Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Second- and Third-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs.

CONTEXT.­: Therapeutic drug monitoring has traditionally been widely used for first-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. The last 2 decades have seen the introduction of second- and third-generation AEDs (eg, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate) into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE.­: To use data from the College of American Pathologists Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Extended Proficiency Testing Survey to determine the performance of assays used for therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs, including comparison of enzyme immunoassay and chromatographic techniques. DESIGN.­: Six years of proficiency testing surveys were reviewed (2013-2018). RESULTS.­: Steady growth was seen in participant volumes for newer AEDs. The analytical performance of automated enzyme immunoassays for lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate was similar to that of chromatographic methods, consistent with published literature using patient samples for comparisons. The majority of participating laboratories now use enzyme immunoassays to measure levetiracetam. CONCLUSIONS.­: Survey results reflect steadily growing interest in therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs. The increasing availability of robust immunoassays for new AEDs should facilitate their clinical utility, especially for clinical laboratories that do not perform chromatographic assays for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Ethanol Biomarker Testing and Challenges.

CONTEXT.­: Clinical and forensic testing for ethanol biomarkers, including ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS), is used to discern alcohol use from abstinence. These markers can be key in major decisions, including transplant eligibility or retaining licensure after alcohol misuse. Accuracy, precision, and recognition of the implications of reporting cutoffs are all essential for correct interpretation. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate trends in testing for EtG and EtS, including how laboratories perform testing and how comparable participant results are. DESIGN.­: The study examined the College of American Pathologists ethanol biomarker proficiency testing survey from 2013 to 2019. Trends in methodology, reporting cutoffs, and participant performance were evaluated for qualitative and quantitative EtG testing and for quantitative EtS testing. RESULTS.­: There was little consensus in reporting cutoffs, which ranged from 10 to 1000 ng/mL for EtG and 10 to 1500 ng/mL for EtS. Although median EtG and EtS compared well with target concentrations, individual participants' results varied widely. For quantitative enzyme immunoassay, accuracy and precision were best in EtG challenges less than 1500 ng/mL. For EtG or EtS by mass spectrometry, overall accuracy was good over a wide concentration range, but variability between participants was high. Approximately 10% (409 of 4059) of results were unacceptable, which for mass spectrometry corresponded to more than 35% above or below the group mean. CONCLUSIONS.­: Although many participants performed well, there was insufficient consensus in reporting cutoffs, and a consistent fraction of laboratories failed to achieve survey standards. Guidelines for assay performance and reporting could greatly benefit laboratories and end users.

Interpretation and Utility of Drug of Abuse Screening Immunoassays: Insights From Laboratory Drug Testing Proficiency Surveys.

CONTEXT.­: Urine drug testing is frequently ordered by health care providers. Immunoassays are widely used for drug testing, yet have potential limitations, including variable cross-reactivity. The last decade has seen worsening of a prescription drug abuse epidemic. OBJECTIVE.­: To use data from a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey, Urine Drug Testing, Screening, to determine and summarize the characteristics, performance, and limitations of immunoassays. DESIGN.­: Seven years of proficiency surveys were reviewed (2011-2017). RESULTS.­: Rapid growth was seen in participant volumes for specific immunoassays for synthetic opioids (eg, buprenorphine, fentanyl, oxycodone) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy"). Participant volumes remained high for immunoassays targeting less commonly abused drugs such as barbiturates and phencyclidine. For opiate immunoassays, the number of laboratories using a 2000 ng/mL positive cutoff remained stable, and an increasing number adopted a 100 ng/mL cutoff. Opiate and amphetamine immunoassays showed high variability in cross-reactivity for drugs other than the assay calibrator. Assays targeting a single drug or metabolite generally performed well on drug challenges. CONCLUSIONS.­: Survey results indicate strong clinical interest in urine drug testing and some adoption of new assays. However, urine drug testing availability does not parallel prevailing patterns of drug prescribing and abuse patterns. In particular, specific immunoassays for synthetic opioids and a lower positive cutoff for opiate immunoassays may be underused, whereas immunoassays for barbiturates, methadone, propoxyphene, and phencyclidine may be overused. Laboratories are encouraged to review their test menu, cutoffs, and assay performance and adjust their test offerings based on clinical needs and technical capabilities.

Urine and oral fluid drug testing in support of pain management.

In recent years, the abuse of opioid drugs has resulted in greater prevalence of addiction, overdose, and deaths attributable to opioid abuse. The epidemic of opioid abuse has prompted professional and government agencies to issue practice guidelines for prescribing opioids to manage chronic pain. An important tool available to providers is the drug test for use in the initial assessment of patients for possible opioid therapy, subsequent monitoring of compliance, and documentation of suspected aberrant drug behaviors. This review discusses the issues that most affect the clinical utility of drug testing in chronic pain management with opioid therapy. It focuses on the two most commonly used specimen matrices in drug testing: urine and oral fluid. The advantages and disadvantages of urine and oral fluid in the entire testing process, from specimen collection and analytical methodologies to result interpretation are reviewed. The analytical sensitivity and specificity limitations of immunoassays used for testing are examined in detail to draw attention to how these shortcomings can affect result interpretation and influence clinical decision-making in pain management. The need for specific identification and quantitative measurement of the drugs and metabolites present to investigate suspected aberrant drug behavior or unexpected positive results is analyzed. Also presented are recent developments in optimization of test menus and testing strategies, such as the modification of the standard screen and reflexed-confirmation testing model by eliminating some of the initial immunoassay-based tests and proceeding directly to definitive testing by mass spectrometry assays.

See, Test & Treat: A 5-Year Experience of Pathologists Driving Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening to Underserved and Underinsured Populations.

CONTEXT: - See, Test & Treat is a pathologist-driven program to provide cervical and breast cancer screening to underserved and underinsured patient populations. This program is largely funded by the CAP Foundation (College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois) and is a collaborative effort among several medical specialties united to address gaps in the current health care system. OBJECTIVE: - To provide an outline for administering a See, Test & Treat program, using an academic medical center as a model for providing care and collating the results of 5 years of data on the See, Test & Treat program's findings. DESIGN: - Sources include data from patients seen at Tufts Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts) who presented to the See, Test & Treat program and institutional data between 2010 and 2014 detailing the outline of how to organize and operationalize a volunteer cancer-screening program. RESULTS: - During the 5-year course of the program, 203 women were provided free cervical and breast cancer screening. Of the 169 patients who obtained Papanicolaou screening, 36 (21.3%) had abnormal Papanicolaou tests. In addition, 16 of 130 patients (12.3%) who underwent mammography had abnormal findings. CONCLUSIONS: - In general, women from ethnic populations have barriers that prevent them from participating in cancer screening. However, the CAP Foundation's See, Test & Treat program is designed to reduce those barriers for these women by providing care that addresses cultural, financial, and practical issues. Although screening programs are helpful in identifying those who need further treatment, obtaining further treatment for these patients continues to be a challenge.

The Pathologist Workforce in the United States: II. An Interactive Modeling Tool for Analyzing Future Qualitative and Quantitative Staffing Demands for Services.

CONTEXT: Pathologists are physicians who make diagnoses based on interpretation of tissue and cellular specimens (surgical/cytopathology, molecular/genomic pathology, autopsy), provide medical leadership and consultation for laboratory medicine, and are integral members of their institutions' interdisciplinary patient care teams. OBJECTIVE: To develop a dynamic modeling tool to examine how individual factors and practice variables can forecast demand for pathologist services. DESIGN: Build and test a computer-based software model populated with data from surveys and best estimates about current and new pathologist efforts. RESULTS: Most pathologists' efforts focus on anatomic (52%), laboratory (14%), and other direct services (8%) for individual patients. Population-focused services (12%) (eg, laboratory medical direction) and other professional responsibilities (14%) (eg, teaching, research, and hospital committees) consume the rest of their time. Modeling scenarios were used to assess the need to increase or decrease efforts related globally to the Affordable Care Act, and specifically, to genomic medicine, laboratory consolidation, laboratory medical direction, and new areas where pathologists' expertise can add value. CONCLUSIONS: Our modeling tool allows pathologists, educators, and policy experts to assess how various factors may affect demand for pathologists' services. These factors include an aging population, advances in biomedical technology, and changing roles in capitated, value-based, and team-based medical care systems. In the future, pathologists will likely have to assume new roles, develop new expertise, and become more efficient in practicing medicine to accommodate new value-based delivery models.

The opioid abuse and misuse epidemic: implications for pharmacists in hospitals and health systems.

PURPOSE: The current epidemic of prescription opioid abuse and misuse in the United States is discussed, with an emphasis on the pharmacist's role in ensuring safe and effective opioid use. SUMMARY: U.S. sales of prescription opioids increased fourfold from 1999 to 2010, with an alarming rise in deaths and emergency department visits associated with the use of fentanyl, hydrocodone, oxycodone, and other opioid medications. Signs and symptoms of opioid toxicity may include altered mental status, hypoventilation, decreased bowel motility, central nervous system and respiratory depression, peripheral vasodilation, pulmonary edema, hypotension, bradycardia, and seizures. In patients receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain, urine drug testing is an important tool for monitoring and assessment of therapy; knowledge of opioid metabolic pathways and assay limitations is essential for appropriate use and interpretation of screening and confirmatory tests. In recent years, there has been an increase in federal enforcement actions against pharmacies and prescription drug wholesalers involved in improper opioid distribution, as well as increased reliance on state-level prescription drug monitoring programs to track patterns of opioid use and improper sales. Pharmacies are urged to implement or promote appropriate guidelines on opioid therapy, including the use of pain management agreement plans; policies to ensure adequate oversight of opioid prescribing, dispensing, and waste disposal; and educational initiatives targeting patients as well as hospital and pharmacy staff. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in hospitals and health systems can play a key role in recognizing the various forms of opioid toxicity and in preventing inappropriate prescribing and diversion of opioids.

Urine drug testing for pain management.

An epidemic of prescription drug abuse in the United States has increased the burden on clinical toxicology testing laboratories. Urine drug testing provides objective evidence for compliance and aberrant drug behavior in patients on chronic (non-cancer) pain management. This article describes the testing menu, drug testing assays including tandem mass spectrometry and their limitations, interpretation of opiate results and clinical considerations.

Interpretation and utility of drug of abuse immunoassays: lessons from laboratory drug testing surveys.

CONTEXT: To assist with patient diagnosis and management, physicians from pain services, drug treatment programs, and the emergency department frequently request that urine be tested for drugs of abuse. However, urine immunoassays for drugs of abuse have limitations. OBJECTIVE: To use data from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys to determine and summarize the characteristics, performance, and limitations of urine immunoassays for drugs of abuse. DESIGN: Six years of urine drug testing proficiency surveys were reviewed. RESULTS: Lysergic acid diethylamide and methaqualone are infrequently prescribed or abused and, therefore, testing may be unnecessary. However, implementation of more specific testing for methylenedioxymethamphetamine and oxycodone may be warranted. Each drug of abuse immunoassay exhibits a different cross-reactivity profile. Depending on the cross-reactivity profile, patients with clinically insignificant concentrations of drugs may have false-positive results, and patients with clinically significant concentrations of drugs may have false-negative results. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory directors should be aware of the characteristics of their laboratories' assays and should communicate these characteristics to physicians so that qualitative results can be interpreted more accurately. Furthermore, manufacturer's claims should be interpreted with caution and should be verified in each organization's patient population, if possible.

Antiquated tests within the clinical pathology laboratory.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence supporting the discontinuation of laboratory tests that do not have clinical utility today. STUDY DESIGN: We selected 10 representative tests considered antiquated by most experts in the clinical laboratory medicine field: creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, serum folate and red blood cell folate, amylase, lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio, qualitative serum human chorionic gonadotropin, prostatic acid phosphatase, bleeding time, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. METHODS: Published literature was reviewed to provide evidence of the poor performance and/or limited clinical utility of these tests. When available, subscriptions to the Proficiency Testing Program of the College of American Pathologists were tracked from 1993 to 2008 as supporting evidence. Finally, when appropriate, alternative testing was suggested. RESULTS: The data show clearly that there is a national trend toward reduction or elimination of these 10 tests. CONCLUSION: Together with their clinical colleagues, clinical laboratorians should review their menu of tests and consider removing tests that do not provide clinical benefit. In most cases, alternative tests are already in clinical use.

The effect of famotidine, esomeprazole, and ezetimibe on levothyroxine absorption.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature describing the effect of gastric acid suppression on levothyroxine absorption has been inconsistent. Also, ezetimibe, a lipid-lowering compound that inhibits intestinal absorption of cholesterol, may interfere with levothyroxine absorption. The objective of this study was to measure changes in levothyroxine absorption before and after famotidine, esomeprazole or single-dose ezetimibe." METHODS: We conducted levothyroxine absorption testing on 30 healthy volunteers, excluding those with thyroid disease. Subjects were randomized to receive one of three regimens: 1 week of either famotidine or esomeprazole, or a single dose of ezetimibe administered simultaneously with levothyroxine (n = 10 in each group). Baseline levothyroxine absorption testing was performed on all subjects using 600 mcg of Synthroid with thyroid hormone levels checked at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration, and then repeated 6 weeks later, after administration of one of the three study drug regimens. The area under the curve (AUC) over 8 hours for serum thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), and free T4 index, and the mean peak hormone levels achieved during levothyroxine absorption testing at baseline and following administration of one of the three study medications were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Peak mean hormone levels and AUCs of T4, T3, and free T4 index during absorption testing before and after each of three study medications did not differ. Results for differences before and after study medication did not reach significance even when using the subtractive correction method of AUC calculation. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were noted in levothyroxine absorption after gastric acid suppression with 1 week of famotidine or esomeprazole. A simultaneously administered dose of ezetimibe did not significantly change levothyroxine absorption.

Association of first-trimester thyroid function test values with thyroperoxidase antibody status, smoking, and multivitamin use.

OBJECTIVE: To determine first-trimester thyroid function values and associations with thyroperoxidase antibody (TPO-Ab) status, smoking, emesis, and iodine-containing multivitamin use. METHODS: We collected information by interview, questionnaire, and blood draw at the initial obstetric visit in 668 pregnant women without known thyroid disease. We compared thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), total thyroxine (T4), and free T4 index (FT4I) values by TPO-Ab status. Multiple regression was used to identify characteristics associated with thyroid function values. RESULTS: The following median (range containing 95% of the data points) thyroid function test values were obtained in 585 TPO-Ab-negative women: TSH, 1.1 mIU/L (0.04-3.6); FT4I, 2.1 (1.5-2.9); and T4, 9.9 microg/dL (7.0-14.0). The following median (range containing 95% of the data points) thyroid function test values were obtained in 83 TPO-Ab-positive women: TSH, 1.8 mIU/L (0.3-6.4) (P<.001); FT4I, 2.0 (1.4-2.7) (P = .06); and T4, 9.3 microg/dL (6.8-13.0) (P = .03) (P values denote statistically significant differences between TPO-Ab-positive and negative participants). Among TPO-Ab-negative participants, TSH level was not associated with use of iodine-containing multivitamins, smoking, or race. TSH increased 0.03 mIU/L for every year of maternal age (P = .03) and decreased by 0.3 mIU/L for every increase in parity (P<.001). T4 decreased 0.04 microg/dL for every year of maternal age (P = .04). Mean FT4I was 2.05 in smokers and 2.20 in nonsmokers (P<.01). There were no relationships between T4 or FT4I and parity, race, or iodine-containing multivitamin use. CONCLUSION: TPO-Ab status of pregnant women should be considered when constructing trimester-specific reference ranges because elevated serum TPO-Ab levels are associated with higher TSH and lower T4 values.

Effects of six months of daily low-dose perchlorate exposure on thyroid function in healthy volunteers.

CONTEXT: Perchlorate has been detected in U.S. drinking water supplies at levels ranging from 4 to 200 microg/liter as well as in agricultural products. Perchlorate is known to be a competitive inhibitor of iodine uptake by the thyroid through the sodium-iodide symporter. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether prolonged exposure (6 months) to low levels of perchlorate would perturb thyroid function. DESIGN: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of 13 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: INTERVENTIONs included placebo vs. 0.5 mg or 3.0 mg potassium perchlorate daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum thyroid function tests, 24-h radioactive iodine uptake, serum thyroglobulin (Tg), urinary iodine and perchlorate, and serum perchlorate were measured. RESULTS: Mean urinary perchlorate value during ingestion of 0.5 mg perchlorate daily was 332.7 +/- 66.1 microg per 24 h or 248.5 +/- 64.5 microg/g creatinine and mean values for the four subjects who received 3 mg perchlorate daily were 2079.5 +/- 430.0 microg per 24 h or 1941.7 +/- 138.5 microg/g creatinine. There was no significant change in the thyroid (123)I uptakes during perchlorate administration. There were no significant changes in serum T(3), free T(4) index, TSH, or Tg concentrations during the exposure period, compared to baseline or postexposure values. Urine iodine values for the 3-mg perchlorate group were higher, but not significantly so, at baseline than during perchlorate exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that a 6-month exposure to perchlorate at doses up to 3 mg/d had no effect on thyroid function, including inhibition of thyroid iodide uptake as well as serum levels of thyroid hormones, TSH, and Tg.

123I thyroid uptake and thyroid size at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the administration of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to normal volunteers.

CONTEXT: Recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) is used to evaluate thyroid carcinoma patients and off-label for (131)I thyroid ablation and nontoxic goiter therapy. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the optimal time for (131)I administration after rhTSH. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five euthyroid nongoitrous volunteers participated in the study. DESIGN: Baseline 24-h thyroid (123)I uptake (RAIU) was measured, and then 0.1 mg rhTSH was administered. (123)I was administered 24, 48, or 72 h after rhTSH, and a repeat 24-h RAIU was obtained. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic research center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thyroid function tests, thyroid ultrasounds, and electrocardiograms were measured before rhTSH, then daily for 4 d, and finally 7 d after rhTSH. RESULTS: Serum TSH concentrations 24 h after rhTSH increased from 1.7 +/- 0.5 muU/ml (mean +/- sd) to 13.3 +/- 4. The 24-h RAIUs rose from 25 +/- 5 to 47 +/- 8% (88% increase) when the (123)I was given at 24 h after rhTSH and from 29.8 +/- 7 to 40.5 +/- 13% (36% increase) when the (123)I was given at 48 h and were unchanged when the (123)I was given at 72 h. The post-rhTSH RAIU increase was greater at 24 than at 72 h (P < 0.005) and marginally greater than at 48 h (P = 0.057). Thyroid volumes significantly increased 48 h after rhTSH (10 +/- 3.8 vs. 11.1 +/- 3.7 ml; P < 0.009). Electrocardiograms were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Marked increases in RAIU occurred when (123)I was given 24 h after rhTSH administration to euthyroid volunteers. Smaller increases were observed at 48 h and none at 72 h.