Cybersecurity and critical care staff: A mixed methods study.

INTRODUCTION: Cyberattacks on healthcare organisations are becoming increasingly common and represent a growing threat to patient safety. The majority of breaches in cybersecurity have been attributed to human error. Intensive care departments are particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks. The aim of this study was to investigate cybersecurity awareness, knowledge and behaviours among critical care staff. METHODS: This was a multi-site cross-sectional survey study administered to critical care staff. Cybersecurity awareness was evaluated using the validated HAIS-Q instrument. Knowledge and behaviours were evaluated by direct questioning and scenario-based multiple-choice questions. Free text options were also offered to respondents. Thematic analysis was performed on free text sections. RESULTS: Median scores of 12-15 in each of the HAIS-Q focus areas were achieved, indicating high levels of cybersecurity awareness among critical care staff. However, self-reported confidence in cybersecurity practices, especially identifying signs of cybersecurity breaches and reporting cybersecurity incidents, were relatively low. Participants responses to the scenarios demonstrated a lack of knowledge and awareness of some of the mechanisms of cyberattacks. Barriers to safe cybersecurity practices among staff that emerged from the qualitative analysis included: a lack of training and education; heavy workloads and staff fatigue; perceived lack of IT support and poor IT infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Critical care staff appear to have a high-level cybersecurity awareness. However, in practice safe cybersecurity practices are not always followed. ICU departments and hospitals must invest in the human aspect of cybersecurity to strength their cyber-defences and to protect patients.

Protocol for a prospective cohort study exploring the gut microbiota of infants with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (the GuMiBear study).

INTRODUCTION: The gut microbiota develops from birth and matures significantly during the first 24 months of life, playing a major role in infant health and development. The composition of the gut microbiota is influenced by several factors including mode of delivery, gestational age, feed type and treatment with antibiotics. Alterations in the pattern of gut microbiota development and composition can be associated with illness and compromised health outcomes.Infants diagnosed with 'congenital heart disease' (CHD) often require surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) early in life. The impact of this type of surgery on the integrity of the gut microbiome is poorly understood. In addition, these infants are at significant risk of developing the potentially devastating intestinal condition necrotising enterocolitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will employ a prospective cohort study methodology to investigate the gut microbiota and urine metabolome of infants with CHD undergoing surgery involving CPB. Stool and urine samples, demographic and clinical data will be collected from eligible infants based at the National Centre for Paediatric Cardiac Surgery in Ireland. Shotgun metagenome sequencing will be performed on stool samples and urine metabolomic analysis will identify metabolic biomarkers. The impact of the underlying diagnosis, surgery involving CPB, and the influence of environmental factors will be explored. Data from healthy age-matched infants from the INFANTMET study will serve as a control for this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received full ethical approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Children's Health Ireland, GEN/826/20.

The experiences of adolescents living with a central venous access device: A qualitative analysis.

Background: Central venous access devices are used in paediatric populations for specific chronic conditions requiring long-term treatment. Very little isknown about how young people experience living with such devices. Aim: To gain a deep understanding of adolescents' (aged 12-17 years) experiences of living with a central venous access device from the perspective of the adolescents themselves, and of one of their parents. Design: A descriptive phenomenological design was chosen. Methods: The sample comprised 20 participants, 10 adolescents with a central venous access device who were purposefully selected from a paediatric unit in Ireland, along with one of each adolescent's parents. Five of the adolescents had a skin tunnelled catheter that partly sits outside the body; and five a totally implanted port contained within the body. Participants were interviewed in adolescent-parent dyads, and data were analysed using an established phenomenological method. Results: Findings are presented around three themes: (i) The process of receiving treatment; (ii) managing skin tunnelled catheters and totally implanted ports day-to-day; and (iii) activities of daily living with a skin tunnelled catheter or a totally implanted port. Participants tended to compare their current device with previously negative experiences of multiple needle punctures associated with peripheral cannula insertions. Participants were largely positive about the type of device the adolescent currently had. However, in terms of daily management of the device itself and engaging in daily activities, totally implanted ports were more favourable than skin tunnelled catheters. Participants with a totally implanted port tended to minimise the needle-stick experience to access to the totally implanted port's reservoir. Discussion: Findings from the present study on adolescents concur with those of previous studies on adults that found that individuals with a central venous access device were largely positively disposed to their device and tended to compare their experiences of it to previously negative experiences with peripheral cannula insertions. Findings also reflect existing research that has reported a favourable disposition to self-management of a central venous access device, and a greater freedom to engage in everyday activities for those with a totally implanted port compared to those with a skin tunnelled catheter. Conclusion: We conclude that the type of central venous access device may have a pervasive and important impact on the everyday lives of adolescents and this needs to be given appropriate weight in formal guidelines for clinicians.

The impact of introducing nurse-led analgesia and sedation guidelines in ventilated infants following cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced clinical outcomes in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit following standardisation of analgesia and sedation practice are reported. Little is known about the impact of standardisation of analgesia and sedation practice including incorporation of a validated distress assessment instrument on infants post cardiac surgery, a subset of whom have Trisomy 21. This study investigated whether the parallel introduction of nurse-led analgesia and sedation guidelines including regular distress assessment would impact on morphine administered to infants post cardiac surgery, and whether any differences observed would be amplified within the Trisomy 21 population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective single centre before/after study design was used. Patients aged between 44 weeks postconceptual age and one year old who had open cardiothoracic surgery were included. RESULTS: 61 patients before and 64 patients after the intervention were included. After the intervention, a reduction in the amount of morphine administered was not evident, while greater use of adjuvant sedatives and analgesics was observed. Patients with Trisomy 21 had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation after the change in practice. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study affirm the importance of the nurses' role in managing prescribed analgesia and sedation supported by best available evidence. A continued education and awareness focus on analgesia and sedation management in the pursuit of best patient care is imperative.

Nurses' knowledge of chest drain management in an Irish Children's Hospital.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore contact with and knowledge regarding chest drain management among nurses. BACKGROUND: Chest drains are commonly used in both adult and paediatric settings, for example, for cardiothoracic patients or postspinal surgery, where they are inserted intra-operatively to drain excess fluid. Despite a large number of children requiring chest drain insertion annually, current literature suggests that many nurses have reduced contact with chest drains and a knowledge deficit regarding their management. Furthermore, the literature is limited in relation to chest drain management in the paediatric patient. Mismanagement of chest drains can have devastating consequences for patients. DESIGN: A standardised descriptive survey approach was employed. METHODS: The sample consisted of 121 critical care and ward nurses from a large urban paediatric hospital, who cared for chest drains on a regular basis. Data were collected using a 37-item questionnaire, adapted from a study in the adult setting. Statistical analysis was performed using spss V15. RESULTS: The findings demonstrate that increased exposure to caring for children with chest drains is synonymous with a greater perception of knowledge levels in this area of practice. While critical care nurses looked after children with chest drains more frequently than ward nurses, there was no difference in the knowledge assessment section of the questionnaire. This research identified where knowledge deficits exist. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the key areas where overall uncertainties existed leading to a decreased knowledge perception. Nurses are engaging with methods of knowledge acquisition; however, those who have less contact with chest drains require regular updates. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Addressing misconceptions about chest drain management is imperative. Providing up to date guidelines in clinical areas will improve chest drain management. Strategic educational initiatives are in place to ensure identified knowledge deficits are addressed and a complete revision of chest drain guidelines has been undertaken.