Qualitative interviews of patients with COPD and muscle weakness enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating a new anabolic treatment: patient perspectives of disease experience, trial participation and outcome assessments.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and muscle weakness can cause impaired physical function, significantly impacting patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Loss of muscle strength is usually assessed through clinical and performance outcome (PerfO) assessments, which consists of tasks performed in a standardized manner, providing evidence of a patient's functional ability. However, evidence documenting the patient experience of COPD and muscle weakness is limited. METHODS: This two-stage qualitative study used semi-structured interviews in patients aged 45-80 years with COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity ratio < 0.70, and FEV1% predicted of 30-80%) and muscle weakness. In Stage 1, 30-minute concept elicitation interviews were conducted with participants recruited across three US sites to explore impacts on physical functioning and activities of daily living. In Stage 2, interviews were performed with participants exiting a Phase IIa trial investigating the efficacy of a selective androgen receptor modulator (GSK2881078) on leg strength, whereby PerfOs were used to evaluate strength and physical functioning endpoints. These participants completed either 60-minute in-depth (n = 32) or 15-minute confirmatory (n = 35) interviews exploring trial experience, completion of outcome measures, disease experience and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: In Stage 1 (n = 20), most participants described their muscles as weak (83.3%). Difficulties with walking (100%) and lifting heavy objects (90%) were reported. In Stage 2, 60-minute interviews, all participants (n = 32) reported a positive trial experience. Most participants reported that the home exercise program was easy to fit into daily life (77.8%), the PROactive daily diary was easy to complete (100%) and wearable sensors were easy to use (65.6%). However, technical issues were reported (71%), and few participants (19.4%) found physical assessments easy to complete. Improvements in muscle strength and functional limitations were reported by most participants. The shorter 15-minute confirmatory interviews (n = 35) supported the in-depth interview results. CONCLUSION: The qualitative interviews generated in-depth evidence of key concepts relevant to patients with COPD and muscle weakness and support the assessments of patient strength and physical function as outcome measures in this population in future studies. TRIAL NUMBER: GSK Stage 1: 206869; Stage 2: 200182, NCT03359473; Registered December 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03359473 .

Evaluating the Appropriateness of Existing Health-Related Quality of Life Measures in Lichen Planus.

INTRODUCTION: Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory skin disorder that can present in various forms across the body, including lesions on the skin (cutaneous LP [CLP]), scalp (lichen planopilaris [LPP]) and mucosal regions (mucosal LP [MLP]). Several existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were identified for potential use in LP clinical development programs. This study aimed to assess the content validity and psychometric measurement properties of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Scalpdex and Oral Lichen Planus Symptom Severity Measure (OLPSSM) in an LP population. METHODS: Patients completed the PROs at various time points as part of an international Phase 2 clinical study in adults with MLP (n = 37), LPP (n = 37) and CLP (n = 37). Test-retest reliability, construct validity and sensitivity to change were assessed. In addition, qualitative cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with adults with MLP (n = 20), LPP (n = 19) and CLP (n = 19) in the USA and Germany to examine the PROM content validity. RESULTS: The DLQI demonstrated adequate reliability and validity, although its ability to detect change was modest and most items were considered not relevant in qualitative interviews. The ESS had good reliability but limited evidence of validity and ability to detect change. Conceptual relevance varied according to the qualitative interview data. The Scalpdex was miscellaneous across domains, but the 'Symptoms' domain performed well overall. Overall, Scalpdex concepts were reported as relevant by most LPP patients interviewed. The OLPSSM demonstrated good psychometric properties and strong evidence of content validity. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric and qualitative findings support the use of the OLPSSM and Scalpdex within specific LP subtypes but cautioned use of the DLQI. Administration of the ESS is not recommended in LP because of its poor psychometric performance. Given these limitations, further validation of non-specific disease measures is needed and/or the development of additional LP-specific PROMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04300296.

Patient Experience of Lichen Planus: A Qualitative Exploration of Signs, Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life Impacts.

INTRODUCTION: Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory skin disorder that can present in various forms across the body, including lesions on the skin (cutaneous LP [CLP]), scalp (lichen planopilaris [LPP]), and mucosal regions (mucosal LP [MLP]). Qualitative exploration of the patient experience of LP, notably symptoms and impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), is limited. A scarcity of research was also identified relating to emotional wellbeing impacts of CLP patients. Two qualitative studies were conducted with LP patients to address these gaps. METHODS: Study 1 consisted of exit interviews conducted with a subset of adult patients with MLP (n = 5), CLP (n = 4), and LPP (n = 4) enrolled in an LP clinical study in the United States (US) to explore the patient experience. Study 2 consisted of independent qualitative interviews conducted with adult CLP patients (n = 13) from the US and Germany to further explore impacts on emotional wellbeing. RESULTS: Exit interviews found that itch , pain, and skin lesions were most frequently reported as signs/symptoms of LP. Itch and skin lesions were experienced across all LP subtypes, while pain was only reported by CLP and MLP patients. These signs/symptoms impacted HRQoL including emotional wellbeing (frustration, embarrassment), daily activities (oral hygiene, clothing options), social functioning (intimacy, social activities), and physical functioning (chewing/swallowing, opening/moving mouth). Impacts on activities of daily living (ADL) and physical functioning were mostly experienced by MLP patients. Independent qualitative interviews, which further explored impacts of CLP on patients' emotional wellbeing, identified frustration, worry, sadness, embarrassment, and depression as the most frequently experienced. CONCLUSION: The findings contribute to the literature by providing qualitative insights into signs/symptoms and HRQoL impacts of LP, from the adult patient perspective. The findings also highlight the importance of considering assessment of HRQoL impacts in future clinical LP research, particularly impacts on emotional wellbeing when selecting instruments for assessment of HRQoL in the CLP population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04300296.