25 years of lipid-lowering therapy: secular trends in therapy of coronary patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Guidelines on dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) over the years recommend lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals by more intense therapy. Nevertheless, LDL­C has increased in the general population. Real-world trends of LLT medication as well as of LDL­C levels in cardiovascular high-risk patients are unclear. METHODS: From 2158 patients who were referred for elective coronary angiography, lipid medication was analyzed at admission in three cardiovascular observational studies (OS) over the last 25 years: OS1: 1999-2000, OS2: 2005-2008 and OS3: 2022-2023. The three studies were performed at the same cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Austria. RESULTS: The proportion of patients without LLT significantly decreased from OS1 through OS2 to OS3 (49.4%, 45.6%, and 18.5%, respectively, ptrend < 0.001). Moreover, the percentage of patients under high-intensity statin treatment significantly increased from 0% to 5.1%, and 56.5% (ptrend < 0.001). Significantly more patients became treated by more than one compound (OS1: 1.8%, OS2: 1.6%, OS3: 31.2%; ptrend < 0.001). In the latest OS3, a trend to fixed-dose combination of statins with ezetimibe was observed. Mean LDL­C levels decreased from 129 mg/dL over 127 mg/dL to 83 mg/dL, respectively (ptrend < 0.001). Of the patients on high-intensity therapy 34% met the recent ESC/EAS goals (LDL-C < 55 mg/dL), but only 3% on non-intense therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that during the observational period of a quarter of a century, treatment intensity increased and LDL­C levels improved considerably. Guidelines apparently matter in this high-risk population and are considered by primary care physicians.

Bempedoic Acid: How Will It Shape the Future Lipid-Lowering Landscape? Mode of Action, Evidence, and Clinical Use.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoproteins are now proven to be causal for atherosclerosis. Pharmacological treatment focuses on an increase of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, particularly in the hepatocyte, which leads to uptake of LDL from blood, thereby reducing the burden to the arterial wall. This mechanism has first been proven by statins to be effective to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The concept of "the lower, the better" was shown by high-intensity statins and new compounds like ezetimibe, PCSK9 antibodies, inclisiran, and ultimately bempedoic acid. SUMMARY: Although first considered only a relatively weak LDL-C lowering drug, bempedoic acid proved to be very effective, for example, in statin-intolerant patients to reduce cardiovascular events in the CLEAR-Outcomes study. In the era of personalized medicine, it should not be forgotten that the individual response to a LDL-C lowering drug can vary considerably. Bempedoic acid has a favorable safety profile, particularly it does not induce muscle problems because its precursor is not metabolized to the active drug in the muscle, and it does not induce hyperglycemia. Bempedoic acid probably is best used in combination with ezetimibe, which leads to LDL-C reductions in the range of moderately intensive statins; in an oral triple combination with a high-intensity statin, LDL-C reductions in the range of two-thirds can be achieved. KEY MESSAGES: Bempedoic acid is a further weapon against the atherogenic effect of LDL cholesterol - in both primary and secondary prevention.

Circulating glypican-4 is a new predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure confers a high burden of morbidity and mortality. However, risk prediction in heart failure patients still is limited. Blood-based biomarkers hold promise to improve clinical risk assessment. Recently we have identified circulating glypican-4 (GPC4) as a significant predictor of mortality in coronary angiography patients and patients with peripheral artery disease. The impact of serum GPC4 on mortality in patients with heart failure is unknown and is addressed in this prospective cohort study. METHODS: We prospectively recorded all-cause mortality in 288 patients with heart failure. GPC4 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline. RESULTS: During the 24-month follow-up period, 28.1% (n = 81) of the patients died. Serum GPC4 significantly predicted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) per doublingof GPC4 = 3.57 [2.31-5.53]; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that GPC4 was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HR per doubling = 3.25 [1.75-6.04]; P < 0.001) as well as in those with preserved ejection fraction (HR per doubling = 3.07 [1.22-7.70]; P = 0.017). The association between serum GPC4 and all-cause mortality remained significant in multivariable Cox regression analysis correcting for traditional risk factors (P = 0.035). Results from C-statistics indicated an additional prognostic value of GPC4 relative to NT-proBNP for the prediction of two-year all-cause mortality (P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Circulating GPC4 independently predicts all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure.

Data on the association of serum glypican-4 with future major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

This data article is associated to the research article titled 'Serum glypican-4 is a marker of future vascular risk and mortality in coronary angiography patients' (Muendlein et al., 2022). The present article provides additional prospective data on the association of serum glypican-4 (GPC4) with the incidence of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), vascular mortality, and overall mortality in a cohort of 760 coronary angiography patients. Serum GPC4 levels significantly differed between patients with or without an event during follow up. The results were confirmed in subgroup analyses with respect to age, sex, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, the presence of significant coronary stenoses, and renal function, as well as medical treatment. That said, an interaction term between GPC4 and impaired renal function and between GPC4 and the use of beta blockers on the incidence of future fatal events reached statistical significance. In addition, C-statistics were performed showing an additional predictive value of categorized GPC4 to a basic risk model including traditional risk factors for overall mortality.

Serum glypican-4 is a marker of future vascular risk and mortality in coronary angiography patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glypican-4 (GPC4) is a cell surface protein, but can be released into circulation under various clinical conditions. The association of circulating GPC4 with the risk of future cardiovascular events or death is unclear. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between serum GPC4 and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Our study included 760 patients undergoing coronary angiography. During a mean follow up period of 6.3 years, the incidence of MACE, vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality was recorded. Serum GPC4 levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Serum GPC4 was highly significantly associated with increased age, body mass index, brain natriuretic peptide, and oxidized low density lipoprotein, as well as with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate. During the follow-up period, 145 patients died, including 67 vascular deaths. MACE occurred in 137 patients. Serum GPC4 was significantly associated with MACE, vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, with adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for one standard deviation change of serum GPC4 of 1.32 [1.10-1.58], 1.38 [1.06-1.78], and 1.53 [1.29-1.82], respectively. The best cut-off value for serum GPC4 for predicting MACE, vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality was 7.24 ng/ml for all three endpoints. Respective adjusted HRs were 1.61 [1.07-2.43], 2.85 [1.62-5.01], and 2.92 [2.00-4.27]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that elevated serum GPC4 levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE, vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Single and joint impact of type 2 diabetes and of congestive heart failure on albuminuria: Data from subgroup analysis and data on moderate albuminuria.

We investigated 180 consecutive patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), of whom 83 had type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and 97 did not have diabetes as well as 223 controls without CHF, of whom 39 had T2DM and 184 did not have diabetes. Data was recorded by standardized interviews and by standardized examination protocols at our institution and were extracted from medical records. Here, we analyzed data on gender differences. Further, we examined the effect of CHF and T2DM on moderate albuminuria, i.e. on an albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) of 30-300 mg/g. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of our patients stratified by gender. Table 2 gives ACRs and prevalence rates of albuminuria separately for men and women. In logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, history of smoking, history of hypertension, use of statins, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists and other antihypertensive medication CHF and T2DM predicted the prevalence of albuminuria in a mutually independent manner in men (OR 4.93 [95% CI 1.76-13.85]; p = 0.002 and OR 2.38 [1.11-5.11]; p = 0.027, respectively), as well as in women (OR 5.66 [95% CI 1.76-18.20]; p = 0.004 and OR 3.53 [1.38-9.08]; p = 0.009, respectively). There was no significant interaction between gender and CHF or T2DM regarding the presence of albuminuria (p = 0.933 and 0.533, respectively), indicating that the association of CHF and T2DM with albuminuria did not differ significantly between men and women. In multivariate analysis of covariance, CHF and T2DM proved to be independent predictors of ACR in women after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, history of smoking, history of hypertension, use of statins, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists and other antihypertensive medication (F = 5.38; p = 0.022 and F = 4.95; p = 0.028, respectively); for men the corresponding F-values were 2.70; p = 0.102 and 3.12; p = 0.079, respectively. There was no significant interaction between gender and CHF or T2DM regarding ACR (p = 0.464 and 0.202, respectively), indicating that the association of CHF and T2DM with the ACR did not differ significantly between men and women. Regarding moderate albuminuria, both CHF and T2DM predicted moderate albuminuria adjusted in a mutually independent manner after the adjustments described above, with ORs of 4.75 [95% CI 2.16-10.45]; p< 0.001 and OR 2.08 [1.13-3.83]; p=0.018, respectively. The data set presented here could be reused with similar patient cohorts for pooled analysis.

Type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular events in peripheral artery disease versus coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is higher in peripheral artery disease (PAD) than in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, and PAD overall confers higher cardiovascular risk than CAD. How cardiovascular risk compares between PAD and CAD patients when analyses are stratified by the presence of type 2 diabetes is unclear and is addressed in the present study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded major cardiovascular events (MACE; ie, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke) over 10.0±4.7 years in 923 patients with stable CAD, of whom 26.7% had T2DM and in 292 patients with PAD, of whom 42.1% had T2DM. Four groups were analyzed: CAD patients without diabetes (CAD/T2DM-; n=677), CAD patients with T2DM (CAD/T2DM+; n=246), PAD patients without diabetes (PAD/T2DM-; n=169) and PAD patients with T2DM (PAD/T2DM+; n=123). RESULTS: The event rate for MACE increased over our four investigated groups: it was lowest in CAD/T2DM- patients (2.52 events per 100 person-years). It was significantly higher in CAD/T2DM+ patients (3.96 events per 100 person-years; p<0.001), in PAD/T2DM- patients (3.68 events per 100 person-years; p=0.022), and in PAD/T2DM+ patients (7.10 events per 100 person-years; p<0.001), who in turn were at a higher risk than CAD/T2DM+ or PAD/T2DM- patients (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Cox regression analysis after multivariate adjustment showed that the presence of T2DM (HR=1.44 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.92); p=0.012) and the presence of PAD versus CAD (HR=1.48 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.91); p=0.002) were mutually independent predictors of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our data show that T2DM as well as the presence of PAD versus CAD are mutually independent predictors of MACE. Patients with both PAD and T2DM are at an exceedingly high risk of cardiovascular events.

Single and joint impact of type 2 diabetes and of congestive heart failure on albuminuria.

AIMS: Albuminuria is a characteristic feature of diabetic nephropathy, and urine albumin excretion is also increased in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, no data are available on the single and joint associations of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and CHF with albuminuria. This issue was addressed in the present study. METHODS: We investigated 4 groups of patients: 180 patients with CHF, of whom 83 had T2DM (CHF+/T2DM+) and 97 did not have diabetes (CHF+/T2DM-) and 223 controls without CHF, of whom 39 had T2DM (CHF-/T2DM+) and 184 did not have diabetes (CHF-/T2DM-). RESULTS: The albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) was 9.2 [5.7-16.9] mg/g in CHF-/T2DM- patients. Compared to this group it was higher in CHF-/T2DM+ patients (16.1 [7.7-27.8] mg/g; p = 0.004), in CHF+/T2DM- patients (22.0 [9.0-76.8] mg/g; p < 0.001) and in CHF+/T2DM+ patients (66.2 [16.0-177.0] mg/g; p < 0.001), in whom in turn it was higher than in CHF-/T2DM+ (p < 0.001) or in CHF+/T2DM- (p = 0.001) patients. The ACR did not differ significantly between CHF-/T2DM+ and CHF+/T2DM- patients (p = 0.188). In multivariate analysis of covariance, CHF and T2DM proved to be independent predictors of ACR after multivariate adjustment (F = 5.68; p = 0.018 and F = 4.79; p = 0.029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that T2DM and CHF are mutually independent determinants of albuminuria.

Lipid profiles of patients with manifest coronary versus peripheral atherosclerosis - Is there a difference?

AIM: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are both caused by atherosclerosis. Serum lipids and lipoproteins are predictive of the development of atherosclerosis but it is not clear if they differ in the two manifestations, PAD and CAD. We tested whether a more detailed characterization of the lipid and lipoprotein patterns of PAD and CAD allows a clear differentiation between the two atherosclerotic phenotypes. METHODS: A cohort of 274 statin-naïve patients with either newly diagnosed imaging proven PAD (n = 89) or stable CAD (n = 185) was characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance- and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based advanced lipid and lipoprotein analysis. An independent cohort of 1239 patients with PAD and CAD was used for validation. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in markers of inflammation as well as ceramide and phosphatidylcholine levels between patients with PAD and CAD. In contrast, basic lipid markers including total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) or detailed lipoprotein profiles did not differ significantly between patients with PAD and CAD. Applying ratios and scores derived from ceramides and phosphatidylcholines further improved the discrimination between PAD and CAD. These significant differences were independent of body composition, from the status of smoking or type 2 diabetes mellitus, and also from apolipoprotein C-III and other inflammatory parameters which were different between CAD and PAD. CONCLUSION: The present study clearly suggests that PAD and CAD differ in terms of their ceramide- and phosphatidylcholine-based lipid patterns but not in lipoprotein characteristics.

Downhill hiking improves low-grade inflammation, triglycerides, body weight and glucose tolerance.

Exercise is a well-established tool for cardiovascular risk reduction. Particularly eccentric exercise, which essentially means walking downwards could favour more people becoming physically active. With the present controlled study, we tested the hypothesis that eccentric exercise can improve insulin sensitivity, triglyceride handling, body mass index, glucose tolerance and inflammation. We allocated 127 healthy sedentary individuals to one of two groups: (i) an active group of 102 individuals walking downwards a predefined route three to five times per week over two months, covering a difference in altitude of 540 m; for the upward route a cable car was used, for which adherence was recorded electronically and (ii) a matched control group of 25 individuals who stayed sedentary. Fasting and postprandial metabolic profiles were obtained at baseline and after two months. Compared to baseline, eccentric exercise significantly improved HOMA insulin resistance (1.94 ± 1.65 vs. 1.71 ± 1.36 (µU-1 ml) × ((mmol/l)-122.5); p = 0.038) and resulted in a decrease in fasting glucose (97 ± 15 vs. 94 ± 9 mg dl-1; p = 0.025) and glucose tolerance (238 ± 50 vs. 217 ± 47 mg dl-1 h-1; p < 0.001), whereas these parameters did not change significantly in the control group. Eccentric exercise significantly improved triglyceride tolerance (1923 ± 1295 vs. 1670 ± 1085 mg dl-1 h-1; p = 0.003), whereas triglyceride tolerance remained unchanged in the control group (p = 0.819). Furthermore, body mass index (27.7 ± 4.3 vs. 27.4 ± 4.3 kg m-2; p = 0.003) and C-reactive protein (0.27 ± 0.42 vs. 0.23 ± 0.25 mg dl-1; p = 0.031) were significantly lowered in the eccentric exercise group but not in the control group. Downhill walking, a type of exercise is a promising unusual exercise modality with favorable effects on body mass index, insulin action, on postprandial glucose and triglyceride handling and on C-reactive protein.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00386854.

The LDL-C/ApoB ratio predicts major cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The low density lipoprotein cholesterol to Apolipoprotein B (LDL-C/ApoB) ratio is a validated proxy for low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size that can be easily calculated from a standard lipid/apolipoprotein profile. Whether it is predictive of cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerosis is not known and is addressed in the present investigation. METHODS: We determined the LDL-C/ApoB ratio in a cohort of 1687 subjects with established atherosclerosis. Prospectively, major cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke were recorded over a period of 9.9 ± 4.6 years. The study covers >16,000 patient-years. RESULTS: At baseline, the LDL-C/ApoB ratio was 1.36 ± 0.28 in our cohort. During follow up, a total of 558 first MACE were recorded. The LDL-C/ApoB ratio predicted MACE in univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (HR 0.90 [0.82-0.98]; p = 0.014); this finding was confirmed after adjustment for age, gender, intensity of statin treatment, hypertension, history of smoking, type 2 diabetes, body mass index and ApoB (HR 0.87 [0.78-0.97]; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The LDL-C/ApoB ratio is independently predictive of MACE in subjects with established atherosclerosis.

The age of randomized clinical trials: three important aspects of randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy with examples from lipid, diabetes, and antithrombotic trials.

This review article aims to explain the important issues that data safety monitoring boards (DSMB) face when considering early termination of a trial and is specifically addressed to the needs of clinical and research cardiologists. We give an insight into the overall background and then focus on the three principal reasons for stopping trials, i.e. efficacy, futility, and harm. The statistical essentials are also addressed to familiarize clinicians with the key principles. The topic is further highlighted by numerous examples from lipid trials and antithrombotic trials. This is followed by an overview of regulatory aspects, including an insight into industry-investigator interactions. To conclude, we summarize the key elements that are the basis for a decision to stop a randomized clinical trial (RCT).

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a strong predictor of LDL cholesterol target achievement in patients with peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at a very high risk of cardiovascular events and strongly benefit from lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C); updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend an LDL-C target of at least <55 mg/dl for these patients. Whether the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) affects LDL-C target achievement in PAD patients is unknown and is addressed in the present study. METHODS: We investigated an unselected consecutive series of 319 patients with sonographically proven PAD, of whom 136 (42.6%) had T2DM. RESULTS: The LDL-C target of <55 mg/dl was met by 8.1% of T2DM patients and by 2.2% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.014); LDL-C was <70 mg/dl in 22.8% of patients with T2DM and in 9.8% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of T2DM was an independent and strong predictor of LDL-C target achievement after multivariate adjustment including age, gender, potency adjusted statin use, BMI, smoking, hypertension and other lipid-modifying therapy for the <55 mg/dl target (OR 3.58 [1.08-11.90]; p = 0.038) as well as for the <70 mg/dl target (OR 2.78 [1.40-5.35]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We conclude that T2DM is a strong and independent predictor of LDL-C target achievement among PAD patients; however, also among PAD patients with T2DM only a minority meets the current target of <55 mg/dl and most patients do not even have an LDL-C < 70 mg/dl.

Usefulness of Handgrip Strength to Predict Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a validated and simple technique to estimate skeletal muscular strength. Whether HGS is a predictor of overall mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) is not known, this question is therefore addressed in the present study. We prospectively investigated a cohort of 691 patients with angiographically proven CAD. HGS was measured at baseline, and all-cause death as well as cardiovascular events was recorded over a period of up to 12 years. During a follow-up time of 9.2 ± 3.1 years, 31.3% (n = 216) of the study participants died. Further, 27.8% (n = 192) suffered major cardiovascular events and 56.6% (n = 391) any cardiovascular event. Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed a reduced mortality risk with higher HGS univariately (hazard ratio [HR] for each 5 kg increase in HGS 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.92]; p <0.001), after adjustment for age and gender (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001), and after further adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001). Similarly, high HGS was protective of major cardiovascular events as well as of total cardiovascular events (HRs in the fully adjusted model 0.86 [0.78 to 0.94]; p = 0.002 and 0.89 [0.83 to 0.96]; p = 0.002, respectively). From these data, we conclude that HGS is an independent predictor of overall survival and of cardiovascular events in patients with CAD.

Impact of EMpagliflozin on cardiac function and biomarkers of heart failure in patients with acute MYocardial infarction-The EMMY trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established antidiabetic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. Although growing evidence suggests beneficial effects on myocardial remodeling, fluid balance and cardiac function, the impact of empagliflozin initiated early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been investigated yet. Therefore, the impact of EMpagliflozin on cardiac function and biomarkers of heart failure in patients with acute MYocardial infarction (EMMY) trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in diabetic and non-diabetic patients after severe AMI. METHODS: Within a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial we will enroll patients with AMI and characteristics suggestive of severe myocardial necrosis are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary endpoint is the impact of empagliflozin on changes in NT-proBNP within 6 months after AMI. Secondary endpoints include changes in echocardiographic parameters, levels of ketone body concentrations, HbA1c levels and body weight, respectively. Hospitalization rate due to heart failure or other causes, the duration of hospital stay and all-cause mortality will be assessed as exploratory secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: The EMMY trial will test empagliflozin in patients with AMI regardless of their diabetic status. The EMMY trial may therefore underpin the concept of SGLT2 inhibition to improve cardiac remodeling, pre-and afterload reduction and cardiac metabolism regardless of its antidiabetic effects. Results will provide the rationale for the conduct of a cardiovascular outcome trial to test the effect of empagliflozin in patients with AMI.

The age of randomized clinical trials: three important aspects of randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy with examples from lipid and diabetes trials.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are important and the Gold Standard for drugs in modern cardiovascular (CV) therapy. The cornerstone of RCTs is the recording of hard clinical endpoints instead of surrogates. It is important to select an appropriate endpoint. Efficacy endpoints must be clinically relevant and can be hierarchically divided. A very interesting innovation in endpoint acquisition is the total event paradigm.