The Fall of the Nation's First Gender-Affirming Surgery Clinic.

Johns Hopkins Hospital established the first gender-affirming surgery (GAS) clinic in the United States in 1966. Operating for more than 13 years, the clinic was abruptly closed in 1979. According to the hospital, the decision was made in response to objective evidence claiming that GAS was ineffective. However, this evidence directly contradicted many contemporaneous studies and faced immediate criticism from the scientific community. Despite this resistance, it took the hospital nearly 40 years to resume performing GAS. Scientific evidence-imbued in scandal, bias, and moralism-was instrumentalized to serve broader institutional interests. The burgeoning field of plastic surgery tethered and then untethered GAS from its auspices in response to poor technical outcomes and transphobia. No longer serving surgeons' interests, the clinic was marginalized to "barely minimal facilities" in 1974, five years before GAS was formally banned. Over the next 5 years, the clinic co-inhabited space with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Simultaneously, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology navigated scandals related to reproductive technology (namely, the Dalkon Shield [A.H. Robins] controversy) until the clinic space was demolished in 1979. The study that informed the GAS ban was preferentially funded in keeping with the political economy of biomedical research. This article presents a spatial argument for how the closure of the nation's first GAS clinic was not based in empirical data alone but was manipulated to fuel political and institutional agendas.

A Systematic Review of Muscle Synergies during a Walking Gait to Define Optimal Donor-Recipient Pairings for Lower Extremity Functional Reconstruction.

Functional lower extremity reconstruction primarily aims to restore independent ambulation. We sought to define the synergies recruited during a walking gait to inform donor selection for various motor deficits. With these findings, we discuss the functional neuromuscular components of independent gait with the goal of informing lower extremity reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE for articles published between January 2000 and December 2020. Search terms included (1) "motor module(s)," "synergy," "motor pattern," or "motor primitive" and (2) "gait," "walking," "ambulation," or "locomotion." Abstracts/full texts were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Results: A total of 38 studies were selected. The average reported number of synergies and variance accounted for was 4.5 ± 0.9 and 88.6% ± 7.7%, respectively. Four motor modules were conserved across nearly all studies. Conclusions: Walking can be reduced to the sequential activation of four motor modules. Activities during the stance phase are critical for both standing stability and forward progression and should be prioritized for reconstruction with the goal of preserving efficient gait. Muscles recruited during swing, except those used for ankle dorsiflexion, are less prone to injury and benefit from greater redundancy, less often necessitating reconstruction. With the emphasis on stability during stance, several synergistic or sometimes even antagonistic tendons can be used to replace their counterparts and restore efficient, independent ambulation. With a finite supply of donor tissues, and in the absence of well-defined clinical outcomes data, this research allows us to effectively prioritize reconstructive goals and maximize patient outcomes.

Readability Analysis and Accessibility of Online Materials About Transgender Voice Care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine readability, understandability, and actionability of online health information related to transgender voice care. STUDY DESIGN: Review of online materials. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: A Google search of "transgender voice care" was performed with the first 50 websites meeting inclusion criteria included. Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Understandability and actionability were measured by 2 independent reviewers using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P). Unpaired t tests were used to compare clinician- and patient-oriented sites, surgical and nonsurgical sites, and sites that discuss nonbinary indications for voice care. Analysis of variance was used to compare sites that discuss voice feminization, masculinization, both, or neither. RESULTS: Average scores across the cohort for FRES, FKGL, and SMOG were 43.77 ± 13.52, 12.14 ± 2.66, and 11.30 ± 1.93, respectively, indicating materials were above a 12th-grade reading level. PEMAT-P scores for understandability and actionability were 64.95% ± 15.78% and 40.55% ± 23.86%, respectively. Patient-oriented sites were significantly more understandable and actionable than clinician-oriented sites (P < .02). Websites that discussed only voice feminization were significantly more readable according to objective metrics (FKGL, SMOG) than websites that discussed both feminization and masculinization or those that did not differentiate care types (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Online information written about transgender voice care is written at a level above what is recommended for patient education materials. Providers may improve accessibility of transgender voice care by enhancing readability of online materials.