Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessing the accuracy of rapid immunochromatographic tests in dengue diagnosis.

The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rapid dengue diagnostic tests. The search was conducted in the following databases: LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), CRD, The Cochrane Library, Trip Medical Database and Google Scholar. ELISA and PCR assays were adopted as reference methods. Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Forest Plot were performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity for each parameter analyzed (NS1, IgM and IgG). The results revealed that the combined analysis of the IgM antibody with the NS1 antigen resulted in greater sensitivity than the isolated analysis of IgM. The three analytes together showed the best performance, with a combined sensitivity of 90 % (95 % CI: 89-92 %) using ELISA as a comparator. Thus, the present review provides relevant knowledge for decision-making between the available rapid diagnostic tests.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the accuracy of rapid immunochromatographic tests for dengue diagnosis.

Rapid immunochromatographic tests are frequently used to diagnose dengue due to their easy use, low cost, and fast response. A high level of accuracy is essential for rapid diagnostic tests to support their large-scale use. Thus, this systematic review aims to evaluate the accuracy of rapid dengue diagnostic tests. The investigation was run through the following databases: LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), CRD, The Cochrane Library, Trip Medical Database, and Google Scholar. To solve difficulties, two independent reviewers performed document screening and selection. ELISA assay was adopted as a reference test because of several methodologic advantages. Seventeen articles were included accordingly, reckoning 6837 participating individuals. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Forest Plot were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for each analyzed parameter (anti-dengue IgM, IgG, and NS1 antigen). The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed as moderate using QUADAS-2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively. The sensitivity of IgM concerning the studied tests ranged from 13.8 to 90%, while that of NS1 ranged from 14.7 to 100% (95% CI). The antibodies with NS1 presented increased sensitivity; pooled data show that the association of the three analytes bestows the best result, with a combined sensitivity of 90% (CI 95%: 87-92%) and a pooled specificity of 89% (CI 95%: 87-92%). Thus, the present review provides relevant knowledge for decision-making between available rapid diagnostic tests.