Efficacy of Metformin-Cabergoline Compared to Metformin Monotherapy for Management of PCOS With Hyperprolactinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Metformin plays a major part in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome .Trials are being conducted to compare the effectiveness of combination of metformin with cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of metformin monotherapy and combination therapy with cabergoline versus metformin for the management of polycystic ovarian syndrome with hyperprolactinemia. Methodology: An extensive search up until 31 May 2024 of electronic databases (PubMed, Registry of Controlled Clinical Trials, Web of Sciences, SCOPUS) to find pertinent studies. An analysis was conducted with both observational data and randomized clinical trials . To compute the standard mean difference, weighted mean difference, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval, RevMan (v5.3) was utilized. Primary outcomes that were assessed included body-mass index, regular menstruation, weight change, prolactin, testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels. Results: Three randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study, taking a total patient population of n = 535, were part of our final analysis. Prolactin (SMD = -3.23 95% CI: (-4.90, -1.55)) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels (SMD = -0.27 95% CI: (-0.52, -0.01)) were significantly lower in the metformin and cabergoline combination therapy group; monthly regularity was also significantly higher (OR = 3.07 95% CI: (2.09, 4.51)). Statistically, there was no significant difference in weight, body-mass index, or testosterone levels. Conclusions: In the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome, the combination of metformin and cabergoline significantly lowers prolactin levels and encourages regular menstrual cycles. Although metformin has the potential to suppress testosterone levels, more investigation is required to determine how combination therapy affect dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate and testosterone levels. It's interesting to note that while neither intervention had a substantial impact on weight or body-mass index, metformin and cabergoline combination therapy outperformed metformin monotherapy in terms of supporting regular menstrual cycles. Customized therapy approaches are essential, and large-scale trials involving a variety of groups are required to comprehend the safety and effectiveness of treatments.

Efficacy of metformin compared to metformin and cabergoline combination In this study, 2 therapies for women with high prolactin levels­a hormone associated with PCOS­were examined. Their goal was to determine which combination of metformin and cabergoline produced the best results.Observational data and randomized clinical trials were included while searching through several databases for pertinent studies. Researchers discovered that the combination of metformin and cabergoline was superior to using metformin alone in reducing prolactin and another hormone called DHEAS. The menstrual periods of women receiving the combined therapy were also more regular. However, there wasn't much difference in weight, body mass index (BMI), or testosterone levels between the 2 groups. In summary, it appears that the combination of cabergoline and metformin is a more effective way to treat the symptoms of PCOS, which include irregular periods and elevated prolactin levels. To find out how it impacts other hormones and whether it's long-term safe and effective, further research is still required.

Efficacy of Inclisiran in Patients Having Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Heterozygous Compared to Homozygous Trait, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether inclisiran sodium has different efficacy in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) patient groups. METHODS: We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis of ORION clinical trials. PubMed, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for the relevant studies. Atheroscalerotic parameters considered for our objective were low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), apolipoprotein B, and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Primary outcomes were the percentage difference in atheroscalerotic parameters at follow-up relative to baseline values. Our study examined these primary outcomes to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between the HeFH and HoFH groups. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed when at least 2 studies reported on the same variable. RESULTS: Four ORION clinical trials provided the data related to the mean difference in the atheroscalerotic parameters at follow-up relative to baseline, of HeFH and HoFH patient populations, after administration of 300 mg inclisiran subcutaneously. We pooled together these mean differences for each group and applied a statistical test to analyze if the values were significantly different between the groups. The results of our study unveiled the significant difference in pooled mean differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HeFH: -48.62%; HoFH: -9.12%; P < 0.05), total cholesterol (HeFH: -30.31%; HoFH: -11.50%; P < 0.05), apolipoprotein (HeFH: -39.97%; HoFH: -14.68%; P < 0.05), and nonhigh-density lipoprotein (HeFH: -44.51%; HoFH: -12.22%; P < 0.05) between HeFH and HoFH groups. However, the difference in pooled mean difference in PCSK9 values (HeFH: -68.41%; HoFH: -56.25%; P = 0.2) between HeFH and HoFH groups was statistically insignificant. Studies were of high quality. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference in the reductions in atherosclerotic lipid parameters in heterozygous and homozygous populations after the administration of inclisiran except for PCSK9 parameter. Further studies are needed to support this conclusion.