Profiling of bacterial bloodstream infections in hematological and oncological patients based on a comparative survival analysis.

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a frequent complication in patients with hematological and oncological diseases. However, the impact of different bacterial species causing BSI and of multiple BSI remains incompletely understood. We performed a retrospective study profiling 637 bacterial BSI episodes in hematological and oncological patients. Based on the 30-day (30d) overall survival (OS), we analyzed different types of multiple BSI and grouped BSI-associated bacteria into clusters followed by further assessment of clinical and infection-related characteristics. We discovered that polymicrobial BSI (different organisms on the first day of a BSI episode) and sequential BSI (another BSI before the respective BSI episode) were associated with a worse 30d OS. Different bacterial groups could be classified into three BSI outcome clusters based on 30d OS: favorable (FAV) including mainly common skin contaminants, Escherichia spp. and Streptococcus spp.; intermediate (INT) including mainly Enterococcus spp., vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN); and adverse (ADV) including MDRGN with an additional carbapenem-resistance (MDRGN+CR). A polymicrobial or sequential BSI especially influenced the outcome in the combination of two INT cluster BSI. The presence of a polymicrobial BSI and the assignment into the BSI outcome clusters were identified as independent risk factors for 30d mortality in a Cox multivariate regression analysis. The assignment to a BSI outcome cluster and the differentiated perspective of multiple BSI open new insights into the prognosis of patients with BSI and should be further validated in other patient cohorts.

Impact of Clostridioides difficile infection on the outcome of patients receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are common in autologous (auto-HSCT) or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. However, the impact of CDI on patient outcomes is controversial. We conducted this study to examine the impact of CDI on patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study, including 191 lymphoma patients receiving an auto-HSCT and 276 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving an allo-HSCT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were causes of death and, for the allo-HSCT cohort, GvHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS). RESULTS: The prevalence of CDI was 17.6% in the AML allo-HSCT and 7.3% in the lymphoma auto-HSCT cohort. A higher prevalence of bloodstream infections, but no differences concerning OS or cause of death were found for patients with CDI in the auto-HSCT cohort. [AU] In the allo-HSCT cohort, OS and GRFS were similar between CDI and non-CDI patients. However, the leading cause of death was relapse among non-CDI patients, but it was infectious diseases in the CDI group with fewer deaths due to relapse. CONCLUSIONS: CDI was not associated with worse survival in patients receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and there were even fewer relapse-related deaths in the AML allo-HSCT cohort.