Design, synthesis, conformational analysis, and biological activity of Cα1-to-Cα6 1,4- and 4,1-disubstituted 1H-[1,2,3]triazol-1-yl-bridged oxytocin analogues.

Oxytocin (OT) is a neurohypophyseal peptide hormone containing a disulphide-bridged pseudocyclic conformation. The biomedical use of OT peptides is limited amongst others by disadvantageous pharmacokinetic parameters. To increase the stability of OT by replacing the disulphide bridge with the stable and more rigid [1,2,3]triazol-1-yl moiety, we employed the Cu2+-catalysed side chain-to-side chain azide-alkyne 1,3-cycloaddition. Here we report the design, synthesis, conformational analysis, and in vitro pharmacological activity of a homologous series of Cα1-to-Cα6 side chain-to-side chain [1,2,3]triazol-1-yl-containing OT analogues differing in the length of the bridge, location, and orientation of the linking moiety. Exploiting this macrocyclisation approach, it was possible to generate a systematic series of compounds providing interesting insight into the structure-conformation-function relationship of OT. Most analogues were able to adopt similar conformation to endogenous OT in water, namely, a type I ß-turn. This approach may in the future generate stabilised pharmacological peptide tools to advance understanding of OT physiology.

Manually calculated oesophageal bolus clearance time increases in parallel with reflux severity at impedance-pH monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal clearance has been scarcely studied. AIMS: Oesophageal clearance in endoscopy-negative heartburn was assessed to detect differences in bolus clearance time among patients sub-grouped according to impedance-pH findings. METHODS: In 118 consecutive endoscopy-negative heartburn patients impedance-pH monitoring was performed off-therapy. Acid exposure time, number of refluxes, baseline impedance, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and both automated and manual bolus clearance time were calculated. Patients were sub-grouped into pH/impedance positive (abnormal acid exposure and/or number of refluxes) and pH/impedance negative (normal acid exposure and number of refluxes), the former further subdivided on the basis of abnormal/normal acid exposure time (pH+/-) and abnormal/normal number of refluxes (impedance+/-). RESULTS: Poor correlation (r=0.35) between automated and manual bolus clearance time was found. Manual bolus clearance time progressively decreased from pH+/impedance+ (42.6s), pH+/impedance- (27.1s), pH-/impedance+ (17.8s) to pH-/impedance- (10.8s). There was an inverse correlation between manual bolus clearance time and both baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index, and a direct correlation between manual bolus clearance and acid exposure time. A manual bolus clearance time value of 14.8s had an accuracy of 93% to differentiate pH/impedance positive from pH/impedance negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: When manually measured, bolus clearance time reflects reflux severity, confirming the pathophysiological relevance of oesophageal clearance in reflux disease.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of a large monocentric series of patients affected by thyroid hormone (Th) resistance and suggestions for differential diagnosis in patients without mutation of Th receptor ß.

OBJECTIVE: The syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) is caused by a mutation of TH receptor ß (TRß) in 80% of cases. Patients without mutation (non-TR-RTH) may have a biochemical pattern that is difficult to differentiate from that of pituitary TSH-secreting adenoma (TSHoma). Herein, we report a large monocentric series of RTH focusing on patients with non-TR-RTH, to evaluate possible clinical or biochemical parameters able to distinguish them from TSHoma. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 99 consecutive patients with inappropriate TSH secretion (IST) syndrome referred to our Department between 1983 and 2011, identifying 68 patients with RTH and 31 patients with TSHomas. MEASUREMENTS: Patient records were reviewed for the main clinical, biochemical and imaging characteristics. RESULTS: Of our 68 patients with RTH, 16 (23·5%) did not show a TRß mutation and did not have affected family members. Of these 16 patients, three developed a TSHoma, during follow-up. To distinguish non-TR-RTH from TSHoma, we identified appropriate cut-off values for the main biochemical parameters that demonstrated the greatest sensitivity and specificity (T3 suppression test, α-subunit/TSH molar ratio, α-subunit assay and TRH test) and we calculated the probability for each patient to develop a TSHoma. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the identified cut-offs could become a very useful tool in the challenging differential diagnosis between sporadic non-TR-RTH and TSHoma. It would then be possible to select the patients at higher risk of developing a TSHoma and therefore needing a closer follow-up.