Radiosynthesis, Preclinical, and Clinical Positron Emission Tomography Studies of Carbon-11 Labeled Endogenous and Natural Exogenous Compounds.

The presence of positron emission tomography (PET) centers at most major hospitals worldwide, along with the improvement of PET scanner sensitivity and the introduction of total body PET systems, has increased the interest in the PET tracer development using the short-lived radionuclides carbon-11. In the last few decades, methodological improvements and fully automated modules have allowed the development of carbon-11 tracers for clinical use. Radiolabeling natural compounds with carbon-11 by substituting one of the backbone carbons with the radionuclide has provided important information on the biochemistry of the authentic compounds and increased the understanding of their in vivo behavior in healthy and diseased states. The number of endogenous and natural compounds essential for human life is staggering, ranging from simple alcohols to vitamins and peptides. This review collates all the carbon-11 radiolabeled endogenous and natural exogenous compounds synthesised to date, including essential information on their radiochemistry methodologies and preclinical and clinical studies in healthy subjects.

The Effect of an Asymmetric Energy Window on Bone Scintigraphy Image Quality.

Bone scintigraphy is one of the most common nuclear medicine tests. Previous work investigated the effectiveness of an asymmetric window (ASW) for planar bone scintigraphy using simulation and phantom data. Phantom studies concluded that the ASW improved both the resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio when imaging objects with high scatter. The aim of this study was to confirm this improvement increased image quality in patients. This study also investigated whether the differences between a symmetric window (SW) and an ASW depended on body mass index. Methods: Fifty-eight patients had 2 scans: a standard scan using an SW of 140 keV ± 10% and a scan using an ASW of 140 keV + 10% and - 7.5%. Three readers independently compared the 2 image sets and scored them using a 5-score scale (ranging from 1 = ASW better [clinically important] to 5 = SW better [clinically important]). Scores from all radiologists were pooled and analyzed statistically. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In 93 cases (53%), the readers scored the ASW images better than the SW images. In 5 cases (3%), the ASW images were preferred, with the difference considered clinically important; there were no cases in which the SW was similarly preferred. For the sign test, we determined whether the total of 93 scores of 1 or 2 (ASW preferred) was significantly different from the 15 scores of 4 or 5 (SW preferred). The P value was less than 0.00001, demonstrating that the difference was significant. Conclusion: In patients undergoing bone scintigraphy, ASW provided an improvement in image quality that in some cases was judged clinically important.

Value of a Lower-Limb Immobilization Device for Optimization of SPECT/CT Image Fusion.

UNLABELLED: The foot and the ankle are small structures commonly affected by disorders, and their complex anatomy represents a significant diagnostic challenge. By providing information on anatomic and bone structure that cannot be obtained from functional imaging, SPECT/CT image fusion can be particularly useful in increasing diagnostic certainty about bone pathology. However, because of the lengthy duration of a SPECT acquisition, a patient's involuntary movements may lead to misalignment between SPECT and CT images. Patient motion can be reduced using a dedicated patient support. We designed an ankle- and foot-immobilizing device and measured its efficacy at improving image fusion. METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients who underwent SPECT/CT of the ankle and foot with and without a foot support. The misalignment between SPECT and CT images was computed by manually measuring 14 fiducial markers chosen among anatomic landmarks also visible on bone scintigraphy. ANOVA was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The absolute average difference without and with support was 5.1 ± 5.2 mm (mean ± SD) and 3.1 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, which is significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of the foot support significantly decreased misalignment between SPECT and CT images, which may have a positive clinical influence in the precise localization of foot and ankle pathology.