism risk also increased significantly from 54.5 to 84.3% (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.31-4.62), resulting in the potential prevention of ± 261 venous thromboembolisms per year. Conclusions Our multifaceted intervention significantly increased thromboprophylaxis guideline adherence.

Economic impact of Patient's Own Medication use during hospitalisation: a multicentre pre-post implementation study.

Background Medication is frequently thrown away after a patient's discharge from hospital, with undesirable economic and environmental consequences. Because of the rising costs of healthcare, interventions to reduce medication wastage (and associated costs) are warranted. Using Patient's Own Medication during hospitalisation might decrease medication wastage and associated costs. Objective To study the economic impact of patient's own medication use on medication waste and hospital staff's time spent during hospitalisation. Setting In seven Dutch hospitals, of which university, teaching, general, and specialised hospitals, eight different hospital wards, surgical and medical, were selected. Method In this prospective pre-post intervention study data on the economic value of medication waste and time spent by healthcare professionals were collected for a 2 months period each. The economic value of medication waste was defined as the value (€) of wasted medication per 100 patient days. For each ward, time spent on medication process activities was measured 10 times per staff member. The average time spent (in hours) on medication process steps (multiple activities) per staff member per 100 patients and associated salary costs were calculated for both periods. Main outcome measure The primary outcome of the study was the total economic value (€) of wasted medication per 100 patient days. Results Implementation of Patient's Own Medication decreased the economic value of wasted medication by 39.5% from €3983 to €2411 per 100 patient days. The mean time spent on the total medication process was reduced with 5.2 h per 100 patients (from 112.7 to 104.4 h per 100 patients). We observed a shift in professional activities, as physicians and nurses spent less time on the medication process, whereas pharmacy technicians had a greater role in it. When time spent was expressed as salary; €1219 could be saved per 100 patients. Conclusions This study showed that 'Patient's Own Medication' implementation may have a positive economic impact, as the value of medication waste decreases, hospital staff devoted less time on the medication process, and staff deployment is more efficient.

The effect of a computerized prescribing and calculating system on hypo- and hyperglycemias and on prescribing time efficiency in neonatal intensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing glucose requires complex calculations because glucose is present in parenteral and enteral nutrition and drug vehicles, making it error prone and contributing to the burden of prescribing errors. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the impact of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system with clinical decision support (CDS) for glucose control in neonatal intensive care patients (NICU) focusing on hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes and prescribing time efficiency. METHODS: An interrupted time-series design to examine the effect of CPOE on hypo- and hyperglycemias and a crossover simulation study to examine the influence of CPOE on prescribing time efficiency. NICU patients at risk for glucose imbalance hospitalized at the University Medical Center Utrecht during 2001-2007 were selected. The risks of hypo- and hyperglycemias were expressed as incidences per 100 patient days in consecutive 3-month intervals during 3 years before and after CPOE implementation. To assess prescribing time efficiency, time needed to calculate glucose intake with and without CPOE was measured. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between pre- and post-CPOE mean incidences of hypo- and hyperglycemias per 100 hospital days of neonates at risk in every 3-month period (hypoglycemias, 4.0 [95% confidence interval, 3.2-4.8] pre-CPOE and 3.1 [2.7-3.5] post-CPOE, P = .88; hyperglycemias, 6.0 [4.3-7.7] pre-CPOE and 5.0 [3.7-6.3] post-CPOE, P = .75). CPOE led to a significant time reduction of 16% (1.3 [0.3-2.3] minutes) for simple and 60% (8.6 [5.1-12.1] minutes) for complex calculations. CONCLUSIONS: CPOE including a special CDS tool preserved accuracy for calculation and control of glucose intake and increased prescribing time efficiency.

Clinical pharmacy interventions in paediatric electronic prescriptions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency, nature and determinants of clinical pharmacy interventions in paediatric electronic prescriptions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort with nested case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital, The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients 0-18 years with at least one drug prescription admitted to hospital between 1 March 2004 and 1 January 2008, excluding patients receiving intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: Electronic medication prescriptions for paediatric inpatients were verified and if necessary interventions were made by the paediatric clinical pharmacy. Prescriptions requiring intervention (cases) were compared with prescriptions not requiring interventions (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of clinical pharmacy interventions, per 10 000 paediatric electronic prescriptions, and the determinants thereof. RESULTS: Interventions were made for 1577 (1.1%) of 138 449 prescriptions. 81% of the interventions concerned correction of a prescription that might have had adverse clinical consequences. Interventions in prescriptions for antibacterial agents for systemic use were made most often. Most corrections concerned wrong doses (45%). 1577 cases were compared with 1983 controls. The risk of interventions was higher for children aged 1 month to 2 years than for 12-18-year-olds (OR=1.97 (95% CI 1.63 to 2.38)). The risk for 'free-text' prescriptions was five times higher than for 'standardised structured template' prescriptions. No differences were found between day, evening and night shift prescriptions. Significantly more interventions were made in the oral dosage form (OR=1.63 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.88)) and administration route (OR=1.80 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.09)) than for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric prescribing errors occur frequently and are not completely prevented by electronic prescribing systems. This study provides information for improvements in electronic prescribing for paediatric patients. Incorporating tailored solutions, such as minimised free-text entry, certain obligatory fields and integrated dose checking and indications, can improve the quality and efficiency of electronic prescribing in paediatrics.

The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review.

CONTEXT: Pediatric and intensive care patients are particularly at risk for medication errors. Computerized physician order entry systems could be effective in reducing medication errors and improving outcome. Effectiveness of computerized physician order entry systems has been shown in adult medical care. However, in critically ill patients and/or children, medication prescribing is a more complex process, and usefulness of computerized physician order entry systems has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of computerized physician order entry systems on medication prescription errors, adverse drug events, and mortality in inpatient pediatric care and neonatal, pediatric or adult intensive care settings. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Embase up to November 2007 were used as our data sources. Inclusion criteria were studies of (1) children 0 to 18 years old and/or ICU patients (including adults), (2) computerized physician order entry versus no computerized physician order entry as intervention, and (3) randomized trial or observational study design. All studies were validated, and data were analyzed. RESULTS. Twelve studies, all observational, met our inclusion criteria. Eight studies took place at an ICU: 4 were adult ICUs, and 4 were PICUs and/or NICUs. Four studies were pediatric inpatient studies. Meta-analysis showed a significant decreased risk of medication prescription errors with use of computerized physician order entry. However, there was no significant reduction in adverse drug events or mortality rates. A qualitative assessment of studies revealed the implementation process of computerized physician order entry software as a critical factor for outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of computerized physician order entry systems clearly reduces medication prescription errors; however, clinical benefit of computerized physician order entry systems in pediatric or ICU settings has not yet been demonstrated. The quality of the implementation process could be a decisive factor determining overall success or failure.