Risk of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy in the Second Eye in Adult Patients with Bilateral Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To examine the incidence and risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in the patients who develop rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in their fellow eye after having a prior RRD complicated by PVR. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective observational study. SUBJECTS: Eyes with retinal detachment and PVR between 2015 and 2023 were identified through the Vestrum Health Database METHODS: Risk factors for PVR development, specifically documented PVR in the fellow eye, gender, age, lens status, and presenting and final visual acuity, were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio for PVR development during 6 months post-operative period. RESULTS: Of 57,264 patients, 11% had PVR in at least one eye. Of the 50,989 patients who did not develop PVR after the initial RRD, 4,834 developed RRD in the fellow eye. 166 of these patients developed PVR in their second eye for a PVR rate of 3% in the fellow eye. Of the 6,275 patients who developed PVR after primary RRD repair, 406 of these patients went on to develop RRD in their fellow eye. 42 of these patients developed PVR in their second eye for a PVR rate of 10%. A regression model that also included age, gender and visual acuity led to an odds ratio of 3.42 (p<0.001). The odds ratio of PVR development generally decreased with age. Pseudophakic patients had a higher odds ratio for PVR development, 1.48 (p=0.017). Initial patients with VA 20/40-20/80 had an odds ratio of 2.15 (p=0.003). Patients with VA worse than 20/200 had an odds ratio of 2.89 for PVR development (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history RRD with PVR in one eye, have approximately 3.5 times higher rate of PVR in their second eye after RRD compared with patients without a history of PVR. This finding potential impacts surgical decisions and use of prophylactic anti-PVR therapy if the patient's second eye has RRD. The final visual acuity in second eye of patients with history PVR is better than for the second eye of patients with no history of PVR which may indicate surgeons are already taking steps to prevent PVR in the patient's second eye.

Real-World Safety Outcomes with Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Findings from the IRIS® Registry.

INTRODUCTION: To assess real-world safety outcomes for adults with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with brolucizumab from the US-based IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 18,312 eyes (15,998 patients) treated with ≥ 1 intravitreal brolucizumab injections between 8 October 2019 (US launch date for brolucizumab) and 7 October 2021 were followed up for ≤ 2 years after first injection (index date). The study assessed the predefined incident ocular adverse events of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and retinal vascular occlusion (RO). RESULTS: Overall, 614/18,312 eyes (3.4%) experienced any IOI, RV, and/or RO event. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to an event was 84 (42-167) days; 77.4% of events (475/614) occurred within 6 months after index date. Median (IQR) number of brolucizumab injections before an event was 2 (1-4). For eyes with an adverse event and visual acuity (VA) data (n = 406), median (IQR) change in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters from pre-event VA was 0 (- 7 to + 5) at the 6-month follow-up; 50 eyes (12.3%) had a VA loss of 10 or more ETDRS letters. Risk of an event (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was decreased in eyes from male patients (0.61 [0.53-0.71]), from older patients (0.83 [0.76-0.90]), from treatment-naive patients (0.51 [0.38-0.69]), and from patients who started brolucizumab in the second year after launch (0.68 [0.53-0.86] vs. first year). CONCLUSION: In this large real-world brolucizumab safety study, 3.4% of eyes experienced an IOI, RV, and/or RO event. Among eyes that experienced an adverse event for which VA data were available, median ETDRS vision change was 0 letters (IQR - 7 to + 5).

Risk Factors for Meeting Criteria for Switching from Bevacizumab to Aflibercept When Treating Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Visual Acuity of < 20/40.

PURPOSE: To identify factors for meeting prespecified criteria for switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and moderate vision loss initially treated with bevacizumab in DRCR Retina Network protocol AC. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy participants with one or both eyes harboring CI-DME with visual acuity (VA) letter score of 69 to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/50-20/320). METHODS: Eligible eyes were assigned to receive intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (n = 158) or bevacizumab followed by aflibercept if prespecified criteria for switching were met between 12 weeks and 2 years (n = 154). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Meeting switching criteria: (1) at any time, (2) at 12 weeks, and (3) after 12 weeks. Associations between meeting the criteria for switching and factors measured at baseline and 12 weeks were evaluated in univariable analyses. Stepwise procedures were used to select variables for multivariable models. RESULTS: In the group receiving bevacizumab first, older participants showed a higher risk of meeting the switching criteria at any time, with a hazard ratio (HR) for a 10-year increase in age of 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.58). Male participants or eyes with worse baseline VA were more likely to switch at 12 weeks (for male vs. female: odds ratio [OR], 4.84 [95% CI, 1.32-17.81]; 5-letter lower baseline VA: OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.03-1.63]). Worse 12-week central subfield thickness (CST; 10-µm greater: HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]) was associated with increased risk of switching after 12 weeks. The mean ± standard deviation improvement in visual acuity after completing the switch to aflibercept was 3.7 ± 4.9 letters compared with the day of switching. CONCLUSIONS: The identified factors can be used to refine expectations regarding the likelihood that an eye will meet protocol criteria to switch to aflibercept when treatment is initiated with bevacizumab. Older patients are more likely to be switched. At 12 weeks, thicker CST was predictive of eyes most likely to be switched in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Surgical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment and Fellow Eye Involvement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the associations, fellow eye retinal tear or detachment, and surgical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in young adults. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. SUBJECTS: Patients aged ≤ 30 years who underwent surgical repair for RRD between 2014 and 2021 at a single practice. The mean age was 23.85 years (range, 12-30 years). METHODS: Data collected included demographics, preoperative clinical features of the RRD, visual acuity (VA), type of surgery performed, anatomic outcomes, OCT findings, fellow eye retinal tear or detachment, and postoperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative VA and single-surgery anatomic success rate. RESULTS: One hundred one patients (109 eyes) were included. Sixty-seven patients (74 eyes) and 17 patients (19 eyes) were followed for ≥ 1 year and 5 years, respectively. The most common associations were myopia (66 eyes, 60.6%), trauma (8 eyes, 7.3%), and prior ocular surgery (7 eyes, 6.4%). Median preoperative Snellen VA was 20/70. The macula was attached in 31 eyes. Scleral buckle (SB) alone was performed in 75 eyes, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) + SB was performed in 27 eyes, PPV alone was performed in 6 eyes, and cryotherapy with pneumatic retinopexy was performed in 1 patient. Single-surgery anatomical success was 88.7% for SB, 89.7% for PPV + SB, and 75% for PPV. The median final postoperative Snellen VA was 20/50. Twelve patients presented with bilateral RRDs, and sequential surgery was performed in 8 patients, followed by 4 patients who underwent surgery with fellow eye laser barricade. Fourteen patients (13.9%) developed a retinal tear or detachment in the fellow eye, with a mean interval of 8 months from presentation. Of the 17 patients who were followed for ≥ 5 years, 3 patients (17.6%) developed a fellow eye retinal tear or detachment. After initial anatomical success, 6 eyes (5.5%) developed proliferative vitreoretinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The most common association of RRD in this study was myopia. Scleral buckle alone was the most common surgical intervention. However, outcomes were generally favorable with SB-only and PPV + SB. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the risk of bilateral retinal detachment and the risk of fellow eye retinal tear and detachment. These patients require long-term surveillance in both eyes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Levodopa Is Associated with Reduced Development of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether levodopa (L-DOPA) is associated with a reduced likelihood of developing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Three studies were performed: retrospective analyses in the Vestrum Health Retina Database (#1-2) and case-control analysis in the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (#3). PARTICIPANTS: Eyes with neovascular AMD and 2 years of follow-up (#1). Eyes with non-neovascular AMD and 1 to 5 years of follow-up (#2). Patients aged ≥ 55 years with newly diagnosed neovascular AMD matched to controls without neovascular AMD (#3). METHODS: Eyes were divided into 2 groups (#1-2): exposed to L-DOPA before or on the date of neovascular (#1) or nonneovascular (#2) AMD diagnosis, and eyes not exposed to L-DOPA. We extracted AMD risk factors, number of intravitreal injections (#1), and conversion rate to neovascular AMD (#2). We calculated the percentage of newly diagnosed neovascular AMD cases and matched controls exposed to any L-DOPA and determined the cumulative 2-year dose in grams by tertiles (< 100 mg, approximately 100-300 mg, and approximately > 300 mg per day, #3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of intravitreal injections (#1) and detection of new-onset neovascular AMD (#2-3) after adjusting for AMD risk factors. RESULTS: In the Vestrum database, eyes with neovascular AMD that were exposed to L-DOPA underwent 1 fewer intravitreal injection over 2 years (N = 84 088 control vs. 530 L-DOPA eyes, P = 0.006). In eyes with nonneovascular AMD (N = 42 081-203 155 control vs. 314-1525 L-DOPA eyes), L-DOPA exposure was associated with a reduced risk of conversion to neovascular AMD by 21% at year 2 (P = 0.029), 35% at years 3 to 4 (P < 0.001), and 28% at year 5 (P = 0.024). In the MarketScan databases (N = 86 900 per group), cumulative 2-year doses of L-DOPA between approximately 100 to 300 mg per day and approximately > 300 mg were associated with decreased odds of developing neovascular AMD by 15% (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.97) and 23% (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa use was associated with reduced detection of new-onset neovascular AMD. A prospective, randomized clinical trial should be considered to investigate whether low-dose L-DOPA reduces neovascular AMD conversion. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

One-Year Brolucizumab Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration from a Large United States Cohort in the IRIS® Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual acuity (VA) and injection intervals in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 12 months of brolucizumab therapy in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who received brolucizumab exclusively for 12 months (2308 eyes of 2079 patients). METHODS: Observational study of eyes with a first injection of brolucizumab (index), followed by 2 or more brolucizumab injections over the following 12 months without switching to another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in best recorded VA and, for eyes receiving prior anti-VEGF therapy (treatment-experienced eyes), the difference between the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months and the anti-VEGF injection interval before switching. The interval before switching was defined as the time between the prior anti-VEGF and index brolucizumab injections; brolucizumab interval was the time between the closest injection to day 365 and the preceding injection. Secondary outcomes included incident adverse events. RESULTS: Overall VA at index was 61.6 ± 18.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 83.7% of treatment-naive eyes (184/220) and 86.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1797/2088) showed stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) VA at 12 months. Among treatment-experienced eyes receiving a prior anti-VEGF injection within 365 days before index, 29.5% (594/2015) showed an interval before switching of 8 weeks or more (mean, 7.6 ± 5.5 weeks), whereas 83.1% (1734/2015) showed a brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months of 8 weeks or more (mean, 10.3 ± 4.0 weeks). In all, 77.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1554/2015) showed an interval extension of 1 week or more; of these, 55.4% (861/1554) showed an extension of 4 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, at 12 months, brolucizumab treatment prolonged the interval between anti-VEGF injections for most treatment-experienced eyes, particularly those with shorter intervals before switching, while maintaining or improving VA. With careful balancing of the benefits and risks, switching to brolucizumab treatment may offer the advantage of extending the treatment interval for patients with a high anti-VEGF therapy burden. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Factors Linked to Injection Interval Extension in Eyes with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Switched to Brolucizumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection interval extension in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) switched to brolucizumab treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who switched from another anti-VEGF agent to brolucizumab-only treatment for ≥ 12 months from October 8, 2019, through November 26, 2021. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable analyses examined associations of demographic and clinical characteristics with the likelihood of interval extension after switching to brolucizumab therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eyes were classified as either extenders or nonextenders at 12 months. Extenders were eyes that achieved (1) an extension of ≥ 2 weeks in the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months versus the interval before switching (time between the last known prior anti-VEGF injection and first [index] brolucizumab injection) and (2) stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) visual acuity (VA) at 12 months versus VA at index injection. RESULTS: Of 2015 eyes among 1890 patients who switched to brolucizumab treatment, 1186 (58.9%) were extenders. In univariable analyses, demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between extenders and nonextenders, except that extenders had shorter intervals before switching versus nonextenders (mean, 5.9 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 10.1 ± 7.6 weeks, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression modeling, a shorter interval before switching was associated significantly and positively with interval extension with brolucizumab therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 5.6 for interval before switching of < 8 weeks versus ≥ 8 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-6.9; P < 0.001), and eyes with an index VA of 40 to 65 letters were significantly less likely to be extenders than eyes in the higher (better) index VA categories. CONCLUSIONS: Length of the treatment interval before switching was the characteristic associated most strongly with successful interval extension with brolucizumab. Treatment-experienced patients who required more frequent injections (i.e., shorter intervals before switching) showed the greatest extensions when switching to brolucizumab. With careful consideration of benefits and risks, brolucizumab may be a valuable option for patients with higher treatment burdens because of the need for frequent injections. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Antivascular endothelial growth factor agents for wet age-related macular degeneration: an IRIS registry analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes of patients in the United States who received antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Retrospective study PARTICIPANTS: Patients with wet AMD. METHODS: Using the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry, we studied patients with wet AMD who received ≥1 anti-VEGF injection, who were ≥50 years old, and with ≥1.5 years of follow-up. Patients were grouped based on follow-up duration (in years): ≥1.5 (cohort 1), ≥2.5 (cohort 2), and ≥3.5 (cohort 3). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups. 36.8%, 34.5%, and 39.2% of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, respectively, had an injection interval <8 weeks in length at the end of year 1. Results were similar at year 2 and 3. In cohorts 1-3, visual acuity (VA) changes from baseline ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 (year 1), -1.3 to -1.7 (year 2), and -2.8 to -3.1 (year 3) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. By the end of year 3, 41%, 39%, and 42% of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, respectively, had discontinued treatment (no injection for >6 months). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of eyes had injection intervals <8 weeks in length at the end of year 1. VA was slightly better at the end of year 1 and declined after the first year despite treatment. By the end of year 3, more than one-third of eyes had discontinued treatment. Given the high treatment burden, wet AMD patients may benefit from more durable approaches that require less frequent dosing.

Analysis of Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Development of Complications Using a Large Database of Retina Specialists.

PURPOSE: To examine the incidence of complications after posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) through an extended follow-up period and to identify patient-specific factors associated with a greater incidence of complication. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes with acute PVDs between 2015 and 2019 were identified through the Vestrum Health database. METHODS: Complications (vitreous hemorrhage, retinal break, and retinal detachment) were evaluated after acute PVD at presentation and throughout the 6-month follow-up period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of complications throughout the 6 month follow-up period after PVD and odds of complications by patient-specific factors. RESULTS: A total of 9635 eyes were included. The rate of any complication was 25.0%, isolated vitreous hemorrhage was 13.1%, retinal breaks without detachment was 16.0%, and retinal detachment was 4.2%. The majority of each complication was noted at presentation; however, 8.0% of isolated vitreous hemorrhages, 19.2% of retinal breaks without detachment, and 25.8% of retinal detachments were first noted within the 6-month follow-up period. Men experienced a significantly higher rate of any complication than women (30.0% versus 21.7%, P < 0.001), as well as retinal breaks and retinal detachments at both presentation and within 6-month follow-up. Patients with pseudophakia experienced significantly higher rates of delayed retinal detachment than phakic eyes (odds ratio, 1.85 [1.13, 3.04], P = 0.01). Among eyes with lattice/peripheral retinal degeneration, 44.2% experienced any complication throughout the clinical course. The presence of a retinal break in the fellow eye and retinal detachment in the fellow eye was associated with a significantly increased rate of any complication at any time point (retinal break: P < 0.0001; retinal detachment: P = 0.02), as well as each individual complication within the 6 month follow-up period. Among eyes with vitreous hemorrhage at presentation, 42.0% had a concurrent or delayed retinal break and 10.5% had concurrent or delayed retinal detachments. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically significant proportion of PVD-related complications are detected late, warranting extended follow-up, especially in higher-risk groups such as men, pseudophakic eyes, eyes with lattice/peripheral retinal degeneration, and eyes with a history of retinal breaks or detachment in the fellow eye. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

VITREOUS SEEDING OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN A PATIENT RECEIVING CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of vitreous seeding with tractional retinal detachment as a result of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a patient on systemic checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 44-year-old Hispanic woman with a history of renal cell carcinoma with metastases to the lungs, adrenal glands, hilar lymph nodes, and peritoneum presented with a complaint of severe floaters and blurry vision of the right eye for two months. She was found to have dense, web-like vitreous opacities and a peripheral tractional retinal detachment of the right eye. Pars plana vitrectomy, membrane peeling, endolaser, air-fluid exchange, gas injection, and vitreous biopsy were performed. The vitreous and membranes were sent for cytology with stains, including AE1/AE3, PAX-8, CK-7, CA-IX, AMACR, and S-100. Cytology revealed crowded groups of glandular cells, some in papillary-like formations. Positive stains included AE1/AE3, PAX-8, CK-7, CA-IX, and AMACR. CONCLUSION: Cytology and pathology demonstrated that vitreous seeding of metastatic renal cell carcinoma without an ocular mass lesion. It is hypothesized that the use of checkpoint inhibitors played a role in allowing for the atypical and previously unreported seeding of renal cell carcinoma to the vitreous.

Safety Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results From the IRIS Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map.

IMPORTANCE: Limited data exist on the real-world safety outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with brolucizumab (Beovu). OBJECTIVE: To determine the real-world incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis (RV) and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO), for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who underwent brolucizumab treatment. Additionally, potential risk factors associated with these adverse events were evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map. Patients initiating and receiving 1 or more brolucizumab injections from October 8, 2019, to June 5, 2020, with up to 6 months of follow-up were included. INTERVENTION: Brolucizumab injections. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Incidence of IOI (including RV) and/or RO and RV and/or RO and risk stratification for the identified risk factors. RESULTS: Of 10 654 and 11 161 included eyes (from the IRIS Registry and Komodo Health database, respectively), the median follow-up times were 97 and 95 days. Most eyes switched from another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent (9686 of 10 654 [90.9%] and 10 487 of 11 161 [94.0%], respectively), most commonly aflibercept (7160 of 9686 [73.9%] and 7156 of 10 487 [68.2%]), and most were from women (6105 of 10 654 [57.3%] and 6452 of 11 161 [57.8%]). The overall incidence of IOI and/or RO was 2.4% (255 of 10 654 eyes) and 2.4% (268 of 11 161 eyes) for the IRIS and Komodo groups, respectively, and RV and/or RO, 0.6% (59 of 10 654 eyes and 63 of 11 161 eyes), respectively. Patients with a history of IOI and/or RO in the 12 months before brolucizumab initiation had an increased observed risk rate (8.7% [95% CI, 6.0%-11.4%] and 10.6% [95% CI, 7.5%-13.7%]) for an IOI and/or RO event in the 6 months following the first brolucizumab treatment compared with patients without prior IOI and/or RO (2.0% in both data sets). There was an increased estimated incidence rate in women (2.9% [95% CI, 2.5%-3.3%] and 3.0% [95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%]) compared with men (1.3% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%]), but this risk was not as large as that of a prior IOI and/or RO. Similar findings were observed for patients with RV and/or RO events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The incidence rate of IOI and/or RO was approximately 2.4%. Patient eyes with IOI and/or RO in the 12 months prior to first brolucizumab injection had the highest observed risk rate for IOI and/or RO in the early months after the first brolucizumab treatment. However, given study limitations, the identified risk factors cannot be used as predictors of IOI and/or RO events, and causality with brolucizumab cannot be assessed.

Pneumatic Vitreolysis with Perfluoropropane for Vitreomacular Traction with and without Macular Hole: DRCR Retina Network Protocols AG and AH.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) in eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with and without full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Two multicenter (28 sites) studies: a randomized clinical trial comparing PVL with observation (sham injection) for VMT without FTMH (Protocol AG) and a single-arm study assessing PVL for FTMH (Protocol AH). PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adults with central VMT (vitreomacular adhesion was ≤3000 µm). In Protocol AG, visual acuity (VA) was 20/32 to 20/400. In Protocol AH, eyes had a FTMH (≤250 µm at the narrowest point) and VA of 20/25 to 20/400. METHODS: Pneumatic vitreolysis using perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central VMT release at 24 weeks (Protocol AG) and FTMH closure at 8 weeks (Protocol AH). RESULTS: From October 2018 through February 2020, 46 participants were enrolled in Protocol AG, and 35 were enrolled in Protocol AH. Higher than expected rates of retinal detachment and tear resulted in early termination of both protocols. Combining studies, 7 of 59 eyes (12% [95% CI, 6%-23%]; 2 eyes in Protocol AG, 5 eyes in Protocol AH) that received PVL developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n = 6) or retinal tear (n = 1). At 24 weeks in Protocol AG, 18 of 23 eyes in the PVL group (78%) versus 2 of 22 eyes in the sham group (9%) achieved central VMT release without rescue vitrectomy (adjusted risk difference, 66% [95% CI, 44%-88%]; P< 0.001). The mean change in VA from baseline at 24 weeks was 6.7 letters in the PVL group and 6.1 letters in the sham group (adjusted difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -6.1 to 4.5]; P = 0.77). In Protocol AH, 10 of 35 eyes (29% [95% CI, 16%-45%]) achieved FTMH closure without rescue vitrectomy at 8 weeks. The mean change in VA from baseline at 8 weeks was -1.5 letters (95% CI, -10.3 to 7.3 letters). CONCLUSIONS: In most eyes with VMT, PVL induced hyaloid release. In eyes with FTMH, PVL resulted in hole closure in approximately one third of eyes. These studies were terminated early because of safety concerns related to retinal detachments and retinal tears.

PREOPERATIVE DOMED MACULAR CONTOUR CORRELATES WITH POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL GAIN AFTER VITRECTOMY FOR SYMPTOMATIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE.

PURPOSE: Evaluate macular features on preoperative ocular coherence tomography as indicators of postoperative visual gain following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 66 eyes that underwent vitrectomy with membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling for symptomatic ERM. Inclusion criteria required a pre-op visual acuity of at least 20/200 and minimum follow-up of 1 year. In addition, 31 of these eyes with complete 5-line raster pre-op ocular coherence tomography had segmentation analysis which included noncentral ERM to inner nuclear layer and ERM to outer plexiform layer measurements. RESULTS: Eyes with "domed" pre-op macular contour had a mean preoperative acuity of 20/70 and gained a mean 2.4 lines at one year, compared with those with "flat" or "depressed" macular contour, having a 20/60 mean preoperative acuity and 0.6 lines gained (P = 0.02). Changes for other ocular coherence tomography features examined were not statistically significant. Paracentral ERM to inner nuclear layer measurements had moderate correlation, whereas paracentral ERM to outer plexiform layer measurements had weak correlation with gain in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: An inner macular-domed contour in eyes with ERM predicted better visual gain after vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling compared with a flat or depressed contour.

Association Between Change in Visual Acuity and Change in Central Subfield Thickness During Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Participants Randomized to Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The determination of optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield thickness (CST) is an objective measure, and visual acuity (VA) is a subjective measure. Therefore, using OCT CST changes as a surrogate for VA changes in diabetic macular edema seems reasonable. However, studies suggest that change in OCT CST following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular edema is correlated with changes in VA but varies substantially among individuals, and so may not be a good surrogate for changes in VA. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between changes in VA and changes in OCT CST across 3 anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab) used in a randomized clinical trial for diabetic macular edema. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post hoc analyses were conducted of DRCR Retina Network Protocol T among 652 of 660 participants (98.8%) meeting inclusion criteria for this investigation. The study was conducted between August 22, 2012, and September 23, 2015. The post hoc data collection and analysis were performed from May 29 to July 11, 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Six monthly intravitreous anti-VEGF injections (unless success was achieved after 3-5 months) were administered; subsequent injections or focal/grid laser photocoagulation treatments were given as needed per protocol to achieve stability. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Association between changes in VA letter score with changes in CST at 12, 52, and 104 weeks after randomization to aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. RESULTS: Of the 652 participants, 304 were women (46.6%); median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 54-67 years). The correlation between CST and VA at the follow-up visits was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.16-0.31) in 616 patients at 12 weeks, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.24-0.38) in 609 patients at 52 weeks, and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.15-0.31) in 566 patients at 104 weeks. The correlation coefficients of change in VA vs change in OCT CST for these time intervals were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.29-0.43) at 12 weeks, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.29-0.43) at 52 weeks, and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.26-0.41) at 104 weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Changes in CST appear to account for only a small proportion of the total variation in changes in VA. These findings do not support using changes in OCT CST as a surrogate for changes in VA in phase 3 clinical trials evaluating anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema or as a guide to inform the physician or patient about changes in VA after anti-VEGF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01627249.

The Real-World Effect of Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs on Intraocular Pressure: An Analysis Using the IRIS Registry.

PURPOSE: To identify sustained differences in intraocular pressure (IOP) after intravitreous injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs. DESIGN: Database study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeing an ophthalmic provider who contributes to the database. METHODS: We identified a total of 23 776 unique patients who received only a single type of anti-VEGF medication (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or ranibizumab) by injection in the right eye in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight Registry. Subgroups included patients with age-related macular degeneration only and patients who had not received an anti-VEGF injection for at least 1 year before the study. We examined those with at least 12, 18, and 25 injections for each of these 3 medications. For all groups, we used fellow, untreated eyes for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean change in IOP from baseline at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up and the proportion of eyes with a clinically significant IOP increase (defined as sustained rise of at least 6 mmHg to an IOP of more than 21 mmHg). RESULTS: All patients in all groups receiving all drugs showed a decrease in IOP from baseline, with a mean of 0.9 mmHg in treated eyes compared with an average decrease of 0.2 mmHg in fellow untreated eyes, a statistically significant difference. A generalized linear model accounting for confounders associated bevacizumab with slightly less lowering of IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab in most subgroups. A clinically significant IOP increase was seen in 2.6% of eyes receiving injections compared with 1.5% in the associated untreated fellow eyes. Clinically significant IOP increases occurred at a rate of 1.9%, 2.8%, and 2.8% for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively, which was significantly higher than untreated fellow eyes for bevacizumab and ranibizumab, but not for aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses from real-world data indicate that anti-VEGF intravitreous injections are associated with a small but statistically significant decrease in IOP over time. A proportion of patients, on average 2.6%, experienced a sustained clinically significant IOP rise with these drugs overall compared with 1.5% in the fellow untreated eyes. However, such an increase was not seen with aflibercept.